SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

ECC 584 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT

Capstone Project

1.0 Introduction
Integrated Design Project (IDP) expose students to engineering design and practices in real
projects. The course includes complex engineering problems and design systems,
components, and processes integrating core areas and meeting specified needs with
appropriate considerations for public health and system, cultural, societal, and environmental.
There are three continuous assessments in IDP: (1) Capstone Project (Group project) 50%
and (2) Case Study Project (Individual project) 10%, and (3) Common Test 40%. This
document provides assessment details for Capstone Project.
2.0 Descriptions for CO, PO, Bloom’s Taxonomy, WP, WK and SDGs
Course Outcomes (CO)
CO1: Define and formulate solutions to complex design problem. (PO1)
CO2: Use the design standards with consideration of real world constraint in particular to the
environmental responsibilities of a professional engineer and matters related to economic, legislation,
safety and health, ethical, cultural and societal. (PO3)
CO5: Practice effective engineering management in the project design. (PO11)
CO6: Demonstrate leadership skills, ability to work independently and in a team through project
design, presentation and defense of project findings. (PO9)

Programme Outcomes (PO)

PO1: Apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an
engineering specialization as specified in WK1 to WK4 respectively to the solution of complex
engineering problems.
PO3: Design solutions for complex civil engineering problems and design systems, components or
processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety,
cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. (WK5)
PO9: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-
disciplinary settings.
PO11: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering management principles and
economic decision-making and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team,
to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Domain and Level of Difficulty

Cognitive Domain – C6
Affective Domain – A4

Complex Engineering Problem Characteristics (WP, WK)

WP1: in-depth engineering knowledge at the level of one or more of WK3, WK4, WK5, WK6 or WK8
which allows a fundamental based, first principles analytical approach;
Required WKs are:
WK3: A systematic, theory-based formulation of engineering fundamentals required in the
engineering discipline.
WK4: Engineering specialist knowledge that provides theoretical frameworks and bodies of
knowledge for the accepted practice areas in the engineering discipline; much is at the forefront of
the discipline.
WK5: Knowledge that supports engineering design in a practice area.
WK6: Knowledge of engineering practice (technology) in the practice areas in the engineering
discipline.
WK7: Comprehension of the role of engineering in society and identified issues in engineering
practice in the discipline: ethics and the professional responsibility of an engineer to public safety;
the impacts of engineering activity: economic, social, cultural, environmental and sustainability
WP2: Range of conflicting requirements

1
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

WP3: Depth of Analysis

WP5: Extent of applicable code
WP7: Interdependence

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation (Ensure access to water and sanitation for all)
Target 6.1 By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water
for all
Target 6.2 By 2030, achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and
end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in
vulnerable situations

SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth (Promote inclusive and sustainable economic
growth, employment and decent work for all)
Target 8.2 Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological
upgrading and innovation, including through a focus on high-value added and labour-intensive
sectors

SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities (Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and
sustainable)
Target 11.1 By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic
services and upgrade slums
Target 11.2 By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport
systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production (Ensure sustainable consumption and

production patterns)
Target 12.6 Encourage companies, especially large and transnational companies, to adopt
sustainable practices and to integrate sustainability information into their reporting cycle
Target 12.8 By 2030, ensure that people everywhere have the relevant information and awareness
for sustainable development and lifestyles in harmony with nature

SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals (Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable
development - Multi-stakeholder partnerships)
Target 17.16 Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-
stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology and financial
resources, to support the achievement of the sustainable development goals in all countries, in
particular developing countries
Target 17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society
partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships

3.0 Learning Outcomes

At the end of the Capstone Project, the students should be able to:
i. Define and formulate solutions to complex design problem associate with building and
infrastructural design.
ii. Use the design standards with consideration of real-world constraint in carry out design
and detailing for building, foundation and infrastructural works, such as earthwork,
sewerage, drainage, road and water reticulation.
iii. Practice effective engineering management for the given project.
iv. Demonstrate leadership skills, ability to work independently and in a team through project
design, presentation and defense of project findings.

