Socrates believed that philosophical reflection is essential to knowing ourselves better. He required those he conversed with to think critically about their views and defend what they know and don't know. This is because we do not realize what we truly believe until we are challenged to defend our beliefs. If we are ignorant about something, we need to learn from others who are knowledgeable. Socrates used examination of beliefs to provide opportunity for self-knowledge, rather than relying on poor reasoning.
Socrates believed that philosophical reflection is essential to knowing ourselves better. He required those he conversed with to think critically about their views and defend what they know and don't know. This is because we do not realize what we truly believe until we are challenged to defend our beliefs. If we are ignorant about something, we need to learn from others who are knowledgeable. Socrates used examination of beliefs to provide opportunity for self-knowledge, rather than relying on poor reasoning.
Socrates believed that philosophical reflection is essential to knowing ourselves better. He required those he conversed with to think critically about their views and defend what they know and don't know. This is because we do not realize what we truly believe until we are challenged to defend our beliefs. If we are ignorant about something, we need to learn from others who are knowledgeable. Socrates used examination of beliefs to provide opportunity for self-knowledge, rather than relying on poor reasoning.
- what we believe to be true becomes the - occurs when the end of an argument
basis of our ? comes back to the beginning without
- we need to learn from others who ? if we having proven itself. are ignorant about something - people - this erroneous kind of reasoning is - person called? - pity - this becomes the basis of our action - populum - socrates required those he converse to ?, - post hoc to ? their views, to account for what they - this fallacy is the attempt to prove ? and do not ? something by showing how many people - socrates believed that ? or ? provides us think that it’s true with opportunity to know ourselves - this is the fallacy of trying to prove better something by saying it again and again. - required those he converse to think, to - this makes use of the bandwagon defend their views, to account for what argument. they know and do not know. - this uses moral, psychological, cultural - philosophical reflection is essential or physical pressure/ threat instead of because we do not realize what we reason in its argument. truly ? until we are challenged to ? - tradition - mko - using historical preferences of the - it is worth sharing to other if we ? people (tradition), either in general or as - is essential because we do not realize specific as the historical preferences of a what we truly believe in until we are single individual, as evidence that the challenged to defend them historical preference is correct - if we know something, it is worth ? to - verecundiam others - when compassion or pity is being used - if we are ? about something, we need to to obscure the issue learn from others who know - when the argument concludes if there is - fallacy if what kind of reasoning? insufficient data to establish a valid - examination of beliefs or thoughts sequence when what is true to a few is provides us with opportunity to ? better made true to all. - contrary to a lover of wisdom, - when the personality of the opponent is “pilosopo” refers to someone who attacked when it has nothing to do with reasons poorly the issue - believed that an examination of beliefs - when the popular sentiments of the or thoughts provides us with opportunity majority or those that counts are made to know ourselves better the basis of the conclusion. - as a critic - when the truth or falsity of an issue is asserted because no one can offer proof - an appeal that is claiming that something of its contradictory must be true because it is believed by someone who said to be an “authority” types of logical fallacy on the subject yung tatlo - antiquitatem - argument to the point of disgust - authority - baculum - circular reasoning or - fallacy of false cause - force - hasty generalization - hominem - ignorance - ignorantiam - is an idea which many people believe to be true, but which is in fact false because it is based on incorrect information or reasoning - misericordiam - nauseam - numbers - numerum - occurs when someone incorrectly assumes a relationship between two things