Professional Documents
Culture Documents
European Journal of
Psychotherapy & Counselling
Publication details, including instructions for authors
and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rejp20
On becoming a psychotherapist:
Technologies (manualisation and
e-learning) versus communities
of practice
a
Del Loewenthal
a
Department of Psychology , Roehampton University,
Whitelands College , Holybourne Avenue, London , UK
Published online: 30 Oct 2012.
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or
suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed
in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the
views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should
not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions,
claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities
whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection
with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-
licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly
forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Downloaded by [Adams State University] at 07:48 15 October 2014
European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling
Vol. 14, No. 4, December 2012, 313–316
EDITORIAL
On becoming a psychotherapist: Technologies (manualisation
and e-learning) versus communities of practice
considered as mirroring those features of CBT, which may have led to the
perception of CBT’s success in providing a far cheaper way of training and
carrying out the therapy which importantly, at least at first sight, lends itself to
randomised control trials which current forces in our society use for
legitimization. It could be further claimed that such simplifications do much
to take away from unnecessary professional mystification. Thus mentalisation,
CBT and any other approaches that can be manualised in this way can be seen
as both economical and effective in training technicians. Indeed, mentalisation,
which started with treating people with Borderline Personality Disorder
(Bateman & Fonagy, 2004), has since expanded in many directions (Bateman &
Fonagy, 2011).
On the other hand, there is Merleau-Ponty’s (1962) phrase, which I am fond
of quoting, stating that sometimes if one takes away the mystery, one takes
away the thing itself. Whilst one might argue that such manualised approaches
as mentalisation don’t in fact take away the mystery, but rather help you stay
more with it, our concerns might still be heightened regarding this
technologising of the psychological therapies if we consider further the
nature of psychotherapeutic knowledge. Surely in order to be psychological
therapists, we need the time and space to consider not so much explicit
knowledge, but what Polanyi (1967) terms ‘tacit knowledge’. Tacit knowledge
cannot be taught and learnt but can be imparted and acquired. In some ways
similarly, Oakeshott (1962) distinguishes ‘practical’ from ‘technical’ knowl-
edge. Such practical knowledge cannot really be learnt just through a manual,
it requires the face to face contact.
More recently Lave and Wenger (1991) spoke of this as a community of
practice that focuses on social participation in a community. Here learning
occurs when the student acquires knowledge, not only from the master, but
also from ‘advanced apprentices’ and ‘fellow novices’. Such communities of
practice have previously been with us in professional education, for example
learning communities with a stress far more on equality were very prevalent
through humanistic influences on learning in the second half of the twentieth
century (Heron, 1974). Surely such learning, which is socially situated, is not
only the basis of the psychological therapists’ development, but perhaps also,
as a result of the therapy, the client’s/patient’s development.
Such learning can never take place through just a technical manualisation,
however sophisticated the electronic means. We are of course in an era where
education has undergone enormous change (e.g. in medicine, see Morris &
Blaney, 2010). Working patterns have indeed changed and led to less face to
face contact – we are far more likely to be looking at separate digital screens in
our work and leisure time than ever before.
There are innovations, through using collaborative websites, to create new
virtual communities of practice (Boulos, Marambam, & Wheeler, 2006), which
attempt to enable the sharing of peer to peer generated knowledge between all
levels of the community (Duffy & Bruns, 2006). However, such ‘blended
Downloaded by [Adams State University] at 07:48 15 October 2014
learning’ (Littlejohn & Pegler, 2007) still appears to be best when it is based on
existing face to face communities of practice (Sharpe & Oliver, 2007).
People who are psychological therapists are very fortunate to still have the
main approach in most cases to their basic learning, through a community of
practice involving the face to face contact of their teaching, their supervision
and in their individual and/or group therapy. However, there are increasing
pressures on this. There is a greater expectation that learning can take place at
home, at work or on the move. In different ways, most of the psychotherapy
bodies in the UK have reduced the time people need to be in therapy to qualify
(Loewenthal, forthcoming). And there is less of general sense of community
which makes it all the more difficult for people to be able to get together to
form learning or any other type of communities. But are not these even more
reasons why manualisation should never be the starting point for our learning?
It would be far better for the individuals and communities we serve, if we start
with both practice (Snell & Loewenthal, 2011) and communities of learning,
rather than theory and learning technologies.
Our first paper for this general issue, ‘The effect of psychodrama on people
living with HIV/AIDS’ by Karabilgin, Gökengin, Doğaner and Gökengin from
Turkey, explores the effects of psychodrama on the life functioning of people
living with HIV positive status through a mixed methods study. This interesting
study explores how to help people living with HIV/AIDS to gain insight, to get
free of the burden of negative feelings (anger, shame, guilt, fear of death) and to
cope with the difficulties in their inner world, their family and their
environment.
The second paper ‘Nature as therapist: Integrating permaculture with
mindfulness and acceptance-based therapy in the Danish Healing Forest
Garden Nacadia’ by Corazon, Stigsdotter, Steen and Rasmussen explores the
framework of an experimental project aimed at developing nature-based
therapy and is an excellent example of an environmental therapy which
proceeds by bringing together both a therapeutic and an environmental
framework.
The next paper is John Osborne’s exploration of the ‘Existential and
psychological aspects of the transition to retirement’. Here the author considers
how the extended nature of retirement has created numerous psychological
issues now that retirement may sometimes be longer than the time spent in a
Editorial 315
work life. This innovative paper attempts to blend some of the fundamental
themes of existentialism with the psychological issues that occur prior to and in
retirement.
The fourth paper entitled ‘Increased participation in the life context, a
qualitative study of clients’ experiences of problems and changes after
psychotherapy’ is by Wilhelmsson-Göstas, Wiberg and Kjellin from Sweden.
The authors’ excellent aim is two-fold: to gain a deeper understanding of both
the participants’ problems that led them to seek help through psychotherapy,
and of similarities and variations in changes of these problems related to the
experience of either cognitive behavioural therapy or psychodynamic
psychotherapy.
Our last paper, before our book reviews, focuses on research and is by
Downloaded by [Adams State University] at 07:48 15 October 2014
Del Loewenthal
Department of Psychology, Roehampton University
Whitelands College, Holybourne Avenue, London, UK
d.loewenthal@roehampton.ac.uk
References
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Loewenthal, D. (forthcoming) Counseling and psychotherapy in the United Kingdom:
The future of the talking therapies. In R. Wu (Ed.) The handbook of counseling and
psychotherapy in an international context. Routledge.
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.).
London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
Morris, C., & Blaney, D. (2010). Work-based learning. In T. Swanwick (Ed.),
Understanding medical education: Evidence theory and practice (pp. 69–82).
Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics. London: Methuen.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, Double Day
Downloaded by [Adams State University] at 07:48 15 October 2014
and Company.
Sharpe, R., & Oliver, M. (2007). Supporting practitioners’ design for learning.
In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age:
Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 117–128). Abingdon: Routledge.
Snell, R., & Loewenthal, D. (2011). A training in post-existentialism: Placing Rogers
and psychoanalysis. In D. Loewenthal (Ed.), Post-existentialism and the psycholo-
gical therapies: Towards a therapy without foundations (pp. 137–156). London:
Karnac.