See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/222078052

Why offshore wind energy?

Article  in  Renewable Energy · February 2011

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.009

CITATIONS READS

247 2,250

4 authors:

M. Dolores Esteban J Javier Diez

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & Universidad Europea Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
72 PUBLICATIONS   909 CITATIONS    71 PUBLICATIONS   478 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Jose Santos Lopez-Gutierrez Vicente Negro

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
79 PUBLICATIONS   788 CITATIONS    111 PUBLICATIONS   885 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

risk & Resilience View project

SMARTeST - Smart Resilient Technologies, Systems and Tools View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Vicente Negro on 14 October 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Volume 36 Issue 2 February 2011 ISSN 0960-1481

ELSEVIER

Renewable Energy
AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

Ed itor-i n-Ch iet: A.A.M. Sayigh

Renewable Energy
AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

Editor-in-Chief: A. A. M. Sayigh

"

ELSEVIER
Amsterdam· Boston· London· New York· Oxford· Paris· Philadelphia· San Diego· St Louis
 RENEWABLE ENERGY, VOL. 36, ISS. 2

Contents
Reviews
K. Patlitzianas and K. Karagounis 429 The progress of RES environment in the most recent member states of the
ED
I. M. Atadashi, M. K. Aroua and 437 Biodiesel separation and purification: A review
A.A.Aziz
M. D. Esteban, J. J. Diez, J. S. L6pez and 444 Why offshore wind energy?
V. Negro
Articles
S. Haji 451 Analytical modeling of PEM fuel cell i-V curve
A. Gupta, R. P. Saini and M. P. Sharma 459 Modelling of hybrid energy system-Part I: Problem formulation and
model development
A. Gupta, R. P. Saini and M. P. Sharma 466 Modelling of hybrid energy system-Part 11: Combined dispatch strategies
and solution algorithm
A. Gupta, R. P. Saini and M. P. Sharma 474 Modelling of hybrid energy system-Part Ill: Case study with simulation
results
"Q. Shu, J. Gao, Y. Liao, D. Wang and 482 Estimation of the sauter mean diameter for biodiesels by the mixture
J.Wang topological index
A. A. EI-Ehwany, G. M. Hennes, E. I. Eid 488 Experimental investigation of the performance of an elbow-bend type heat
and E. EI-Kenany exchanger with a water tube bank used as a heater or cooler in alpha-type
Stirling machines
J. R. San Crist6bal 498 Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy
project in spain: The Vikor method
F. Ghorbani, H. Younesi, A. Esmaeili Sari 503 Cane molasses fermentation for continuous ethanol production in an
and G. Najafpour immobilized cells reactor by Saccharomyces cerevisiae
K. Tar, I. Farkas and K. R6zsavOlgyi 510 Climatic conditions for operation of wind turbines in Hungary
M. Q. Fan, L. X. Sun and F. Xu 519 Hydrogen production for micro-fuel-cell from activated AI-Sn-Zn-X
(X: hydride or halide) mixture in water
D.Kim 525 Improvement of structural and optoelectrical properties by post-deposition
electron beam annealing of ITO thin films
Inamuddin, T. A. Cheema, S. M. J. Zaidi 529 Three dimensional numerical investigations for the effects of gas diffusion
and S. U. Rahman layer on PEM fuel cell performance
A. Shigetomi, Y. Murai, Y. Tasaka and 536 Interactive flow field around two Savonius turbines
Y.Takeda
C.K.Ekman 546 On the synergy between large electric vehicle fleet and high wind
penetration - An analysis of the Danish case

(Contents continued on inside back cover)

Indexed!Abstracted in:
Cambridge Scientific Abstr., Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology, SC/SEARCH,
Research Alert. Also covered in the abstract and citation database SCOPUS®. Full text available on
ScienceDirect® ISSN 0960-1481

