Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author(s): Gerben S. van der Vegt, Peter Essens, Margareta Wahlström and Gerard George
Source: The Academy of Management Journal , August 2015, Vol. 58, No. 4 (August 2015),
pp. 971-980
Published by: Academy of Management
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Academy of Management is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The Academy of Management Journal
Editor's note : This editorial is part of a series and injury, and, although buildings collapsed, fires
written by editors and co-authored with a se- broke out, and the Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant
nior executive , thought leader ; or scholar from was affected, the situation was kept under control.
a different field to explore new content areas However, the earthquake severely damaged the
and grand challenges with the goal of expand- submarine communication cables that served much
ing the scope , interestingness, and relevance of of East and South-East Asia, with profound effects
the work presented in the Academy of Man- on communications and financial transactions in
agement Journal. The principle is to use the the area (Smith & Petley, 2009).
editorial notes as " stage setters " to open up Although adverse events of all kinds are in-
fresh new areas of inquiry for management re- evitable and have larger impacts, some organ-
search. GG izations and societies are better able to rebound
from and sustain such shocks than are others.
Ten years of Global Risks reports by the World Analyses of recovery processes after the New
Economic Forum show a daunting list of risks that Zealand earthquakes revealed that businesses with
challenge humankind, including water and food strong pre-existing organizational collaboration
crises, terrorist attacks, cybercrime, financial crises, networks were better able to access support and
and extreme weather events, among others (World organize themselves than those that did not have
Economic Forum, 2015). The annual number of such networks in place (Stevenson et al., 2014). And
these high-risk events worldwide has steadily in- although the quadruple disaster - earthquake, tsu-
creased from around 350 in 1980 to almost 1,000 in nami, nuclear alert, and power shortages - that hit
2014 (UN, 2015). Managing the devastation of these Japan in 2011 severely damaged the supply chain of
disaster events extends beyond concerns about Toyota, resulting in a global production loss for the
mortality; economic losses are rising from around company of 5% in 2011, Toyota claimed it was able
U.S. $50 billion in the 1980s to around U.S. $250 to limit its losses due to the collective and coor-
billion in the last decade (UN, 2015). Similarly, dinated efforts of suppliers, dealers, and overseas
cataclysmic effects caused by climate change operations (Asano, 2012). In contrast, Haitian busi-
will, with increasing regularity, shape business nesses and organizations are still struggling to re-
and society (Ho war d-Gren ville, Buckle, Hoskins, & build after the much smaller quake they endured
George, 2014). in 2010.
The larger scale and impact of adverse events is Why do some organizations and societies suc-
the result of the increased density of global net- cessfully adjust and even thrive amid adversity
works of people, organizations, and countries. High- while others fail to do so? With this editorial, we
risk events that, at first, seem to cause only local, would like to inspire management scholars to take
isolated effects can now snowball in magnitude up the "grand challenge" of studying the role and
and do damage to vital infrastructures that impact functioning of organizations during adverse natural
events on a regional and even global scale. The ash or social events. Organizations form the nexus be-
from the erupted Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland, tween individuals and societies. They provide em-
for example, disrupted air transport across Europe ployment for a large proportion of the community
and strongly affected the whole world's manu- and play an important role in delivering the essen-
facturing supply chain. At its peak, the crisis im- tial services on which we all rely in our daily lives,
pacted 29% of global aviation and affected 1.2 such as electrical power, water, food, health, com-
million passengers a day. Collectively, businesses munications systems, financial services, and trans-
from dozens of countries lost billions in uninsured portation. Organizations also work together to shape
losses (Munich RE, 2011). The 2006 Hengchun and mitigate the consequences of disasters when they
earthquake in Taiwan involved limited loss of life occur. More research focusing on a better understanding
971
Copyright of the Academy of Management, all rights reserved. Contents may not be copied, emailed, posted to a listserv, or otherwise transmitted without the copyright holder's express
written permission. Users may print, download, or email articles for individual use only.
UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING RISK collectives (e.g., families, organizations, and socie-
ties) that are, "as the Japanese say, like bamboo,
The risks and adverse events on which we will which bends under the weight of winter snow but
focus in this editorial are disasters and organiza- stands tall again come springtime" (Mitchell, 2013: i).
tional crises. McFarlane and Norris (2006: 4) de- Resilience reflects the ability of systems to absorb
fined a disaster as "a potentially traumatic event and recover from shocks, while transforming their
that is collectively experienced, has an acute onset, structures and means for functioning in the face of
and is time delimited; disasters may be attributed to long-term stresses, change, and uncertainty. This
natural, technological, or human causes." A crisis is requires actively understanding the risk landscape,
a low-probability, high-impact event that threatens determining where those risks are best owned and
the viability of the system and is characterized by managed, strengthening the components of the sys-
ambiguity of cause, effect, and means of resolution, tem that helps to face those risks, and understanding
as well as by a shared belief that decisions must be how the interrelatedness of these components affects
made swiftly (Pearson & Clair, 1998). These adverse system functioning.
