Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Title
iew
4
v
7 Shigehiro Ishizukad
re
8
9 aNuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki
10 319-1195, Japan
er
11 bGraduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
pe
12 cInstitute of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
13 dDepartment of Forest Soils, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki
14 305-8687, Japan
ot
15
16 Corresponding author
tn
18
rin
ep
Pr
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
19 Abstract
iew
22 However, the temperature sensitivity of the decomposition of SOC that is stored in the
23 mineral soil remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to quantify the temperature
24 sensitivity of SOC pools with different mean residence times (MRTs) ranging from
v
25 days to approximately a century in the upper 20 cm of the mineral soil. Based on the
re
26 finding that the MRT of SOC varied according to the soil type and depth, soil samples
27 were collected from three Japanese forests using thin-layer sampling. These samples
28
er
were incubated at two laboratory temperatures (20°C and 30°C) for >100 days. Using a
31 and resistant) SOC pools with varying MRTs. The relationship between the MRT and
32 temperature sensitivity (Q10 value) of the pools was then determined. The active SOC
ot
33 pool was identified as a small (<0.7% of the total SOC) rapidly cycling (generally <2
34 weeks) C pool at all depths. The slow pool was a much larger (23%–52%) C pool that
tn
35 cycled on a timescale of decades to more than a century. Across all sites and depths, the
36 Q10 values increased from 1.1 to 4.0 with increasing MRTs and were greater than 2.0
37 for all SOC pools with an MRT >40 years. Although the mechanisms controlling the
rin
38 overall degradability and temperature sensitivity of SOC are not yet fully understood,
39 our results demonstrate that a large amount of C (1.4–3.2 kg C m−2 in the top 15 cm)
ep
40 that has been stabilized over decades in the surface mineral soil is highly vulnerable to
41 warming.
Pr
42
43 Keywords
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
44 Soil organic carbon (SOC); Mean residence time (MRT); Temperature sensitivity (Q10);
46
iew
47 Funding
48 This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
v
50
re
51 CRediT authorship contribution statement
53
er
original draft, Funding acquisition. Koichi Moriya: Methodology, Investigation.
56
57
ot
tn
rin
ep
Pr
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
58 1. Introduction
60 component of the global carbon (C) cycle (IPCC, 2021) because it produces a carbon
iew
61 dioxide (CO2) emission flux from the soil to the atmosphere (also known as soil
63 approximately 6–8 times greater than that of the anthropogenic CO2 emission flux
v
64 (Bond-Lamberty and Thomson, 2010; Bond-Lamberty et al., 2018; IPCC, 2021).
re
65 Therefore, changes in the SOC decomposition rate could have a considerable impact on
67
er
process (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). Therefore, global warming is expected to
68 enhance the soil heterotrophic respiration (Bond-Lamberty et al., 2018; Nissan et al.,
pe
69 2023) and consequently the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, which can then
70 potentially accelerate global warming due to the positive feedback loop (Jenkinson et al.,
71 1991; Crowther et al., 2016). However, there is no consensus regarding the magnitude
ot
76 characterized by the Q10 value, a factor by which the SOC decomposition rate increases
rin
77 when the temperature increases by 10°C (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). In Earth
78 System Models (ESMs, i.e., coupled climate–carbon cycle models), a function using
ep
79 this parameter value is widely utilized to evaluate the warming-induced effect on soil C
80 emission (Potter et al., 1993; Friedlingstein et al., 2006; Todd-Brown et al., 2013;
Pr
81 Foereid et al., 2014). Although the Q10 value for SOC decomposition can vary
82 depending on environmental and biological factors such as the temperature and SOC
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
83 properties (Davidson and Janssens, 2006; Hamdi et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2018), most
84 ESMs employ a fixed Q10 value (1.5 or 2.0) for all soil types and SOC properties (Cox
85 et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2005; Friedlingstein et al., 2006; Foereid et al., 2014). It has
iew
86 recently been suggested that the feedback magnitude of soil heterotrophic respiration on
87 warming may be underestimated by 25% if an assumed invariant Q10 value is used for
88 ESMs (Zhou et al., 2009). Therefore, quantifying the actual temperature sensitivity of
v
89 SOC decomposition is pivotal to accurately predict the future of the global C cycle and
re
90 Earth’s climate (Conant et al., 2011; Todd-Brown et al., 2013; Foereid et al., 2014).
92
er
materials with varying degrees of biochemical recalcitrance. The fundamental principles
96 1999; Davidson and Janssens, 2006). This behavior has been observed in the
ot
98 However, in mineral soil (below the O horizon), the temperature sensitivity of organic
tn
100 biological mechanisms (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). Although Fang et al. (2005) and
101 Vaughn and Torn (2019) showed that labile and stable SOC pools responded similarly
rin
103 studies (Knorr et al., 2005; Conant et al., 2008) which indicated that a resistant SOC
ep
104 pool was more sensitive to temperature than that of a labile SOC pool (thus supporting
105 the carbon quality-temperature hypothesis). There are also studies that show opposite
Pr
106 results (Giardina and Ryan, 2000; Fissore et al., 2009). These contradictory results may
107 be due to the SOC pools utilized in these studies that differ in their overall SOC stability
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
108 (degradability). This may be governed by not only the SOC biochemical recalcitrance
109 but also some other mechanisms operating in the mineral soils, such as the physiology
iew
111 (Davidson and Janssens, 2006; von Lützow and Kögel-Knabner, 2009; Qin et al., 2019).