ELSEVIER 1111111111.11111111
0960-1481(201102)36:2;1-U

PRINTED BY POLESTAR WHEATONS LTD, EXETER, UK

(Contents continuedfrom outside back cover)
J. E. Stopa, K. F. Cheung and Y.-L. Chen
J. Morrissey, T. Moore and R. E. Horne
S. Luo, C. Liu, B. Xiao and L. Xiao
S. Karellas, K. Terzis and D. Manolakos
R. Vardimon
A. O. Menezes, M. T. Rodrigues,
A. Zimmaro, L. E. P. Borges and
M.A.Fraga
P. Sugandhavanija, S. Sukchai, N. Ketjoy
and S. Klongboonjit
C.Acikgoz
K. Kalidasa Murugavel and K. Srithar
B. Velazquez-Marti, E. Fernandez-
Gonzalez, I. Lopez-Cortes and
D. M. Salazar-Hernandez
E. Monteiro, V. Mantha and A. Rouboa
J. Fan, T. N. Kalnes, M. Alward,
J. Klinger, A. Sadehvandi and
D. R. Shonnard
N. H. Reich, W. G. J. H. M. van Sark and
W. C. Thrkenburg
Y. Hang, M. Qu and F. Zhao
R. Rayegan and Y. X. Tao
V. B. Miller, E. W. Ramde,
R. T. Gradoville Jr. and L. A. Schaefer
E. Uzlu, A. Akpmar and
M. ihsan Komiircii
G. Iglesias and R. Carballo
E. L. Kriiger, B. Givoni and C. Laroca
S. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Bu and
J.Bai
C.-H. Cheng and Y.-J. Yu
A. F. Zanette, R. A. Barella,
S. B. C. Pergher, H. Treichel, D. Oliveira,
M. A. Mazutti, E. A. Silva and J. V. Oliveira
554 Assessment of wave energy resources in Hawaii
568 Affordable passive solar design in a temperate climate: An experiment in
residential building orientation
578 A novel biomass pulverization technology
583 Investigation of an autonomous hybrid solar thermal ORC-PV RO
desalination system. The Chalki island case
591 Assessment of the potential for distributed photovoltaic electricity
production in Israel
595 Production of renewable hydrogen from aqueous-phase reforming of
glycerol over Pt catalysts supported on different oxides
600 Determination of effective university-industry joint research for
photovoltaic technology transfer (UIJRPTT) in Thailand
608 Renewable energy education in Turkey
612 Performance study on basin type double slope solar still with different
wick materials and minimum mass of water
621 Quantification of the residual biomass obtained from pruning of trees in
Mediterranean almond groves
627 Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in
Portugal
632 Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil
642 Charge yield potential of indoor-operated solar cells incorporated into
Product Integrated Photovoltaic (PIPV)
648 Economical and environmental assessment of an optimized solar cooling
system for a medium-sized benchmark office building in Los Angeles,
California
659 A procedure to select working fluids for Solar Organic Rankine Cycles
(ORCs)
671 Hydrokinetic power for energy access in rural Ghana
676 Restructuring of Turkey's electricity market and the share of hydropower
energy: The case of the Eastern Black Sea Basin
689 Wave resource in El Hierro-an island towards energy self-sufficiency
699 Simplified method for yearlong thermal analysis of building prototypes
709 Bio-hydrogen production from cornstalk wastes by orthogonal design
method
714 Dynamic simulation of a beta-type Stirling engine with cam-drive
