Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VIII
LGAS C – Leyte II and Biliran Province
Provincial Satellite Auditing Office (PSAO)
Baybay City, Leyte
Rodulfo S. Loreto
Municipal Accountant
We have audited some of the Barangay transactions for Calendar Years 2019,
2020 and 2021 and 2022 and observed the following deficiencies:
1. The accuracy, existence and valuation of all properties of the barangay under
Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) amounting ₱3,124,022.38 as of
December 31, 2022, continued to be unconfirmed due to a) non-conduct of
physical count of its properties for the past 10 years; b) not detailed PPE
Ledger Cards; c) non-maintenance of Property Cards by the Designated
Property Custodian,contrary to Item 7.2.5, Chapter VII of Manual on the
Financial Management of Barangays and other pertinent COA rules and
regulations.
1.2. Likewise, Item 2.1.6 of COA Circular No. 2010-001 requires the Accountants to
submit subsidiary schedules of general ledger accounts, on or before February 14
of each year.
1.3. The Statement of Financial Position for CY 2022 of Barangay Sto. Niño reflected
a total amount of ₱3,124,022.38 properties under Property, Plant and Equipment
(PPE) account. The details are shown in Table 1.
PPE Amount
Land 942,282.00
Office Building 1,054,041.20
Other Structure 186,435.00
Furniture and Fixtures 79,779.00
I.T Equipment 66,646.00
Sports Equipment 48,504.00
Other Property Plant and Eqipment 95,800.00
Road Networks 321,890.00
Water Supply System 328,645.18
TOTAL ₱3,124,022.38
1.4. However, no inventory report was submitted and the Barangay had never
submitted an inventory report for the past 10 years. Thus, the accuracy of all the
properties of Barangay as shown in Table 1 could not be ascertained.
1.5. The Audit Team was not able to confirm the recorded PPE because though the
Municipal Accountant had already maintained the PPE Ledger Cards (PPELC),
there is no detailed description of the property such as the brand, size, color, etc.
and the properties were just lumped per major account in the property ledger card
instead of having a different PPELC for each class of property. There was also no
data on the reference and quantity.
1.7. This observation was consistently included in the Audit Report on Barangay
(ARB) Sto. Niño since CY 2013 or for the past 10 years. The continued failure of
the barangay officials to implement the audit recommendations is a blatant
defiance of the rules on property management and other relevant laws and
regulations. This is despite the seminar conducted by COA to all barangay
officials on the adoption of the Barangay Financial Management Manual wherein
the RIPE was first introduced.
1.8. The RIPE is intended to confirm the existence of the reported assets in the books
of the Barangay and validate whether these assets are within the vicinity of the
same or in its designated location. Without the RIPE, the amount in the books
cannot be substantiated while the existence of the properties cannot be confirmed.
Losses, damages or unserviceable properties will not be detected and the persons
liable for such losses will not be held accountable thereof.
1.9. Due to the above mentioned deficiencies, the accuracy, existence and reliability of
the PPE accounts cannot be confirmed which will affect the fair presentation of the
Barangay’s assets in its Financial Statements.
1.11. We also recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer
Designate to:
1.13. Lastly, we recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer-
Designate and the Municipal Accountant should periodically reconcile their
respective records so as to establish a more reliable PPE balance.
2.0. The Cash - Local Treasury account was overstated by ₱265,064.24 due to
over/under recording of collections, non-recording of various deposits and
uncorrected unreconciled beginning balance between the cash examination
report and the general ledger contrary to the provision of Section 111 of PD
1445 and Section 3.3 of COA Circular No. 96-011 dated October 2, 1996.
2.1. Section 111 (2) of PD 1445 provides that the highest standards of honesty,
objectivity and consistency shall be observed in the keeping of accounts to
safeguard against inaccurate or misleading information.