112 The mean residence time (MRT, a reciprocal of turnover time) of SOC in the
113 mineral soil is not a direct indicator of its biochemical recalcitrance; instead, it is
v
114 indicative of the overall degradability of the SOC that interacts with the soil constituents
re
115 under actual environmental conditions. Generally, the current ESMs separate the soil C
116 into several conceptually defined SOC pools with different MRTs (Friedlingstein et al.,
117
er
2006; Todd-Brown et al., 2013; Foereid et al., 2014): for example, active (with MRTs
118 of years or shorter), slow (MRTs of decades to a century), and resistant (MRTs of
pe
119 centuries or longer) SOC pools. Because the surface soil (upper 20–30 cm of mineral
120 soil) stores a large amount of SOC with MRTs of decades to centuries (Schimel et al.,
121 1994; Trumbore et al., 1996; Falloon et al., 1998; Gaudinski et al., 2000; Koarashi et al,
ot
122 2009; Ota et al., 2013), it is likely that the long-term (over the next century) response of
123 soil C to climate change will be largely determined according to the response of the
tn
124 slow SOC pool to increasing temperatures. Therefore, quantifying the relationship
125 between the MRT (particularly <100 years) and temperature sensitivity of SOC could
126 improve our ability to predict the magnitude and persistence of the carbon cycle–climate
rin
128 In the present study, we aimed to explore the relationship between the MRT and
ep
129 temperature sensitivity of SOC in the surface mineral soil. For this purpose, the soil
130 type and depth were used as surrogates for the SOC degradability under actual
Pr
131 environmental conditions. This is because even within the upper 20–30 cm of mineral
132 soil, the MRT of SOC differs depending on the soil type and depth (Scharpenseel et al.,
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
133 1989; Trumbore, 2000; Koarashi et al., 2009), possibly because of the simultaneous
134 operation of several SOC stabilization mechanisms at varying degrees. Soil samples
135 were collected using thin-layer sampling from the surface layers of three Japanese forest
iew
136 sites, and the samples were incubated at two laboratory temperatures for >100 days. A
137 three-pool first-order decomposition model (Paul et al., 2001; 2006; Grandy and
138 Robertson, 2007; Fissore et al., 2009) was fitted to the incubation results to separate the
v
139 soil C into three (active, slow, and resistant) SOC pools with different MRT ranges.
re
140 During the three-pool separation, the size and MRT of the resistant SOC pools were
141 estimated based on the C and radiocarbon (14C) analyses of the soil samples after acid
142
er
hydrolysis treatment (Leavitt et al., 1996; Paul et al., 2006; Fissore et al., 2009). This
143 approach allowed us to obtain SOC pools with a variety of MRTs (days to centuries),
pe
144 and thus to determine the SOC decomposition temperature sensitivity of the pools (as
145 Q10 values), and consequently, the relationship between the MRT and Q10 value.
146
ot
149 The study was performed at three forest sites (AP, OG, and IB) in Japan (Table 1).
151 70–80-year-old Japanese beech (Fagus crenata) with virtually no understory. The OG
rin
152 site is a temperate, deciduous, broadleaved forest dominated by Japanese beech (Fagus
153 crenata) and Japanese oak (Quercus crispula) with no understory. The IB site is a
ep
155 (Larix leptolepis) with low bamboo bushes (Sasamorpha borealis). The mean annual
Pr
156 temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) ranged from 6.1°C–10.7°C
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
158 The soil types have been classified as Andosol for the AP and OG sites (Ishizuka et
159 al., 2006; Yoshinaga et al., 2002) and Cambisol for the IB site, using the classification
160 of the Food and Agricultural Organization (IUSS working Group WRB, 2015). The soil
iew
161 pH was all acidic (4.5–4.7) and the soil at the AP and OG sites had a strong influence of
162 volcanic ash deposition. The pyrophosphate extractable aluminum (Alp) and iron (Fep)
163 contents were higher in the AP and OG soils than in the IB soil (Table 2). The contents
v
164 of the acid oxalate extractable and dithionite-citrate extractable Al and Fe (Alo, Feo, Ald,
re
165 and Fed, respectively) were also higher in the AP and OG soils than in the IB soil. In the
166 AP and OG soils, the Alo + 1/2Feo value was greater than 20 g kg−1, which is the value
167
er
that is used as the diagnostic criterion for andic soil properties to distinguish between
168 volcanic ash and non-volcanic ash soils (Imaya et al., 2007).
pe
169
171 Soil samples were collected from the AP site in September 2008, OG site in
ot
172 January 2007, and IB site in March 2009. At all of the sites, three cores of mineral soil
173 (9.5 cm in diameter and >20 cm long) were taken after removing the O horizons. The
tn
174 soil cores were divided into seven layers (0–2, 2–4, 4–6, 6–8, 8–10, 10–15, and >15 cm
175 depth intervals) in the laboratory, and composited according to the layers. Parts of the
176 thin-layered soil samples were sieved using a mesh with 4-mm openings, and the visible
rin
177 plant roots in the sieved samples were removed with tweezers. The soil samples from
178 the AP and IB sites were immediately incubated and those from the OG site were stored
ep
179 at 6°C in sealed plastic bags for a few days before incubation.
180
Pr
182 The soil samples (9–229 g dry weight equivalent depending on the soil depth) were
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
183 placed in open-top jars (jar volumes of 100, 300, or 500 mL) and incubated for >100
184 days in the dark under two laboratory incubation temperature (LIT) conditions of 20°C
185 (LIT20) and 30°C (LIT30). The soil moisture content was not adjusted before
iew
186 incubation and the moisture content remained the same as the field moisture conditions
187 at the time of sampling (0.72–1.52, 1.04–1.39, and 0.62–0.80 g-water g−1-dry soil for
188 the AP, OG, and IB soil samples, respectively). The moisture content was maintained
v
189 during incubation by adding deionized water to the soil. Throughout the incubation
re
190 period, the jars were periodically placed into a larger, open-topped container that was
191 then enclosed with a soil CO2 flux system setup (LI-6400 with a soil flux chamber
192
er
6400-09, LI-COR, USA) to measure the CO2 emission rates of the soil samples. The
196 Portions of the thin-layered soil samples were dried at 50°C in an oven and then
ot
197 sieved using a mesh with 2-mm openings, and the visible plant roots were removed with
198 tweezers. Approximately 2–10 g of the <2-mm soil samples (bulk soil samples) were
tn
199 subject to acid hydrolysis treatment (1.2 M HCl at 80°C for 2 h, three times, Koarashi et
200 al., 2009). After treatment, the samples were neutralized by washing with deionized
201 water and dried to obtain the acid-insoluble SOC fractions (AISF).
