You are on page 1of 16

Growing season N2O emissions from two-year

potato rotations in a humid environment in


New Brunswick, Canada
Emily Snowdon1,2, Bernie J. Zebarth1,4, David L. Burton2, Claudia Goyer1, and
Philippe Rochette3
1
Potato Research Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 4Z7;
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N 5E3; and
3
Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard,
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

Quebec City, Quebec, Canada G1V 2J3. Received 19 October 2012, accepted 18 April 2013.
Snowdon, E., Zebarth, B. J., Burton, D. L., Goyer, C. and Rochette, P. 2013. Growing season N2O emissions from two-year
potato rotations in a humid environment in New Brunswick, Canada. Can. J. Soil Sci. 93: 279294. Few studies have
examined the effects of crop rotation on N2O emissions. This study quantified N2O emissions from seven 2-yr potato
rotations over a 3-yr period, 20082010, where the potato phase was present in 2008 and 2010. In addition, the potential to
predict variation in cumulative growing season N2O emissions was examined using indices of nitrate availability [nitrate
exposure (NE), a time integrated measure of soil nitrate concentrations in the surface soil], carbon availability (cumulative
growing season CO2 emissions) and aeration [time-weighted average water-filled pore space (WFPS)]. In the potato phase
of the rotations, even for treatments receiving the same fertilizer N rate (193 kg N ha 1), a wide range in cumulative
growing season N2O emissions was measured in both 2008 and 2010 (0.391.49 and 0.812.03 kg N ha1, respectively).
The NE explained 52 and 70% of the variation in growing season N2O emissions under potato production in 2008 and
2010, respectively. Carbon availability also had a significant effect on N2O emissions, as indicated by increased N2O
emissions in rotations where residues of the preceding crop resulted in increased CO2 emissions early in the growing
season. A large proportion (67%) of the variation in cumulative N2O emissions among rotation crops was also explained
by NE. Choice of rotation crop resulted in an almost twofold difference (0.91.7 kg N ha1) in N2O emissions over the
2-yr rotation cycle. Greater N2O emissions over the 2-yr rotation cycle were measured for rotation crops of soybean,
Italian ryegrass, red clover and potato than for rotation crops of corn, canola and barley. However, the fertilizer N
management in both the potato and rotation crop phases may be as or more important than the choice of rotation crop in
influencing the risk of N2O emissions.

Key words: Red clover, Italian ryegrass, soybean, barley, canola, corn

Snowdon, E., Zebarth, B. J., Burton, D. L., Goyer, C. et Rochette, P. 2013. Émissions de N2O d’un assolement de pomme de
terre de deux ans pendant la période végétative, dans un environnement humide, au Nouveau-Brunswick (Canada). Can. J. Soil
Sci. 93: 279294. Peu d’études se sont intéressées aux conséquences de l’assolement sur les dégagements de N2O. L’étude
que voici quantifie les émissions de N2O de sept rotations de deux ans de pomme de terre au cours d’une période de trois
ans, soit de 2008 à 2010, la pomme de terre ayant été cultivée en 2008 et en 2010. Les auteurs ont également déterminé si on
peut prévoir la fluctuation des émissions cumulatives de N2O durant la période végétative en recourant aux indices de
disponibilité des nitrates [exposition aux nitrates (EN), une mesure temporelle intégrée de la concentration de nitrates dans
la couche superficielle du sol], de disponibilité du carbone (dégagements cumulatifs de CO2 pendant la période végétative)
et d’aération (espace moyen des pores remplis d’eau pondéré dans le temps). Durant la phase « pomme de terre » de la
rotation, les émissions cumulatives de N2O mesurées pendant la saison de croissance en 2008 et 2010 ont considérablement
varié (de 0,39 à 1,49 et de 0,81 à 2,03 kg de N par hectare, respectivement), même pour les parcelles sur lesquelles on avait
appliqué la même quantité d’engrais azoté (193 kg de N par hectare). L’EN a respectivement expliqué 52 et 70 % de la
variation des dégagements de N2O observée durant la période végétative, pendant la culture de la pomme de terre, en 2008
et 2010. La quantité de carbone disponible a elle aussi une incidence significative sur les émissions de N2O, comme le révèle
la hausse de ces dernières quand les résidus de la culture antérieure augmentent les dégagements de CO2 en début de saison.
Une grande part (67 %) de la variation des émissions cumulatives de N2O observée entre les cultures de l’assolement
s’explique par l’EN. Le choix de la culture en rotation double presque l’écart (0,91,7 kg de N par hectare) des émissions de
N2O durant l’assolement de deux ans. Les assolements de soja, de ray-grass d’Italie, de trèfle rouge et de pomme de terre
engendrent de plus fortes émissions de N2O que les assolements de maı̈s, de canola et d’orge pendant la rotation de

4
Corresponding author (e-mail: bernie.zebarth@ Abbreviations: NE, nitrate exposure; WFPS, water-filled pore
agr.gc.ca). space

Can. J. Soil Sci. (2013) 93: 279294 doi:10.4141/CJSS2012-115 279


280 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

deux ans. Néanmoins, la gestion des engrais azotés durant la culture de la pomme de terre et les autres phases de
l’assolement pourrait exercer une aussi grande influence sur les émissions de N2O éventuelles que le choix de la culture
proprement dite.

Mots clés: Trèfle rouge, ray-grass d’Italie, soja, orge, canola, maı̈s

Crop rotation is widely used as a means of controlling on medium-textured soils (Zebarth et al. 2012a). In-
diseases, weeds and insect pests and of enhancing soil tensification of potato production has resulted in short
tilth, nutrient availability and water-holding capacity, rotations, with barleypotato the most common. There
thereby increasing productivity (Stark and Love 2003). is increased interest in introducing new rotation crops
While the effects of many different management prac- including forages such as Italian ryegrass (grown as a
tices on N2O emissions have been examined, including green manure), or alternative crops that can be used to
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

nitrogen (N) fertilization (van Groenigen et al. 2004; produce biofuels such as soybeans and canola. However,
McSwiney and Robertson 2005), organic amendments the implications of changes in potato rotations with
(Rochette et al. 2008), tillage (Six et al. 2004), soil respect to N2O emissions are unknown.
compaction (Ball et al. 1999) and drainage (Elmi et al. Emissions of N2O are associated primarily with the
2002), few studies have examined the effects of crop denitrification process in regions with humid soil
rotation. moisture regimes (Mosier 1998), and the denitrification
The magnitude of N2O emissions can be influenced process is controlled primarily by aeration and by the
by the choice of crop species in the current year, as well availability of organic carbon and nitrate (Gillam et al.
as the choice of preceding crop. Drury et al. (2008) 2008). Consequently ancillary parameters which are
reported that when grown in monoculture over three related to these controlling factors are often chosen to
growing seasons, N2O emissions were greater for corn help explain variations in N2O emissions. Water-filled
(2.62 kg N ha1) than for soybean (0.84 kg N ha1) pore space (WFPS) was used as a measure of soil aera-
or winter wheat (0.51 kg N ha 1). In addition, N2O tion (Linn and Doran 1984). Nitrate exposure [pre-
emissions from a corn crop were greater when the viously referred to as nitrate intensity (Burton et al.
preceding crop was corn (2.62 kg N ha1) than when 2008)], is a time-integrated measure of the availability of
the preceding crop was winter wheat (1.64 kg N ha1) soil nitrate concentration for denitrification, and was
or soybean (1.34 kg N ha1). Similarly, Ellert and found to be highly positively related with cumulative
Janzen (2008) reported higher N2O emissions from growing season N2O emissions (Burton et al. 2008;
spring wheat when the preceding crop was alfalfa than Zebarth et al. 2008, 2012b). Emissions of CO2, which
when the preceding crop was corn regardless of manure primarily reflect soil respiration, were used as a measure
or fertilizer N management, and Mosier et al. (2006) of carbon availability (Honeycutt et al. 1988) and
reported higher N2O emissions from unfertilized corn are closely related to denitrification in laboratory
when the preceding crop was soybean than when the incubations (Miller et al. 2008).
preceding crop was corn. These differences in N2O The objectives of this study were: (1) to quantify N2O
emissions were attributed to differences in fertilizer N emissions in a series of 2-yr potato rotations and (2) to
application to the different crop species in the current measure ancillary parameters for the purpose of gaining
year, as well as to residual nitrate and crop residues insight into the controls on N2O emissions under field
from the preceding crop (Drury et al. 2008). However, conditions. Objective 2 was included in order to improve
such studies commonly do not measure ancillary para- our understanding as to which factors contributed to
meters that would allow the controlling factors on any measured differences in N2O emissions among crop
emissions to be identified. rotations under objective 1, and consequently to identify
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the most economic- the key factors to be considered when selecting potato
ally important arable crop in Atlantic Canada (Zebarth rotations in the context of reducing N2O emissions.
et al. 2012a). N2O emissions are commonly increased by To aid in achieving objective 2, additional treatments
increased fertilizer N inputs (McSwiney and Robertson varying in fertilizer N inputs and additional sampling of
2005) or increased soil nitrate concentrations (Gillam row locations to reflect differences in aeration were
et al. 2008). As a result, N2O emissions from potato performed under potato production for a preceding
production are of concern due to the relatively high barley crop.
fertilizer N inputs (Zebarth et al. 2003), the high nitrate
concentrations in the root zone during the growing
season (Zebarth and Milburn 2003), and the potential MATERIALS AND METHODS
for high residual nitrate after tuber harvest (Cambouris The experiment was established in 2007 in Fredericton,
et al. 2008). Potato production in this region with humid NB, Canada (lat. 45855?N, long. 66836?W). N2O emis-
moisture regimes [mean annual precipitation 1124 mm sions were measured from the same plots during the
(Environment Canada 2011)] is primarily rain-fed and growing seasons of 2008 to 2010.
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 281