events are caused by factors outside the system, are In contrast to traditional risk management ap-
unexpected, and require immediate action. Exam- proaches that focus on the identification of risks
ples include hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, large and alleviating the level of vulnerability to external
industrial and nuclear accidents, terrorist attacks, disturbances, adopting a resilience approach to
and explosions. disturbances implies focusing on capabilities and
The traditional way of coping with adverse events capacities that create or retain resources in a form
is to develop approaches and systems to identify sufficiently flexible, storable, convertible, and mal-
risks. Empirical data, probability distributions, and leable that enables systems to successfully cope
mathematical models are used to analyze past and with and learn from the unexpected (Sutcliffe &
predict future adverse events. These forecasts en- Vogus, 2003). The notion of resilience thus has the
able decision makers to anticipate disturbances to positive connotation of flexibility and strengthen-
the "normal" state of affairs and to make better- ing, whereas that of vulnerability can connote pas-
informed decisions about how to manage risk port- sivity, insecurity, and inevitability, none of which is
folios. While such an approach can certainly help helpful for mobilizing action. Re-orienting from
societies and companies to anticipate and mitigate "vulnerability" to "resilience" also better captures
the consequences of some disasters and crises, it is the desired outcome - preparedness for dealing with
usually impossible to identify all potential risks and unforeseen disruptive events.
to collect all the information necessary to conduct
adequate risk assessments. Indeed, in all of the ex- ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE
amples listed above, traditional risk management
practices were insufficient to provide protection The concept of resilience has its intellectual roots
against the adverse events that took place. A key in the field of individual psychology and the science
characteristic of many of the disasters and crises of child behavior, where it referred to the ability of
societies face nowadays is that they are triggered
by improbable events the causes of which are not
1 In the context of disaster management, the term
well understood. Many crises emerge from a pat-
"resilience" was established with the adoption of the
tern of several events coinciding in space and
Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 by the United
time, and the joint occurrence and cascading con-
Nations following the World Conference on Disaster Risk
sequences of such adverse events are hard to antici- Reduction in 2005. The framework focused on the pri-
pate and predict. oritization of risk reduction, identifying risks and en-
To cope with disruptive events that cannot be hancing early-warning systems, building a culture of
adequately addressed with traditional risk man- safety and resilience, reducing underlying risk factors,
agement systems, a small but growing number of and strengthening disaster preparedness and response
academics, managers, policy makers, and politicians capabilities.
Lynch, P., O'Toole, T., & Biemans, W. 2014. From conflict Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. 1998. Reframing crisis man-
to crisis in collaborative NPD. Journal of Business agement. Academy of Management Review, 23:
Research , 67: 1145-1153. 59-76.
Marrone, J. A. 2010. Team boundary spanning: A multi- Ressier, S. 2006. Social network analysis as an approach
level review of past research and proposals for the to combat terrorism: Past, present, and future re-
future. Journal of Management, 36: 911-940. search. Homeland Security Affairs, 22: 1-10.
Masten, A., & Monn, A. R. 2015. Child and family resil- Roehrich, J., Lewis, M., & George, G. 2014. Are public-
ience: A call for integrated science, practice, and private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic
review. Social Science & Medicine, 113: 110-119.
professional training. Family Relations, 64: 5-21.
McFarlane, A., & Norris, F. 2006. Definitions and con- Schreffler, R. 2012. Quake changes little in Toyota's
supply-chain strategy. WardsAuto, May 16, 2012.
cepts in disaster research. In F. Norris, S. Galea,
Retrieved from wardsauto.com/supply-chain/quake-
M. Friedman & P. Watson (Eds.), Methods for
disaster mental health research : 3-19. New York: changes-little-toyota-s-supply-chain-strategy-0 (April
30, 2015).
Guilford Press.
Smith, K., & Petley, D. 2009. Environmental hazards:
McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., & Brunsdon, D. 2008.
Assessing risk and reducing disaster (5th ed.). New
Facilitated process for improving organizational York: Routledge.
resilience. Natural Hazards Review , 9: 81-90.
Stevenson, J. R. 2014. Organisational resilience after the
Mendonça, D., Webb, G., Butts, C. T., & Brooks, J. 2014. Canterbury earthquakes: A contextual approach.
Cognitive correlates of improvised behaviour in di- PhD thesis, University of Canterbury.
saster response: The cases of the Murrah building and
Stevenson, J. R., et al. 2014. Organizational networks
the World Trade Center. Journal of Contingencies
and recovery following the Canterbury earthquakes.
and Crisis Management , 22: 185-195.
Earthquake Spectra, 30: 555-575.
Mitchell, A. 2013. Risk and resilience: From good idea
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. 2003. Organizing for resil-
to good practice (OECD Development Co-operation ience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn
Working Papers, no. 13). Paris: OECD Publishing. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: 94-110.
Munich RE. 2011. TOPICS GEO: Natural catastrophes San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
2010 - Analyses, assessments, positions. Munich, Tihanyi, L., Graffin, S., & George, G. 2014. Rethinking
Germany: Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesell- governance in management research. Academy of
schaft. Available at http://www.preventionweb.net/ Management Journdl, 57: 1535-1543.
files/1 7345_munichere.pdf.
Uitdewilligen, S., & Waller, M. J. 2011. Adaptation in
National Research Council Committee on Private-Public multiteam systems: The role of temporal semistructures.
Sector Collaboration to Enhance Community Disaster In S. }. Zaccaro, M. A. Marks & L. DeChurch (Eds.),
Resilience. 2011. Building community disaster Multiteam systems: An organization form for dy-
resilience through private-public collaboration. namic and complex environments: 365-394. London:
Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Taylor & Francis.