rin
202 The bulk soil and AISF samples were homogenized by grinding and the C content
203 of the samples were measured using a total organic C analyzer (TOC-5000 with a solid
ep
204 sample module: SSM-5000A, Shimadzu, Japan). Preparation of samples for 14C analysis
205 was performed according to the procedure detailed by Koarashi et al. (2009). Briefly,
Pr
206 the samples were combusted in quartz tubes sealed with a clean CuO wire and Ag foil
207 under vacuum conditions. The CO2 generated in the tubes was cryogenically purified
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
208 and recovered, which was then used to prepare the graphite targets for 14C
209 measurements with an accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) at the Aomori Research
210 and Development Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA-AMS-MUTSU). The
iew
211 subsamples of the purified CO2 were also used to measure the 13C isotopic signature
212 (13C) with an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (MAT-252, Finnigan MAT, Bremen,
213 Germany). All radiocarbon data were reported using 14C notation, which is the per mil
v
214 (‰) deviation of the 14C/12C ratio of the sample from that of the absolute 14C standard
re
215 in 1950, with correction for the mass-dependent isotope fractionation in the
216 environment to a constant 13C value of −25‰ (Stuiver and Polach, 1977). The
217
er
analytical uncertainty of the 14C values was ~5‰ (1 standard deviation (SD)).
218
pe
219 2.5. Quantifying sizes and MRTs of the three SOC pools
220 The size and MRT of the three SOC pools (active, slow, and resistant) were
222 (Paul et al., 2001; 2006; Grandy and Robertson, 2007; Fissore et al., 2009):
224 where CT(t) represents the total SOC at time t; Ca, Cs, and Cr represent the initial sizes
225 of the active, slow, and resistant SOC pools, respectively (i.e., CT(0) = Ca + Cs + Cr);
226 and ka, ks, and kr represent the decomposition rate constants for the three SOC pools,
rin
227 respectively.
228 In this study, it was assumed that the resistant SOC pool in the model was
ep
229 represented by the AISF fraction obtained after the acid hydrolysis (Leavitt et al., 1996;
230 Paul et al., 2006; Fissore et al., 2009), considering the relatively long MRT of the
Pr
231 AISF-C (see section 3.3). Hence, the resistant pool size (Cr) was determined to be the
232 same as the AISF-C size. To determine the MRT for the resistant SOC pool, the MRT
10
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
233 of the AISF fraction was estimated based on the 14C result, using a time-dependent,
234 steady-state model (Trumbore et al., 1996; Gaudinski et al., 2000; Koarashi et al.,
235 2012):
iew
236 F(t) = k ‧ Fatm(t−1) + F(t−1) ‧ (1−k−), (2)
237 where F(t) is the fraction of the modern C (F14C), which is equivalent to Δ14C/1000 + 1,
238 in the SOC pool at year t; k is the decomposition rate constant for the SOC pool (y−1);
v
239 Fatm(t−1) is the F14C of CO2 in the atmosphere at year t−1; F(t−1) is the F14C in the
re
240 SOC pool at year t−1; and is the radioactive decay constant for 14C (y−1). Fatm(t−1)
241 was derived from the atmospheric 14C-CO record (Koarashi et al., 2009). Using this
2
242
er
model, the Δ14C value of the SOC can be predicted to identify a value of k that best
243 explains the measured Δ14C value, following this the MRT can be estimated as k−1 (in
pe
244 years).
245 The CO2 emission rate during the incubation at a constant temperature can be
248 Given the long 14C-derived MRTs (in excess of 100 years, see section 3.3) for the
tn
249 resistant SOC pools and thus the small values for kr in the Eq. (3), it is clear that the
250 resistant SOC pool contributes almost nothing to the measured CO2 emission rates over
251 the 100 days of the incubation. Therefore, the CO2 emission during the incubation can
rin
254 Using Eq. (4), the parameter values for Ca and Cs (= CT(0) − Ca − Cr), and ka and ks
255 at LIT20 and LIT30 (i.e., ka20, ka30, ks20, and ks30) that best explain the observed
Pr
256 changes in the CO2 emission rates during incubation at LIT20 and LIT30, were
257 determined by minimizing the residual sum of squares in the fitting results. The MRTs
11
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
258 for the active and slow SOC pools at LIT20 and LIT30 (i.e., MRTa20, MRTa30,
259 MRTs20, and MRTs30) were calculated as the reciprocals of ka20, ka30, ks20, and ks30,
260 respectively. Finally, the MRT at the field MAT (MRTMAT) for the active and slow SOC
iew
261 pools were estimated using the obtained MRT values at LIT20 and the conversion factor,
262 Q10(20−MAT)/10, with the value of Q10 evaluated in the manner described in section 2.6.
263 The model fitting to the observations was performed using R software 4.1.1 (R core
v
264 team, 2021) with the minpack.lm package (Elzhov et al., 2023). The R package solved
re
265 the nonlinear least-squares equations through a modification of the
266 Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and provided the statistical significance (p < 0.05) of
267
er
the estimated parameters (Elzhov et al., 2023).