Soils at the experimental site belong to the Research spacing to achieve a plant density of 26 800 plants ha1.
Station soil association (coarse loamy morainal abla- Fertilizer N (diammonium phosphate plus ammonium
tional till over coarse loamy morainal lodgement till), nitrate) was banded at planting approximately 7.5 cm to
and are classified in the Canadian soil classification each side and 5 cm below the seed pieces at a rate of 193
system as Humo-Ferric Podzols (Rees and Fahmy kg N ha1 for all rotations, the recommended rate for
1984). Soil properties for the 0- to 15-cm depth were potatoes grown on this soil following a non-legume
soil pH (1:1 water) of 6.2 and soil organic C and total N rotation crop (Zebarth et al. 2007). Standard commer-
concentrations of 19.2 g C kg 1 and 1.67 g N kg1, cial practices were used for disease, insect and weed
respectively (LECO CNS-1000, Leco Corporation, St. control. Vine desiccation was done on 2008 Sep. 26 and
Joseph, MI). Soil textural class [pipette method with 2010 Sep. 15 using diquat, and the crop was harvested
organic matter removal (Kroetsch and Wang 2008)] on 2008 Oct. 08 and 2010 Oct. 0405. Total tuber yield
was loam with 490 g kg1 sand, 390 g kg 1 silt and was determined based on two crop rows.
110 g kg 1 clay.
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

The experiment used a randomized complete block Emissions of N2O and CO2
design with nine treatments replicated four times. The The N2O and CO2 measurements were taken approxi-
treatments included seven 2-yr potato rotations where mately weekly from early spring to late autumn after
the potato phase of the rotation was present in 2008 moldboard plowing to approximately 10 cm depth in
and 2010 and rotation crops grown in 2007 and 2009 each growing season. In the potato phase, two collars
(Table 1). Rotation crops included: corn (Zea mays were installed in each plot in early spring and remained
L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), soybean (Glycine max in place until planting. After planting, two collars were
L.), Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.), potato installed in each of the ridge and furrow row locations of
(Solanum tuberosum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) each plot (i.e., four per plot). All collars were removed
and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). The two addi- prior to ridge formation (approximately 4550 d after
tional treatments included rotation crops of barley and planting) and re-installed immediately upon completion
red clover except that no fertilizer N was applied in the of ridge formation, and remained in place until final
potato phase of the rotation. The plots were 5.5 m  tuber harvest. After final harvest, two collars were
10 m in size. No irrigation was applied as is common in installed in each plot and were removed for autumn
this production region. moldboard plowing. In addition, where the preceding
In each case, the rotation crops were managed as crop was barley only, two additional collars were
would be appropriate for potato rotations in New installed in the furrow locations compacted by tractor
Brunswick, except for the red clover which would not traffic during planting. In the rotation crop phase, two
collars were installed in each plot in early spring and
normally be grown in a 2-yr rotation. Rotation crops
remained in place until planting. After planting, two
were machine planted 2007 May 0615 and 2009 May
collars were installed in each plot between the crop rows
1321 and harvested in August to October depending
and remained in place until late autumn. The exceptions
on crop species. Information on cultivars grown and on
were the corn rotation crop, for which two collars
N fertilization for the rotation crops is summarized
were installed in each of the crop row and inter-row
in Table 2. locations, and the potato crop, for which two collars
In the potato phase of the rotations, potatoes were were installed in each of the ridge and furrow locations,
hand-planted using hand-cut potato seed, cultivar in each plot. Collars were removed for autumn mold-
Russet Burbank, on 2008 May 22 and 2010 May 13 board plow-down.
using a 0.91-m row spacing and a 0.41-m within-row The N2O and CO2 flux measurements were made
using a non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber
Table 1. Experimental treatments for the establishment year in 2007, the with a total volume of 6.5 L, covering a soil area of
potato phase of the rotations in 2008 and 2010, and the rotation crop 315 cm2 (Burton et al. 2008). All plants were removed
phase in 2009 from the inner collar area. Gas samples were collected
Treatment 2007 2008 2009 2010 over a 30-min deployment period, with samples col-
z
lected at 0, 10, 20 and 30 min (Burton et al. 2008). Gas
1 Corn Potato N Corn Potato N samples were collected by removing 20 mL of gas from
2 Soybean Potato N Soybean Potato N
3 Canola Potato N Canola Potato N
the headspace of the chamber and injecting it into a pre-
4 Italian ryegrass Potato N Italian Potato N evacuated (to 500 millitorr) 12-mL Exetainer (Labco,
ryegrass UK). Five replicates of each of breathing grade oxygen
5 Potato Potato N Potato Potato N and 8.8 mL L1 N2O were taken on each sampling date
6 Barley Potato N Barley Potato N to ensure the reliability of the storage and handling of
7 Red clover Potato N Red clover Potato N
8 Barley Potato N  Barley Potato N  the gas samples (Burton et al. 2008).
9 Red clover Potato N Red clover Potato N  Gas samples were analyzed for concentrations of N2O
and CO2 by a Varian Star 3800 Gas Chromatograph
N fertilized at 193 kg N ha 1; N  unfertilized.
z
(Varian, Walnut Creek, CA) fitted with an electron
282 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Table 2. Crop management practices for the rotation crops in 2007 and 2009

Fertilizer N application

Pre-plant At planting

Row spacing Rate Rate


Crop species Seeding rate (m) (kg N ha 1) Formulation (kg N ha 1) Formulation
1
Corn (Pioneer 36B96) 79 000 plants ha 0.76 120 Urea (4600) 37 Diammonium phosphate
(221510)
Canola (Pioneer 45H21) 6.7 kg ha 1 0.15 100 Ammonium sulfate NA NA
(1800)
1
Soybean (Pioneer 90M01) 140 kg ha 0.15 NA NAz NA NA
Italian ryegrass (Lemtal) 28 kg ha 1 0.15 67 Urea NA NA
Potato (Russet Burbank) 26 800 plants ha 1 0.91 NA NA 193 Ammonium nitrate (3400)
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

plus diammonium phosphate


(23.311.711.7)
Barley (AC Encore) 140 kg ha 1 0.15 67 Urea NA NA
Red clover (AC Endure) 11 kg ha 1 0.15 NA NA NA NA

z
NA, not applicable.