mechanism via the combination of the thermodynamic and dynamic
models
726 Screening, optimization and kinetics of Jatropha curcas oil
transesterification with heterogeneous catalysts
(Contents continued on BMIl)
Contents continuedfrom inside back cover
A. Ramzy K., R. Kadoli and
T. P. Ashok Babu
A. Franco and P. Salza
R. Mari, L. Bottai, C. Busillo,
F. Calastrini, B. Gozzini and G. Gualtieri
Jalaluddin, A. Miyara, K. Tsubaki,
S. Inoue and K. Yoshida
S. A. Chowdhury, M. Mourshed,
S. M. R. Kabir, M. Islam, T. Morshed,
M. R. Khan and M. N. Patwary .
H. Chen, Y. Ding, N. T. Cong, B. Dou,
V. Dupont, M. Ghadiri and P. T. Williams
E. Harder and J. M. Gibson
M.Doman
P. D. Pouloupatis, G. Florides and
S. Tassou
Data Bank
D. Karamanis, C. Tsabaris, K. Stamoulis
and D. Georgopoulos
Technical Notes
K. Tar and S. Szegedi
J. Hu and Y. He
E. Xu, Q. Vu, Z. Wang and C. Yang
R. Nasiri and A. Radan
J. R. Hutchinson, P. J. Schubel
and N. A. Warrior
P. Puech and V. Tishkova
L. Reijnders
A. M. A. Haidar, P. N. John and
M. Shawal
Corrigendum
J.-Y. Park, Z.-M. Wang, D.-K. Kim
and J.-S. Lee
732 Improved utilization of desiccant material in packed bed dehumidifier
using composite particles
743 Strategies for optimal penetration of intermittent renewables in complex
energy systems based on techno-operational objectives
754 A GIS-based interactive web decision support system for planning wind
farms in Tuscany (Italy)
764 Experimental study of several types of ground heat exchanger using a steel
pile foundation
772 Technical appraisal of solar home systems in Bangladesh: A field
investigation
779 A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol
reforming: Thermodynamics and experimental
789 The costs and benefits of large-scale solar photovoltaic power production
in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
797 Solar-based rural electrification policy design: The Renewable Energy
Service Company (RESCO) model in Fiji
804 Measurements of ground temperatures in Cyprus for ground thermal
applications
815 Wind energy resources in the Ionian Sea
823 A statistical model for estimating electricity produced by wind energy
829 DFIG wind generation systems operating with limited converter rating
considered under unbalanced network conditions - Analysis and control
design
848 Modeling and simulation of 1 MW DAHAN solar thermal power tower
plant
858 Pole-placement control of 4-leg voltage-source inverters for standalone
photovoltaic systems: Considering digital delays
866 A cost and performance comparison of LRTM and VI for the manufacture
of large scale wind turbine blades
872 Thermodynamic analysis of a Stirling engine including regenerator dead
volume
879 The life cycle emission of greenhouse gases associated with plant oils
used as biofuel
881 Optimal configuration assessment of renewable energy in Malaysia
889 Corrigendum to "Effects of water on the esterification of free fatty acids
by acid catalysts" [Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 614-618]
 Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Renewable Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene

Review

Why offshore wind energy?

M. Dolores Esteban, J. Javier Diez*, Jose S. López, Vicente Negro
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Profesor Aranguren S/N, 28040 Madrid, Spain

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: At the beginning of 2010, only 2000 wind megawatts had been installed offshore. Although the first
Received 17 May 2010 offshore wind farm experiment took place in 1990, most of the facilities built up to now have been pilot
Accepted 14 July 2010 projects. Then, offshore wind power can be considered as an incipient market. However, just at this
Available online 14 August 2010
moment, the growth of this technology finally seems to be happening, being several countries at the top
of its development (the United Kingdom, Denmark, Holland, Sweden and Germany). This current situ-
Keywords:
ation, the raw materials problems and the general commitments to reduce the emissions of greenhouse
Offshore wind power
gases are leading to predict a promising future for this technology. This paper deals with a brief revision
Renewable energy
Conventional energy
of the state of the art of offshore wind power, followed by a critical discussion about the causes of the
Global warming recently growth that is currently happening. The discussion is based on the comparison of offshore wind
Greenhouse gases energy with other renewable energies (like onshore wind, marine hydrodynamics, hydraulic, solar, etc.)
and even with conventional power.
Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction
Several factors have been the key ones to push renewable
energies, being the most important ones the attribution of the
global warming to the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission from the
combustion of fossil fuels, the concern about the reduction of these
emissions by means of the introduction of greenhouse gases
emissions limits (Kyoto Protocol) and the search for energy security,
together with the aversion to the traditional fission nuclear power
and the lack of progression in the application of the fusion nuclear
power. Moreover, the increase of energy demand for the last years
and its recovery increase expected when the economical crisis will
finish (see Fig. 1), lead to a higher renewable energy push.
Wind energy has been the renewable power most used up to
now, mainly by means of onshore installations. This selective
progress can be explained due to both the high wind resource
availability and the high technology maturity of wind energy in
comparison with the rest of renewable energies. These two reasons
are likely the causes because the wind energy is considered
essential to achieve the commitments acquired in the Kyoto
Protocol. Anyway, the commitments success will require carrying
out several measures simultaneously [2], being one of them the
push of the construction of offshore wind farms.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34 913365384.
E-mail addresses: lolaestp@hotmail.com, mdesteban@ciccp.es (M.D. Esteban),
jjdiez@caminos.upm.es (J.J. Diez), jslopez@caminos.upm.es (J.S. López), vnegro@
caminos.upm.es (V. Negro).
Although the origin of offshore wind energy dates from the
nineties of the last century, the growth of this technology is just
beginning to happen in different ways depending on the country,
and according to several decisive factors: the limited space in land
for the development of onshore wind farms because of the
competing site usage, the less general environmental impact
caused by offshore wind energy, etc.
There are in fact reasons to expect the optimistic development
of offshore wind. This paper tries to explain the main reasons, based
on a summary and revision of the state of the art, and on the
discussion about the different technologies to produce electricity
and their relative efficiency and opportunities, differentiating
between conventional and renewable sources, and even among the
different renewable sources.
2. State of the art relating to offshore wind energy
Wind energy has been recognized as one of the key renewable
energy sources, and its main development has been through the
construction of onshore wind farms, having installed only 2000
offshore wind megawatts (MW) at the end of the year 2009.
Specifically, the first wind turbine in the sea was set up in
Sweden in 1990. This facility was formed by a single 220 kW
(kilowatts) wind turbine, located 350 m from the coast, and sup-
ported on a tripod structure anchored to the seabed about 6 m
deep.
Between 1991 and 1998, experimental low rating projects were
carried out whose different models of wind turbines and different

0960-1481/$ e see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.009
 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450 445

Fig. 1. (a) Energy demand around the world in the year 2007. (b) Energy demand forecasting in the year 2030 [1].

