FACTS:

Petitioners are Mohammedans (Muslim) by religion. Petitioner No. 1 is the wife

of Petitioner No. 2. The respondent No. 1 is the state, i.e., NCT of Delhi. The
respondent No.2 is the Commissioner of Police and the respondent No. 3 is the
SHO of the Police Station. The respondent No.4 is the father and respondent
No.5 is the mother of the petitioner No. 1 Respectively. The petitioners were in
love with each other and got married on 11.03.2022 in accordance with Muslim
rites. They took decision to get married out of their own free will and consent.

The respondent Nos. 4 and 5 being parents of the petitioner No.1 are opposing
the marriage of the petitioners and have registered an FIR under Section 363
IPC against the petitioner No.2. Though, initially the FIR was under Section 363
IPC, subsequently Section 376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO have been added.

According to the petitioner no.1, she was regularly beaten by her parents at
home. The parent tried to forcibly marry her to someone else even though she
was in love with the petitioner No.2. The respondent-State has filed a status
report, as per which, the petitioner was only 15 years and 5 months on the date
of the marriage. Petitioner No.1 is pregnant and the petitioners are expecting a
child together.

ISSUES RAISED:

1. Whether personal law (Muslim law) will prevail over POCSO?

THE COURT HELD THAT-

In the present case personal law would prevail as-

In ‘Gulam Deen and another vs. State of Punjab and others’ High Court of
Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh held that, as per Article 195 from the book
‘Principles of Mohammedan Law by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mullam,’ capacity of
marriage for Muslims are that-

(1) Every Mohomedan of sound mind, who has attained puberty, may enter into
a contract of marriage. (2) Lunatics and minors who have not attained puberty
may be validly contracted in marriage by their respective guardians. (3) A
marriage of a Mahomedan who is sound mind and has attained puberty, is void,
if it is brought about without, his consent.