Assignment no 1

(ARTICLE–REVIEW)
Submitted To: Miss Saniya
Submitted By: Urwa Sajjad 439- FSS-BSIR-F17
Wardah Asif 491-FSS-BSIR-F17
Article Name: The Middle East in International Affairs
written by LOUISE FAWCETT which was published in
July, 2018.

1
Introduction:
The Middle East region has long attracted and continuous to attract very high
levels of interest. The continuous fallout from the Arab uprisings currently
centered on events in Syria and Yemen is one recent reminder. Its politics and
international relations have occupied a place in history, reflecting importance of
British interest in Middle East generally. A quick tally of published articles verifies
this. A number of other articles touched upon Middle Eastern topic in less directed
ways and a number of general issues have included. Furthermore international
affairs started publishing special issues the first was in 1974 that was focusing on
Arab Israel war, the next one is in 2009 dedicated to the region of north Africa,
then in 2010 the topic was post American Iraq, in 2013 the legacy of Iraq war and
then finally in 2017 contentious boarders the special issue from which the idea of
this virtual issue derived. The first virtual issue on MENA was published in 2013.
This high level of interest is unsurprising for reasons that relate also to the very
timing of the general appearance its establishment in 1922 coincided with an
intense period of British presence in MENA through its role in treaties after the
First World War. This is captured in the first article by ARNOLD WILLSON
published in the aftermath of these treaties in 1926. The agreements held to define
the contemporary turn overs of MENA, the sykis, picot treaty and the balf our
declaration making in respect of the region that becomes Middle East. The San
Remo treaty 1920 formally defined mandates it give governance structure with
League of Nations which gave Britain and France substantial role in defining
regional territory, politics ,economics and society. The mandate period itself was
relatively short, independent states emerged after the Second World War but its
legacy prove long lasting. In cold war and post-cold war eras the legacy of British
and French environment has an impact on the region’s international relations. In
1991 gulf war, Middle East peace process the 2003 Iraq war and 2011 the
intervention in Libya are some recent examples. The legacy remains highly topical.
A theme picked up in international affairs special issue on MENA comprising of
boarder contestation and territorial disputes. The western influence is always
present the nearly hundred year history of MENA and have been brought into relief
by the Arab uprisings. It is easy to justify a virtual issue on Middle East at start of
2018 making hundred years of Middle East to that of hundred years of general

2
history. It’s an over statement to say that the regions continuous to attract
enormous interest.
The inductory peace sets the scene for the virtual issue by locating a chosen
articles in the history of the general and enduring questions about the regions
politics and international relations. The choices include several studies on relations
between MENA and the west, the refuges crisis, the nature of Iranian foreign
policy, the rise of new states, the roles of external powers including cold war and
post-cold war periods evolving various influences of Islam. This selection not only
reflects on important issues surrounding MENA but also tries to capture some of
the important moments in its history. The selection also draws upon expertise of
individual which makes writing about modern Middle East politics and history.
Some of the authors are notable scholars and policy makers whose influences were
written into regional histories.

Britain's moment in the Middle East:

The articles talked about here generally date from the experience of the Middle
East since the Second World War where the pertinence of contemporary issues to
the present global request is especially clear. In any case various pieces from the
most punctual releases of the diary are of enthusiasm for stamping out the future
landscape especially from a British point of view for this was as Elizabeth Monroe
appropriately called it England's minute in the Middle East. Some of these are not
scholastic articles thusly, rather conversation pieces by arrangement producers
however they are regardless uncovering in their substance. The principal article by
Arnold Wilson, a British authority who filled in as common magistrate in Iraq
from 1918 to 1920 is a valid example. Distributed in 1926, and essentially called
The Middle East a sign of the locale's new assignment by western forces was first
perused as a discourse at Chatham House. It appropriately catches the various parts
of Britain's minute with its orderly contradictions. Though Wilson was to some
degree a disputable figure, whose perspectives didn't generally line up with those
of individual approach creators he restricted, for instance, the autonomy of Iraq it
uncovers those components of pride and partiality of British strategy producers in
deciphering local occasions in the mid-1920s. Promising a brief review of Arabia,
Palestine and Syria it dances from state to state communicating questions about
Ibn Saud's initiative and the capacities of the recently brought into the world Saudi