types of foundations were tested. Wind turbines of 450e600 kW As a result of this, offshore wind farms are beginning to take part
units rating were used for these projects, and distances of up to of the sea and coastal landscape in some countries, being located in
4 km from the coast and depths of up to 6 m were reached. dynamic and changing surroundings. An integral management
Although certain doubts were initially raised, these facilities model therefore needs to be applied enabling not only the technical
showed good profitability and reliability indices. and financial feasibility of the offshore wind farm project to be
Multimegawatt wind turbines were brought in later, in a second achieved, but also respect for the environment.
experimental phase, having been the Utgrunden project, built in As an essential part of this state of the art exposition, the
Sweden in 2000, the first project with those characteristics. Several evolution of offshore wind power since 1990 up to 2007 is exposed
of these facilities marked the commencement of the first in the Fig. 3, and the distribution of this power among the different
commercial wind farms: Blyth, Middelgrunden and Yttre Sten- countries is shown in the Fig. 4.
grund. Later, the Horns Rev and Nysted facilities, both on Danish In the next future, it is expected a huge increase of the offshore
coasts, were the confirmation of this type of facility’s adaptation to wind power installed, not only in the already experimented
the marine environment. countries, but also in another countries like France, Spain [4]. While
As from then, facilities of this type have continued being built.
And in fact, it is essential to push the use of offshore wind energy
(see Fig. 2) to achieve the commitments acquired in the Kyoto
Protocol.
As it has been exposed before, the growth of offshore wind
power is currently happening in different ways depending on the
country. This can be explained because of several decisive factors:
the different environment of the different countries e as the lack of
land space in some countries for the development of onshore wind
farms, sometimes due to the competing site usage, the expected
minor general environmental impact with offshore wind farms in
comparison with onshore wind farms, the government support, etc.
[3]. For example, while Holland has not practically free space in
land for this kind of installations, in the United Kingdom and
Denmark there are a public opposition to onshore wind farms and, Fig. 2. Comparison between the potential of onshore and offshore wind energy in
as a consequence of this, there is an important push for offshore different depths, and the energy demand in Europe. This graphic shows the need to
wind energy [4]. push offshore wind energy [5].
446 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450
Fig. 3. Growth of the offshore wind energy capacity since 1990 to 2007 [6].
some of these countries have suitable coastal characteristics for
offshore wind farm installations, not all of them; for example, the
Spanish coastal platform is very slope, and the seabed is very depth
close to the coast in comparison with other countries like Germany.
In fact, there are several theories e all of them with optimist
perspectives e about the evolution of the offshore wind power
installed (see Fig. 5).
3. Discussion
This discussion goes from the most general to the most detailed
issues, and it is organized in three sub-sections: 1) comparison
between renewable and conventional energies, 2) comparison
between wind energy and other types of renewable energies, and
3) comparison between offshore and onshore wind energy.
3.1. Renewable vs. conventional energy
Nowadays, the electricity market is based on the use of
conventional or traditional energy technologies, being important
also the participation of hydropower. Nevertheless, some of these
technologies came into crisis lately. Firstly, fossil fuel-based ones
came into crisis (oil crisis in the years 1973 and 1979); secondly,
fission nuclear energy came also into crisis although not in such
a general way as the fossil fuel-based technology. In fact, the
opposition to the use of fossils was established depending on the
countries and policy factors; thirdly, hydropower also fell into
crisis, which was justified by an environmental attitude that
appeared due to the lack of conservative criteria for the use of
hydrological resources. The classic large hydropower projects were
stopped, but also the development of small-scale hydropower.
Fig. 4. Distribution of the offshore wind megawatts in operation in the different
countries at the beginning of the year 2009 [7].
Fig. 5. Different theories about the expected development of offshore wind power in
Europe [4].
In those years, a general interest about the adjustment of fusion
nuclear power existed. The passage of time has made evident the
error about the fusion power expectative, and renewed the demand
for the fission power. And, on the other hand, the objections about
hydropower and maritime installations were reduced.
All that leads to the push of renewable energy (including
hydropower), which can already be considered as part of the
current electricity market, although not in a general way. As has
been exposed before, several are being the key reasons to push
renewable energies, being one of them the reduction of the carbon
dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.
This implies that renewable energies let to achieve additional
energy security because of the use of the own resources of a region,
being able these ones to answer in a relative way to the increase of
