Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3) In an E-R diagram, there are ________ business rule(s) for every relationship.
A) two
B) three
C) one
D) no
Answer: A
Diff: 2 Page Ref: 49
Topic: The E-R Model: An Overview
AACSB: Use of Information Technology
1
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
7) Which of the following is not a suggestion by Salin regarding developing data names?
A) Prepare a definition of the data.
B) Keep insignificant or illegal words.
C) Arrange the words in a meaningful, repeatable way.
D) Assign a standard abbreviation for each word.
Answer: B
Diff: 2 Page Ref: 51
Topic: Modeling Relationships
AACSB: Analytic Skills
Subtopic: Data Names and Definitions
8) A good data definition will describe all of the characteristics of a data object EXCEPT:
A) subtleties.
B) examples.
C) who determines the value of the data.
D) who can delete the data.
Answer: D
Diff: 1 Page Ref: 52
Topic: Modeling the Rules of the Organization
AACSB: Analytic Skills
Subtopic: Data Definitions
2
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
9) Customers, cars, and parts are examples of:
A) entities.
B) attributes.
C) cardinals.
D) relationships.
Answer: A
Diff: 1 Page Ref: 53
Topic: Modeling Entities and Attributes
AACSB: Analytic Skills, Use of Information Technology
10) Which of the following is an entity type on which a strong entity depends?
A) Owner
B) Member
C) Attribute
D) None of the above
Answer: D
Diff: 2 Page Ref: 55
Topic: Modeling Entities and Attributes
AACSB: Reflective Thinking, Use of Information Technology
Subtopic: Strong Versus Weak Entity Types
11) An entity type whose existence depends on another entity type is called a ________ entity.
A) strong
B) weak
C) codependent
D) variant
Answer: B
Diff: 1 Page Ref: 55
Topic: Modeling Entities and Attributes
AACSB: Reflective Thinking
Subtopic: Strong Versus Weak Entity Types
A) a one-to-many relationship.
B) a strong entity and its associated weak entity.
C) a codependent relationship.
D) a double-walled relationship.
Answer: B
Diff: 2 Page Ref: 55
Topic: Modeling Entities and Attributes
AACSB: Analytic Skills
Subtopic: Strong Versus Weak Entity Types
3
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
more for a life of action than for one of repose. No one was more agreeable
in manner, in gesture, deed and word; he was extremely affable, almost
always smiling when he first met people. His step was extraordinarily rapid,
and when his friends remarked upon it he would say nothing was so
irksome to him as loss of time, and that he did not see why, when he could
go quickly from place to place, he should go slowly. When he could pass a
day according to his fancy he was wont to divide it into three portions; one
he gave to his studies, one to his private concerns, and one to his
pleasures.... He was more inclined to pleasure than was perhaps fitting, not
only from inclination, but to adapt himself to the wishes of his superiors
and friends. When he was at any public or private assembly where there
were ladies, he would lightly fall in love, for he was much inclined to the
society of women; attaching himself rather to those remarkable for elegance
and grace of manner than to those who were merely beautiful in feature. He
was exceedingly fond of music, sang well and accurately, and was not
ashamed to sing the penitential psalms at night in public together with his
brother Lorenzo and others such on holidays. He took much pleasure also in
composing in our own tongue both in prose and verse, as may be seen by
the translations and madrigals of his which are sung at the present day. He
was sumptuous in dress; as much so as any other man in the city. He
delighted in travel, and in seeing new manners and people, but his many
and various affairs did not permit him to indulge this desire. To sum up his
character in one word, those who were acquainted with literature thought
that he had never given his attention to other things; while those who had
business relations with him, and knew in how masterly a fashion he
conducted his affairs, could not easily be persuaded that he ever attended to
other matters; whilst those who knew him as a man of pleasure could
scarcely believe that he found time for aught else.”