2.2. For CY 2022, the Barangay has a Cash in Treasury account balance of
₱273,879.24 in its Financial Position. However, review on the submitted General
Ledger and Journals for CY 2022 versus the conduct of cash examination
disclosed that the balance should have been ₱8,815.00 as of December 31, 2022.
The outstanding balance was due to over/under recording of collections,
over/under recording of deposits and non-recording of deposits for CYs 2020 to
2022 and non-adjustment of beginning balance of Cash in Treasury which
should have been ₱190.00, per cash examination conducted last July 17, 2023.
Details are shown in table 2.
Cash in Bank
3.2. Section 111 (2) of PD 1445 provides that the highest standards of honesty,
objectivity and consistency shall be observed in the keeping of accounts to
safeguard against inaccurate or misleading information.
3.3. Pertinent provision of COA Circular No. 96-011 dated October 2, 1996, provide:
Section 3.2 The Local Accountants shall within ten (10) days from
receipt of the Bank Statements (BS), reconcile the same BS with
the General Ledgers (GL) and prepare the BRS in five (5) copies.
3.5. The failure to submit the BRS resulted to difficulty in ascertaining the accuracy
and correctness of the funds Cash in Bank Balance at yearend. Further, errors
committed by the bank cannot be promptly corrected.
3.7. We also recommend that the Municipal Accountant prepare and submit the
BRS of the Barangay within 10 days from receipt of Bank Statements in
order to have a reliable Cash in Bank Balance
11.0. Release of 10% Sangguniang Kabataan share totalling ₱511,699.00 were not
made within the prescribed period and were not supported by Official
Receipts issued by the Sangguniang Kabataan Treasurer contrary to Sections
3.8 and 5.1.4 of the Handbook on the Financial Transactions of the
Sangguniang Kabataan(HFTSK) and Section 4.6 of Presidential Decree
(P.D.)No. 1445, thus, funds intended for SK may be used by the barangay for
other purposes and was not properly documented.
11.1. Section 3.8 of the Handbook on the Financial Transactions of the Sangguniang
Kabataan provides that revenue generated from sources expressly authorized
under RA No. 10742 and collections thereof shall at all times be acknowledged
properly by issuing an Official Receipt (OR). Revenue collected by the SK
through direct deposit to the SK’s bank account shall be supported with a copy of
Validated Deposit Slip (VDS)/Credit Memo (CM) in lieu of OR.
11.2. Moreover, section 5.1.4 of the same handbook provides that upon receipt of the
monthly internal revenue allotment (IRA) of the barangay, the Punong Barangay
shall automatically release not later than five (5) working days without further
delay the share of the SK equivalent to ten percent of the general fund of the
barangay by issuing check in the name of the SK for deposit to the latter’s bank
account.
11.3. In addition, section 4.6 of P.D.1445 states that Claims against government funds
shall be supported with complete documentation.
11.4. However, it was disclosed that the release was not made monthly or within the
prescribed period which is not later than five (5) working days upon receipt of the
monthly internal revenue allotment (IRA) of the barangay as some were released
in lump sum. Details is shown in table 11.
11.5. Furthermore, the above releases were not supported with Official Receipts issued
by the Sangguniang Kabataan Treasurer. In an interview with the Municipal
Accountant, the SK officials may not still be aware that their receipts of 10%
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Sto. Niño, Mahaplag, Leyte Page
shares should be supported with official receipts and that they are yet to attended
the seminar on the Handbook on the Financial Transactions of the Sangguniang
Kabataan conducted by the Commission in which such policy is one of the
highlights to be discussed.
11.6. The delayed release of SK shares exposes the risk of the fund being used for other
purposes while the Official Receipts issued by the SK Treasurer would have
supported the disbursements made by the barangay as proof of receipt by the SK.
11.7. We recommend that the Barangay shall automatically release not later than
five (5) working days without further delay upon receipt of the monthly IRA
of the barangay.