268
pe
269 2.6. Quantifying temperature sensitivity of the active and slow SOC pools
270 For all soil layers, the Q10 values for the active and slow SOC pools were
273 where k20 and k30 are the decomposition rates for the SOC pool at 20°C and 30°C,
tn
275
277 Statistical differences between the means of two groups were examined using a
278 t-test at the 5% (p = 0.05) significance level. Statistical relationships between two
ep
279 variables were examined by the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient at the
281
282 3. Results
12
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
283 3.1. SOC stock in the forest surface soils
284 The three forest sites investigated in this study differed in the amount and depth
285 profile of the SOC in their surface soil (Table 3). The SOC stocks in the upper 15 cm of
iew
286 the mineral soil were 5.8, 9.1, and 3.4 kg C m−2 at the AP, OG, and IB sites,
287 respectively. The SOC density (kg C m−2 cm−1-depth) decreased with depth at the AP
288 and IB sites, but was nearly constant and remained high down to ~20 cm at the OG site.
v
289
re
290 3.2. CO2 emission rates
291 In the incubation study, temporal changes in the CO2 emission rate (normalized to
292
er
the soil C content, in mg C g−1-soil C day−1) for all the soil layers showed a similar
293 two-phase pattern with relatively fast rates during the early incubation period followed
pe
294 by slower rates thereafter (Fig. 1). The CO2 emission rate was highest at the beginning
295 of the incubation, dropped rapidly at around day 40, and then remained low and
296 relatively constant through day 120. Regarding the depth trend in the soil profiles, the
ot
297 CO2 emission rate was generally higher in shallower soil layers than in the deeper soil
298 layers. At nearly all depths and sites, the CO2 emission rate at LIT30 was higher than
tn
299 that at LIT20. Throughout the incubation period, the CO2 emission rate was highest in
300 the IB soil where the SOC stock was the lowest and the amount of organically
301 complexed Al (Alp) and short-range-order minerals (Alo and Feo) were the lowest
rin
303
ep
305 Although the AISF-SOC density (in kg C m−2 cm−1-depth) differed among the
Pr
306 three forest surface soils (Table 3), it was positively correlated (r2 = 0.95, p < 0.0001, n
307 = 21) with the total SOC density across the sites and at all depths, indicating that the
13
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
308 AISF-SOC represents a similar proportion of the total SOC in the different soils.
309 The 14C values for the bulk SOC steeply decreased with depth at all sites (Table
310 3) with positive values at the shallower depths and negative values at the deeper depths,
iew
311 indicating that overall the older and thus slower-cycling SOC was present in the deeper
312 depths. The positive 14C values observed in the upper soil layers indicated that the
313 SOC in these layers has a significant component of organic C labeled with “bomb” 14C
v
314 that was deposited from the atmospheric nuclear weapon testing conducted in the late
re
315 1950s and early 1960s. The AISF fraction was similar in the depth profile of 14C as the
316 bulk soil, but was generally lower in the 14C value than the bulk soil. The AISF-C was
317
er
enriched in 14C compared with the bulk soil C that was observed in the top two layers at
318 the AP site, which probably reflects a higher relative contribution of “bomb” 14C (i.e.,
pe
319 decades-old C) to the AISF fraction than to the bulk soil C. The MRTMAT for the
320 AISF-C was estimated based on the 14C value, which increased with depth and ranged
322
323 3.4. Partitioning of the SOC pools and their contribution to the total CO2 emission
tn
324 The size and MRT of the active and slow SOC pools were determined through
325 fitting the decomposition model (Eq. (4)) to the observed CO2 emission rate over time.
326 For all sites, depths, and times, the modeled CO2 emission rates reproduced the
rin
327 observed rates well. Fig. 2 shows examples of the fitting results for the top 0–2 cm and
328 bottom 15–21 cm soil layers of the OG site at LIT20 and LIT30. All fitting results are
ep
330 With the obtained parameters, the active SOC pool was identified at all depths as a
Pr
331 small sized pool (0.1–3.4 g C m−2 cm−1-depth), which accounted for only 0.1%–0.7% of
332 the total SOC (Table 4). The MRTMAT of the active SOC pool ranged from 3 days to 12
14
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
333 weeks. There were no apparent depth trends in either of the proportional size or
334 MRTMAT of the pool. Because of the short MRT, the active pool contributed the most
335 (63%–96%, average: 85%, estimated by dividing the SOC content by MRTMAT) to the
iew
336 CO2 emission rate at the time when incubation started (Table 4). However, the
337 contribution of this pool to the total CO2 emission decreased to <10% within 30–50
338 days (Figs. 2 and A1). Some exceptions showed a longer MRTMAT (74–85 days) for the
v
339 active pools in the upper 0–6 cm of the soil layers at the AP site. These deviations may
re
340 be partly due to a lack of CO2 emission rate measurements for these layers during the
341 first few days of incubation (Figs. 1 and A1), which resulted in an underestimation of
342
er
the initial rate of CO2 emission by the model fitting and thus an overestimation of the
343 MRTMAT.
pe
344 In contrast to the active SOC pool, the slow SOC pool represented a significant
345 proportion of the total SOC (23%–52%, 30%–38%, and 31%–47% for the AP, OG, and
346 IB soils, respectively) at all sites and depths (Table 4). The MRTMAT estimated for the
ot
347 slow SOC pool ranged from 12–231 years. Note that the MRTMAT values for the two
348 soil layers (6–8 and 8–10 cm) of the OG site are not included in the following
tn
349 discussion because the fitting model analysis indicated that the decomposition of the
350 slow SOC, which is characterized by ks (the reciprocal of MRT), for these layers was
351 not statistically significant (p > 0.05) to explain the observed change in the CO2
rin
352 emission rate. Because of the size and MRT, the slow SOC pool constantly contributed
353 to the CO2 emission rate throughout the incubation period (Figs. 2 and A1). The slow
ep
354 pool was estimated to be responsible for 3%–31% (average: 12%) of the CO2 emission
355 rate at the time that incubation started (Table 4). The contribution of the slow SOC pool
Pr
356 became the most significant after the active SOC pool was exhausted (several tens of
357 days after initiation of incubation) (Figs. 2 and A1). There were also no clear depth
15
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
358 trends in either of the proportional size or MRTMAT of the slow SOC pool. Regarding
359 the site-to-site variability, the MRTMAT for the slow SOC pool was generally short
360 (14–44 years) at the IB site which had the lowest SOC stock and reactive metal content
iew
361 but had the highest CO2 emission rate among the three sites.