3
Arabia to join the League of Nations a calm fulfillment at the situation of Iraq
where King Faisal is hailed for his accomplishment in joining Iraqi people groups
doubt in regards to Turkey (as previous war time adversary) and applause for Reza
Shah Pahlavi’s changing energy in Persia (Iran) with the assistance of a huge and
expanding staff of US residents.
There is a sure incongruity today in ascribing the ascent of the Pahlavi Shah to US
support given that US association in Iran was obviously one factor in the
government's ruin in 1979. At last on Palestine and what was then Trans-Jordan
while conceding that Lord Balfour's ongoing visit to Palestine had been a slip-up
the speaker expressed his conviction that extensively the approach currently being
followed is the most ideal in the conditions. It is anything but difficult to pick
statements to score focuses against British approach and to be shrewd after
occasions yet one can't however be struck by the degree to which British
authorities basically misunderstood things.

Rising powers:
In the event that the above article is purposely peppy on Iran's possibilities offering
a list of things to get for the rising Iranian system and its relationship with the West
it isn't without notice connotations about Iran's independence and want for
freedom. This freedom guaranteed by the Allied Declaration on Iran would be
affirmed considerably more obstinately after the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Far
starker are the admonitions in another article written around the same time by the
British antiquarian H. A. R. Gibb. In it a portion of the stewing area wide
difficulties that previous articles have implied ascend to the surface. Gibb a
prominent student of history of Arabism and Islam reviews the locale in 1944
watching the across the board provincial restlessness and premonition. He focuses
to the new directions created by the war specifically the seriousness of financial
conditions and theorizes on conceivable future local choices including the ascent of
armed force based autocracy a Moslem unrest or an enemy of Western
development speaking to the old Moslem feeling of solidarity. Every one of these
results have in this way developed regardless of whether military upsets in the
1950 and 1960s to supplant the systems introduced by previous frontier powers
and the tirelessness of significant level military impact an Islamic transformation
(in Iran) with overflows somewhere else and an enemy of western development

4
speaking to Islamic solidarity which has described various times of the district's
history directly through to the present. Remarking additionally on the developing
jobs of the US and Russia Gibb urges joint effort between the wartime partners.
His smartness on universal legislative issues (as on household governmental
issues) and how to deflect a territorial emergency goes to a great extent unnoticed
as Cold War follows in the Middle East and other local theaters as investigated
further beneath.

Simmering regional tension:

The fourth article composed a couple of years after the fact by the Israeli
negotiator and government official Abba Eban however progressively idealistic in
tone handles a related subject. Entitled to some degree tastelessly some social and
social issues of the Middle East it gives a depiction solution and a warning. He
thinks about the cutoff points and traps to procedures of westernization which for
Eban were the way to provincial advancement. In exquisite writing he depicts an
awkward middle stage where men have cut themselves untied from a total and
bound together culture which was their own and only contacted the outside of a
different universe which they seek to enter. Some have opposed he portrays the
Wahhabi development as a confirmation of Islamic independence and a refusal to
endeavor the Westernizing transformation by any stretch of the imagination. The
western vision he accepts can win however just under specific conditions if the
Middle East wishes to bring the West into its restoring life the endeavor can
possibly thrive if the West is acknowledged as an unbreakable entire a brought
together arrangement of culture and society.
Eban's attention is on the Arab world yet this was not just an Arab issue. A
significant number of the strains he suggests are as applicable to a nation like Iran
where both a certification of independence (effectively noted in 1944) and
dismissal of the West went with the Iranian Revolution of 1979. They are likewise
important to the instance of Turkey, which has wound up comparatively got
between various inclinations. These are caught in the accompanying article
wherein history specialist Bernard Lewis investigates three inclinations in Turkey
which have coincided and contended after some time Islam Ottomanism and
Turkism. He sees how the recently settled Turkish Republic embraced the
possibility of the Turkish country however that its fundamental mainstream quality