capture detector, thermal conductivity detector and a the assumption that gas flux measured on the sampling
Combi-PAL Autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, date was representative of the average daily flux.
Switzerland). The electron capture detector was oper- Cumulative emission values were subsequently averaged
ated at 3008C, 90% Ar, 10% CH4 carrier gas at 20 mL across chambers to obtain appropriate mean values.
min1, Haysep N 80/100 pre-column (0.32 cm diameter For time periods when row locations were not present
50 cm length) and Haysep D 80/100 mesh analytical (i.e., before and after planting), the measured gas flux
columns (0.32 cm diameter 200 cm length) in a column was applied to both row locations for calculation of
oven operated at 708C. The pre-column was used in cumulative values.
combination with a four-port valve to remove water
from samples. The thermal conductivity detector was Soil mineral N and Nitrate Exposure
operated at 1308C, pre-purified helium (He) carrier Soil samples for determination of soil mineral N
gas at 30 mL min 1, Haysep N 80/100 mesh (0.32 cm concentrations were collected from each plot on each
diameter 50 cm length) pre-column followed by a date that N2O and CO2 fluxes were measured. Samples
Porapak QS 80/100 mesh (0.32 cm diameter 200 cm consisted of a composite of eight soil cores, 2.54 cm in
length) analytical column maintained at 708C. diameter. In the potato phase, pre-plant and post-
As described by Burton et al. (2008), N2O and harvest soil samples were collected from 010 cm depth
CO2 (g N2O ha1 d1 and kg CO2 ha1 d 1) fluxes randomly within the plot. Post-planting, soil samples
(Fc) were calculated using the following equation were collected from 010 cm depth separately from the
(Hutchinson and Livingston 1993): ridge and furrow locations. After ridge formation, the
Fc dC=dt VcMmol=(AVmol) (1) depth of soil samples collected from the ridge location
was adjusted to 020 cm to reflect the greater depth of
where dC/dt is the rate of change in N2O or CO2 the soil A horizon. In addition, where the preceding crop
concentration (mol mol 1 h1), A is the surface area was barley, soil samples were collected from 010 cm
(m2) of the chamber, Vc is the total volume (L) of the depth in the compacted furrow. In the rotation crop
chamber (i.e., chamber plus exposed collar), Mmol is the phase, soil samples were collected from 010 cm depth
molar mass of N2O (g mol 1) and Vmol is the volume randomly within the plot except for the potato rotation
of a mole of N2O (L mol1) inside the chamber crop, which was sampled as described for the potato
corrected for temperature using the ideal gas law. The phase, and for corn, where samples were collected from
flux value of dC/dt was calculated using the simple 010 cm depth separately from the row and inter-row
linear regression of the gas concentrations versus time locations between planting and harvest. The soils were
over the deployment period. All flux values were stored at 48C and processed within 24 h. All soil samples
adjusted to represent grams of N and kg of C per were passed through a 4.75-mm sieve, and a 20-g sub-
hectare per day. Cumulative growing season gas fluxes sample was dried at 1058C for 48 h to determine
were calculated from 2008 May 01 to Nov. 04, 2009 gravimetric water content. A 25-g sub-sample of moist
Apr. 30 to Nov. 09 and 2010 Apr. 29 to Oct. 26 (187-, soil was extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 using a 1:2
193- and 180-d monitoring periods for 2008, 2009 and soil:extractant ratio and a shaking time of 30 min
2010, respectively) on an individual chamber basis by (Miller et al. 2008). Extracts were filtered and stored
linear interpolation between sampling dates, following at 208C pending analysis. Concentrations of NO3-N
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 283

plus NO2-N (hereafter referred to as NO3-N) and calculated from the soil bulk density and gravimetric
NH4-N were determined colorimetrically using a Tech- water content, and assuming a particle density of 2.65
nicon Auto Analyzer II system following Technicon Mg m 3. Average denitrification rate and WFPS were
Industrial Method #100-70W and Technicon Industrial calculated for each preceding crop and row location for
Method #98-70W, respectively. Blank samples were also the five dates when all row locations were present.
run to account for background levels in the procedure.
Nitrate exposure was calculated as the linear inter- Statistical Analyses
polation of the NO3-N concentrations between sam- All data were tested for normality and a log10 trans-
pling dates for the same time period as cumulative formation was performed as required. For the potato
growing season N2O emissions (Burton et al. 2008). It phase, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed
is expressed in units of g N d kg 1, which combines twice for each parameter. The first compared the seven
both the magnitude of NO3-N concentrations and the preceding crops and two row locations (ridge vs. furrow)
duration when they are present. This measure gives us a only for treatments where the potato crop was fertilized.
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

temporally integrated measure of the exposure of the The second ANOVA compared two fertilizer N rates
soil microbial community to the NO3 over the growing (0 and 193 kg N ha1) and three row locations (ridge,
season. furrow, compacted furrow) where barley was the preced-
ing crop. In the rotation crop phase, a single ANOVA
Denitrification Assay was performed. ANOVA was performed using the
Denitrification was measured using the acetylene inhibi- General Linear Model of SAS software. Means pre-
tion technique as described by Paul and Zebarth (1997). sented in tables and figures were calculated using
Intact cores with a height of 10 cm and a 6-cm diameter non-transformed data. Statistical comparisons among
were used except for the potato ridge after hilling, where treatment mean values were performed using Fisher’s
the soil core was 20 cm in height. Sampling was done Protected LSD test for main effects and LSmeans for
on seven dates in each growing season (approximately interactions.
every 3 wk from pre-plant until mid-season, then In addition, ANOVA was performed to compare N2O
approximately monthly until after crop harvest) when emissions over the 2-yr potato rotations. Cumulative
N2O emissions were measured. In the potato phase, two emissions were averaged across chambers within indivi-
cores were sampled per plot pre-plant and post-harvest. dual plots in each year. Cumulative emissions for each
Between planting and harvest, two cores were sampled plot were then averaged over the potato phase of the
in the ridge only except where the preceding crop was rotations in 2008 and 2010, and added to the cumulative
barley, in which case two cores were sampled from each emissions from 2009, to reflect cumulative emissions
of the ridge, furrow and compacted furrow locations. In over the 2-yr rotation cycle.
the rotation crop phase, two cores were sampled from Relationships among measured parameters were as-
each plot. The exceptions were for between planting and sessed using regression analyses using the General
harvest for the corn rotation crop, where two cores were Linear Model of SAS software. These analyses consid-
collected from each of the row and inter-row locations, ered each combination of preceding crop and row
and for the potato rotation crop, where two cores were location for the potato phase, or each combination of
sampled from each of the ridge and furrow locations. crop species and row location for the rotation phase,
Soil cores were placed in a 1.5-L canning jar, or in an as individual cases. A time-weighted average WFPS
approximately 3.2-L PVC cylinder for cores of 20 cm (WFPSTW) was calculated for each case. A daily value of
height, and a 20-mL time zero headspace sample was WFPS was calculated by linear interpolation between
collected. Immediately, the jar or cylinder was sealed sampling dates of gravimetric water content measured
with a lid fitted with a septum, 40 mL of headspace gas from soil samples used to determine soil mineral N
was removed by syringe, and 100 mL of acetylene, concentration, in combination with the soil bulk density
generated by reaction of calcium carbide with water, values calculated from the denitrification cores. In the
was injected into the headspace to achieve a minimum potato phase of the rotations, denitrification cores were
10% concentration of acetylene in the headspace and to not collected in all furrow row locations, and conse-
maintain the headspace under positive pressure during quently the average soil bulk density measured in the
the incubation. Headspace gas was sampled after furrow location of the plots with a preceding crop of
incubation for 24 h in a container buried in the soil barley was assigned to the furrow location for all other
to reflect field soil temperature. Headspace gas samples preceding crops. Given that all plots were under potato
were injected into previously evacuated exetainers production had similar soil management practices,
and concentration of N2O determined as described and given that there was no significant difference in
above. Following the denitrification assays, soil from soil bulk density in the ridge location among preceding
all cores was passed through a 4.75-mm sieve, and crop treatments, this is likely a reasonable assumption.
soil bulk density determined. Denitrification rate and Stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to
bulk density were corrected for coarse fragment (i.e., determine the potential to predict cumulative N2O
4.75 mm) content. The WFPS of the soil matrix was emissions from cumulative CO2 emissions, NE, and
284 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