362
363 3.5. Q10 values for the active and slow SOC pools
v
364 The results from the model fitting to the CO2 emission rates at LIT20 and LIT30
re
365 were used to calculate the Q10 values for the active and slow SOC pools. The Q10 values
366 for the active SOC pools ranged from 1.2–1.7 with an average of 1.4 ± 0.1 (1 SD) (Fig.
367
er
3). The Q10 values for the slow SOC pools ranged from 1.1–4.0 with an average of 2.2 ±
368 0.6 (1 SD). The Q10 value for the slow SOC pool was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher
pe
369 than that for the active SOC pool. Across all sites and depths, the Q10 values were
370 positively correlated with the MRTMAT for the active (r2 = 0.51, p < 0.001, n = 21) and
372
373 4. Discussion
tn
375 For most of the sites and depths, the three-pool first-order decomposition model
376 with determined parameters explained the observed change in CO2 emission rates with
rin
377 time well, thereby enabling the separation of the total soil C into three (active, slow, and
378 resistant) SOC pools with different MRT ranges. The active SOC pool was small in size
ep
379 (0.1%–0.7% of the total SOC) and consisted of rapidly cycling (generally <2 weeks) C
380 under the MAT conditions. The slow SOC pool was identified as a much larger C pool
Pr
381 (at least 23%–52%) that cycled on a timescale of decades to more than a century. As
382 evidenced, a rapid decline in the CO2 emission rate during the early incubation stage
16
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
383 was observed for a range of soils (Townsend et al., 1997; Hartley and Ineson, 2008;
384 Fissore et al., 2009; Wetterstedt et al., 2010). This decline has previously been
385 interpreted as an indication of the existence of a small, labile SOC pool and a much
iew
386 larger, more recalcitrant SOC pool (Townsend et al., 1997). The quantified sizes and
387 MRTMAT values of the active and slow SOC pools in this study are consistent with this
v
389 The CO2 emission rate expressed on a per gram soil C (in mg C g−1-soil C d−1)
re
390 basis can be considered an indicator of the SOC degradability. The active SOC pool was
391 found at all depths and showed no clear depth trends in either of the proportional size or
392
er
MRTMAT (Table 4), indicating that the active pool represents a highly degradable part
393 of the SOC that produces the CO2 efflux at a significant rate throughout the soil profile.
pe
394 Similar sizes and turnover properties have been reported for the soil microbial biomass
395 C (Saggar et al., 1999; Blagodatskaya et al., 2011) and dissolved organic C (Qualls and
397 Despite the significantly longer MRTMAT for the slow SOC pool than the active
398 SOC pool (Table 4), the slow SOC pool contributed approximately 12% of the CO2
tn
399 emission from the soil even at the beginning of incubation. This was evidently because
400 of the large SOC stock in the slow pool. The possible mechanisms for SOC storage over
401 the timescale of decades to a century in this pool include the following: selective
rin
403 rhizodeposits (Baldock et al., 1997; Nierop, 1998), production of microbially derived
ep
404 organic compounds (Kiem and Kögel-Knabner et al., 2003), physical protection of SOC
405 through aggregate formation (von Lützow et al., 2006), and sorption of SOC in the outer
Pr
406 regions of the organo-mineral complexes (Kleber et al., 2007). At the IB site, where a
407 higher CO2 emission rate (and thus higher SOC degradability) was observed, the
17
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
408 slow-pool MRTMAT was shorter (generally less than 25 years) than those at the other
409 two sites. This suggests that the regulatory mechanisms controlling the dynamics of the
410 slowly cycling SOC may differ among the sites. For example, there may be a weaker
iew
411 interaction of SOC with the soil minerals at the IB site, as suggested by the
413 The resistant (or AISF) SOC pool contained approximately half to three-quarters of
v
414 the soil C at all depths. Despite the large stock of C in the pool, its contribution to the
re
415 CO2 emission rate was almost negligible because of its long MRTMAT of 85–1070 years.
416 The AISF-SOC pool is assumed to consist of not only highly condensed, biochemically
417
er
resistant humic substances but also the less-resistant organic substances that are strongly
418 associated with the mineral phase and are physically protected in microaggregates
pe
419 (Leifeld and Fuhrer, 2005; Paul et al., 2008). Although it is likely that the AISF-SOC
420 pool is heterogeneous and contains both faster and slower-cycling C (Trumbore and
421 Zheng, 1996; Koarashi et al., 2009), the overall long MRTMAT of this pool and positive
ot
422 correlation between the amount of total SOC and AISF-SOC suggest the importance of
423 this pool in C accumulation in the forest surface (0–20 cm) soil. This result also implies
tn
424 that the AISF-SOC pool can be increased or decreased due to natural and artificial
425 changes in the environmental conditions, such as climate and land-use changes (Paul et
427
429 Our approach using laboratory incubation and AISF-14C measurements of the
430 thin-layered soil samples revealed the depth distributions of the size and MRTMAT for
Pr
431 the active and slow SOC pools from the surface soil of three Japanese forests (Table 4).