5
was never fully as complete as was now and again accepted. Lewis at that point
focuses to various indications of expanding strict movement. Writing in the mid-
1950s he takes note of how it isn't anything but difficult to evaluate this job of
strict restoration in present day Turkey alluding to future difficulties that are
especially suitable for an investigation of Turkey today where the standards of
Kemalism and political Islam remain in apparent pressure. This equivalent topic is
tended to over six decades later in a 2017 audit article on the conundrums of the
new Turkey where Ayla Göl shows that the constancy of Islam as a major aspect of
the nation's history, culture and society has made Turkey's first Catch in state
society relations. With protected radicalism imperiled Turkey today is in unrest.
The inquiry she closes is whether most of individuals in Turkey will choose to
praise the centennial of the Turkish republic in 2023 as a mainstream republic or
an Islamic one.
Still on the subject of stewing strains and symptomatic of continuous provincial
issues Owen Tweedy's article in 1952 portrays the locale's exile tragedy in the
wake of the principal Arab Israel War of 1948. That war saw the removal of
800,000 Arabs from what became Israel. For the individuals who have followed
the history and later outcast and compassionate emergencies of the district
Tweedy's piece on the displaced people of the 1950s makes for convincing
perusing. Tweedy an Anglo-Irish Arabist and columnist uncovers the condition of
the camps depicting some frightful pictures of refugees and analyzing the
worldwide office assigned to think about them (UNWRAA). He recognizes
different reasons for Arab hatred: against Israel on whose very victories the
displaced person emergency is based and whose banks had solidified Arab exile
resources Britain that critically deserted those for whose premiums as required of
Palestine we had been mindful lastly, the United Nations and America And it is
shocking how they are consequently sectioned together. He interfaces this disdain
to an across the board development of against Western inclination a kind of
shading bar backward.
Tweedy's going with suggestions for the UN, Britain and different powers for the
most part went unnoticed however his depiction of the district's displaced person
tragedy holds all its importance when Arab outcasts from the locale's numerous
wars have created grave compassionate emergencies setting loads on neighboring

6
states and uncovering the warmish promise to philanthropy of states further away
from home.
Rather than the melancholy admonitions over no quick pressures are anticipated in
the topic of the following article on Kuwait which not just conceives the rising of
that little state yet in addition the rise of the destined to be prosperous Gulf region.
While such little states during the 1950s had little organization got between an
endeavors to quick track state building and oppose the predation of outside forces
Kuwait's story is a fascinating one as this article appears. Composed by the student
of history and local master Elizabeth Monroe this piece offers an infiltrating
understanding on the chances and difficulties confronting such a state got again in
the later article on Qatar. She begins with the tale of an explorer to Kuwait who
thanks his host for giving him a ringside seat for the Creation proceeding to depict
in straight to the point terms the conditions encompassing the quick development
of a solid little town. While the Kuwait of 1954 is a long ways from the prosperous
developing city of the late twentieth century. Monroe hails the achievements of its
pioneers and the eagerness of the individuals for intentionally changing over their
recently discovered oil riches. She additionally focuses to the forthcoming
difficulties the requirement for monetary expansion to lessen oil reliance, and the
unanswerable inquiry of things to come whether so desirable a spot can hold the
freedom that has right now saved mainly because of indirect however consistent
British security. The Iraq attack of Kuwait in 1990 prompting global mediation the
next year will gave an answer.
International relations and regional crises
States like Kuwait were clearly not key players in international relations however
their roles would come to affect the conduct of other regional states, regardless of
whether in the Gulf War, Iraq War or Arab uprisings. The following two pieces
think about more legitimately local elements and the difficulties confronting
outside forces, and their at last blended record in providing regional order.
The article by Charles Issawi was composed the year after the groundbreaking
occasions encompassing the foundation of the United Arab Republic (UAR) in
1958. This was a key Arab patriot minute—one that saw the brief association of
Egypt and Syria. Issawi, an Egyptian born economic history specialist, analyzes
the difficulties confronting the area at that point and features what he sees as the