2
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

4.0 Tasks in Capstone Project

The capstone project consists of both group and individual assessments. This course requires
students participating in the design of a real integrated project in the construction industry and
capstone project. Students review the background information of the site and the neighboring
sites. They define and formulate the solutions to the design problems. Students write
technical report or proposal on their approach to address problems and pursue efforts to
develop the proposed solutions with considerations of real-world constraints. The course also
exposes the students to an integrated design experience with the team members as role-
playing planners, designers, users, constructors, operators and maintenance community
where different points of views are promoted, fostering co-ordination and cooperation among
team members. Students will carry out scopes of work in Structure, Geotechnical,
Infrastructure and Construction Management. The detailed tasks are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1: Details of tasks for Capstone Project

Section Tasks Notes
Prelim Preliminary setting
Set up a consultant team with brief company profile, prepare
executive summary (i.e. project site, type of development,
project scopes of works) in the report.
1.0 Part 1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CO2-PO3 (C5)
1.1 Structural Key Plan WP1: Depth of Knowledge
✓ Interpret a set of architectural drawings and propose Required
engineering solutions to the building project (i.e. WK3: Engineering
materials, location, preliminary sizing the elements etc.) Fundamental
✓ Prepare structural key plans for the building which are WK4: Specialist Knowledge
ready for submission to authority. WK5 – Engineering Design
WK6 -Engineering Practices
1.2 Structural Design Application of Engineering
✓ Estimate appropriate actions imposed on the structural Knowledge in Calculation
elements based on codes of practice. CO1-PO1 (C4)
✓ Perform structural analysis to obtain the forces and Design Process
deflections of the structural elements with any justified CO2-PO3 (C6)
assumptions. WP2: Range of
✓ Perform design processes of the structural elements Conflicting requirements:
with excellent design basis and design considerations
WP5: Extent of applicable
to safety, cost effective and/or environmental contexts.,
codes
For examples, structural elements for superstructure of
a typical building project are: beams, slabs, stairs, WP7: Interdependence
columns and walls. SDG 11, SDG 12
1.3 Detailing CO2-PO3 (C5)
✓ Prepare detailing comprises of all substantial
information that is required for construction processes SDG 11, SDG 12
in accordance to appropriate standards and guidelines
both by manual and application of software

2.0 PART 2: SUB-STRUCTURE DESIGN

2.1 Selection of foundation CO1-PO1 (C4)
✓ Interpret site investigation results and analyse the soil WP2: Range of
profile. Conflicting requirements
✓ Determine necessary information for selection of
foundation. WP3: Depth of analysis
✓ Justify assumptions with complete rationale and apply
engineering & scientific principles in geotechnical SDG 11, SDG 12
knowledge.in the selection of suitable foundation for the
project.

3
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

2.2 Foundation design CO2-PO3 (C6)

✓ Determine necessary information for design. WP5: Extent of applicable
✓ To design the proposed foundation in accordance to codes
appropriate standards and guidelines.
✓ To provide detailing for the designed foundation. SDG 11, SDG 12

3.0 PART 3: Infrastructure Design Application of Engineering

✓ Interpret a set of drawings (i.e key plan, location plan, Knowledge in Calculation
site plan, architectural plan, survey plan) CO1-PO1 (C4)
✓ Identify the design constraints in the planning of Design Process
infrastructure design. CO2-PO3 (C6)
✓ Get information from local authority for submission/ WP2: Range of
design. Conflicting requirements:
3.1 3.1 Earthwork
WP5: Extent of applicable
✓ Propose the most suitable platform level
codes
✓ Determine a balance in the total cut and fill
✓ Propose and design for slope or any earth retaining WP7: Interdependence
structures when encounter different level of platform.
✓ Prepare earthwork layout plan with appropriate SDG 6, SDG 11, SDG 12
detailing.
3.2 3.2 Drainage
✓ Estimate the peak discharge for the project.
✓ Propose and design a drainage system.
✓ Prepare drainage layout plan with appropriate detailing.

