Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Bill Baker (Partner) & James Pawlikowski (Associate Director) (2015) The
Design and Construction of the World’s Tallest Building: The Burj Khalifa, Dubai, Structural
Engineering International, 25:4, 389-394, DOI: 10.2749/101686615X14355644770857
Abstract
The design of the Burj Khalifa rep-
resents a truly collaborative effort
between all members of the design
team. A tower of such height required
interaction and input from all par-
ties to create a system and form that
responds efficiently to wind and gravity
loads, while also facilitating construc-
tion and enhancing building function.
This paper will focus on the challenges
faced by the design team, as well as the
lessons learned during the design and
construction phases, and how they can
be applied to the next generation of
supertall buildings.
Keywords: wind engineering; but-
tressed core; high-performance con-
crete; tall buildings.
Introduction
International Shanghai Taipei 101 One world Makkah Royal Burj khalifa
The challenge of the Burj Khalifa was Commerce World Trade Clock Tower
Centre Financial Center Hotel
not only to create the world’s tallest Center
building, but it was to do so utilizing Hong Kong Shanghai Taipei New York Mecca Dubai
conventional systems, materials, and 2010 2008 2004 2014 2012 2010
construction methods, albeit modified 484 M 492 M 508 M 541 M 601 M 828 M
and utilized in new capacities. A tower
of this height had never before been Fig. 1: World’s tallest buildings
seen, which required much innovation,
both in terms of new ideas, and in devel- Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel Tower Form
oping new ways to use and advance is currently the second tallest in all
current technologies. To achieve this, three categories at 601, 601 and 559 m, A primary concern in the engineering
the design required intensive and con- respectively (ctbuh.org). of tall buildings is the effect of wind
stant collaboration between architects, on the buildings’ structure. The form
The 163 story Tower is the center-
engineers, and specialty consultants to of the Burj Khalifa is the result of
piece of a USD20+ billion develop-
develop a building form that addressed collaboration between the architects
ment located just outside of downtown
structural efficiency, constructabil- and engineers to vary the shape of
Dubai. It is a mixed-use building, con-
ity, building aesthetics, and function the building along its height, thereby
sisting primarily of residential and
simultaneously. minimizing wind forces on the build-
office usage, as well as an Armani hotel
At the height of 828 m, Burj Khalifa and retail outlets. The project included ing, while also keeping the structure
eclipsed the previous record holder by the Tower, an adjacent podium struc- simple and fostering constructability
over 300 m (Taipei 101 at 508 m) (Fig. ture, and low-rise office and pool (Fig. 2). The floor plan of the Tower
1). From the outset of the project, the annex buildings. The total area for the consists of a tri-axial, Y-shaped plan,
owner—Emaar Properties PJSC of project is 465 000 m2, with the Tower formed by having three separate
Dubai—intended that the Tower be portion being 280 000 m2. Construction wings connected to a central core. As
the world’s tallest building. It currently for the preliminary works and foun- the Tower rises in height, one wing at
holds the record for height in all three dations began in January 2004. After each tier “sets back” in a spiraling pat-
categories as defined by the Council a hiatus in work on the site, the con- tern, further emphasizing its height.
on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat struction of the superstructure started The result is 24 different primary floor
(CTBUH): height to architectural top in April 2005 and was completed in plates (plus some less major varia-
(828 m); height to tip (830 m); and January 2009. The Tower was opened tions), creating a stepping geometry
highest occupied floor (585 m). The in January 2010. that presents multiple building widths
Construction Methods
and Concrete Technology
The latest advancements in construc-
tion techniques and material technol-
ogy were used by the prime contractor
to construct the Burj Khalifa. Three
primary tower cranes were located
Initial scheme Intermediate scheme Final scheme Tallest tested scheme adjacent to the central core, with
each continuing to various heights as
Base moment required. One of the keys to speed
0
100%
65%
100%
76%
100%
72%
100%
and to facilitate construction was to
minimize the time these cranes were
Acceleration needed: automatic self-climbing form-
0
100%
65%
100%
66%
100%
45%
100%
work was employed to form the walls
and perimeter blade columns: wall
Fig. 6: Tower’s improved wind behavior reinforcement was prefabricated on
the ground in 8 m segments to facili-
tate rapid placement; and high-speed,
high-capacity construction hoists were
used to transport workers and mate-
rials. The nose columns were formed
with circular steel forms, and the floor
slabs were placed on panel formwork.
A specialized GPS monitoring system
was developed to ensure the verticality
of the structure.
The construction sequence for the
structure had the central core and
slabs cast first, in three sections, fol-
lowed by the wing walls and their
slabs, and then the wing nose columns
and slabs (Fig. 9). With the exception
of the wing noses, the contractor used
ing from the heat of hydration was an Special attention was given to rein-
important consideration in determin- forcement detailing for the founda-
ing the raft concrete mix design and tion elements to assist in facilitating
placement methods. The C50 raft mix in their construction. “Pour enhance-
incorporated 40% fly ash, to slow the ment strips” were created throughout
process, and a water-to-cement ratio of the raft, providing for ease of access to
0.34. Additionally, some water was sub- the bottom of the raft and allowing for
stituted with ice to limit the heat gain. simplified concrete placement. These
A testing program was instigated prior strips were created by omitting every
to the first pour whereby large-scale, tenth reinforcing bar in each direction,
3.7 m test cubes of the concrete mix which established a grid of 600 mm ×
were poured to verify the concrete’s 600 mm access points throughout the
temperature performance, as well as raft (raft reinforcement was typically
the concrete placement procedures. spaced at 300 mm) (Fig. 8). In addition Fig. 8: Raft reinforcement
(a) (b)
Parts of this paper have been published previ- Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
ously in the following proceedings and articles: Tall Building Database. ctbuh.org.
Conference Topics
Structural Sustainability
Intelligent Solutions
High-Performance Materials
Challenges in Major Projects
Organised by
The Chinese Group of IABSE
and Guangzhou University
Tongji University
Hong Kong Zhuahai-Macau Bridge Authority
www.iabse.org/Guangzhou2016