You are on page 1of 43

6.

976
High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems
Lecture 7
Noise Modeling in Amplifiers

Michael Perrott
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Copyright © 2003 by Michael H. Perrott


Notation for Mean, Variance, and Correlation

ƒ Consider random variables x and y with probability


density functions fx(x) and fy(y) and joint probability
function fxy(x,y)
- Expected value (mean) of x is

ƒ Note: we will often abuse notation and denote


as a random variable (i.e., noise) rather than its mean
- The variance of x (assuming it has zero mean) is

- A useful statistic is

ƒ If the above is zero, x and y are said to be uncorrelated


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Relationship Between Variance and Spectral Density
Two-Sided Spectrum One-Sided Spectrum

Sx(f) Sx(f)
A 2A

f f
-f2 -f1 0 f1 f2 0 f1 f2

ƒ Two-sided spectrum

- Since spectrum is symmetric


ƒ One-sided spectrum defined over positive frequencies
- Magnitude defined as twice that of its corresponding
two-sided spectrum
ƒ In the next few lectures, we assume a one-sided
M.H. Perrott
spectrum for all noise analysis MIT OCW
The Impact of Filtering on Spectral Density

Sx(f) |H(f)|2 Sy(f)


A B AB

f f f
0 0 0

x(t) y(t)
H(f)

ƒ For the random signal passing through a linear,


time-invariant system with transfer function H(f)

- We see that if x(t) is amplified by gain A, we have

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Noise in Resistors

ƒ Can be described in terms of either voltage or current

R
R in
en

ƒ k is Boltzmann’s constant

ƒ T is temperature (in Kelvins)


- Usually assume room temperature of 27 degrees Celsius
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Noise In Inductors and Capacitors

ƒ Ideal capacitors and inductors have no noise!

C L

ƒ In practice, however, they will have parasitic resistance


- Induces noise
- Parameterized by adding resistances in parallel/series
with inductor/capacitor
ƒ Include parasitic resistor noise sources

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Noise in CMOS Transistors (Assumed in Saturation)

ID Transistor Noise Sources


D
G
Drain Noise (Thermal and 1/f)
S Gate Noise (Induced and Routing Parasitic)

ƒ Modeling of noise in transistors must include several noise


sources
- Drain noise
ƒ Thermal and 1/f – influenced by transistor size and bias
- Gate noise
ƒ Induced from channel – influenced by transistor size and bias
ƒ Caused by routing resistance to gate (including resistance of
polysilicon gate)
ƒ Can be made negligible with proper layout such as fingering of
devices

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Drain Noise – Thermal (Assume Device in Saturation)

ind

VGS G
VD>∆V

S D

ƒ Thermally agitated carriers in the


channel cause a randomly varying 2
ind
current ∆f

- γ is called excess noise factor


4kTγgdo
ƒ = 2/3 in long channel
ƒ = 2 to 3 (or higher!) in short f
channel NMOS (less in PMOS)
- gdo will be discussed shortly
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Drain Noise – 1/f (Assume Device in Saturation)

ind

VGS G
VD>∆V

S D

ƒ Traps at channel/oxide interface


randomly capture/release carriers 2
ind
∆f
drain

- Parameterized by Kf and n 4kTγgdo


1/f noise
drain thermal noise

ƒ Provided by fab (note n ≈ 1)


f
ƒ Currently: Kf of PMOS << Kf of 1/f noise
corner frequency
NMOS due to buried channel
- To minimize: want large area (high WL)
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Induced Gate Noise (Assume Device in Saturation)
ing
indg

VGS G
VD>∆V

S D

ƒ Fluctuating channel potential


couples capacitively into the gate 2
ing
terminal, causing a noise gate ∆f
current
slope =
20 dB/decade
4kTδgdo

- δ is gate noise coefficient 5 ft


f

ƒ Typically assumed to be 2γ α

- Correlated to drain noise!


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Useful References on MOSFET Noise

ƒ Thermal Noise
- B. Wang et. al., “MOSFET Thermal Noise Modeling for
Analog Integrated Circuits”, JSSC, July 1994
ƒ Gate Noise
- Jung-Suk Goo, “High Frequency Noise in CMOS Low
Noise Amplifiers”, PhD Thesis, Stanford University,
August 2001
ƒ http://www-tcad.stanford.edu/tcad/pubs/theses/goo.pdf
- Jung-Suk Goo et. al., “The Equivalence of van der Ziel and
BSIM4 Models in Modeling the Induced Gate Noise of
MOSFETS”, IEDM 2000, 35.2.1-35.2.4
- Todd Sepke, “Investigation of Noise Sources in Scaled
CMOS Field-Effect Transistors”, MS Thesis, MIT, June 2002
ƒ http://www-mtl.mit.edu/research/sodini/sodinitheses.html

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Drain-Source Conductance: gdo