WFPSTW where these parameters can be taken as until September (Fig. 1B). Cumulative growing season
indices of carbon availability, nitrate availability and CO2 emissions were significantly greater for a preceding
aeration, respectively. Terms were retained within the crop of Italian ryegrass than for all other preceding
regression model for P B0.15. crops except barley and red clover, and were also sig-
nificantly lower for a preceding potato crop than for all
RESULTS preceding crops except canola (Table 4). Cumulative
Growing season (May to September) air temperatures CO2 emissions were greater from the ridge than from the
were generally similar to, or slightly warmer than, the furrow. Where the preceding crop was barley, cumula-
long-term (19712000) average (Table 3). Growing tive CO2 emissions were greater in the ridge than the
season precipitation in 2008 (404 mm) was 13% below furrow or compacted furrow and were not influenced by
the long-term average of 462 mm. Growing season N rate (Table 5).
precipitation in both 2009 and 2010 was 20% above the Soil NH4 concentrations increased rapidly in late
long-term average, but the distribution of precipitation May in response to fertilizer application at planting,
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

differed between years. In 2009, precipitation was above then decreased over time reaching background concen-
average in every month from June to September. In trations by early July (Fig. 2A). Soil NO3 concentra-
2010, rainfall was over double the normal value in June tions also increased rapidly in late May, and remained
and September, and less than half of normal in May and elevated over a longer time period, reaching background
August. concentrations in early August. The NE was greater for
a preceding red clover crop than for all other preceding
Potato Phase of Rotation in 2008
crops, and NE was also lower for a preceding canola
Total tuber yield in 2008 averaged 34.4 t ha1, and did
not vary with preceding crop. Where the preceding crop crop than for all preceding crops except Italian ryegrass
was barley, total tuber yield was greater for fertilized and corn (Table 4). The NE was greater for the ridge
(36.1 t ha 1) than for unfertilized (23.9 t ha1) plots. (4.58 g d kg1) than for the furrow (2.31 g d kg 1).
The N2O emissions in 2008 increased after planting Where the preceding crop was barley, there was a
and fertilizer application in late May, and were generally significant N fertilization by row location interaction
elevated for the period from planting until mid-August, on NE (Table 5). The NE was greater for the ridge than
particularly for preceding crops of Italian ryegrass and for the furrow or compacted furrow for fertilized plots,
red clover from late May until the end of June (Fig. 1A). whereas for unfertilized plots, NE was greater for the
There was a significant effect of preceding crop on compacted furrow than for the ridge.
cumulative growing season N2O emissions, with greater The WFPSTW was greater for the furrow (49.3%
emissions for preceding crops of Italian ryegrass and WFPS) than for the ridge (45.1% WFPS), but did not
red clover (average of 1.45 kg N ha 1) than for all differ among preceding crops (Table 4). Where barley
other preceding crops (average of 0.52 kg N ha1) was the preceding crop, WFPSTW was not affected by
(Table 4). When averaged over preceding crop, N2O fertilizer N rate, and was greatest in the compacted
emissions were significantly greater from the ridge (1.08 furrow (53.0% WFPS), intermediate in the furrow
kg N ha1) than the furrow (0.50 kg N ha 1). Where (48.5% WFPS) and lowest in the ridge (43.7% WFPS)
the preceding crop was barley, there was a significant (Table 5).
fertilizer N rate by row location interaction on N2O Mean denitrification rate in the ridge averaged over
emissions (Table 5). For fertilized plots, N2O emissions all seven sampling dates was 17 ng N g1 d1 and did
were greater from the ridge than from the furrow or not vary significantly with preceding crop (data not
compacted furrow, whereas for unfertilized plots, row presented). Where the preceding crop was barley, mean
location had no effect on N2O emissions. denitrification rate averaged over the five sampling dates
The CO2 emissions in 2008 were low in spring, between planting and harvest did not differ between
increased rapidly in late May, and remained elevated fertilizer N rates (Fig. 3). Mean denitrification rate did,


Table 3. Monthly mean air temperature and precipitation for the experimental period in comparison with the 30-yr (1971 2000) climate normals (data
from the Fredericton CDA climate station; Environment Canada 2011)

Air temperature (8C) Precipitation (mm)

Month 2008 2009 2010 30 yr 2008 2009 2010 30 yr

May 10.7 12.0 12.6 11.2 46 83 43 100


Jun. 16.9 16.0 16.1 16.4 91 131 206 92
Jul. 20.8 18.0 20.8 19.3 81 107 80 90
Aug. 18.1 20.0 19.1 18.6 68 133 32 85
Sep. 14.2 13.0 15.3 13.7 118 100 195 95
MaySep. 16.1 15.8 16.8 15.8 404 554 555 462
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 285

A) 2008 B) 2008
120
80

100

CO2 flux (kg CO2-C ha–1d–1)


N2O flux (g N2O-N ha–1d–1)

60 Preceding crop
80
Barley
Canola
60 Corn
40
Italian ryegrass
Potatoes
40 Red clover
Soybean
20
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

20

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

C) 2009 D) 2009
35 150

30
120
CO2 flux (kg CO2-C ha–1d–1)
N2O flux (g N2O-N ha–1d–1)

25

90
20

15 60

10
30
5

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

E) 2010 F) 2010
180 180

150 150
CO2 flux (kg CO2-C ha–1d–1)
N2O flux (g N2O-N ha–1d–1)

120 120

90 90

60 60

30 30

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Fig. 1. Temporal variation of N2O and CO2 emissions for seven 2-yr potato rotations: (A) N2O and (B) CO2 emissions from the
potato crop in 2008; (C) N2O and (D) CO2 emissions from rotation crops in 2009; (E) N2O and (F) CO2 emissions from the potato
crop in 2010. Emissions were averaged over row locations for the potato crop and for potato and corn rotation crops. Note that the
range of values on the Y axis varies among graphs. Error bars represent 91 SE.
286 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Table 4. Cumulative growing season N2O and CO2 emissions, nitrate exposure (NE), and time-weighted average water-filled pore space (WFPSTW) from
potato production in 2008 and 2010 as influenced by preceding crop, and measured under ridge and furrow row locations

Cumulative N2O emissions Cumulative CO2 emissions NE WFPSTW


(kg N2O-N ha1) (t CO2-C ha1) (g d kg1) (% WFPS)

2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010

Preceding crop
Barley 0.53b 1.09bc 4.41ab 5.42cd 3.37b 2.94bc 46.2 51.5
Canola 0.39b 0.93c 3.71bc 4.86de 2.59c 2.44bc 44.9 50.0
Corn 0.59b 0.85c 3.99b 4.12e 3.07bc 2.32c 44.3 48.3
Italian ryegrass 1.41a 1.66ab 4.93a 7.22a 3.17bc 2.67bc 49.5 51.8
Potato 0.49b 0.81c 3.03c 4.51de 3.64b 2.46bc 48.6 52.8
Red clover 1.49a 1.33bc 4.20ab 6.14bc 4.85a 3.78a 49.2 52.2
Soybean 0.61b 2.03a 3.96b 6.69ab 3.41b 3.16ab 47.8 52.5
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

Row location
Ridge 1.08a 1.78a 4.65a 6.06a 4.58a 3.72a 45.1b 46.9b
Furrow 0.50b 0.70b 3.42b 5.07b 2.31b 1.93b 49.3a 55.7a
Statistical significance
Preceding crop [PC] * * * * * * NS NS
Row location [R] * * * * * * * *
PC R NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
SEM 0.18 0.29 0.39 0.46 0.35 0.39 1.3 1.3

ae Treatment means in the same column and for the same main effect followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (P0.05)
based on a protected LSD test.
*P B0.05; NS, not significant.

however, vary with row location, with greatest values Rotation Crop Phase In 2009
for the compacted furrow (158 ng N g1 d1), The N2O emissions in 2009 (Fig. 1C) were generally low
intermediate values for the furrow (52 ng N g1 d1) over the entire growing season in comparison with
and lowest values for the ridge (10 ng N g1 d 1). N2O emissions in 2008 (Fig. 1A). The exceptions were

Table 5. Cumulative growing season N2O and CO2 emissions, nitrate exposure (NE), and time-weighted average water-filled pore space (WFPSTW) from
potato production in 2008 and 2010 where the preceding crop was barley as influenced by fertilizer N rate and row location

Cumulative N2O emissions Cumulative CO2 emissions NE WFPSTW


(kg N2O-N ha1) (t CO2-C ha 1) (g d kg1) (% WFPS)

N rate (kg N ha 1) Row location 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010 2008 2010

N rate
0 0.18b 0.52b 3.48 5.26 1.12b 1.12b 48.6 55.6
193 0.45a 0.88a 3.80 4.82 2.81a 2.60a 48.2 52.8
Row location
Ridge 0.43a 1.12a 4.61a 5.95a 2.85a 2.48a 43.7c 47.7b
Furrow 0.25b 0.53b 3.78a 5.53a 1.55b 1.60b 48.5b 58.5a
Compacted furrow 0.26b 0.44b 2.54b 3.64b 1.49b 1.49b 53.0a 56.4a
N raterow location
0 Ridge 0.17bc 0.65b 4.14 6.10 0.91d 0.98c 43.2 48.3
0 Furrow 0.14c 0.48b 3.82 6.03 1.15cd 1.09c 48.8 61.2
0 Compacted furrow 0.24bc 0.44b 2.48 3.65 1.28c 1.31c 53.9 57.2
193 Ridge 0.70a 1.60a 5.08 5.80 4.79a 3.99a 44.2 47.0
193 Furrow 0.36b 0.58b 3.73 5.03 1.95b 1.90b 48.2 55.9
193 Compacted furrow 0.28bc 0.45b 2.59 3.64 1.70bc 1.90b 52.2 55.6
Statistical significance
N rate [N] * * NS NS * * NS NS
Row location [R] * * * * * * * *
N R * * NS NS * * NS NS
SEM 0.07 0.13 0.42 0.32 0.21 0.19 1.2 4.0

ad Treatment means in the same column and for the same main effect or interaction followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly
different (P 0.05) based on a protected LSD test.
*P B0.05; NS, not significant.
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 287