7
immense detach among Arab and western policies. He alludes to the continuous
arrangement of catastrophes which the West has endured in the eastern portion of
the Arab world over the most recent couple of years, contending that ethically the
West is totally ruined. As a ruthless colonialist and crazy war hawk, the West is
more vulnerable than whenever over the most recent 50 years, and feeble no matter
how you look at it: ethically, socially, economically and strategically; it was
additionally frail corresponding to its principle rival, the USSR. The Arabs are 'no
longer awed. Issawi's recommendation toward the West was to quit contradicting
patriotism, to yield its significant goals, and lessen its reliance on Arab oil,
highlighting the gigantic undiscovered shale assets in the US. In the end, the UAR
flopped as much due to inward logical inconsistencies as outer pressures, however
his center contention is incredible regardless. Sixty years on the Arab world is far
more grounded, whenever isolated, and positively not 'awed'
Issawi’s warnings to the West about its failure to gauge regional politics and lack
of superb engagement with the Arab world may have been accurate, but his
predictions of western weak spot had been premature, as printed in the subsequent
article. Rostow’s take on the Middle East is that it is principally a stage on which
superpower rivalries are performed out, and in that competition the US dominated.
Without disputing the centrality of the Arab Israel conflict, Rostow’s approach
shifts attention away from regional politics and ideologies and places regional
events firmly in a world context. Rostow, a Professor at Yale University and
Visiting Fellow at Oxford when the article used to be published, duly writes that
‘the Middle East disaster is no longer a regional quarrel about Israel’s proper to
exist. It is, on the contrary, a split in the basis of world politics a Soviet challenge
to the relationship of Western Europe and the United States, and therefore to the
stability of electricity on which the possibility of cutting-edge peace depends. As
such, the possibility of Soviet hegemony in MENA is no longer one that the US
and NATO can view with ‘merely educational curiosity. This is a simple realist
account about the present day balance of strength to which International Relations
students can with no trouble relate one which envisages the US playing a main
function to counter Soviet expansionism. If Rostow’s understanding of the Soviet
hazard is overstated, his grasp of the USSR’s considerable and longstanding
pursuits in MENA is mainly convincing in the mild of the moves and have an
effect on of Russia in the vicinity today, the subject of Roy Allison’s article below.

8
One prescription for reducing regional tensions is to tackle the central difficulty of
peace between Israel and its Arab neighbours, working inside the UN framework
with US or NATO guarantees presenting Arab states and choice to Soviet safety.
Fast forward twenty years it is 1991 and there is no regional peace. It’s a long way
cry from Rostow’s world the Cold War used to be rapidly winding down, and the
central factors of the fighting described above are no longer in place at least for the
time being. Though the late 1980s noticed a ceasefire in the longstanding Iran Iraq
War, the Middle East is no longer part of any quit of Cold War dividend. Indeed,
the Middle East crisis continues at every other level, as advised in the title of the
piece by using Yezid Sayigh. With Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and the
global intervention that followed, the Gulf is at the epicenter of regional politics,
however as soon as greater the disaster is of a greater widely wide-spread nature.
Sayigh portrays this as a failure of Arab regional order. He describes how the
ancient Arab order one primarily based on Arab cohesion of the sort illustrated
through Issawi, which had helped to grant a regional balance of power is no longer
in place, enabling the expansionist ambitions of Saddam Hussein. His is also an
indictment in opposition to individual Arab states, against a new generation of
Arab leaders, whose egocentric and divisive policies have undermined the safety of
states and any feel of a collective regional safety system. Though the Nineteen
Nineties would see essential steps towards addressing the longstanding struggle
between Israel and the Arab states, these efforts were eventually frustrated. Nearly
two a long time on there is nevertheless no feel of any functioning regional
security gadget and no on the spot prospect of growing one. Arab politics stay
characterized by division and the pursuit of selfinterested insurance policies.
The failure of the ‘West’
The failure of the Arab regional system as described by means of Sayigh is to some
extent, additionally the failure of western powers. This was possibly no longer
obvious in the on the spot post-Cold War order where western hubris was seen in
the enunciation of a ‘new world order’ by US President George W. Bush an order
with MENA at its heart. The revamped European Union was part of this afterglow,
rolling out a set of insurance policies designed to decorate its new international
repute and reach. However, from the perspective of 2018, neither the US nor the
European powers the liveliest exponents of the Bush vision could declare any long