ƒ gdo is defined as channel resistance with Vds=0


- Transistor in triode, so that

- Equals g m for long channel devices


ƒ Key parameters for 0.18µ NMOS devices

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Plot of gm and gdο versus Vgs for 0.18µ NMOS Device
Transconductances gm and gdo versus Gate Voltage Vgs
4

Id 3.5

Transconductance (milliAmps/Volts)
Vgs 3
M1
gd0=µnCoxW/L(Vgs-VT)
2.5
W 1.8µ
=
L 0.18µ 2

1.5

gm (simulated in Hspice)
1

0.5

0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Gate Voltage Vgs (Volts)

ƒ For Vgs bias voltages around 1.2 V:


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Plot of gm and gdο versus Idens for 0.18µ NMOS Device
Transconductances g m and g do versus Current Density
4

Id 3.5

Transconductance (milliAmps/Volts)
Vgs 3
M1
2.5
W 1.8µ gd0=µnCoxW/L(Vgs-VT)
=
L 0.18µ 2

1.5

gm (simulated in Hspice)
1

0.5

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Current Density (microAmps/micron)

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Noise Sources in a CMOS Amplifier

RD

enD

enG engpar
RG Rgpar

Cgd Cdb
1 vgs ro ind
ing Cgs gmvgs -gmbvs
gg
ID RD

Vout
RG
Csb endeg
vs
Vin Rdeg
RS

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Remove Model Components for Simplicity

RD

enD

enG engpar
RG Rgpar

Cgd Cdb
1 vgs ro ind
ing Cgs gmvgs -gmbvs
gg
ID RD

Vout
RG
Csb endeg
vs
Vin Rdeg
RS

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Key Noise Sources for Noise Analysis

RD

enD

enG
RG

ing vgs Cgs gmvgs ind


ID RD

Vout
RG
endeg
vs
Vin Rdeg
RS

ƒ Transistor gate noise ƒ Transistor drain noise

Thermal noise 1/f noise


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Apply Thevenin Techniques to Simplify Noise Analysis

iout
D
G

Zg Zgs ing vgs Cgs gmvgs ind

S
iout
Zdeg D
G

Zg Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

S
Zdeg

ƒ Assumption: noise independent of load resistor on drain


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Calculation of Equivalent Output Noise for Each Case

iout
D
G

Zg Zgs ing vgs Cgs gmvgs ind

S
iout
Zdeg D
G

Zg Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

S
Zdeg

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculation of Zgs

iout
D
G
itest
Zg Zgs vtest vgs Cgs gmvgs

S
v1 Z
deg

ƒ Write KCL equations

ƒ After much algebra:

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculation of η

iout
D
G

Zg Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs itest

S
v1 Zdeg

ƒ Determine Vgs to find iout in terms of itest

ƒ After much algebra:

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculation of Output Current Noise Variance (Power)
iout
D
Iout
G
D
G
Zg Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg
S
Zg
Zdeg
S
Zdeg

ƒ To find noise variance:

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Variance (i.e., Power) Calc. for Output Current Noise

ƒ Noise variance calculation

ƒ Define correlation coefficient c between ing and ind

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Parameterized Expression for Output Noise Variance

ƒ Key equation from last slide

ƒ Solve for noise ratio

ƒ Define parameters Zgsw and χd

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Small Signal Model for Noise Calculations
iout
D
Iout
G
D
G
Zg Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg
S
Zg
Zdeg
S
Zdeg

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Example: Output Current Noise with Zs = Rs, Zdeg = 0
Source
iout
ens
Rs

Vin Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

ƒ Step 1: Determine key noise parameters


- For 0.18µ CMOS, we will assume the following

ƒ Step 2: calculate η and Zgsw

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculation of Output Current Noise (continued)

ƒ Step 3: Plug values into the previously derived expression

Drain Noise Multiplying Factor

- For w << 1/(R C


s gs):

Gate noise contribution


- For w >> 1/(R C
s gs):

Gate noise contribution


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Plot of Drain Noise Multiplying Factor (0.18µ NMOS)
Drain Noise Multiplying Factor Versus Frequency for 0.18 µ NMOS Device
1
f << 1/(2πRsCgs)

0.95
Drain Noise Gain Factor

0.9

0.85

0.8

f >> 1/(2πRsCgs)
0.75
1/100 1/10 1 10 100
Normalized Frequency --- f/(2πRsCgs) (Hz)

ƒ Conclusion: gate noise has little effect on common


source amp when source impedance is purely resistive!
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Broadband Amplifier Design Considerations for Noise

2
indg
∆f
drain gate noise contribution
1/f noise with purely resistive
source impedance
drain thermal noise
4kTγgdo

f
1/f noise 1
corner frequency 2πRsCgs

ƒ Drain thermal noise is the chief issue of concern


when designing amplifiers with > 1 GHz bandwidth
- 1/f noise corner is usually less than 1 MHz
- Gate noise contribution only has influence at high
frequencies (such noise will likely be filtered out)
ƒ Noise performance specification is usually given in
terms of input referred voltage noise
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Narrowband Amplifier Noise Requirements

