Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
FRONT PAGE
___________________________________________________________________
COURSE NO: LAW433 DURATION: 1½ HRS DATE: NOV. 2015
SUBJECT: LAW
INSTRUCTIONS:
KBL Construction (KBLC) has entered into a contract with BMG for the supply of
building material worth P300 000 on 13th March 2015. The duration of the
contract was three months. The parties’ contract has an arbitration clause that
states that; ‘All disputes arising out of the contract shall be referred to arbitration
comprising a panel of three professionals being, a legal practitioner, chartered
accountant and a civil engineer. The seat of the arbitration shall be Gaborone.’
On 13th April 2015, BMG, after supplying building materials worth P150 000.00,
advised that it shall stop any further supplies pending payment for the materials it
had already supplied. KBLC in response advised that the agreement did not make
provision for payments before the expiry of the duration of the contract, being
three months.
After protracted legal proceedings, the parties finally had the matter referred to
arbitration before a panel comprising of a legal practitioner, a construction
engineer and an accountant.
Soon after the award has been made, KBLC receives information that the legal
practitioner who formed part of the panel, has shares in BMG and that the
construction engineer is engaged by BMG to refurbish their warehouse.
a) Advise the parties on the legality of taking the matter to Court prior to
Arbitration on the issues covered by the arbitration clause. [15 Marks]
b) Advise KBLC of the cause of action it may adopt post the arbitration process
in the light of the two arbitrator’s connection with BMG.
[15 marks]
[Total: 30 marks]
3
Question Two
Peter Mzara completed his Degree of Bachelor of Laws from the University of
Botswana in November 2001. He was admitted and enrolled as a legal
practitioner in November 2001. On 24th November 2009 Peter was convicted of
the offence of obtaining by false pretences and given an 18 months prison
sentence which was wholly suspended. He was subsequently struck off the roll of
legal practitioners.
Question Three
Mr Gupta Hayatu, a prominent farmer in the Central District of Botswana, has had
his crops destroyed and or damaged by a pesticide supplied and applied by the
Department of Crop Production under the Ministry of Agriculture. Upon
independent investigations carried out by Offshore Laboratories, it was found
that at the time that the pesticide was applied, it had already expired. It was
found further that the ratio used for the mixture of the pesticide was not in
accordance with the manufacturer’s directions.
Mr Hayatu is desirous of seeking legal recourse on the matter. The first step he
takes is to call your office and arrange for an interview or initial consultation.
4
Question Four
Mr Attorney Veer has set up a Law Firm in Gaborone, and is the sole proprietor in
the firm. His friend, Ancilloti, is a practitioner practising in Francistown, and is also
a sole proprietor. In an effort to avoid travelling to Francistown to execute client’s
instructions there, Mr Veer always engages Ancilloti to do so. The arrangement
having worked for the law firms, they decide to enter into an agreement of
associate law firms, such that all cases in Francistown are attended to by Mr
Ancilloti and all cases in Gaborone are attended to by Mr Veer. The relationship
has grown and blossomed to an extent that for all matters the two firms handle,
the power of attorney reflects the two attorneys’ names.
Boor Enterprises (Pty) Ltd approached Mr Veer for assistance to recover a motor
vehicle that has been impounded by the Botswana Unified Revenue Services
(BURS). Mr Veer prepared an urgent application for the matter with the
assistance of Mr Ancilloti. After service of the papers, BURS decided to approach
Mr Ancilloti for assistance. Mr Ancilloti accepted the instructions and filed
opposing papers.
On the day of the hearing, the two attorneys meet outside Court and decide that
the matter must be settled out of Court. They proceeded to present, without their
clients’ input, a settlement agreement to the Court which was subsequently made
an Order of Court.
[20 marks]
[Total 20 marks]