9
lasting successes. The subsequent two articles describe the frustrations and
disappointments of European and US policy in the Middle East and the areas
thereby created for the upward push of other actors. The first article beneath this
heading captures Europe’s enduring Middle East quandary and projects it into the
twenty-first century. Despite a wealthy if complicated records of engagement with
the region, European powers, have been in a position to correctly put in force a
new set of regional policies. The article by way of Kristina Kausch and Richard
Youngs 18 takes a critical seem to be at European insurance policies in the Middle
East from the standpoint of 2009. They regardless of a plethora of well-resourced
and plenty publicized Neighborhood or Mediterranean focused policies designed to
create a safe and at the same time worthwhile house for MENA–EU relations, the
consequences have been disappointing. The Euro Med imaginative and prescient
could have been a platform for economic, political and social development, but
that vision has languished the subsequent Spanish backed Union for the
Mediterranean proposal, instead than supplying a new lease of life was another nail
in the coffin. Key positions on democratization and human rights had been watered
down rather than promotion good governance the EU was once content with good
ample governance. This was once a factor brought forcefully home by way of the
toppling of the Supported Tunisian regime in 2011 showing how in Rosemary
Hollis’s words the EU had been no friends to democratization.
If the record of Europe in MENA is a second-rate one, the US record also merits
critical analysis. On the tenth anniversary of the Iraq War, and with Obama
embarking on his second term Fawaz Gerges20 exposes the myth of a
transformative policy agenda and analyses why US Middle East policy persistently
fails. Obama’s policy is characterized by continuity over change: From the
PalestinianIsraeli peace to Afghanistan, Obama’s conduct affirms to the structural
and institutional continuity of US foreign policy. In a changed regional and global
environment, no longer reflective of a unipolar order, US policy is increasingly
challenged by states for whom deference to the West is no longer the norm. Gerges
likens the end of America’s moment in MENA to the end of Britain’s moment
nearly fifty years earlier the Arab world no longer holds the Americans in awe:
America is neither be scared nor trusted to act rationally and wisely preserve world
peace.