“It is the declared policy of the State that all resources of the
government shall be managed, expended or utilized in accordance
with law and regulations, and safeguard against loss or wastage
through illegal or improper disposition, with a view to ensuring
efficiency, economy and effectiveness in the operations of
government. The responsibility to take care that such policy is
faithfully adhered to rests directly with the chief or head of the
government agency concerned.”
4.3. Moreover, COA Circular No. 2015-009 dated December 1, 2015 prescribed the
Revised Chart of Accounts for LGUs to conform with the adoption of the Phil.
Public Sector Accounting Standard (PPSAS). On recording of expenses, the
following accounts were prescribed to be used by LGUs:
This account is used to record the cost of goods for distribution to people
affected by calamities/disasters/ground conflicts such as canned goods,
blankets, mats, kitchen utensils, flashlights and other similar items. Credit this
account for issuance to end-users, transfers or write-down.
Welfare Goods Expenses
5-02-03-060
Debit
4.4. Audit of disbursements in CY 2019-2022 disclosed that the LGU procured a total
of ₱167,520.00 goods for distribution paid from the BDRRMF. Details on the
purchase of various relief goods in response to calamities charged to the Local
Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund are as follows:
4.5. Perusal of the submitted documents related to the distribution of the purchased
relief goods revealed that the reports on the distribution do not contain
information as to the quantity of such goods received by the affected
beneficiaries.
4.6. Moreover, it was also disclosed that the issuances of the above transactions were
erroneously recorded as Food Supplies Expense instead of Welfare Goods for
Distribution upon initial recording and Welfare Goods Expense upon distribution.
4.7. The improper documentation on the distribution of the relief goods casts doubts
on the regularity and even existence of the program which aims to provide relief
of the affected families, while the erroneous entry of expense resulted in an
overstatement of Food Supplies Expense by ₱167,520.00 and an understatement
of the Welfare Goods Expense by the same amount.
4.8. We recommend that the Punong Barangay submit the reports on the
distribution of relief goods with complete details.
4.9. We also recommend the Bookkeeper to record issuances of relief goods not as
Food Supplies Expense but as Welfare Goods Expense.
5.2. Whereas, Section 5.1.16 of the same Circular states “The amount and details of
the unexpended balance of LDRRMF shall be discussed in the Notes to Financial
Statements”. A sample of disclosure was attached as Annex D of the same
circular as shown below:
5.3. Review on disclosure made on the Notes to Financial Statements of the LDRRMF
of the barangay disclosed that it was not in the prescribed format as provided in
Annex D of COA Circular No. 2012-002 as it only shows in lump-sum the
available, utilized and balances from previous years unexpended and current
appropriations.
5.4. The Notes failed to discuss in detail the balances under current years
appropriations under 30%QRF and 70%Mitigation Fund and the detailed
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Sto. Niño, Mahaplag, Leyte Page
breakdown of the unexpended prior years balances which should have given
additional value to the financial statements.
6. Prior year’s unexpended DRRMF were not transferred to the Special Trust
Fund nor was included in the LDRRMF Investment Plan for CYs 2019, 2020,
2021, and 2022, contrary to Sections 4.4 and 5.1.2 of COA Circular 2012-002,
thus, the funds were left idle in the bank and the objectives of providing the
fund for its purpose may not have been attained.
6.1. Section 4.4 of COA Circular 2012-002 states “The unexpended LDRRMF shall
accrue to a special trust fund solely for the purpose of supporting disaster risk
reduction and management activities of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council (LDRRMC) within the next five years. The LDRRMCs
shall decide on the use of the unexpended balance of LDRRMF which shall
be incorporated in the Local Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund
Investment Plan.”
6.2. Whereas, Section 5.1.2 of the same circular states, “A LDRRMFIP for the DRRM
program shall be prepared annually. It shall present the 30% allocation for QRF
in lump sum and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and
preparedness with details as to projects and activities to be funded. The
LDRRMFIP shall also include a separate caption, the list of projects and
activities charged to the unexpended LDRRMF of previous years.”