Filippo’s son, Piero Strozzi, went to Barcelona to plead the cause of the
exiles before Charles V., and after their disastrous defeat at Montemurlo and
his father’s murder, entered the service of Francis I., who created him Lord
of Belleville and a knight of S. Michael. When the Marquess Del Vasto was
beaten by the Conte d’Enghien in 1544 at Ceresole, Piero Strozzi attempted
to seize Milan. Failing in this, he crossed the Po at Piacenza, and fought his
way down to Serravalle, but had to retire into Piedmont, where he besieged
and took the town of Alba. He was recalled to France in 1545, when he
fought against the English, and the following year he joined the Protestant
army in Germany against Charles V. Later he took part with the Duc de
Guise in defending Metz, when besieged by the Emperor. On the Sienese
appealing to Francis I. for help against Duke Cosimo I. backed by Charles
V., Strozzi rushed to their assistance armed with full powers from the King,
who made him a Marshal of France. When Siena was forced to capitulate
Piero, who knew that Duke Cosimo had offered a large reward for his head,
fled in disguise, but returned to Italy in 1556, sent by Henry II. to the aid of
Pope Paul IV. against the Emperor. After the battle of St. Quintin in the
Netherlands, where the Spaniards gained a decisive victory, Strozzi was
recalled to France, and assisted at the taking of Calais by the Duc de Guise.
Two years later he was killed at the siege of Thionville.
His brother Leone, Prior of Capua, went to Malta, where he became a
Knight of the Order and Captain of the galleys. He fought with distinction
under Andrea Doria, and in 1541 entered the service of Francis I., whose
rivalry with the Emperor Charles V., patron of the Medici, gave him hopes
of revenging the murder of his father and of liberating Tuscany from the
yoke of a family he hated. In 1547 Leone fought against England, and is
said to have been the first European admiral to sail through the Straits of
Gibraltar. Four years later after vainly trying to force Andrea Doria to fight,
he drove his fleet from the coasts of France, and setting sail for Barcelona,
captured several of the enemy’s ships within sight of shore. Discovering
that the Connetable Anne de Montmorency was intriguing against him,
Leone sent back his standard to the King and, breaking the chains which
closed the port of Marseilles, sailed back to Malta, where he planned the
fortifications of S. Elmo and S. Michael. When the Sienese rose against
Cosimo I. he re-entered the service of France and, summoned by his brother
Piero, preceded the fleet with three swift galleys and landed at Scarlino on
the coast of Tuscany, where he was killed whilst reconnoitring.
The noble palace belongs to Prince Piero Strozzi, head of the family; as
in 1568 Cosimo I. restored to the Cardinal Lorenzo Strozzi and his nephew
Leone the half of the building confiscated by the State when Filippo Strozzi
97
rebelled.
PALAZZO DELLO STROZZINO
Vasari’s statement that Arnolfo filled up most of the old tower to build his
own upon was disproved in 1814. The architect del Rosso, in executing some
restorations in the old palace, discovered a small dark room which had been
walled up, and which he surmised, probably correctly, to have been the
famous Alberghettino, or Barberia, where Cosimo the Elder was immured,
and in later days Savonarola. In one corner of this room is a rectangular
opening, or well, the bottom of which is about ten and a half feet below the
level of the courtyard; various underground passages, to which access is
obtained by a man-hole in the guard-room, communicate with it and seem to
bear out the old tales of secret trapdoors down which unhappy prisoners
disappeared for ever. Vasari is also wrong in saying that part of the church of
San Piero Scheraggio was destroyed at the same time, for it was only partially
103
swept away to widen the street a century later.
The tallest part of the Palazzo Vecchio with five windows on the northern
side and six on the western (not counting the modern balcony) crowned with
the square, so-called Guelph battlements, is Arnolfo’s original building and
his design was faithfully carried out after his death in 1301. The tower, so
majestic, and at the same time so elegant is a model of daring and skill, half
resting as it does on the alur, or covered passage, supported by
machicolations, which surrounds the top of the palace. Half-way up the tower
is another alur, adorned with swallow-tailed, or so-called Ghibelline
battlements, whence rise four columns with Gothic capitals, supporting the
battlemented top of the tower with its golden lion, the emblem of Florence, as
a weathercock. It was not until 1344 that the bell of the Council, which till
then had been suspended on the battlements of the palace, was hung in the
tower, so that it might be better heard on the opposite side of the Arno. In its
place was put the bell from Vernio, which rang to warn the guards whenever a
fire burst out in the town. In 1363 the bell of Foiano, taken when the castle
was sacked, was brought to Florence and placed above the alur, to tell the
merchants that the dinner hour had come. The big bell cracked and in 1373
was recast by a certain Ricco di Lapo, when it was said that it could be heard
for thirteen miles round the city. When the Florentine arms were victorious, it
rang for days in token of triumph, until Duke Alessandro de’ Medici
destroyed it in 1532.