A) 2008 B) 2008
350 200

300

NO3 concentration (mg N kg–1)


NH4 concentration (mg N kg–1)

150 Preceding crop


250
Barley
200 Canola
Corn
100
Italian ryegrass
150 Potatoes
Red clover
100 Soybean
50

50
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

C) 2009 D) 2009
150 300

250

NO3 concentration (mg N kg–1)


NH4 concentration (mg N kg–1)

120

200
90
150

60
100

30
50

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

E) 2010 F) 2010
250 150
NH4 concentration (mg N kg–1)

NO3 concentration (mg N kg–1)

200 120

150 90

100 60

50 30

0 0
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Fig. 2. Temporal variation in soil NH4 -N and NO3 -N concentrations for seven 2-yr potato rotations: (A) NH4 -N and (B) NO3 -
N concentrations for the potato crop in 2008; (C) NH4 -N and (D) NO3 -N concentrations for the rotation crops in 2009; (E) NH4 -
N and (F) NO3 -N concentrations for the potato crop in 2010. Concentrations were averaged over row locations for the potato
crop and for potato and corn rotation crops. Note that the range of values on the Y axis varies among graphs. Error bars
represent 91 SE.

potatoes, which had elevated N2O emissions from June sions were greater for the potato crop (1.07 kg N ha1)
to August, and corn, which had elevated emissions in than for all other crop species (average of 0.22 kg
July (Fig. 1C). Cumulative growing season N2O emis- N ha1) (Table 6).
288 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

200 a The WFPSTW varied among crop species (Table 6).


The WFPSTW was significantly greater for barley and
Mean denitrification rate (ng N g–1d–1)

175 Italian ryegrass than for corn, red clover or soybeans.


150
Mean denitrification rate, averaged over all seven
sampling dates, did not differ among crop species, and
125 averaged 38 ng N g1 d1 (data not presented). The
higher average denitrification rate under the potato crop
100 in 2009 than in 2008 is consistent with the higher
a
WFPSTW in 2009, as well as the higher growing season
75 b
precipitation in 2009.
a
50

25 c b Potato Phase of Rotation in 2010


Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

Total tuber yield in 2010 averaged 30.2 t ha1, and did


0 not vary with preceding crop. Where the preceding crop
Ridge Furrow Compacted Ridge Furrow Compacted was barley, total tuber yield was greater for fertilized
furrow furrow
(31.3 t ha1) than for unfertilized (19.1 t ha1) plots.
2008 2010
The seasonal pattern of N2O emissions in 2010 (Fig.
Fig. 3. Mean denitrification rate under potato production in
1E) was similar to that of 2008 (Fig. 1A) with elevated
2 yr, averaged over five sampling dates during the growing emissions occurring during June and July. The some-
season, as influenced by two N rates and three row locations what greater N2O fluxes measured after planting in 2010
where the preceding crop was barley. Row locations in the compared with 2008 may reflect significant rainfall
same year with the same lower case letter are not significantly events in early June of 2010. In particular, there were
different (P 0.05). high N2O emissions in early June for preceding crops
of Italian ryegrass and soybeans. Cumulative growing
There was no clear seasonal pattern in CO2 emis- season N2O emissions were greater for a preceding crop
sions during the 2009 growing season (Fig. 1D). The of soybeans than for all other preceding crops except
effect of crop species on cumulative growing season Italian ryegrass. Cumulative N2O emissions were also
CO2 emissions was of marginal statistical significance greater for preceding crops of soybeans and Italian
(P 0.0509). ryegrass than for preceding crops of canola, corn and
Soil NH4 concentrations were elevated for some crop potatoes (Table 4). Cumulative N2O emissions averaged
species in May and early June, particularly for potatoes, across preceding crops were greater from the ridge (1.78
barley and canola (Fig. 2C). Soil NH4 concentrations kg N ha1) than from the furrow (0.70 kg N ha 1).
over the remainder of the growing season were low Where the preceding crop was barley, cumulative N2O
regardless of crop species. Soil NO3 concentrations emissions were greater for fertilized plots (0.88 kg N
were also elevated for some crop species in May and ha 1) than for unfertilized plots (0.52 kg N ha1), and
June (Fig. 2D). In particular, high soil NO3 concentra- greater for the ridge (1.12 kg N ha1) than for the furrow
tions were measured under potato and corn crops in and compacted furrow (average of 0.49 kg N ha1)
June. The NE was significantly greater for potato and (Table 5).
corn crops (average of 2.98 g d kg1) compared with all The seasonal pattern of CO2 emissions in 2010
other crop species (0.83 g d kg1) (Table 6). (Fig. 1F) was less distinct than for 2008 (Fig. 1A) with

Table 6. Cumulative growing season N2O and CO2 emissions, nitrate exposure (NE), and time-weighted average water-filled pore space (WFPSTW) for
seven rotation crops in 2009. Values are averaged across row locations for potato and corn crops

Cumulative N2O emissions Cumulative CO2 emissions NE WFPSTW


Crop (kg N2O-N ha1) (t CO2-C ha 1) (g d kg1) (% WFPS)

Barley 0.21b 5.57 1.21b 66.2a


Canola 0.24b 5.08 0.67b 60.9ab
Corn 0.28b 3.65 2.68a 55.9b
Italian ryegrass 0.15b 4.97 0.95b 65.6a
Potato 1.07a 4.01 3.28a 60.3ab
Red clover 0.17b 6.74 0.78b 58.6b
Soybean 0.24b 5.12 0.52b 56.9b
Statistical significance
Crop * NS * *
SEM 0.02 1.45 0.50 2.2

a, b Treatment means in the same column followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (P 0.05) based on a protected LSD test.
*P B0.05; NS, not significant.
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 289

Cumulative N2O emissions (kg N ha–1 over 2 year rotation)


more uniform emissions across sampling dates. The
exceptions were high CO2 emissions in early June for 2.0
preceding crops of Italian ryegrass and soybeans, and in a
late September for Italian ryegrass (Fig. 1F). Cumula- a
a a
tive growing season CO2 emissions were greater for a
1.5
preceding crop of Italian ryegrass than for all preced-
ing crops except soybeans (Table 4). Cumulative CO2
emissions were also greater for preceding crops of b b
Italian ryegrass and soybeans than for preceding crops 1.0 b

of barley, corn, potatoes and red clover, and were lower


for a preceding crop of corn than for all preceding crops
except canola and potatoes. Where the preceding crop 0.5
was barley, cumulative CO2 emissions were not affected
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