3.3 3.3 Road

✓ Propose and design appropriate road layout for the
development with suitable pavement thickness.
✓ Prepare road layout plan with appropriate detailing.

3.4 3.4 Sewerage

✓ Estimate the Population Equivalent (PE) for the project.
✓ Propose and design a sewerage system.
✓ Prepare sewerage layout plan with appropriate
detailing.

3.5 3.5 Water Supply

✓ Estimate the water demand for the project.
✓ Propose and design a water supply system.
✓ Prepare water supply layout plan with appropriate
detailing.

4.0 PART 4: Project Management

4.1 Bill of Quantities CO5-PO11 (C4)
✓ Identify and provide taking off elements of construction
works for building and infrastructural works. SDG 8
✓ Estimate the cost for construction with complete
schedules, list of works relevant to drawings and show
quantities in the Bill of Quantities.
4.2 Project Planning CO5-PO11 (C6)
✓ Perform project planning that consists of (i)dentify SDG 12
construction works, (ii) estimate time on task, (iii)
establish milestones, (iv) provide financial S Curve and
(v) manage construction works using appropriate tools.
Students are required to prepare ONE technical report for Part 1 - Part 4 covering super- and sub-
structures, infrastructure designs and project management which is ready for submission to the
local authority.

4
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

5.0 Assessment

The performance criteria matrix is shown in Appendix A: Performance Criteria Matrix for
Capstone Project (Report) (40%), and Appendix B: Performance Criteria Matrix for Capstone
Project (Viva) (10%). The Capstone Project is assessed by the lecturer and industrial Panel
as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Capstone Project Assessments

Assessments Reference Group/ Marks CO,PO, Assessor
Individual (10%) WP, WK
Assessments
Report Capstone Group 37.5 CO1, PO1 Lecturer
Project (Report) CO2, PO3
Evaluation CO5, PO11
Form Individual 2.5 CO6, PO9
Presentation Capstone Group 10 CO1, PO1 Industry
Project (Viva) CO2, PO3 Panel
Evaluation CO5, PO11
Form CO6, PO9

6.0 Format of Report

Specific format for the technical report is attached in Appendix C.

5
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

Prepared by:

Ir. Ts. Dr. Anizahyati Alisibramulisi, AJK, IDP (IDP Coordinator)

Ir. Muhd Salmizi Ja’afar, AJK IDP (Chair, IDP Committee)
Ir. Shaharin Hamid, Lecturer IDP
Ir. Ts. Dr. Thevaneyan Krishta @ David, Lecturer IDP
Ts. Dr. Adnan Derahman, AJK IDP
Prof. Ir. Dr. Ahmad Kamil Arshad, AJK IDP
Ir. Dr. Ismacahyadi Bagus Mohamed Jais, AJK IDP
Ir. Ts. Sulaiman Hasim, AJK IDP
IDP Committee
Date: March 2022
Vetted by:

Dr. Ir. Oh Chai Lian

IDP (Resource Person)
Date: 1 April 2022
Verified by

Ts. IRMA NOORAZURAH MOHAMAD

Senior Lecturer
School of Civil Engineering
College of Engineering
UiTM Shah Alam, Selangor

TS. IRMA NOORAZURAH MOHAMAD

Complex Problem Committee
Date: 15 April 2022

6
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM
ECC584 Capstone Project (Report) Evaluation Form
IDP/CP_REPORT/2021v3
Appendix A: Performance Criteria Matrix for Capstone Project (Report) (40%)
A) Lecturer Information:
Name:
B) Student Information:
Class Group:
Individual Code*/Name/ID No. of Students:
*1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

