Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RIZAL LAW
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 1425.
Something to think About
▪ Considering the context of 1950s, what issues and interests were at
stake in the debate over the Rizal bill? Do these issues remain
pertinent to the present?
▪ Identify the difference between the original bill (Recto) and Laurel’s
version. Was RA 1425 a face saving compromise or victory for the
Catholic Church?
▪ Why do you think the Catholic hierarchy in the 1950s was very
apprehensive about students’ reading Rizal’s novels
Rizal Law
Senate Bill No. 438 House Bill No. 5561 Republic Act 1425
Recto’s Argument
➢Under the principle of police power, the state can require
the reading of the novels to foster better appreciation of
Rizal’s times.
➢Rizal inculcated civic consciousness among Filipinos,
national dignity, patriotism and personal pride.
Anti Rizal Bill
argued that it
▪ Sen. Decoroso Rosales
will be a
▪ Sen. Mariano Cuenco
violation of
▪ Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo
religious
freedom
Anti Rizal Bill
According to the historian Rafael Palma, Rizal was more deserving of the national
hero title. Rizal was even thought to have suggested that Antonio Luna lead the
revolutionary forces since Luna has studied military science which was a brilliant
idea to lessen casualties against the powerhouse Spanish militia. Rizal believed
that only an army that was well prepared and had enough arms would ensure
victory.
Founder of La Liga Filipina
Jose P. Rizal