Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
Moyosolaoluwa Olowokure
DISCLAIMER: This is NOT an official UNILAG FSS material. This compilation was
curated by Moyosolaoluwa for her personal revision; please use with caution
and discretion.
2
INTRODUCTION
Psychology aims at observing, explaining, predicting & modifying behaviour. This is
done using the scientific method of investigation which has 6 KEY STEPS:
Comparative – Collects and Compares the data from different groups or within the
same group at different points in time. e.g. “Gender Differences in recall of
emotional and neutral data”, “Differences in Recall Before and After Interference”
** (Many of us are guilty of using „impact” in our Titles for comparative research.
Now that we know better, we will appropriately use “Differences” in our titles for
comparative research)**
Applied Research – Research aimed at solving a particular problem e.g how to cure
depression
Methodology
Participants were asked to say/write the first word that came to mind after
hearing/seeing a word. The word (stimulus) was displayed for a few seconds and
participants were asked to be honest and to not hesitate before responding. Their
responses were considered and then psychoanalysed.
Instruments:
Timer, Power-point Display, Writing Materials
2-Men will have a (significantly) higher number of blank responses than women.
3- Men will have (significantly) more frequent instances of giving multiple responses
than women.
5
4-Words “bread” and “water” will have (significantly) longer reaction times than “lie”
and “angry” among participants.
5- Participants will have a mean reaction time that is greater than 7 seconds
(One sample t-test)
**NOTE that all these hypotheses are directional.
Methodology
Participants were exposed to emotional and neutral stimuli in two sessions:
emotional words versus neutral words and emotional pictures versus neutral
pictures.
Each group of words was displayed for 15 seconds, participants were then
given another 15 seconds to write the words they could recall (regardless of word
order). The same was done for emotional and neutral pictures.
6
Instruments:
Timer, Power-point Display, Writing Materials
2- Participants will recall (significantly) more emotional words than neutral words.
3- Male participants will recall (significantly) more neutral pictures than female
participants.
4- Male participants will have (significantly) higher recall than female participants.
**NOTE that all these hypotheses are directional.
MEMORIZATION TECHNIQUES
It is believed that chunking and organization makes for better recall of
organized information. Chunking was proposed as a memorization technique by
George Miller in 1956. He believed human short-term memory (STM) could process
7 +/- 2 units of information at a point in time.
7
Methodology
Participants were exposed to unorganised and organised stimuli in two
sessions: 1- unorganised words and unorganised digits and 2- organised words and
organised digits.
Each group of data was displayed for 30 seconds; participants were then
given another 30 seconds to write the words and digits they could recall in the right
order.
Instruments:
Timer, Power-point Display, Writing Materials
3- Male participants will have (significantly) higher recall of organised stimuli than
female participants.
INTERFERENCE EXPERIMENT
Discovered by Hermann Ebbinghaus in 1885, Memory is stored information
that goes through encoding, storage and retrieval. Encoding could be semantic or
elaborative; Storage could be short-term memory or long-term memory and only
information that has been encoded or stored can be retrieved.
Forgetting is the inability to retrieve stored info due to trace decay, cue-
dependent forgetting or interference from another memory.
This interference could be proactive (old affects new) or retroactive (new
affects old) and is especially high when these memories are similar. Inhibition is a
kind of goal-oriented/intentional forgetting (suppression).
The interference experiment seeks to demonstrate and assess this
phenomenon and another early study that aimed to investigate the effect of
retroactive interference was conducted by McGeoch & McDonald in 1931.
Methodology
Participants were exposed to two lists/sets of nonsense syllables on a screen
for 2 minutes each. They were then given 45 seconds to recall and write all the
nonsense syllables they could for each list (A and B) on a sheet of paper. After this
sheet was collected, participants went on a short break and watched a short video.
Participants were asked to not discuss with one another during the experiment. On
returning from the short break, they were asked to recall and write list B and then
asked to recall and write list A.
9
The participants‟ proactive and retroactive interference scores were then calculated
using a stipulated formula and analysed using SPSS.
Instruments:
Timer, Projector/Power-point Display, Nonsense syllables, Writing Materials.
Hypotheses for this test could include:
1-Female Participants will have significantly lower proactive interference scores than
male participants
2-Male Participants will have significantly higher retroactive interference scores than
female participants
Methodology
Participants were exposed to 2 lines on a screen for a few seconds; one line had
convex arrows at both ends while the other had concave arrows at both ends. They
were asked to select the longer line. This was done over multiple trials with lines of
varying lengths and the errors in estimation for each participant were recorded.
Instruments:
Muller-Lyer software
Hypotheses for this test could include:
1-Female Participants will have significantly higher error in estimation than male
participants
ZEBRA-CROSSING EXPERIMENT
Methodology (Place-centred)
A structured observational checklist was used for data collection. The gender
and number of pedestrian actors at the zebra crossing, as well as the gender, vehicle
type (private car, commercial car, commercial bus) and compliance level of the
motorists (yes, no, or remorseful) were recorded.
Motorists were subjected to 6 experimental conditions each repeated (five)
times which resulted in a total of (30) trials.
Instruments:
Observation form, Writing Materials, Video recorder, Pedestrian actors, Zebra
crossing,
Hypotheses for this test could include:
1-The Frequencies of Normal/Expected Behaviour will be significantly higher than
that of Abnormal/Unexpected Behaviour.
Methodology (Place-centred)
Participants were observed at 2001 Eatery, UNILAG selected based on convenience
sampling but were unaware they were being observed (This natural/unobstructive
observation improves the study‟s ecological validity but may raise some ethical
concerns). Participants were not exposed to harm nor was their personal information
collected or shared. The expected and unexpected behaviors as well as their
frequencies and durations were operationalized, observed and recorded over a
period of 30 minutes split into three 10-minute observation sessions.
Instruments:
Observation sheet, Writing Materials, Restaurant environment
References
Kensinger, E.A., Corkin, S. Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional
words more vividly remembered than neutral words?. Memory &
Cognition 31, 1169–1180 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800