by fertilizer N rate, and were greater for the ridge and


furrow (average of 5.7 t C ha 1) than for the compacted 0.0
furrow (3.6 t C ha 1) (Table 5). Corn Canola Soybean Italian Potato Barley Red
Soil NH4 concentrations in 2010 (Fig. 2E) had a ryegrass clover
similar seasonal pattern and were of similar magnitude
Fig. 4. Cumulative growing season N2O emissions over a 2-yr
to those measured in 2008 (Fig. 2A). Soil NO3 cycle for seven 2-yr potato rotations, where the rotations are
concentrations were elevated from planting until late identified by the crop present in the rotation crop phase.
July, with maximum concentrations measured in late Cumulative emissions are based on the average values for the
June (Fig. 2F). The NE was greater for a preceding potato phase of the rotations in 2008 and 2010, plus the
crop of red clover than for all other preceding crops average values for the rotation crop phase in 2009. Treatment
except soybeans (Table 4). The NE was also greater for means with the same lower case letter are not significantly
preceding crops of red clover and soybeans than a different based on a protected LSD test (LSD0.05 0.47).
preceding crop of corn. When averaged across preceding
crops, NE was greater for the ridge (3.72 g d kg 1) than from 0.9 to 1.7 kg N ha1. Cumulative emissions over
for the furrow (1.93 g d kg1). Where the preceding the 2-yr rotations were greater for rotation crops of
crop was barley, NE was greater for fertilized plots (2.60 soybean, Italian ryegrass, red clover and potato than for
g d kg1) than unfertilized plots (1.12 g d kg 1), and rotation crops of corn, canola and barley. For the four
greater for the ridge (2.48 g d kg1) than for the furrow rotations with elevated N2O emissions, the increased
and compacted furrow (average of 1.55 g d kg 1). emissions over the rotation cycle primarily reflected
The WFPSTW did not vary with preceding crop increased emissions during the potato phase of the rota-
(Table 4). When averaged across preceding crops, the tion for soybean, Italian ryegrass, red clover rotation
WFPSTW was greater for the furrow (55.7% WFPS) crops. In contrast, the elevated N2O emissions for the
than the ridge (46.9% WFPS). Where the preceding potatopotato rotation primarily reflected greater N2O
crop was barley, WFPSTW was greater for the furrow emission from the potato crop compared with other
and compacted furrow (average of 57.4% WFPS) than rotational crops in the rotation crop phase.
for the ridge (47.7% WFPS), and did not differ between
N rates. Relationships Among Parameters
Mean denitrification rate in the ridge, averaged over Under potato production in 2008, 52% of the variation
seven sampling dates during the growing season, did not in cumulative growing season N2O emissions, consider-
vary with preceding crop and averaged 6 ng N g1 d1 ing combinations of preceding crop and row location as
(data not presented). Where the preceding crop was separate cases, was explained by NE (Fig. 5A). In
barley, there was no significant effect of N fertilization comparison in 2010, NE explained 70% of the variation
on mean denitrification rate averaged over the five in cumulative growing season N2O emissions under
sampling dates between planting and harvest (Fig. 3). potato production (Fig. 5B). It is interesting to note that
Mean denitrification was greater for the furrow and the slope of the relationship between cumulative N2O
compacted furrow (average of 47 ng N g1 d1) than emissions and NE varied between years with slopes of
for the ridge (6 ng N g1 d 1). 0.26 and 0.52 in 2008 and 2010, respectively.
If the two preceding crops that had the greatest
Cumulative N2O Emissions Across the Two-year numeric values of respiration after planting (i.e., had
Rotation Cycle evidence of increase carbon availability) were excluded
Average N2O emissions from the potato phase of the [Italian ryegrass and red clover in 2008 (Fig. 1B); Italian
rotations in 2008 and 2010 were added to emissions ryegrass and soybeans in 2010 (Fig. 1F)], NE then
from the rotation crop phase in 2009 to reflect emissions explained 90% and 81% of the variation in cumulative
of the 2-yr rotation cycles (Fig. 4). Cumulative emis- growing season N2O emissions for the remaining pre-
sions of the 2-yr rotation cycle varied almost twofold, ceding crops (Fig. 5A, B). Based on stepwise multiple
290 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

A) 2008 B) 2010
3.0 3.0

Cumulative N2O flux (kg N2O-N ha–1)


Cumulative N2O flux (kg N2O-N ha–1)
2.5 2.5

2.0 2.0

1.5 1.5

1.0 1.0
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Nitrate Exposure (g d kg–1) Nitrate Exposure (g d kg–1)

All preceding crops: All preceding crops:


y = 0.257x–0.0547, r2=0.52 y =0.516x–0.194, r2 =0.70
Excluding preceding Italian ryegrass and Excluding preceding Italian ryegrass
red clover crops: and soybean crops:
y = 0.167x–0.0114, r2=0.90 y =0.419x–0.101, r2=0.81
Preceding Italian ryegrass crop Preceding Italian ryegrass crop
Preceding red clover crop Preceding soybean crop
All other preceding crops All other preceding crops

Fig. 5. Relationship between cumulative growing season N2O emissions and nitrate exposure under potato production for seven 2-yr
rotations in 2 yr: (A) 2008 and (B) 2010. Each combination of preceding crop and row location is plotted separately. Regression
equations are fitted for all preceding crops, as well as for all preceding crops except Italian ryegrass and red clover in 2008 and except
preceding crops of Italian ryegrass and soybeans in 2010.

linear regression, including NE, cumulative growing stepwise multiple linear regression, neither inclusion of
season CO2 emissions and WFPSTW increased the cumulative growing season CO2 emissions or WFPSTW
percentage of variation explained in cumulative growing resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of
season N2O emissions under potato production to 70% variation explained in cumulative N2O emissions. The
and 86% in 2008 and 2010, respectively: NE generally increased linearly with increasing fertilizer
N rate for non-legume species (Fig. 6B). For the
2008: y 3:750:198 NE0:297 CO2 unfertilized legume species, NE was greater than would
0:0564 WFPSTW ; r2 0:70 (2) be expected based on fertilizer N rate alone (Fig. 6B).
2010: y 0:3500:311 NE0:243 CO2
0:0262 WFPSTW ; r2 0:86 (3) DISCUSSION
This study examined the N2O emissions over three
where y is cumulative growing season N2O emissions growing seasons from seven 2-yr potato rotations under
(kg N ha1), NE is nitrate exposure (g d kg 1), CO2 is rain-fed potato production on medium-textured soils
cumulative growing season CO2 emissions (t C ha1) in a humid environment. In the potato phase of the
and WFPSTW is time-weighted WFPS (% WFPS). rotations, even for treatments receiving the same
In 2009, NE explained 67% of the variation in fertilizer N rate (193 kg N ha1), a wide range in
cumulative growing season N2O emissions under the cumulative growing season N2O emissions was mea-
different crop species, where the row locations for the sured in each year: 0.39 to 1.49 kg N ha 1 in 2008 and
corn and potato crops were treated as separate cases 0.81 to 2.03 kg N ha 1 in 2010. These results confirm
(Fig. 6A). It should be noted, however, that the relatively that the choice of crop rotation can have important
high percentage of variation explained is due in part implications on N2O emission from potato production
to the single high value of cumulative N2O emissions systems. This finding is consistent with Drury et al.
associated with the potato ridge location. Based on (2008) who found N2O emissions under corn production
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 291

A) B)
1.6 y=0.222x–0.00517, r2=0.67 3.5

3.0

Nitrate exposure(g d kg–1)


1.2
Cumulative N2O flux
2.5
(kg N2O-N ha–1) 2.0
0.8
1.5

1.0
0.4
0.5
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 50 100 150 200
Nitrate exposure (g d kg–1) Fertilizer N rate (kg N ha–1)
Red clover
Soybean
All others: y=0.0188x–0.444, r2=0.85

Fig. 6. For seven rotation crops in 2009 as part of 2-yr potato rotations, relationships between (A) cumulative growing season N2O
emissions and nitrate exposure (row locations treated as separate cases for potato and corn crops) and (B) nitrate exposure and
fertilizer N rate (averaged across row location; regression fitted to non-legume crop species only).

ranged from 1.34 to 2.62 kg N ha1 depending on the the rotation crop phase. This study did not, however,
preceding crop. consider N2O emissions outside of the growing season,
The N2O emissions also varied over a wide range which can make up a large proportion of annual N2O
(0.17 to 1.07 kg N ha1) in the rotation crop phase. emissions (Wagner-Riddle et al. 2007). It is possible
However, most of this range reflects much higher N2O that some of the differences observed among rotations
emissions under potato production than under all other may have been more pronounced if emissions had been
crop species examined. Drury et al. (2008) reported a measured on a year-round basis.
wide range in N2O emissions (0.52 to 2.62 kg N ha1) Increased fertilizer N inputs usually result in an
when wheat, corn and soybean were grown in mono- increase in N2O emissions (e.g., van Groenigen et al.
culture. Similar emissions among rotation crops in the 2004; McSwiney and Robertson 2005). This response
current study may reflect that they were grown as they occurs because fertilizer N inputs lead to increased
would be in a potato rotation, rather than as if they were soil NH4, which can increase N2O emissions from the
grown as a main crop. In particular, Italian ryegrass, nitrification process, or lead to increased soil NO3,
when grown in rotation with potatoes, is used as a green which can lead to increased N2O emissions through an
manure plow-down to increase soil organic matter and increase in denitrification rate, or through a change in
receives approximately one-third of the N rate that the N2O molar ratio (i.e., N2O:N2ON2) (Gillam et al.
would be applied if grown as a forage crop (Zebarth 2008; Mosier 1998; Miller et al. 2008). The NE has been
et al. 2009). used as an index of NO3 availability for the denitrifica-
When cumulative growing season N2O emissions over tion process over time, and was strongly positively
the 2-yr rotation cycle were calculated, emissions varied correlated with cumulative growing season N2O emis-
almost twofold, from 0.9 to 1.7 kg N ha1 over the 2-yr sions in humid climates under potato (Burton et al. 2008;
cycle. It is also useful to note that in this study, the rate Zebarth et al. 2012b) and barley (Zebarth et al. 2008)
of N applied to the potato crop did not vary with crop crop production. In the current study, NE explained a
rotation. However, in practice, fertilizer N rate for the large proportion of the variation in cumulative growing
potato crop may be reduced where the preceding crop is season N2O emissions among crop species, and among
a legume, which may reduce differences in N2O emis- preceding crops, N fertilizer treatments and row loca-
sions among crop rotations. Overall, N2O emissions tions under potato production. It should be noted,
over the 2-yr rotation cycle were elevated for rotation however, that nitrification can also be a significant
crops of soybean, red clover and Italian ryegrass due to source of N2O emissions, and that NE may not only
increased emissions during the potato phase, compared reflect the availability of NO3 for the denitrification
with rotation crops of corn, canola and barley. In process, but also reflect the end product of the nitrifica-
contrast, elevated N2O emissions in the potatopotato tion process.
rotation primarily reflected increased emissions from In potato production, NE was increased by fertiliza-
the potato crop compared with all other crops during tion as might be expected. The effect of fertilization on
292 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