432 As expected, different MRTMAT values were obtained, particularly for the slow SOC
18
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
433 pools, and as a result, SOC pools with an MRTMAT variety (from days to more than a
434 century) were identified across the sites and depths. Using two temperatures (LIT20 and
435 LIT30) for the laboratory incubation conditions, the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of the
iew
436 SOC decomposition rate for the pools was determined, and thus, the relationship
438 It was found that the Q10 values ranged from 1.1–4.0 and increased with increasing
v
439 MRTMAT (Fig. 3). These results are in agreement with the majority of other published
re
440 incubation studies (Conant et al., 2011), which indicates that the decomposition rate of
441 slowly cycling SOC is more sensitive to increases in temperature than that of the rapid
442
er
cycling SOC. In the field observations at the AP site, Atarashi-Andoh et al. (2012)
443 estimated a higher temperature sensitivity for the SOC decomposition than for the more
pe
444 rapidly cycling litter decomposition by separating the soil respiration sources using a
446 Based on the kinetic theory (carbon quality-temperature hypothesis), the substrate
ot
448 with greater activation energy or greater intrinsic biochemical recalcitrance (Davidson
tn
449 and Janssens, 2006). However, in soil, the intrinsic temperature sensitivity may be
450 obscured in cases where the environmental constraints (including physical, chemical,
451 and biological mechanisms) impose more stringent limitations on the SOC
rin
452 decomposition rate. Therefore, the determined Q10 values, particularly for the slowly
453 cycling SOC pool, may rather represent the “apparent temperature sensitivity”, which
ep
454 may be lower or higher than the intrinsic temperature sensitivity of the organic materials
455 (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). Although the MRTMAT of the SOC pool is not
Pr
456 necessarily indicative of the biochemical recalcitrance, the apparent Q10 values
457 increased with the MRTMAT. Thus, these results suggest that the attenuation of the SOC
19
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
458 decomposition temperature sensitivity (MRTMAT < 100 years) caused by environmental
459 constraints in the soils may be slight when compared with the intrinsic temperature
iew
461 consistent with the results of Plante et al. (2009), where no significant differences in the
462 Q10 values were observed for soil (silt loam) samples with different degrees of physical
463 disruption. Alternatively, the present results may suggest that the multiple mechanisms
v
464 operating in the soils themselves are temperature sensitive (Davidson and Jenssens,
re
465 2006; Craine et al., 2010; Conant et al., 2011). For example, Kaiser et al. (2001)
466 reported that the sorption and desorption reactions of SOC with mineral surfaces are
470 Although the mechanisms controlling the degradability and temperature sensitivity
471 of SOC in soils are not yet fully understood, the results of the present study demonstrate
ot
472 that a large quantity of C (1.4–3.2 kg C m−2 in the top 15 cm of mineral soil) that has
473 been stabilized for over decades to roughly a century is highly vulnerable to warming.
tn
474 For all the SOC pools with MRTs of >40 years, the Q10 value was greater than 2.0 (Fig.
475 3), a value that is used equally for different types of SOC pools in most ESMs (Cox et
476 al., 2000; Jones et al., 2005; Friedlingstein et al., 2006; Foereid et al., 2014). Given this,
rin
477 the CO2 emissions from slow SOC pools can remain elevated over the next century,
478 because the pools are large and not depleted even though warming continues to
ep
479 accelerate the rate of SOC decomposition in these pools (Koarashi et al., 2009;
480 Teramoto et al., 2016). The rapidly cycling (active) SOC pools contribute to the current
Pr
481 rate of CO2 emission more than the slowly cycling SOC pools. However, the rapidly
482 cycling pools are not only less temperature sensitive but also small in size, and therefore,
20
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
483 the elevated CO2 emission from the rapidly cycling SOC pools may not be maintained
485 For the resistant SOC pool, no information was obtained regarding its temperature
iew
486 sensitivity in the present study. Karhu et al. (2010) showed that the temperature
487 sensitivity of SOC decomposition is higher for decadally cycling fractions (Q10 =
488 4.2–6.9) compared with annually (Q10 < 2) and centennially cycling fractions (Q10 =
v
489 2.4–2.8) in typical podzol-type soils of boreal forests. This suggests that some
re
490 mechanisms inhibit the temperature response of SOC that cycles on timescales of a
491 century or longer. The resistant SOC pool that is characterized by a long MRTMAT is
492
er
unlikely to be responsible for the annual CO2 emissions. However, given that the
493 Japanese forest surface soils store a large amount (2.0–5.9 kg C m−2) of C as resistant
pe
494 SOC, it is possible that even small changes in the SOC decomposition rates in this pool
495 could have a significant impact on the C stock in soil over the next century (Koarashi et
496 al., 2009). Further studies are required to determine whether a shift in the climate
ot
497 conditions can alter the decomposition rate of SOC that has been stabilized for over
498 decades to a century or longer in the surface mineral soil, which could be essential to
tn
499 accurately predict the magnitude and timing of the response of Japanese forest soil to
501
rin
502 Acknowledgments
503 The authors thank Sinobu Makimoto of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)
ep
504 for the support with the laboratory work, Takayuki Tanaka and the rest of the staff at the
505 Aomori Research and Development Center of the JAEA for the AMS-14C
Pr
506 measurements, and Keizo Hirai of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute,
507 Masakazu Ota, and Takahiro Nakanishi of the JAEA for discussions. The authors also
21
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
508 thank the Iwatehokubu District Forest Office, the Forestry Agency’s Tohoku Regional
509 Forest Office, and the Nagoya University Forest for permission to use the research sites
510 for this study. This work was performed within the framework of the JAEA-FFPRI
iew
511 Cooperation Research Scheme.
512
513 References
v
514 Atarashi-Andoh, M., Koarashi, J., Ishizuka, S., Hirai, K., 2012. Seasonal patterns and
re
515 control factors of CO2 effluxes from surface litter, soil organic carbon, and
516 root-derived carbon estimated using radiocarbon signatures. Agric. For. Meteorol.
521 Blagodatskaya, E., Yuyukina, T, Blagodatsky, S., Kuzyakov, Y., 2011. Turnover of soil
ot
522 organic matter and of microbial biomass under C3-C4 vegetation change:
523 Consideration of 13C fractionation and preferential substrate utilization. Soil Biol.
tn
525 Bond-Lamberty, B., Thomson, A., 2010. Temperature-associated increases in the global
527 Bond-Lamberty, B., Bailey, V. L., Chen, M., Gough, C. M., Vargas, R., 2018. Globally
528 rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades. Nature 560, 80–83.
ep
529 Bosatta, E., Ågren, G. I., 1999. Soil organic matter quality interpreted
531 Bradford, M. A., Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G., B., Fierer, N., Raymond, P. A., Crowther,
532 T. W., 2016. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat.
22
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
533 Clim. Change 6, 751–758.
534 Conant, R. T., Drijber, R. A., Haddix, M. L., Parton, W. J., Paul, E. A., Plante, A. F.,
535 Six, J., Steinweg, J. M., 2008. Sensitivity of organic matter decomposition to
iew
536 warming varies its quality. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 868–877.