The Gonfaloniers and the Priors lived entirely in the Palazzo Vecchio
during the two months they were in office and were not allowed to go out
save on pressing business affecting the Commune. No one could speak to
them in private, they were forbidden to accept any invitations and no one
could dine with them save the notary of the city; but their dinners, served on
silver plate, were excellent and their wines choice. Rastrelli writes: “Ten
golden florins were assigned each day to the Priors solely for their food, all
other expenses being defrayed by the Commune of Florence. This sum was
for the maintenance of the Gonfalonier, the Priors, the notary, the nine
donzelli, or office servants, five monks who served the chapel of the palace,
two who had charge of the seal of the Commune, and the almsgiver and
bursar, who were also monks; there were also the curial notary, two mazzieri,
or mace-bearers, and a cook who was bound to keep two scullions; two
trumpeters and two pifferi, to play while the Signori were at table, four bell-
ringers and one servant.... No man who had been a Gonfalonier could be
arrested until a year had elapsed from the time of his holding office, save for
some very heinous offence, and he was allowed to carry arms of any kind for
104
the rest of his life.” In front of the great door of the palace, where now are
105
the steps and a platform, was the ringhiera, erected in 1323, of which one
hears so often in the history of Florence. Here the Podestà harangued the
people from his bigoncia, or pulpit, and here the Gonfalonier received the
Standard of the People in state and delivered batons of command to the
various condottieri who served the Republic. On the ringhiera Walter de
Brienne, Duke of Athens and Count of Lecce, met the Priors on the 8th
September, 1342, when the people and the nobles shouted, “Let the Duke
have command for life, let the Duke be our lord.” The latter, gathering round
him, forced open the door of the palace, led him into the apartment of the
Priors and hailed him as ruler. The Priors were relegated to the Sala delle
Armi, the white silken banner with the red cross of the People was removed,
the books containing the enactments were torn to shreds, and the Duke’s flag,
foreign to Florence, was unfurled on the tower, while the bell of Liberty rang
out the Dio laudiamo. Two days later the Priors were thrust out, and the
Palazzo de’ Priori became the Palazzo Ducale.
A council of Wise Men was instituted by the Duke, with but one
Florentine among them, Cerettieri Visdomini, a man of evil repute; and soon
the growing dissatisfaction of his subjects made the Duke think about
fortifying himself in the palace. “He caused,” writes Giovanni Villani, “the
antiporta, or fortified porch, in front of the Palace of the People to be built,
and put iron bars in the windows of the Sala de’ Dugento, or Council
Chamber, being afraid and suspicious of the citizens; and ordered that the
whole palace of the Figliuoli Petri, the towers and houses of the Manieri, of
the Mancini and of Bello Alberti, comprising the ancient citadel, and
extending into the piazza, should be included in the circuit of the said palace.
He began to lay foundations of thick walls, and of towers and barbicans, to
make of the palace a great and strong fortress; stopping the work of building
the Ponte Vecchio, which was of such infinite necessity to the Commune of
Florence, and taking from thence hewn stone and timber. He threw down the
houses of San Romolo in order to extend the piazza as far as the houses of
Garbo ... and demanded permission from the papal court to destroy San Piero
Scheraggio, Santa Cecilia, and Santo Romolo, but the Pope refused his
consent. From the citizens he took certain palaces and houses that stood round
about the palace, and lodged in them his barons and followers without paying
any rent.” Vasari, in his life of Andrea Pisani, writes: “Walter, Duke of Athens
and tyrant of the Florentines, made use of Andrea also in architectural matters,
causing him to enlarge the piazza. Opposite to San Piero Scheraggio, he added
the walls, encased with ‘bozzi,’ alongside of the palace to enlarge it, and in the
width of the wall he constructed a secret staircase for going up and down
without being seen. In the said façade of ‘bozzi’ he made a large door, which
serves to-day for the customs, and above it he placed his arms, all being done
according to the design and advice of Andrea.” The addition made by the
Duke of Athens extends, on the northern side, to the door now called della
Dogana, and his battlements adjoin the machicolations which sustain the alur
surrounding Arnolfo’s original building. On the southern side, where once
stood S. Piero Scheraggio, and now stands the Uffizi, can be seen the door of
the old dogana, above which were the Duke’s arms, effaced by order of the
magistrates when he was deposed.