C) Summary of Evaluation
(R)Report - Group Assessment (R)Report - Individual Assessment
1. Superstructure Design CO PO Marks S.Total 5. Teamwork CO PO Marks S.Total
Individual code*
1.1 Structural Key Plan CO2 PO3 5 1 2 3 4 5
(according to details in B)
CO1 PO1 10 5. Teamwork CO6 PO9 5
1.2 Structural Design
CO2 PO3 10
Marks A for (Sum up items 1-5) 80
1.3 Detailing CO2 PO3 5
2. Substructure Design CO PO Marks S.Total Total Mark= Mark A*0.5 40%
2.1 Selection of foundation CO1 PO1 5 Signature of Lecturer:
2.2 Foundation design CO2 PO3 5
3. Infrastructure Design CO PO Marks S.Total

3.1 Earthwork, Road, Drainage, CO1 PO1 10

3.2 Sewerage & Water Supply CO2 PO3 15
4. Project Management CO PO Marks S.Total Name of Lecturer:
4.1 Bill of Quantities CO5 PO11 5
4.2 Project Planning CO5 PO11 5 Date of Evaluation:

7
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM
ECC584 Capstone Project (Report) Evaluation Form
IDP/CP_REPORT/2021v3
Appendix A: Performance Criteria Matrix for Capstone Project (Report) (40%) cont’
Description of Performance Criteria
Criteria Weight WP, WK E, F D, D+, C- C, C+ B-, B, B+ A-, A, A+
0-30% 40-49% 50-59% 60-74% 75-100%
1.0 Superstructure Design
1.1 Structural Key WP1: Depth of Ability to prepare structural key plans including items (i) practical positioning, (ii) practical sizing, (iii) naming & numbering
Plan Knowledge of structural elements; (iv) clearly written notes & title block and (v) correct gridlines/dimensions
Required
CO2-PO3 (C5) WK3: Engineering Prepare some Prepare all the
Fundamental Prepare few structural Prepare most of the
5 structural key plans structural key plans
WK4: Specialist Prepare none of the key plans with less structural key plans
SDG11,12 Knowledge with satisfactory with excellent framing
structural key plans framing by fulfilling 1/5 with good framing by
WK5 – Engineering framing by fulfilling and fulfilling 4/5
Design item fulfilling 3/5 items
WK6 -Engineering 2/5 items items
Practices
1.2 Structural WP3: Depth of Ability to identify rationale assumptions, and apply engineering & scientific principles to formulate solutions
Design analysis: no
- Application of obvious solution, Demonstrate Demonstrate Justify assumptions
Apply limited
Engineering abstract thinking, Use assumptions and satisfactory reasonable with complete
10 engineering &
Knowledge in originality apply engineering & assumptions and assumptions and rationale and apply
scientific principles
Calculation scientific principles apply engineering & apply engineering & engineering &
with uncertain
CO1-PO1 (C4) with  30% errors scientific principles scientific principles scientific principles
assumptions
SDG11,12 with 20-30% errors with 10-20% errors with ≤ 10% errors.
1.2 Structural WP2: Range of Ability to perform design processes with various design constraints/considerations:(i) public health, (ii) safety, (iii)
Design (Cont) Conflicting cultural, (iv) societal (v) environmental and (vi) economic context, and referring to appropriate code of practices
- Design Process requirements: Excellent design
Demonstrate design Satisfactory design Good design basis
wide & conflicting basis and justify
processes without basis and consider and justify design 2
CO2-PO3 (C6) 10 technical, engr & design 3
Imitate design clear design design 1 constraints, constraints, and
SDG11,12 other issues considerations, and
processes considerations. No and design design accordance
design accordance
information on the accordance with 1 with 1-2 code of
WP5: Extent of with  2 code of
code of practice used. code of practice. practices.
applicable codes practices.
1.3 Detailing Prepare detailing comprises of all substantial information required for construction by manual AND software from
WP7: structural design phases (planning, conceptual, idealization, analysis and detailed design).
5 Interdependence
CO2-PO3 (C5)
Prepare no detailing Prepare detailing Prepare detailing Prepare detailing Prepare detailing
SDG11,12

8
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM
ECC584 Capstone Project (Report) Evaluation Form
IDP/CP_REPORT/2021v3
: Solutions from with limited with some with most of the with all substantial
many sub-parts information, with  information, and 20- information, and 10- information, and ≤
30% errors 30% errors 20% errors 10% errors.