10
Whether or not one accepts the full weight of this argument the above article was
written before the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and the election of Donald Trump in
2016 it is difficult to disagree on the universal discrediting of western policies, the
pivoting away from MENA or on the emergence of new regional and extra
regional actors who an increasing number of vie for influence. In respect of extra
regional powers, the one to notice is, of course, Russia in many approaches the
beneficiary of western indecision over the Syrian hostilities and the prior fallout
from the Libyan intervention. Russia, like European powers, shares the MENA
neighbourhood and has long mounted regional interests there, as cited some place
else in this introduction. Russia emerges from the regional crisis as a conceivable
winner in the feel of being capable to capitalize on western weakness, providing
mediating roles whilst cultivating its nearby partners, notably Syria and Iran as
printed in the article by means of Roy Allison. The guide for Assad, reflecting
longstanding hyperlinks with the Syrian regime, aligns with its wider regional
strategic concerns, supplying Russia an entry factor and vehicle for the extension
of its protection pursuits in the near abroad. In fending off regional chaos, Allison
remarks how President Putin seems to accept as true with that ‘the tenacity of the
Russian function on Syria has earned it larger regional have an effect on in the
Middle East as properly as more desirable world popularity as a central participant
in this foremost worldwide crisis. Within the vicinity itself, other states
increasingly more flex their muscle tissues in a changed regional environment in
which western impact has been steadily downgraded. Gerges’s list of regional
powers blanketed Iran, Turkey and Israel, all of whom, in extraordinary ways, have
been empowered. So has Saudi Arabia. All these ‘rising powers’, some of whose
prior trajectories have been mapped out earlier, have been more and more placing
regional agendas to align with their hobbies and security concerns. Iran, Saudi
Arabia and Israel, much less at once affected by using domestic unrest than
Turkey, have as a consequence won status. Iran and Saudi Arabia are predominant
competitors in an energy struggle that is reshaping regional alliances. Such power
struggles also draw in different rising states like Qatar the concern of the
penultimate article by means of Lina Khatib. With its ‘astute public diplomacy’
and expansive foreign policy Qatar has risen in two many years to emerge as one
of the main regional players of the Middle East. Like Kuwait, however to a greater
degree, Qatar has been able to punch above its weight on the worldwide stage,
demonstrating the potential of small states to command influence. Great wealth,
11
but also the broadcast network Al Jazeera has helped this objective. Yet Khatib,
Head of the Middle East and North Africa programme at Chatham House,
additionally shows how the foundations of Qatar’s meteoric rise are inherently
unstable. Foreign coverage aimed at merchandising a Qatari ‘brand’ offering
fighting mediation, humanitarianism, aid and smooth power was at first popular,
however policy contradictions support for Libya’s uprising, but now not Bahrain’s
reveal the absence of a coherent narrative and the limits of pragmatism. The Qatar–
Saudi rift over support for the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islamist businesses
has deepened, and extends into the wider Gulf region. The outwardly strong Gulf
Cooperation Council the exemplary regional grouping has been weakened and the
new ascendency of the Gulf states stays volatile.

Conclusion
Concluding this quick illustrated journey through a century of MENA’s
international history a few threads can be gathered together. Since the defeat of the
Ottomans late in 1918 and the emergence of the contemporary Middle East, the
place has witnessed a sequence of moments whether British, Arab nationalist,
Islamist or American. Today, Russia appears to be taking part in one such moment
in phrases of its greater regional status. Yet the overriding story here is that none of
these moments have endured. An imposed order is unworkable, neither
predominant external nor regional powers and their accompanying ideologies have
devised a steady regional system. Rather conflict and competition still predominate
in a deeply unsettled regional order. The articles selected right here expose the
complexity of a vicinity whose colonial previous continues to resonate with a
present. From this we now not conclude that the gadget is set to implode a theme
discussed notably in the one of a kind difficulty of July 2017 on contentious
borders. A frequent statement following the Arab uprisings was once that Middle
East states, Arab states in particular, always fragile and contested, were somehow
doomed to fail. However, the proof suggests otherwise. In a concluding article
summing up the contents of the extraordinary issue, William Zartman writes that
states, boundaries and sovereignty in MENA may additionally be ‘unsteady’ but
are probable to stay largely unchanged. Recognizing the a couple of and
persevering with challenges to states over their 100year history, he concludes that
MENA states ‘have an existence that matters and at the equal time is in general
vulnerable, and that the imperfect Middle East machine is now not on the brink of
12
any predominant change, either in its components or in the regional order amongst
them. When things do ‘settle down’ the solely way to provide dynamic stability
and fairly peaceful members of the family will be through the establishment of a
community of states that tolerate one another’s existence and furnish regional order
through mutual relations. Zartman’s is a fitting conclusion to this series of articles
on a afflicted century of Middle East records and international relations.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19