On the 26th July, 1343, the Florentines rose against the Duke. Armed
bands suddenly invaded the streets, waving banners which had been secretly
prepared with the arms of the People emblazoned upon them, and shouting,
“Death to the Duke and his followers! Long live the Commune and Liberty!”
They released the prisoners from the Stinche, forced open the door of the
Palazzo del Podestà, and burnt all the records. Next day the Duke, hoping to
pacify the people, offered the honour of knighthood to one of their leaders,
who disdainfully refused, and told him he had better haul down his flag and
replace the banner of the People on the tower. Meanwhile the allies of
Florence hastened to her aid. Siena sent three hundred horse and four
thousand bowmen, Prato five hundred men-at-arms, S. Miniato two hundred,
while the peasants of the country round seized what weapons they could and
poured into the city. The Bishop Acciajuoli, the nobles and the popolani met
in Sta. Reparata and elected fourteen citizens, seven nobles, and seven
popolani, giving them full power to make laws, while six others, three from
each caste, were to keep order and see that violence and robbery should be
severely punished. To save himself the Duke delivered his chief adviser,
Guglielmo d’Assisi, with his young son, into the hands of the surging
multitude in the Piazza. The lad was torn to pieces first, and then his father.
The old chronicler gives details of this tragedy too horrible to repeat, and then
continues: “On the 3rd August the Fourteen men of Florence appointed to set
things right in the city went to the Palazzo de’ Priori, with Count Simone and
much people, and the Duke ceded the Lordship, saying he had taken it
treacherously, by cunning and by falsehood, as he should not have done. The
said Duke threw down the baton on the ground, and then picked it up and
gave it to the Fourteen, thus delivering to them the Lordship for the Commune
of Florence, and these Fourteen were Lords for the Commune, and this was
written down. The Duke quitted his room that very evening, and the Fourteen
entered it, and by courtesy he was allowed to have another room with fifteen
of his people. During the day it was publicly ordered several times that every
man should lay down his arms, the bells of the Palazzo de’ Priori rang
joyously, great bonfires were lit on the palace and in every corner of Florence.
In truth it was a fine festival.”
For three days, until the people became quieter, the Duke remained in the
palace, and then left at night with a strong escort, carrying off all the gold
plate which had been made for him of the value of 30,000 golden florins.
When he got to Poppi he ratified, “but with a very evil grace,” the
renunciation of the Lordship of Florence, and by way of Bologna went to
Venice, whence he returned to Apulia.
The Fourteen repealed all the Duke’s laws, and with that odd childishness
that sometimes shows itself in the Florentine character, spent twenty golden
florins to have him and his chief advisers painted “in ignominious fashion” on
the tower of the palace of the Podestà and elsewhere. The day of S. Anna was
decreed a public festival, and on that day the banners of the Guilds are still
hung round Or San Michele in remembrance of the deposition of the tyrant of
Florence. They also demolished the fortified porch, built by the Duke in front
of the great door of the palace, and restored the ringhiera. Signor Gotti, in his
exhaustive work on the old palace, thinks that about the same time the two
stone lions, which were gilt, said to have been sculptured by Giovanni de’
Nobili, were placed on either side of the entrance. Matteo Villani speaks of
four others, which the Priors, in 1353, “having little else to attend to on
account of the leisure born of peace, caused to be carved of granite and gilded
at great expense, and placed on the four corners of the palace of the People of
Florence. This they did for a certain vanity that obtained at that time, instead
of having them cast in bronze and then gilt, which would have cost but little
more than the granite, would have been beautiful, and have lasted for many
centuries; but small things and great are continually being spoilt in our city by
106
the avaricious whims of the citizens.”
Three years later the Signoria decided to build a loggia, a necessary
adjunct in those days to a palace, on the southern side of the Piazza where the
houses and tower of the Mint stood. But the project, according to Matteo
Villani, met with considerable opposition among the citizens, who declared
that “a loggia was suitable for tyrants, not for the People,” and it remained in