2.0 Substructure Design

2.1 Selection of WP2: Range of Ability to interpret and analyse geotechnical data, and select suitable foundation with justification based on various
Foundation Conflicting design requirements:(i) safety, (ii) authority, (iii) geotechnical, (iv) societal (v) environmental and (vi) economic context,
- Engineering requirements and (v) code of practices
Knowledge in Excellent justification
Geotechnical Data WP3: Depth of Satisfactory Good justification
based on  2
Interpretation 5 analysis Select without Select without justification based on based on 1-2
considerations
justification and not justification supported 1-2 considerations considerations
supported with
CO1-PO1 (C4) supported with with interpretation of supported with supported with
accurate
SDG11,12 interpretation of geotechnical data with interpretation of interpretation of
interpretation of
geotechnical data many errors geotechnical data geotechnical data
geotechnical data.
with some errors with few errors
2.2 Foundation WP5: Extent of Ability to perform design processes and referring to appropriate code of practices
Design (Cont) applicable codes Satisfactory design
- Design Process Excellent design
5 basis accordance Good design basis
Imitate design Demonstrate design basis accordance with
with 1 code of accordance with 1-2
CO2-PO3 (C6) processes processes  2 code of practices
practice code of practices
SDG11,12
3.0 Infrastructure Design
3.1 Application of Engineering Knowledge in Calculation CO1-PO1 (C4) SDG6, 11,12
Ability to identify rationale assumptions, and apply engineering & scientific principles to formulate solutions
Earthwork 2 WP3: Depth of Apply limited Use assumptions Demonstrate Demonstrate Justify
analysis: no engineering & and apply satisfactory reasonable assumptions
Road 2 obvious solution, scientific engineering & assumptions assumptions and with complete
abstract thinking, principles with scientific and apply apply engineering rationale and
Drainage 2 originality uncertain principles with  engineering & & scientific apply
assumptions 30% errors scientific principles with 10- engineering &
Sewerage 2 principles with 20% errors scientific
Water Reticulation 20-30% errors principles with ≤
2 10% errors.

9
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM
ECC584 Capstone Project (Report) Evaluation Form
IDP/CP_REPORT/2021v3
3.2 Design Process CO2-PO3 (C6) SDG6, 11,12
Ability to perform design processes with various design constraints/considerations:(i) public health, (ii) safety, (iii) cultural, (iv) societal (v) environmental and (vi) economic
context, and referring to appropriate code of practices
Earthwork 3 WP2: Range of Demonstrate Satisfactory Good design Excellent design
Conflicting design processes design basis basis and justify basis and justify
Road 3 requirements without clear and consider design 2/5 design 3/5
Drainage WP5: Extent of Imitate design
3 design design 1/5 constraints, and considerations,
applicable codes processes
Sewerage considerations. constraints, but show satisfactory and show
3 WP7: No layout plan is layout plan lack details in layout complete details
Water Reticulation 3 Interdependence submitted. of details plan in layout plan
4.0 Project Management
4.1 Bill of No WP
Estimate the cost for Estimate the cost for Estimate the cost for
Quantities Estimate the cost for
construction with a lot construction with construction with few
- Costing construction with
Prepare no estimation of missing schedules, some missing missing schedules,
complete schedules,
5 for the construction list of works, schedules, list of list of works,
CO5-PO11 (C4) list of works relevant
cost specifications and works, unrealistic specifications and
SDG 8 to drawings and show
quantities specifications of items quantities
quantities
and quantities
4.2 Project Make decisions in project planning dealing with items (i) identify tasks, (ii) estimate time on task, (iii) establish
Planning milestones, (iv) financial S Curve and (v) manage tasks using appropriate tools
- Decision Making Demonstrate some Demonstrate Demonstrate good Demonstrate
decision making as a satisfactory decision decision making as a excellent decision
5 Demonstrate no
CO5-PO11 (C6) member in a team to making as a member member in a team to making as a member
SDG 12 decision making as a
meet expectations of in a team to meet meet expectations of in a team to meet
member in a team
the clients for 1-2 expectations of the the clients for 3-4 expectations of the
items. clients for 2-3 items. items. clients for 4-5 items.
5.0 Teamwork Demonstrate unclear Demonstrate unclear Demonstrate unclear Demonstrate clear
Demonstrate clear
- Demonstrate and roles, absent for roles, occasionally roles but show roles, excellent
roles and good
internalized meetings, poor late for meetings, satisfactory participation and
participation and
teamwork participation and poor participation and participation and effective interaction
5 interaction during the
interaction during the interaction during the interaction during the during the group work
group work and able
CO6-PO9 (A4) group work and able group work and able group work and able and able to complete
to complete 70-90%
SDG17 to complete < 20% to complete 20-50% to complete 50-70% at least 90% of the
the given tasks.
the given tasks. the given tasks. the given tasks. given tasks.