the cost energy of the raw materials that are not controlled at all by
this region. Besides, another advantage of renewable energies is the
no contribution in a significant way to the emissions of carbon
dioxide (see Fig. 6), leaving the Earth almost intact for next
generations.
In the decision-making about investments, energy industry is
supported on the use of economical models to calculate and
compare the energy cost of the different technologies. The most
used ones are related with the “levelized cost of power”, which
depends on capital cost, operating costs and fuel costs. In the Figs. 7
and 8, the comparison between the levelized cost of different
technologies and the forecast for different years is exposed, and it
can be observed the scarce difference between the relative to
onshore wind and the conventional technologies. Also, it is
important to take into account that some of these technologies,
mainly the renewable ones, are capital intensive but have low
operational costs, while fossil fuel-based technologies may be
cheaper to construct but much more expensive to operate [8].
Fig. 6. Lifetime emissions of carbon dioxide for various power generation technologies [8].
 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450
Fig. 7. Comparative levelized costs of different generating technologies [9].
The levelized cost can be understood as the first analysis for the
discussion about the economic issues of the different technologies
to generate electricity. However, it is important to take into account
the risk related with the difficulty to estimate the fluctuation of the
cost of the raw materials for the operation of some of these tech-
nologies, mainly the fossil fuel ones. On the other hand, there are
several factors than can distort the energy cost, which are the
subsidies (related to the economic incentives fixed by the govern-
ments to push a specific power generation technology, modifying
the offer and demand market. Subsidies are related to the economic
incentives fixed by the governments to push a specific power
generation technology, modifying the offer and demand market.
Nowadays, renewable energies need from economic incentives to
push the companies to invest in those kinds of technologies, but not
in the same range depending on the technology), the externalities
(related to the cost for the society because the use of a specific
technology, and often are ignored. These include the cost to take
into account factors such as the environmental degradation, the
deteriorating human health, which some technologies incur, the
security of fuel supply, etc. e see Fig. 9) and the structural costs
(related to the costs of adapting conventionally structured
Fig. 8. Future levelized cost comparison between different technologies, between 2010
and 2030 [11].
447
electricity transmission and distribution delivery networks to
accommodate intermittent sources of electricity) [10].
Figs. 10 and 11 show the ranking of the different technologies,
both currently and in the future, and it can be observed the
expectation about the prospect rapprochement between conven-
tional and renewable energies, being essential the investments in
the last ones to achieve it.
3.2. Wind energy vs. other renewable energies
Wind energy has been clearly the fastest in its development
among all the renewable energies (see Fig. 12), although in this
statement hydropower must not be taken into account because of
its different origin and way of development in comparison with the
other ones. Estimations suggest that global wind energy could
generate between 20,000 TWh and 50,000 TWh of electricity each
year; and to put that into some perspective, annual global elec-
tricity consumptions in 2004 was around 17,000 TWh. Anyway,
note that a recent estimate establishes the global offshore resource
around 37,000 TWh [12].
The importance of wind energy in comparison with other types
of renewable technologies could be explained due to the combi-
nation of two factors: the availability of resources and the maturity
of the technology in term of cost efficiency. Regarding the first one,
it is clear the huge availability of wind energy, but also of solar,
wave and current, much more than geothermal, small-scale
hydropower and biomass. And regarding the second one, the
maturity of wind energy is high because this has been used since
olden times in many economic activities: sailing, irrigation, milling,
etc., having not so a long evolution other technologies like solar,
wave and currents.
Although the push of offshore wind power is clear, and wind
technology should take the opportunity of the advantages achieved
onshore to move forward in the sea as soon as possible, it would be
necessary to push the rest of the technologies (wave, currents, etc.)
to achieve a similar evolution as the wind one, although more
concentrated in time. This only will be possible with the govern-
ment support looking for research projects and experimental
installations. Regarding the levelized cost (See Fig. 7), nowadays
onshore wind is close to the conventional technologies, but
offshore is still far, and more even the marine hydrodynamic ones;
but in the future it is expected the distances will be reduced.
3.3. Offshore vs. onshore wind energy
In 2007, it was the first time that wind energy achieved the 1% of
the electricity generated in the world [8], almost all of them cor-
responding to onshore wind farms. In fact, there were only
2000 MW installed offshore at the end of 2009, certainly a symbolic
amount. As it has been exposed in the state of the art, offshore wind