6.3. Upon examination of the LDRRMF Investment Plan attached to the Annual
Budget, it was observed that the LDRRMF Investment Plan only included the
items/activities intended to be undertaken/procured out of the current year’s
budget. Also, it was noted that in every Supplemental Budget, a separate
LDRRMF Investment Plan was prepared to identify how the additional funds will
be used, but none was made for the unexpended balances of prior years.
6.4. The Barangay Local Government had a balance of ₱277,357.56 out of its prior
year’s LDRRM as of December 31, 2018 but the Statement of Financial Position
of the barangay showed a Trust Liabilities balance of zero denoting that the
portion of ₱252,795.01 which represented the unused 70% Mitigation Fund-
MOOE and 30% QRF was not recorded under Trust Liability – DRRM and was
not transferred to the Special Trust Fund. The same observations were noted for
CYs 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. Consequently, the unexpended balances of prior
6.5. While it is true that the BDRRM Council will decide on the use of the
unexpended balance of LDRRMF, the same should be reflected in the
LDRRMFIP. Moreover, the continued non-utilization of the unexpended
LDRRMF from previous years left the funds idle in the bank instead of using the
fund to improve the LGU’s capability on disaster mitigation, prevention and
preparedness.
6.6. We recommend that the Barangay Kagawad who is the Chairman of the
Committee on Appropriation (CCA), provide breakdown of the ₱218,410.76
BRRM Fund unexpended balance as of December 31, 2022 which should
only include the unexpended balances for the past 5 years.
6.7. We also recommend that the Municipal Accountant thru her Designated
Bookkeeper record the prior year’s unused BDRRM Fund as Trust
Liabilities under Special Trust Fund, based on the amount provided by the
CCA.
7.1. DBM-DOF-DILG Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1 dated November 24, 2020
provides the revised guidelines on the appropriation and utilization of the 20% of
the annual internal revenue allotment for development projects. The JMC was
issued to increase the responsiveness of the guidelines and promote greater
autonomy, transparency and accountability in the LGUs’ appropriation and
utilization of their respective 20% DF. Pertinent sections of the subject
Memorandum Circular are as follows:
b) Section 3.2 – The LGUs are enjoined to observe the following policies and
guidelines in the appropriation and utilization of the 20% DF:
7.2. During the conduct of our audit, it was noted that the Barangay had appropriated
projects for 20% Development Fund amounting to ₱336,254.00, ₱378,050.39,
₱404,695.20 and ₱565,000.80 for CY 2019, CY 2020, CY 2021 and CY 2022,
respectively. For the 4-year period, the 20% DF appropriation totaled to
₱1,684,000.79 while the continuing balance of the same fund as of January 1,
2019 amounted to ₱587,344.20. The said annual appropriations were for the
following projects:
7.3. However, due to COVID-19 pandemic the Barangay decided to realign the
unexpended PPAs from 2019 budget totaling P297,360.40 in order to appropriate
funds for covid-related expenses. Supplemental Budget No. 1 dated May 15, 2020
was passed containing the following information.
7.4. Review of utilization revealed that out of the available appropriations the
barangay disbursed a total amount of ₱2,084,000.00 to implement the projects
funded under 20% Development Fund from CYs 2019 to 2022 as follows.
7.5. As can be seen in Tables 5, 6 and 7, only 7projects were implemented during the
4-year period. Out of the ₱2,271,344.99 appropriation, ₱867,392.19 was actually
disbursed, which is only equivalent to 38.18% of current and previous years
appropriation.
7.6. Review of the status of implementation of projects of the barangay disclosed that
seven projects identified and budgeted in CYs 2019 to 2022 and prior years
continuing appropriation totaling ₱1,197,746.39.00 were not implemented.
7.7. We recommend that the Punong Barangay implement all the projects
appropriated under 20% Development Fund so that funds are utilized to its
optimum to help achieve the desirable socio-economic development and
environmental outcomes of the Barangay.
May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within five (5)
calendar days from receipt hereof.