10
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

Appendix B: Performance Criteria Matrix for Capstone Project (Viva) (10%)

A. Student Information
Name/ID No. of Students:

1. 4.

2. 5.

3. Class_Group Example: Class EC2208A1_Group 1:

B. Summary of Evaluation
Items CO PO Marks (A)** Weight (B) Total =0.2*A*B
1.1 Engineering Knowledge CO1 PO1 12.5
1. Structural Design
1.2 Design Solutions CO2 PO3 12.5
2.1 Engineering Knowledge CO1 PO1 12.5
2. Infrastructural Design
2.2 Design Solutions CO2 PO3 12.5
3. Project Management CO5 PO11 25
4. Teamwork CO6 PO9 25
GRAND TOTAL (X/100%)
**Fill in marks with range 1 to 5 by referring to respective rubric. Mark = 1 indicates poor ability and Mark = 5 indicates excellent ability.
C. Feedback to Students

-11-
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM
ECC584 Capstone Project (Viva) Evaluation Form
IDP/CP_VIVA/2020v1
Appendix B: Performance Criteria Matrix for Capstone Project (Viva) (10%) cont’
Panel Name: Panel Signature:
Date of Evaluation:
No. Criteria 1 (E, F) 2 (D, D+, C-) 3 ( C, C+) 4 (B-, B, B+) 5 (A-, A, A+)
1. Structural Design Weight Ability to...
1.1 Application of Engineering  apply limited  apply engineering  demonstrate  demonstrate  demonstrate
Knowledge in Calculations engineering & & scientific satisfactory good comprehensive
(CO1-PO1) scientific principles principles to understanding and understanding understanding and
to structural design structural design application of and application of application of
12.5 and use mostly and use few engineering & engineering & underlying
(C) inappropriate inappropriate scientific principles scientific principles engineering &
assumptions. assumptions. to structural design to structural scientific principles to
with general design with structural design with
assumptions. reasonable complete rationale
assumptions. assumptions.
1.2 Design Planning, Process and  imitate processes  demonstrate  produce design  perform design  perform design
Solutions and use findings. processes and processes with processes with processes with
(CO2-PO3) analyze findings satisfactory design good design basis, excellent design basis,
12.5 and show design basis, analyze evaluate findings evaluate findings with
(C) solutions with  40% findings and show and propose justification and
errors. design solutions practical design propose practical and
with 20-30% errors. solutions with 10- reliable design solutions
20% errors. with  10% errors.
2. Infrastructural Design Weight Ability to...
2.1 Application of Engineering  apply limited  apply engineering &  demonstrate  demonstrate good  demonstrate
Knowledge in Calculations engineering & scientific principles to satisfactory understanding and comprehensive
(CO1-PO1) scientific infrastructural design understanding and application of understanding and
principles to and use few application of engineering & application of
12.5 infrastructural inappropriate engineering & scientific principles underlying
(C) design and use assumptions. scientific principles to infrastructural engineering &
mostly to infrastructural design with scientific principles
inappropriate design with general reasonable to infrastructural
assumptions. assumptions. assumptions. design with
complete rationale
assumptions.
No. Criteria 1 (E, F) 2 (D, D+, C-) 3 ( C, C+) 4 (B-, B, B+) 5 (A-, A, A+)
-12-
 ECC584OFCapstone
SCHOOL Project (Viva)UiTM
CIVIL ENGINEERING, Evaluation Form
SHAH ALAM
IDP/CP_VIVA/2020v1