2
indg
∆f
drain gate noise contribution
1/f noise with purely resistive
source impedance
drain thermal noise
4kTγgdo

f
1/f noise Narrowband 1
corner frequency amplifier 2πRsCgs
frequency range

ƒ Here we focus on a narrowband of operation


- Don’t care about noise outside that band since it will be
filtered out
ƒ Gate noise is a significant issue here
- Using reactive elements in the source dramatically
impacts the influence of gate noise
ƒ Specification usually given in terms of Noise Figure
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
The Impact of Gate Noise with Zs = Rs+sLg
Source
iout
Rs ens Lg

Vin Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

ƒ Step 1: Determine key noise parameters


- For 0.18µ CMOS, again assume the following

ƒ Step 2: Note that η =1 , calculate Zgsw

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Evaluate Zgsw At Resonance
Source
iout
Rs ens Lg

Vin Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

ƒ Set Lg such that it resonates with Cgs at the center


frequency (wo) of the narrow band of interest

ƒ Calculate Zgsw at frequency wo

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


The Impact of Gate Noise with Zs = Rs+sLg (Cont.)

ƒ Key noise expression derived earlier

ƒ Substitute in for Zgsw

Gate noise contribution

ƒ Gate noise contribution is a function of Q!


- Rises monotonically with Q
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
At What Value of Q Does Gate Noise Exceed Drain Noise?

Narrowband
2 amplifier
indg
frequency range
∆f

4kTγgdo drain thermal noise


gate noise contribution Q2
f
wo/2π

ƒ Determine crossover point for Q value

=1

- Critical Q value for crossover is primarily set by process


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Calculation of the Signal Spectrum at the Output
Source
iout
Rs ens Lg

Vin Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

ƒ First calculate relationship between vin and iout

ƒ At resonance:

ƒ Spectral density of signal at output at resonant frequency

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Impact of Q on SNR (Ignoring Rs Noise)
Narrowband
2 amplifier
indg
frequency range
∆f

signal spectrum Q2

4kTγgdo drain thermal noise


gate noise contribution Q2
f
wo/2π

ƒ SNR (assume constant spectra, ignore noise from Rs):

ƒ For small Q such that gate noise < drain noise


- SNR out improves dramatically as Q is increased
ƒ For large Q such that gate noise > drain noise
- SNR out improves very little as Q is increased
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Noise Factor and Noise Figure
Equivalent output
referred current noise
enRs (assumed to be independent
Rs of Zout and ZL)

Linear,Time Invariant
vin vx Circuit inout iout
Zin (Noiseless) Zout ZL

ƒ Definitions

ƒ Calculation of SNRin and SNRout

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculate Noise Factor (Part 1)
Source
iout
Rs ens Lg

Vin Zgs vgs Cgs gmvgs indg

ƒ First calculate SNRout (must include Rs noise for this)


-R s noise calculation (same as for Vin)

- SNR out:

ƒ Then calculate SNRin:


M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Calculate Noise Factor (Part 2)

ƒ Noise Factor calculation:

ƒ From previous analysis

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW


Calculate Noise Factor (Part 3)

ƒ Modify denominator using expressions for Q and wt

ƒ Resulting expression for noise factor:

Noise Factor scaling coefficient

- Noise factor primarily depends on Q, w /w , and process specs


o t
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Minimum Noise Factor

Noise Factor scaling coefficient

ƒ We see that the noise factor will be minimized for


some value of Q
- Could solve analytically by differentiating with respect
to Q and solving for peak value (i.e. where deriv. = 0)
ƒ In Tom Lee’s book (pp 272-277), the minimum noise
factor for the MOS common source amplifier (i.e. no
degeneration) is found to be:

Noise Factor scaling coefficient


ƒ How do these compare?
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Plot of Minimum Noise Factor and Noise Factor Vs. Q

Noise Factor Scaling Coefficient Versus Q for 0.18 µ NMOS Device


8

7 Achievable values as
a function of Q under
Noise Factor Scaling Coefficient

6 the constraint that


c = -j0 1
= wo
5 c = -j0.55 LgCgs
c = -j1
4 c = -j0
c = -j0.55
3

Note: curves Minimum across


2 all values of Q and
meet if we
approximate 1
1 Q2+1 Q2 LgCgs c = -j1

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q
M.H. Perrott MIT OCW
Achieving Minimum Noise Factor

ƒ For common source amplifier without degeneration


- Minimum noise factor can only be achieved at
resonance if gate noise is uncorrelated to drain noise
(i.e., if c = 0) – we’ll see this next lecture
- We typically must operate slightly away from resonance
in practice to achieve minimum noise factor since c will
be nonzero
ƒ How do we determine the optimum source impedance
to minimize noise figure in classical analysis?
- Next lecture!

M.H. Perrott MIT OCW

You might also like