Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
HST206-handout-The Turkish Republic-1920s
* An oppostion that formed within the ruling elite and seperated itself from the
ruling party
* Have a liberal stance politically and economically
* Approve of secular and nationalist policies; however, oppose radical,
centralizing or authoritarian tendencies
* Therefore, defend the principle of separation of powers: legislative, executive,
and judicial
* Propose “evolutionary” change rather than “revolutionary” change
+ A rebellion breaks out in the Diyarbakir region of Turkey (South Eastern part) in February
1925. It is led by a Kurdish Naqshbandi sheikh.
+ Historiograpy approaches the nature of this event from three different perspectives:
b. As a religious movement:
* Based on the fact that the leader was a Naqshbandi sheikh (one of the
brotherhoods in Sufi Islam), the rallying cries in the upheaval asked for the re-
institution of the Sharia (Islamic Law) and the Caliphate
+ Results:
* The main preoccupation of the ruling elite at the was the establishment of the new
system in their vision – the rebellion gave them the chance to harshly suppress the
opposition voices. A new law called the Law for the Maintenance of Order was passed
that enabled the government to act authoritatively.
* The Kurdish question became a taboo subject
* Turkish nationalism gained momentum
2
HST206-handout-The Turkish Republic-1920s
+ This law empowered the government for two years to ban any organization or
publication it considered might cause disturbance to law and order.
+ The opposition party, the Progressive Reublican party, opposed it as being too vague
and elastic.
+ The law would be in force in the whole country, not only in the southeast where the
rebellion took place.
+ At the same time two Independence Tribunals (courts) were formed, one for the
eastern provinces and one for the rest of the country.Their duty was only the trials related
to this law.
+ Two years after the expiry, it was extended for two more years until 1929.
3
HST206-handout-The Turkish Republic-1920s
+ Mustafa Kemal sets out for an inspection visit to Southern and Western regions of Turkey.
He was expected in the city of Izmir on June 15 1926. A conspiracy plan to assasinate him is
uncovered.
+ Surviving memebers of the old Committee of Union Progress and the members of the closed-
down opposition party (Progressive People’s Party) are blamed
+ They are tried in the Independence Tribunal – first on spot later in Ankara
+ 20 execution and several jail sentences are given
4
HST206-handout-The Turkish Republic-1920s
+ The term is used to refer to the speech Mustafa Kemal delivered between 15-20 October 1927
in the Congress of the People’s Republican Party. (in 6 days, total of 36 hours)
+ Mustafa Kemal attributed a historical nature to this text and offered it as a history of the
events between 1919-1927. It starts with his arrival in Samsun in 1919
* It has been hotly discussed whether the text has a historical nature - however, it did
have a significan influence on historiography
+ Despite its claim to cover until 1927, the text more or less ends with the appearance of the
opposition party in 1924 – the Progressive People’s Party. Only 1.5% of the text is devoted to
the events after it.
* The text is rather a crticism of the opposition and the justification of their liquidation
* It presents the object of the resistance movement as having been the establishment of
Republic from the start
* The People’s Republican Party was actually formed in 1923. However, the text refers
to the Sivas Congress in 1919 as the fisrt Congress of that Party. In this way the text
identifies the party with the resistance movement and establishes an organic link
between them.