2.2 Design Planning, Process and  imitate  demonstrate processes  produce design  perform design  perform design
Solutions processes and and analyze findings processes with processes with good processes with
(CO2-PO3) use findings. and show design satisfactory design design basis, excellent design
solutions with  40% basis, analyze evaluate findings basis, evaluate
12.5 errors. findings and show and propose findings with
(C) design solutions with practical design justification and
20-30% errors. solutions with 10- propose practical
20% errors. and reliable design
solutions with  10%
errors.

3. Project Management Weight Ability to...

-Project schedule and  demonstrate  demonstrate some  demonstrate  demonstrate good  demonstrate
financial planning minimal application of satisfactory application of application of
(CO5-PO11) application of excellent project application of excellent project excellent project
excellent project management excellent project management management
management principles management principles principles
25 principles specifically in principles specifically in specifically in
(C) specifically in project scheduling specifically in project scheduling project scheduling
project scheduling and financial project scheduling and financial and financial
and financial planning for the and financial planning for the planning for the
planning for the project. planning for the project. project.
project. project.

4. Teamwork Weight Ability to...

- Demonstrate and  demonstrate  demonstrate  demonstrate  demonstrate clear  demonstrate clear
internalized teamwork (CO6- unclear roles and unclear roles and unclear roles & roles, good transition roles, excellent
PO9) no transition fairly transition satisfactory transition between team transition between
25 between team between team between team members, the team member, the
(A) members. No members, the members, the presentation was presentation was
participation in the presentation was presentation was slightly unequal shared equally
presentation by obviously unequal slightly unequal among the group among the group
member(s). among the group among the group members. members.
members. members.

ECC584 Capstone Project (Viva) Evaluation Form

IDP/CP_VIVA/2020v1

-13-
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

Note:
R- Report, P- Presentation, C- Cognitive, A - Affective

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME

1. Define and formulate solutions to complex design problem. (PO1)
2. Use the design standards with consideration of real world constraint in particular to the environmental responsibilities of a professional engineer and matters related to economic, legislation, safety
and health, ethical, cultural and societal. (PO3)
3. Justify with informed reasoning and consideration on consequent responsibilities to the society. (PO6)
4. Accommodate the concept of sustainability in the project design.(PO7)
5. Practice effective engineering management in the project design.PO11)
6. Demonstrate leadership skills, ability to work independently and in a team through project design, presentation and defense of project findings. (PO9)

PROGRAM OUTCOME
PO1- Apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialization as specified in WK1 to WK4 respectively to the solution of complex engineering
problems.
PO3-Design solutions for complex civil engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations. (WK5)
PO6- Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and
solutions to complex engineering problems.
PO7-Understand and evaluate the sustainability and impact of professional engineering work in the solution of complex engineering problems in societal and environmental contexts. (WK7)
PO9- Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings.
PO11- Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering management principles and economic decision-making and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to
manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

-14-
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

APPENDIX C CAPSTONE PROJECT REPORT GUIDELINE

This guidelines aims to help the students in preparing the report for the Capstone Project
(Project 1) in the course Integrated Design Project (ECC584).