energy is being pushed differently depending on the countries and
Fig. 9. External costs for various power generation technologies within the Europe
Union [6].
448 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450
Fig. 10. The relative competitiveness of power generation technologies in 2005, 2008
and 2018 [8].
the policy approaches. In general, the current growth of offshore
wind energy might be explained on the basis of several deter-
mining factors, being the most important ones the lack of space in
land in some countries for the development of onshore wind farms,
sometimes due to the competing site usage, the expected general
minor impact in the environment with offshore wind farms in
comparison with onshore ones, the government support, etc. Also,
the combination of resources availability and technology maturity
of offshore wind is closer to onshore wind than other renewable
technologies. As a result, offshore wind farms are beginning to form
part of the sea and coastal landscape.
The main difference between onshore and offshore wind
installations is on their respective environment, which are much
more complex in the sea not only for the design but also for the
construction and operation works, because of the significant
increase of the factors that can condition all of them. In the
following paragraphs, the most emphasized advantages and
disadvantages of the offshore wind technology in comparison with
the onshore one are exposed [13e17].
The first advantage is the better quality of the wind resource in
the sea, where wind speed is usually bigger, even increasing with
the distance to the coast, and more uniform (softer), leading to less
turbulence effects; therefore the fatigue is less important and let to
increase the lifetime of the offshore wind turbine generator. Other
considerations due to the quality relates to the height at which
a wind turbine is placed (the optimum height for a given offshore
Fig. 11. The relative competitiveness of power generation technologies in 2008 and
2018 [8].
Fig. 12. Annual global wind capacity additions and cumulative installed capacity, in
MW, between 1980 and 2007 [8].
turbine diameter is that whose rotating blades are above the
maximum wave height at the site). The characteristics of the layer
of turbulent air adjacent to the ground and to the sea surface allow
the offshore turbine to be mounted lower than the equivalent
onshore machine.
The second advantage becomes from the bigger suitable free
areas in the sea where offshore wind farms can be installed, leading
to greater installations. Its placement (far from population areas)
lets to reduce the environmental regarding the noise emission,
nearly all related with the increase of the blade-spit speed. Also,
this large distance allows, in some cases, to reduce the visual
impact from the coast. All of these statements, together with the
not such strict limitations in connection with the load to transport,
make possible to install bigger wind turbine units, achieving more
production per install unit.
On the contrary, the first disadvantage is the cost of the
permitting and engineering process, and of the construction and
operation phases. In onshore wind farms, the cost of wind gener-
ator turbines is around 75% total cost of the Project, being this
percentage in offshore installations approximately 33%, which can
be explained as mainly due to the high costs of the sea operations.
Besides, unlike onshore wind farms, there are not usually marine
electrical infrastructures that connect the highest wind resource
areas with the consumer centers, leading to the construction of
longer electrical networks, and even to strengthen the existing
electrical infrastructures.
The offshore wind farm cost per megawatt was estimated, some
years ago, around 2 MV/MW (see Fig. 13), much more than in
offshore wind farms. Nevertheless, this cost has increased and
nowadays, some offshore wind installations are around 4 MV/MW
[18], increase that can be justified because of the learning process
still happening.
A second disadvantage is the necessity of a more developed
offshore wind farms technology. This is essential for the wind
turbine generators (usually similar to onshore ones, but some
research projects are trying to decide which is the most suitable
wind turbine generator type for offshore wind farm, especially with
floating foundation), which will be subjected to high loads and
must to adapt themselves to the marine environment and, there-
fore, to be prepared for the corrosion conditions; also in the
foundations, in the marine operations because of the importance of
accessibility restrictions and the difficulties existing to work in this
environment during the construction and operation phases, etc.
And a third disadvantage is that, due to the limited roughness of
the sea surface, the turbulences propagation are higher offshore
than onshore; then wake effects provoked by the own wind turbine
generators are very important leading to a big impact over the
 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450
Fig. 13. Evolution of cost per megawatt installed offshore in the United Kingdom [19].
lifetime of the wind turbines. To reduce it, the wind turbines must
be disposed obeying a minimum separation among them. Also the
wind resource evaluation is much more complex and expensive
than onshore.
So that although it is evident the difference between the cost of
onshore and offshore wind power, some efforts have to be made to
push the offshore wind technology, and there will be necessary the
improvements of knowledge in several issues like wind turbines,