NE was primarily in the ridge due to banded fertilizer were at or close to field capacity, and thereby resulted in
application, and this fertilizer banding explains most of increased denitrification and associated N2O emissions.
the differences in N2O emissions between the ridge and The relationship between cumulative growing season
furrow locations. The NE also varied with preceding N2O emissions and NE in 2008 and 2010 was improved
crop, presumably due to the effect of residues from the when the preceding crops which had the highest numeric
preceding rotation crop influencing the mineralization values of CO2 emissions shortly after planting were
process, and consequently soil mineral N availability. excluded, compared with inclusion of all preceding
For example, NE was increased by a preceding red crops. In addition, the magnitude of cumulative growing
clover legume crop. season N2O emissions per unit value of NE was greater
In the rotation crops, NE was closely related to for preceding crops, which had the highest numeric
fertilizer N rate for the non-legume crop species. Thus, values of CO2 emissions shortly after planting, than for
in this study, where all fertilizer N was applied pre-plant other preceding crops. These findings are consistent with
or at planting, fertilizer N rate is likely as effective as the hypothesis that increased carbon availability re-
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

NE as an index of risk for non-legume crop species; sulted in increased N2O emissions. This hypothesis is
however, timing of fertilizer application can have a also consistent with laboratory incubations utilizing a
significant effect on NE and on N2O emissions (Zebarth range of organic carbon amendments that have shown a
et al. 2012b). As might be expected, NE for legume crop very close relationship between soil respiration and N2O
species, which in this study received no fertilizer N emissions provided the soil NO3 supply is not depleted
application, was greater than would be expected based (Miller et al. 2008, 2009). Increased N2O emissions were
on fertilizer N rate alone. Overall, NE is a better index reported under field conditions associated with in-
of risk of growing season N2O emissions than fertilizer creased carbon availability due to incorporation of plant
N rate alone because it also considers the effects of residues (Baggs et al. 2000), particularly legume residues
mineralization of soil organic matter and crop residues (Larrson et al. 1998), and soil re-wetting (Zebarth
on NO3 availability. et al. 2008). However, denitrification rates measured
In both 2008 and 2010, predictions of growing sea- in the ridge on 2008 Jun. 03 and 2010 Jun. 01 did not
son N2O emissions under potato production were im- vary significantly with preceding crop. This may reflect
proved when both NE and cumulative growing season incorporation of crop residues below the 10-cm depth
CO2 emissions were considered. These CO2 emissions sampled for denitrification on these dates. Paul and
primarily reflect microbial respiration (Raich and Zebarth (1997) measured considerably greater denitrifi-
Tufekcioglu 2000), but also seasonally variable respira- cation rates at 15- to 30-cm depth than from 0- to 15-cm
tion of below-ground plant tissues including roots in the depth for soils receiving mineral fertilizer or manure,
ridge and furrow (Sharifi et al. 2005) and tubers in the a finding attributed to high organic carbon availability
ridge. Thus, while CO2 emissions may not reflect only due to a deep A horizon, and to increased soil water
microbial activity and carbon availability, they do content and decreased air-filled porosity for the 15- to
reflect oxygen consumption by the microbial community 30-cm depth.
and the crop, and also reflect the availability of carbon Second, there was evidence of reduced CO2 emissions
as an electron donor, both of which can directly due to soil compaction. The reduced CO2 emissions in
influence the denitrification process. the compacted furrow compared with the furrow were
Two distinct effects on CO2 emissions were measured attributed to a reduced oxygen supply. In the current
under potato production. First, there was evidence of study, the denitrification rate was increased in the
increased CO2 emissions in response to decomposition compacted furrow compared with the furrow, at least
of plant residues from the preceding crop. For example on some sampling dates, but there were no significant
a preceding crop of Italian ryegrass, which results in differences in cumulative growing season N2O emis-
incorporation of a considerable amount of above- and sions. In field studies, elevated N2O emissions may
below-ground biomass (Zebarth et al. 2009), resulted coincide with low soil respiration during periods of high
in elevated CO2 emissions in both years. This increase soil water content. For example, Ball et al. (1999)
occurred early in the potato growing season and clearly reported that heavy rainfall under no-till resulted in a
reflects decomposition of plant residues as opposed to sharp reduction in CO2 emissions and a corresponding
potato root growth. Similarly, a preceding crop of red increase in N2O emissions.
clover increased CO2 emissions in 2008, but this effect Emissions of N2O may therefore be associated with
was less evident in 2010, likely reflecting poor germina- increased or decreased soil respiration, making it some-
tion and growth of the red clover in 2009 resulting from what challenging to use soil respiration as an index
cold wet conditions at seeding. It is hypothesized that in predicting risk of N2O emissions. In addition, the
increased soil respiration resulting from residues of the magnitude of the changes in soil respiration due to
preceding crop depleted oxygen supply, or that the residue addition or soil compaction is small relative to
increased soil respiration indicates increased availability the large basal soil respiration, which reduces the
of soil carbon to act as an electron donor, particularly sensitivity of soil respiration as a predictor. Root and
early in the growing season when soil water contents tuber respiration, like microbial respiration, increase
SNOWDON ET AL. * N2O EMISSIONS IN POTATO ROTATIONS 293

oxygen consumption and thus inclusion of root and crops such as forages and legumes, which are important
tuber respiration in the measure of CO2 emissions in maintaining soil quality and productivity in potato
may not be problematic. An improved indicator of soil production systems (Stark and Porter 2005), also
carbon availability may be helpful in predicting the risk increase the risk of N2O emissions in the short term,
of N2O emissions under different cropping systems. but may result in lower N2O emissions per unit of tuber
Inclusion of soil WFPSTW in the stepwise regression yield over the long term.
resulted in some improvement in predicting cumulative
growing season N2O emissions under potato production ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
in 2008 and 2010. However, surprisingly, there was a Funding was provided by the GAPS program and the
negative correlation between WFPSTW and cumulative SAGES program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
growing season N2O emissions in each year. This likely and the Enabling Agricultural Research and Innovation
reflects the fact that in the current study, WFPSTW (EARI) program of the NB Department of Agriculture
varied primarily with row location. Although greater and Aquaculture. Technical assistance was provided by
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