537 Conant, R. T., Ryan, M. G., Agren, G. I., Birge, H. E., Davidson, E. A., Eliasson, P. E.,
538 Evans, S. E., Frey, S. D., Giardina, C. P., Hopkins, F. M., Hyvonen, R. A.,
v
539 Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Lavallee, J. M., Leifeld, J., Parton, W. J., Steinweg, J. M.,
re
540 Wallenstein, M. D., Wetterstedt, J. A. M., Bradford, M. A., 2011. Temperature and
541 soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way
542
er
forward. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3392–3404.
543 Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., Totterdell, I. J., 2000. Acceleration
pe
544 of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model.
546 Craine, J. M., Fierer, N., McLauchlan, K. K., 2010. Widespread coupling between the
ot
547 rate and temperature sensitivity of organic matter decay. Nat. Geosci. 3, 854–857.
548 Crowther, T. W., Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Rowe, C. W., Wieder, W. R., Carey, J. C.,
tn
549 Machmuller, M. B. et al., 2016. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to
551 Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A., 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon
rin
553 Elzhov, T. V., Mullen, K. M., Spiess, A. -N., Bolker, B., 2023. minpack.lm: R Interface
ep
556 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=minpack.lm
557 Falloon, P., Smith, P., Coleman, K., Marshall, S., 1998. Estimating the size of the inert
23
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
558 organic matter pool from total soil organic carbon content for use in the
560 Fang, C., Smith, P., Moncrieff, J. B., Smith, J. U., 2005. Similar response of labile and
iew
561 resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature 433, 57–59.
562 Fissore, C., Giardina, C. P., Swanston, C. W., King, G. M., Kolka, R. K., 2009. Variable
563 temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon in North American forests. Glob.
v
564 Change Biol. 15, 2295–2310.
re
565 Foereid, B., Ward, D. S., Mahowald, N., Paterson, E., Lehmann, J., 2014. The
567
er
assumptions about soil processes. Earth Syst. Dynam. 5, 211–221.
568 Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P.,
pe
569 Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C., Joos, F., Kato, T.,
570 Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D., Raddatz, T., Rayner, P.,
571 Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K. -G., Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A.
ot
572 J., Yoshikawa, C., Zeng, N., 2006. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results
574 Gaudinski, J. B., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., Zheng, S., 2000. Soil carbon cycling
577 Giardina, C. P., Ryan, M. G., 2000. Evidence that decomposition rates of organic
578 carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature 404, 858–861.
ep
579 Grandy, A. S., Robertson, G. P., 2007. Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon
581 Hamdi, S., Moyano, F., Sall, S., Bernoux, M., Chevallier, T., 2013. Synthesis analysis
582 of the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration from laboratory studies in relation
24
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
583 to incubation methods and soil conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 58, 115–126.
584 Hartley, I. P., Ineson, P., 2008. Substrate quality and the temperature sensitivity of soil
iew
586 IPCC, 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
587 Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
588 Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Pean, C.,
v
589 Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K.,
re
590 Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J.B.R., Maycock, T.K., Waterfield, T., Yelekci, O., Yu, R.
591 and Zhou B. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and
595 in the submontane zone of the Kanto and Chubu districts, Japan. Soil Sci. Plant
597 Ishizuka, S., Sakata, T., Sawata, S., Ikeda, S., Takenaka, C., Tamai, N., Sakai, H.,
598 Shimizu, T., Kan-na, K., Onodera, S., Tanaka, N., Takahashi, M., 2006. High
tn
599 potential for increase in CO2 flux from forest soil surface due to global warming in
601 IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014,
rin
602 update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating
603 legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
ep
604 Jenkinson, D. S., Adams, D. E., Wild, A., 1991. Model estimates of CO2 emissions
606 Jones, C., McConnell, C., Coleman, K., Cox, P., Falloon, P., Jenkinson, D., Powlson, D.,
607 2005. Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two
25
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
608 contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Glob. Change Biol. 11,
609 154–166.
610 Kaiser, K., Kaupenjohann, M., Zech, W., 2001. Sorption of dissolved organic carbon in
iew
611 soils: effects of soil sample storage, soil-to-solution ratio, and temperature.
613 Karhu, K., Fritze, H., Hamalainen, K., Vanhala, P., Junger, H., Oinonen, M., Sonninen,
v
614 E., Tuomi, M., Spetz, P., Krrunen, V., Liski, J., 2010. Temperature sensitivity of
re
615 soil carbon fractions in boreal forest soil. Ecology 91, 370–376.
616 Kiem, R., Kögel-Knabner, I., 2003. Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the
617
er
refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 101–118.
618 Kleber, M., Sollins, P., Sutton, R., 2007. A conceptual model of organo-mineral
pe
619 interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal
621 Knorr, W., Prentice, I. C., House, J. I., Holland, E. A., 2005. Long-term sensitivity of
ot
623 Koarashi, J., Atarashi-Andoh, M., Ishizuka, S., Miura, S., Saito, K., Hirai, K., 2009.
tn
627 Koarashi, J., Hockaday, W. C., Masiello, C. A., Trumbore, S. E., 2012. Dynamics of
628 decadally cycling carbon in subsurface soils. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G03033.
ep
629 Leavitt, S. W., Follett, R. F., Paul E. A., 1996. Estimation of slow- and fast-cycling soil
630 organic carbon pools from 6N HCl hydrolysis. Radiocarbon 38, 231–239.
Pr
631 Leifeld, J., Fuhrer, J., 2005. The temperature response of CO2 production from bulk
632 soils and soil fractions is related to soil organic matter quality. Biogeochemistry 75,
26
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
633 433–453.