foundations, construction and operation phases, etc.
4. Conclusions
Science and technology have served to the political power, or
have changed it, for too long time: then these must collaborate
changing the whole consumption paradigm, so that sun light,
ocean movements and winds is becoming in necessary power
sources.
Offshore wind power is undoubtedly going to constitute an
increasing source of power since now, in accordance with the farm
settlement feasibility and the improving management capability.
Something similar although different in the time will happen with
diffuse marine power sources like wave, current and tide/set up;
this will happen only when the technical capability for concen-
tration of their power can be developed.
Offshore and onshore wind farms are different in many issues,
such as the higher cost of the former, mainly because of the
foundations, the electrical networks, and the construction and
operation works. It must be emphasized the still necessary
knowledge improvements to be acquired in many offshore issues:
wind resource, environmental impact, foundation design, optimi-
zation of the electrical connection, wind turbines generators,
construction and operation phases, etc. So, this technology can be
still considered within its learning curve and this could explain the
increase of the cost per megawatt installed in the current instal-
lations, in comparison with the offshore farms installed some
years ago.
Offshore wind can be considered as an incipient market, with
only 1500 MW built up to the middle of the year 2009, and with
most of the facilities built up to now since 1990 being experimental
or pilot projects. Nowadays, offshore wind is not an economically
449
feasible technology yet; it still requires in fact the technical and
economical support by Public Administration Agencies for its
development. The main offshore wind power development focus is
in North Europe, where countries like the United Kingdom and
Germany are pushing this technology, taking so the opportunity to
push also their national industries.
It is necessary to push this technology to achieve the goals
established in the Kyoto Protocol. This is due to the resources
availability and the technology maturity, in term of cost efficiency
in comparison with other renewable technologies. In fact, the
future of this technology can be understood as promising, and it is
expected that offshore wind farms are going to begin to form part of
the sea and coastal landscape.
Besides, some R&D efforts will have to be made regarding the
marine hydrodynamics technologies (wave, tidal and current
power) because of its short development up to now, looking to
achieve a similar maturity as the wind energy; only so, these
renewable sources will be able to take part of the electricity market
in the future. Nevertheless, there is still a long way to cover.
References
[1] Casla A. Evolución del Mercado Eólico. Jornada de Energías Renovables de la
Expo; 2008. Spain, p. 14.
[2] Esteban MD, Diez JJ, López JS, Negro V. Integral management applied to
offshore wind farms. Journal of Coastal Research 2009;SI56:1204e8.
[3] Ackermann, T.; Leutz R, Hobohm, J. World-wide offshore wind potential and
European projects. Power engineering Society Summer Meeting 2001, Van-
couver, Canada, p. 4-9.
[4] The Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs. Development of offshore wind
energy in Europe. Technical Report; 2004. The Netherlands, p. 44.
[5] Ceña A. Evacuación de la energía e integración en la red eléctrica. Jornada de
nuevas energías en el mar: aspectos tecnológicos y de negocio; 2009. Madrid,
p. 60.
[6] Breeze P. The cost of power generation. The current and future competitiveness
of renewable and traditional technologies. Business Insights; 2008. p. 122.
[7] www.ewea.org. European wind energy association web.
[8] Breeze P. The future of wind power. Increasing economic competitiveness as
the technology matures. 1st ed. London, UK: Business Insights; 2008. p. 128.
[9] Breeze P. The future of clean coal. Business Insights; 2007.
[10] Breeze P. The future of global offshore wind power. The technology,
economics and impact of wind power generation. 1st ed. London, UK: Busi-
ness Insights; 2004. p. 125.
[11] Black, Veatch. Percent wind energy penetration in the united states: a tech-
nical analysis of the energy resource; 2007. Technical Report for the American
Wind Energy Assocation.
450 M.D. Esteban et al. / Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 444e450
[12] Leutz R, Ackermann T, Suzuki A, Akisawa A, Kashiwagi T. Offshore wind
energy potential around the Globe. Proceedings European Wind Energy
Conference. Copenhague; 2002.
[13] Sheng JD. Offshore wind energy: the next North sea soil. Journal Sea Tech-
nology; 2008:33e5.
[14] Esteban M.D. Propuesta Metodológica para la Implantación de Parques Eólicos
Offshore. Ph.D. Report. Madrid, Spain; 2009.
[15] Greenpeace. Viento en popa. La necesidad de un plan eólico marino en
España. Technical Report, Spain; 2003. p. 28.
View publication stats
[16] Herman S.A.; Kooijman H.J.T., Hendriks H.B. Variations on a 500 MW offshore
wind farm design. Offshore windenergy in Mediterranean and other Euro-
peans seas Conference. Napoles, Italy; 2003. 10 pp.
[17] International Energy Agency. Wind energy annual report 2006. Technical
Report, Spain; 2006. 271 pp.
[18] Olea J.M. Mecanismos de financiación de los parques eólicos marinos: análisis
de riesgos, esquemas y alternativas de financiación. Offshore Wind Farms
Conference 2008, Madrid, Spain, 36 pp.
[19] www.emerging-energy.com. Emerging energy research web.