Renato Constantino DOES RIZAL DESERVE TO BE OUR NATIONAL HERO? Rizal: • National Revolutions Veneration –Represents the peak of without achievement to which Understanding the minds of man return time and time again Rizal: • Rizal – not the leader of the Veneration revolution without • Was against Bonifacio and Understanding the revolution • Was a reformist – wanted the Philippines to assimilate (be a province of Spain) Rizal & the • Need to analyze WHY Rizal Revolution took no part in the revolution Contradiction • The significance of this action and the significance of the revolution itself • Role in national development An • “with other American colonial American- officials and some conservative Filipinos, chose Sponsored Rizal as a model hero over Hero other contestants – • Aguinaldo too militant • Bonifacio too radical • Mabini unregenerate” • Governor William Howard Taft, 1901 An • During the American American- colonization: Sponsored • Act No. 137 – re-named Morong
Hero province “Rizal”
• Act No. 243 – erection of a monument in honor of Rizal at the Luneta • Act No. 346 – anniversary of Rizal’s death as a day of observance An • Reasons for the enthusiastic American- American attitude toward Rizal: • “Rizal never advocated Sponsored independence, nor did he advocate Hero armed resistance, to the government… • He urged reform from within by publicity, by public education and appeal to public conscience” • William W. Cameron Forbes; Governor Man & His •Rizal’s Realizations: Times • Enlightenment = class consciousness • Equality with the Spaniard = equality of opportunity • Demands: Rizal: The Reformist – Human Liberty – Human dignity • Evident in his writings: social commenter, an exposer of oppression • Rizal’s contribution → recognition of the people as one, elevation of the Indio into FILIPINO • Filipino Nationhood → Rizal helped The Concept developed of Filipino • “Filipino” →originally referred to the Nationhood creoles (Spanish born in the Philippines) or the Espanoles-Filipinos (Filipinos for short) • Rizal → began to use the term “indio bravos” – Transformed “indio” to a badge of honor • Though Rizal was able to win for his The Limited countrymen the name Filipino → it Filipino was still as an Ilustrado that he conceived the term • Ilustrado orientation manifests itself in his novels: – Hero, Ibarra, was Spanish mestizo – Characters: Spaniards, Creole, the mestizo and the wealthy Chinese The Limited • Rizal – was an ilustrado hero whose life’s mission correspond in Filipino a general way to the wishes and aspirations of his class. • Class Perspective → limited understanding of his countrymen • NO CONTRADITION → died for his people YET rejected revolution – WHY? Rizal was acting from patriotic motives in both cases The Limited • Why Reject the Revolution? Filipino – As an Ilustrado he instinctively underestimated the power and talents of the people – Did not equate liberty with independence – Did not consider political independence as prerequisite for freedom Ilustrados • Rizal and others chose & Indios Spain as the arena of their struggle instead of working among their people • Ilustrado → Hispanized sector of our population Ilustrados • Contrast to the Ilustrado & Indios approach → Bonifacio’s Katipunan – Katipunan → revolutionary consciousness and revolutionary practice • Ilustrados → purveyor of ideas which when seized upon by the indios become real weapons.