denitrification rates were measured in the compacted Ginette Decker, Drucie Janes and Karen Terry.
furrow than in the ridge, as would be expected with
greater WFPSTW in the compacted furrow, greater Baggs, E. M., Rees, R. M., Smith, K. A. and Vinten, A. J. A.
cumulative N2O emissions were measured in the ridge 2000. Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating
than in the compacted furrow. Other studies under crop residues. Soil Use Manage. 16: 8287.
potato production have also reported greater denitrifica- Ball, B., Scott, A. and Parker, J. 1999. Field N2O, CO2 and
tion rates in the furrow, but greater N2O emissions from CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in
the ridge (Burton et al. 2008; Dandie et al. 2008). This Scotland. Soil Tillage Res. 53: 2939.
finding is attributed to high soil nitrate concentration in Burton, D. L., Zebarth, B. J., Gillam, K. M. and MacLeod,
J. A. 2008. Effect of split application of fertilizer nitrogen on
the ridge due to fertilizer banding resulting in a high N2O
N2O emissions from potatoes. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88: 229239.
molar ratio of emissions from the ridge. In this study, the Cambouris, A. N., Zebarth, B. J., Nolin, M. C. and Laverdière,
role of WFPS was perhaps best reflected in differences M. R. 2008. Apparent fertilizer nitrogen recovery and residual
between the two potato production years. For example, soil nitrate under continuous potato cropping: Effect of N
the steeper slope of the relationship between cumulative fertilization rate and timing. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88: 813825.
N2O emission and NE in 2010, i.e., greater N2O Dandie, C. E., Burton, D. L., Zebarth, B. J., Henderson, S. L.,
emissions per unit of nitrate availability, likely reflects Trevors, J. T. and Goyer, C. 2008. Changes in bacterial
the wetter conditions in 2010 than in 2008, particularly denitrifier community abundance over time in an agricultural
in response to significant rainfall events shortly after field and their relationship with denitrification activity. Appl.
planting in 2010. Previous studies have also reported that Environ. Microbiol. 74: 59976005.
Drury, C. F., Yang, X. M., Reynolds, W. D. and McLaughlin,
the relationship between cumulative N2O emission and
N. B. 2008. Nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions from
NE varied with growing season, a finding attributed to monoculture and rotational cropping of corn, soybean and
differences in environmental conditions (Zebarth et al. winter wheat. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88: 163174.
2008). Ellert, B. H. and Janzen, H. H. 2008. Nitrous oxide, carbon
The results of this study have practical implications dioxide and methane emissions from irrigated cropping
for mitigating N2O emissions from potato production systems as influenced by legumes, manure and fertilizer. Can.
systems. In this study, choice of 2-yr potato rotation J. Soil Sci. 88: 207217.
resulted in an almost twofold difference in N2O emis- Elmi, A. A., Madramootoo, C., Egeh, M., Liu, A. and Hamel,
sions. The N2O emissions were closely related to NO3 C. 2002. Environmental and agronomic implications of water
availability, as indicated by NE, during both the potato table and nitrogen fertilization management. J. Environ. Qual.
31: 18581867.
and rotation crop phases, and consequently appropriate
Environment Canada. 2011. Climate normals and averages.
fertilizer N management remains one of the most [Online] Available: http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_
important means of managing N2O emissions. As a normals/index_e.html [2011 Dec. 02].
result, the fertilizer N management in both the potato Gillam, K. M., Zebarth, B. J. and Burton, D. L. 2008. Nitrous
and rotation crop phases may be as or more important oxide emissions from denitrification and the partitioning of
than the choice of rotation crop in influencing the risk of gaseous losses as affected by nitrate and carbon addition and
N2O emissions. Emissions of N2O increase with increas- soil aeration. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88: 133143.
ing N inputs, particularly for N inputs in excess of the Honeycutt, C. W., Zibilske, L. M. and Clapham, W. M. 1988.
optimum rate (McSwiney and Robertson 2005). How- Heat units for describing carbon mineralization and predict-
ever uncertainty in the supply of N from the soil, ing net nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:
13461350.
uncertainty in the demand for N by the plant, and the
Hutchinson, G. and Livingston, G. 1993. Use of chamber
risk of economic loss associated with under-fertilization, systems to measure trace gas fluxes. Pages 6378 in L. A.
make selection of the appropriate fertilizer N rate Harper, A. R. Mosier, J. M. Duxbury, and D. E. Rolston,
challenging (Zebarth et al. 2012a). The results of this eds. Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global
study also highlight the important role of carbon climate change. Special Publication No 55. ASA, CSSA,
availability on N2O emissions. Unfortunately rotational SSSA, Madison, WI.
294 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Kroetsch, D. and Wang, C. 2008. Particle size distribution. warming with no-tillage management is only realized when
Pages 713725 in M. R. Carter and E. G. Gregorich, eds. Soil practised in the long term. Global Change Biol. 10: 155160.
sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L. 2003. Potato production systems.
Science, Ottawa, ON. University of Idaho extension, Moscow, ID.
Larsson, L., Ferm, M., Kasimir-Klemedtsson, A. and Stark, J. C. and Porter, G. A. 2005. Potato nutrient manage-
Klemedtsson, L. 1998. Ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions ment in sustainable cropping systems. Am. J. Potato Res. 82:
from grass and alfalfa mulches. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 51: 329338.
4146. van Groenigen, J., Kasper, G., Velthof, G., van den Pol-van
Linn, D. M. and Doran, J. W. 1984. Effect of water-filled pore Dasselaar, A. and Kuikman, P. 2004. Nitrous oxide emissions
space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen
and nontilled soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48: 12671272. fertilizer and slurry applications. Plant Soil 263: 101111.
McSwiney, C. P. and Robertson, G. P. 2005. Nonlinear Wagner-Riddle, C., Furon, A., McLaughlin, N. L., Lee, I.,
response of N2O flux to incremental fertiliser addition in a Barbeau, J., Susantha, J., Parkin, G., Bertoldi, P. V. and
continuous maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system. Global Warland, J. 2007. Intensive measurement of nitrous oxide
Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com by University of Alberta on 07/12/23

Change Biol. 11: 17121719.


emissions from a cornsoybeanwheat rotation under two
Miller, M. N., Zebarth, B. J., Dandie, C. E., Burton, D. L.,
contrasting management systems over 5 years. Global Change
Goyer, C. and Trevors, J. T. 2008. Crop residue influence on
denitrification, N2O emissions and denitrifier community Biology 13: 17221736.
abundance in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40: 25532562. Zebarth, B. J. and Milburn, P. H. 2003. Spatial and temporal
Miller, M. N., Zebarth, B. J., Dandie, C. E., Burton, D. L., distribution of soil inorganic nitrogen concentration in potato
Goyer, C. and Trevors, J. T. 2009. Influence of liquid manure hills. Can. J. Soil Sci. 83: 183195.
on soil denitrifier abundance, denitrification and nitrous oxide Zebarth, B. J., Leclerc, Y., Moreau, G., Gareau, R. and
emissions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73: 760768. Milburn, P. H. 2003. Soil inorganic nitrogen content in
Mosier, A. R. 1998. Soil processes and global change. Biol. commercial potato fields in New Brunswick. Can. J. Soil Sci.
Fertil. Soils 27: 221229. 83: 425429.
Mosier, A. R., Halvorson, A. D., Reule, C. A. and Liu, X. J. Zebarth, B. J., Karemangingo, C., Scott, P., Savoie, D. and
2006. Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas Moreau, G. 2007. Nitrogen management for potato: General
intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Color- fertilizer recommendations. New Brunswick Soil and Crop
ado. J. Environ. Qual. 35: 15841598. Improvement Association. [Online] Available: http://www.
Paul, J. W. and Zebarth, B. J. 1997. Denitrification during the nbscia.ca/id27.html [2009 Oct. 11].
growing season following dairy cattle slurry and fertilizer Zebarth, B. J., Arsenault, W. J., Moorehead, S., Kunelius,
application for silage corn. Can. J. Soil Sci. 77: 241248. H. T. and Sharifi, M. 2009. Italian ryegrass management
Raich, J. W. and Tufekciogul, A. 2000. Vegetation and soil effects on nitrogen supply to a subsequent potato crop. Agron.
respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry 48: J. 101: 15731580.
7190. Zebarth, B. J., Bélanger, G., Cambouris, A. N. and Ziadi, N.
Rees, H. and Fahmy, S. 1984. Soil of the Agriculture Canada 2012a. Nitrogen fertilization strategies in relation to potato
Research Station, Fredericton, N.B. LRRI, Research Branch, tuber yield, quality, and crop N recovery. Pages 165186 in
Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON. Z. He, R. P. Larkin, and C. W. Honeycutt, eds. Sustainable
Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Chantigny, M. H., Gagnon, B. and potato production: Global case studies. Springer, New York,
Bertrand, N. 2008. N2O fluxes in soils of contrasting textures NY.
fertilized with liquid and solid dairy cattle manures. Can. J. Zebarth, B. J., Rochette, P. and Burton, D. L. 2008. N2O
Soil Sci. 88: 175187.
emissions from spring barley production as influenced by
Sharifi, M., Zebarth, B. J., Hajabbasi, M. A. and Kalbasi, M.
2005. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and root fertilizer nitrogen rate. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88: 197205.
morphological characteristics of two clonal selections of Zebarth, B. J., Snowdon, E., Burton, D. L., Goyer, C. and
‘Russet Norkotah’ potato as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Dowbenko, R. 2012b. Controlled release fertilizer product
J. Plant Nutr. 28: 22432253. effects on potato crop response and nitrous oxide emissions
Six, J., Ogle, S. M., Jay breidt, E., Conant, R. T., Mosier, under rain-fed production on a medium-textured soil. Can. J.
A. R. and Paustian, K. 2004. The potential to mitigate global Soil Sci. 92: 759769.

You might also like