Students are expected to submit ONE technical report in FOUR (4) main parts for the
evaluators (i.e. respective lecturer at the submission day stated in lesson plan and panel industry
during the presentation day). Part 1 contains design solutions for superstructure for building
design, Part 2 for foundation design, Part 3 for Infrastructures design whereas Part 4 contains
for construction management.

The contents for Part 1 to Part 4 are detailed in the following sections. The students are strongly
advised to provide solutions based on the scopes in the latest evaluation form for Capstone
Project. The format of the report (i.e. size and type of file, divider, font size, font type, paper
etc) is free.

TECHNICAL REPORT
Title page – See Format in Appendix C1
Evaluation Form
List of Contents
Preliminary
-Brief on the IDP course and the course outcomes (CO) (refer course lesson plan).
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Company Profiles (i.e. Company details, staff organization, member profiles etc)
1.2 Project Description (i.e. brief on the site location, map, type of premise &
development, neighboring sites etc.)
1.3 Overall scope of works in Project 1 (i.e structural design (superstructure and sub-
structure), infrastructural design, construction management)

2.0 Part 1 & Part 2: Superstructure and Foundation Design

2.1 Introduction (i.e. brief on the building-layout, function, size etc. and scopes in the
building design)
2.2 Architectural Plans
2.3 Design Standard
2.3.1 List of code of practice and standard
2.3.2 Design Criteria (i.e. design for fire resistance, exposures, wind &
assumptions etc)
2.3.3 Design Constraints (i.e. health, safety, society, cultural, environment
etc)
2.4 Design Parameters (i.e. loadings, materials in tabular form and cite the sources
etc.)
2.5 Selection criteria of Foundation (i.e. justification)
2.6 Structural Key Plans (i.e. all the floor plans following requirements in the rubric)
2.7 Manual calculations for selected structures (i.e. summary of the calculations:
sizes, analysis results, rebars in tabular form)

-15-
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

2.7.1 Slabs Design and Detailing (i.e. each member 1 one-way and 1 two-
way slabs)
2.7.2 Beams Design and Detailing (i.e. each member 1 simply supported
beam & 1 continuous beam)
2.7.3 Staircases Design and Detailing (i.e. each group 1 staircase)
2.7.4 Column Design and Detailing (i.e. each member 1 column roof-stump
of building)
2.7.5 Foundation Design and Detailing (i.e. each member 1 foundation
design)
2.7.6 Shear Wall & Truss Design and Detailing (optional depends on
project- by group)
2.8 Calculations using software (i.e. attached summary report, report for individual
structures – at least 1 each as in the structures 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.4 and 2.7.5)
2.9 Conclusions

3.0 Part 3: Infrastructural Design Reports

3.1 Earthwork Design Report (Retaining Wall Design to add if applicable)
3.2 Road and Drainage Design Report
3.3 Sewerage Design Report
3.4 Water Supply Design Report
{Note: The design reports for each of the infrastructures should include the following
items:
a) Introduction (i.e. project title, site location, aims of the report)
b) Design Considerations and Constraints (i.e. design codes, equations, assumptions,
rules used in the design, constraints on health, safety, society, cultural etc)
c) Design parameters (i.e. water demand, PE, etc)
d) Proposed Design System/ Design Concept (Sketch)
e) Analysis and Design (attach spreadsheet/software calculation, but must show at
least 1 sample of manual calculation)
f) Layout plan (With title block)
g) Detail drawings

4.0 Part 4: Construction Management

4.1 Bill of Quantity (Summary of the Bill of Quantity, sample of taking off,
estimation)
4.2 Project Planning (see the evaluation form for detailed items)

5.0 Conclusion

Appendix A – Site plan

Appendix B – Borelog

Appendix C1: Title page

-16-
 SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UiTM SHAH ALAM

SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

ECC584 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
PROJECT 1

Design and planning of 4-storey Pangsapuri

at Pasir Puteh, Kelantan

Prepared by EC2208A1 GROUP :1

ID No Name

March 2021 – July 2021

-17-