634 Meyer, N., Welp, G., Amelung, W., 2018. The temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil
635 respiration: Controlling factors and spatial prediction at regional scale based on
iew
636 environmental soil classes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 32, 306–323.
637 Nierop, K. G. J., 1998. Origin of aliphatic compounds in a forest soil. Org. Geochem.
v
639 Nissan, A., Alcolombri, U., Peleg, N., Galili, N., Jimenez-Martinez, J., Molnar, P.,
re
640 Holzner, M., 2023. Global warming accelerates soil heterotrophic respiration. Nat.
642
er
Ota, M., Nagai, H., Koarashi, J., 2013. Root and dissolved organic carbon controls on
643 subsurface soil carbon dynamics: A model approach. J. Geophys. Res. Biogiosci.
pe
644 118, 1646–1659.
645 Paul, E. A., Morris, S. J., Böhm, S., 2001. The determination of soil C pool sizes and
646 turnover rates: biophysical fractionation and tracers. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J.M.,
ot
647 Follett, R.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.) Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon. Lewis
649 Paul, E. A., Morris, S. J., Conant, R. T., Plante, A. F., 2006. Does the acid
650 hydrolysis-incubation method measure meaningful soil organic carbon pool? Soil
652 Paul, S., Veldkamp, E., Flessa, H., 2008. Differential response of mineral-accosiated
653 organic matter in tropical soils formed in volcanic ashes and marine Tertiary
ep
654 sediment to treatment with HCl, NaOCl, and Na4P2O7. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40,
655 1846–1855.
Pr
656 Plante, A. F., Six, J., Paul, E. A., Conant, R. T., 2009. Does physical protection of soil
657 organic matter attenuate temperature sensitivity? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73,
27
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
658 1168–1172.
659 Potter, C. S., Randerson, J. T., Field, C. B., Matson, P. A., Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H.
660 A., Klooster, S. A., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based
iew
661 on global satellite and surface data. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 7, 811–841.
662 Qin, S., Chen, L., Fang, K., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Liu, F., Yu, J., Yang, Y., 2019.
v
664 and microbial communities. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau1218.
re
665 Qualls, R. G., Bridgham, S. D., 2005. Mineralization rate of 14C-labelled dissolved
666 organic matter from leaf litter in soils of a weathering chronosequence. Soil Biol.
670 Saggar, S., Parshotam, A., Hedley, C., Salt, G., 1999. 14C-labelled glucose turnover in
672 Scharpenseel, H. W., Becker-Heidmann, P., Neue, H. U., Tsutsuki, K., 1989.
674 dynamics as well as of morphogenetic and turbation processes. Sci. Total Environ.
676 Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T.
rin
677 H., Parton, W. J., Townsend, A. R., 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls
678 over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 8, 279–293.
ep
679 Stuiver, M., Polach, H. A., 1977. Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19,
680 355–363.
Pr
681 Teramoto, M., Liang, N., Takagi, M., Zeng, J., Grace, J., 2016. Sustained acceleration
28
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
683 warm-temperate forest in southern Japan. Sci. Rep. 6, 35563.
684 Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Randerson, J. T., Post, W. M., Hoffman, F. M., Tarnocai, C.,
685 Schuur, E. A. G., Allison, S. D., 2013. Causes of variation in soil carbon
iew
686 simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations.
688 Townsend, A. R., Vitousek, P. M., Desmarais, D. J., Tharpe, A., 1997. Soil carbon pool
v
689 structure and temperature sensitivity inferred using CO2 and 13CO incubation
2
re
690 fluxes from five Hawaiian soils. Biogeochemistry 38, 1–17.
691 Trumbore, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Amundson, R. A., 1996. Rapid exchange between
692
er
soil carbon and atmospheric carbon dioxide driven by temperature change. Science
696 Trumbore, S., 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon
ot
698 Vaughn, L. J. S., Torn, M. S., 2019. 14C evidence that millennial and fast-cycling soil
tn
699 carbon are equally sensitive to warming. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 467–471.
700 von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Matzner, E., Guggenberger, G.,
701 Marschner, B., Flessa, H., 2006. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils:
rin
702 mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions–a review. Eur. J.
704 von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., 2009. Temperature sensitivity of soil organic
706 Wetterstedt, J. Å. M., Persson, T., Ågren, G. I., 2010. Temperature sensitivity and
29
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
708 study with three substrates. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1806–1819.
709 Yoshinaga, S., Takahashi, M., Aizawa, S., 2002. Landforms and soil characteristics in
710 Ogawa Forest Reserve. In: Nakashizuka, T., Matsumoto, Y. (Eds.) Ecological
iew
711 Studies Vol. 158, Diversity and Interaction in a Temperate Forest Community:
713 Zhou, T., Shi, P., Hui, D., Luo, Y., 2009. Global pattern of temperature sensitivity of
v
714 soil heterotrophic respiration (Q10) and its implications for carbon-climate feedback.
re
715 J. Geophys. Res. 114, G02016.
716
er
pe
ot
tn
rin
ep
Pr
30
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607
ed
717 Figure captions
718
719 Fig. 1. Temporal changes in the CO2 emission rates of the surface soil from three forests
iew
720 (AP, OG, and IB) during incubation. The left and right panels show the results
721 at the laboratory incubation temperature (LIT) conditions of 20°C (LIT20) and
v
723
re
724 Fig. 2. Examples of the model fitting results for the CO2 emission rates observed in the
725 top 0–2 cm and bottom 15–21 cm layers of the OG soil at the laboratory
726
er
incubation temperature (LIT) conditions of 20°C (LIT20) and 30°C (LIT30).
727
pe
728 Fig. 3. Q10 values versus the mean residence time with the mean annual temperature
729 (MRTMAT) for the active and slow soil organic carbon (SOC) pools of Japanese
731
tn
rin
ep
Pr
31
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4554607