You are on page 1of 8

Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Small Ruminant Research


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/smallrumres

Evaluation of new formulations of nematophagous fungi Duddingtonia


flagrans to control gastrointestinal nematodes in post-weaning lambs in
Colombia Andean region
Jaime Andrés Cubides-Cárdenas a, 1, Jimmy Jolman Vargas Duarte b, Henry Grajales Lombana c, 2,
Elizabeth Céspedes-Gutiérrez d, 3, Martha Isabel Gómez-Álvarez d, 4,
Diego Francisco Cortés-Rojas d, *, 5
a
Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA, Sede Tibaitatá, Mosquera, Colombia
b
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de genética, Colombia
c
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Grupo de Investigación: Gestión Tecnologica e Innovación en Sistemas Pecuarios,
Colombia
d
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA, Sede Central, Mosquera, Colombia

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) can reduce or limit sheep production. Nematophagous fungi are natural en­
Biological control emies of GIN and can be used as a biological control tool by reducing the use of anthelmintic drugs. This study,
Bioproducts formulations conducted in the Colombian Andean region (Mosquera, Cundinamarca) under tropical conditions, aimed to
Integrated pest management
evaluate the effectiveness of novel granular formulations (E3, E16) based on Duddingtonia flagrans (native strain)
Anthelmintics resistance
against GIN in a controlled field trial. Four different groups of post-weaning lambs (n = 9) naturally infected with
GIN were allocated in separate paddocks and received daily fungi formulations identified as E3, E16, and fungus
dried biomass (DB) at a dosage of 1 × 106 chlamydospores/kg of body weight for 18 weeks, excepting control
group. Parasitological criteria such as the number of eggs per gram of feces (EPG) and larvae pasture count (L3/
Kg DM) recovered were monitored. The estimated EPG reduction of the developed formulations was 62.7 %, 80.2
%, and 62.3 % for E3, E16, and DB, respectively. There was a significant reduction between the treated groups
and the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding EPG, no significant differences arose between E3 and E16 formu­
lations. The formulation E16 reduced pasture larvae count up to 89 %. The effect of formulations persisted for at
least 42 days after the last fungus administration. Therefore, using these formulations would provide an alter­
native option to control GIN parasites on pasture and in animals.

1. Introduction The control of gastrointestinal nematodes is based on conventional


anthelmintic drugs (Medina et al., 2014; Mendoza de Gives et al., 2022),
Gastrointestinal nematode diseases in cattle and sheep cause losses in widely adopted due to their easy administration, high efficacy, a wide
the livestock industry related to the reduction of weight gain and milk margin of safety, and broad spectrum. However, the inappropriate use of
production (Mendoza de Gives et al., 2022). Particularly in tropical re­ these anthelmintics and the lack of knowledge about integrated control
gions such as Colombia, the environmental conditions of humidity and by producers caused problems such as (1) resistance of parasites to
temperature are optimal for the development and survival of parasites synthetic molecules reducing the control capacity of current products,
(Márquez et al., 2008). (2) bioaccumulation of antiparasitic drugs in products derived from the

* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: dfcortes@agrosavia.co (D.F. Cortés-Rojas).
1
Orcid: 0000-0002-4286-2018
2
Orcid: 0000-0003-0827-6899
3
Orcid: 0000-0002-8587-2152
4
Orcid: 0000-0003-4919-2747
5
Orcid: 0000-0002-5618-6284

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.106980
Received 8 February 2023; Received in revised form 8 April 2023; Accepted 11 April 2023
Available online 13 April 2023
0921-4488/© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

livestock system such as meat and milk, (3) change in the beneficial 2.2. D. flagrans formulations
microbial flora present in manure and animals (4) increase in the fre­
quency of application of the products increase the cost of parasite con­ The strain of D. flagrans: AGROSAVIA: BGMA: H4–0001 was origi­
trol (Cubides et al., 2015; Gilleard et al., 2021; Medina et al., 2014). nally isolated from soil samples from the region of Cota, Cundinamarca –
The fungus Duddingtonia flagrans has a well-stablished nem­ Colombia (4.8099◦ N, 74.1018◦ W). Its use is authorized by the contract
atophagous capacity and high production of chlamydospores which are for access to genetic resources No. 168 of 2017. The biomass for the
resistance structures characterized by a thick wall protecting them in formulations was produced by following the solid-state fermentation
different environments of the ruminant gastrointestinal tract methodology described by Castillo-Saldarriaga et al. (2020). The
(Céspedes-Gutierrez et al., 2021; Ojeda-Robertos et al., 2009). biomass was dried at 35 ◦ C ± 2 ◦ C to reduce the moisture to 10–15 %,
Currently, there are two products based on D. flagrans for biological and subsequently, the coating formulations (Table 2) were sprayed on
control of gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants one of them was the air-fluidized biomass using the Wurster fluid bed coating technique
developed in Australia (Bioworma®) (Healey et al., 2018); and the other (Glatt® Uni-glatt 8512).
one was created in Brazil (Bioverm®) (Braga et al., 2020). However,
those products are not registered in Colombia. 2.3. Formulation characterization
A Colombian native strain of the fungus D. flagrans was isolated and
the optimal conditions for biphasic fermentation to obtain a high The formulations were analyzed at microbiological and physico­
number of chlamydospores were developed (Castillo-Saldarriaga et al., chemical level, as follows.
2020). The design of delivery systems that protect fungus chlamydo­
spores through the gastrointestinal tract of animals is of utmost impor­ 2.3.1. Microbiological characterization
tance for obtaining a high-efficacy bio-product considering previous Solid formulation (5 g) was diluted in 50 mL of a Tween 80 solution
reports in which only 10 % of the administered chlamydospores were (0.1 % v/v), aliquots of this suspension were employed to evaluate
recovered in some cases (Ojeda-Robertos et al., 2009). In this work two chlamydospore concentration, viability and nematode predatory ability.
formulations based on D. flagrans were developed using a coating pro­
cess and adding excipients to maintain the integrity of the fungus after ■ Chlamydospores concentration (chlamydospores/mL): chlamydospores
passing through the gastrointestinal tract of the animals. The objective were counted by optical microscopy employing a Neubauer chamber
of this work was to evaluate the impact of the compositions developed to as described by (Céspedes Gutiérrez et al., 2021).
control gastrointestinal nematodes in post-weaning wool sheep under ■ Viability (CFU/g): was analyzed by plate count in Petri dishes with
Colombian high mountain conditions. Viability and in vitro nematode YMA Agar plus Triton X-100 (1 g/L) incubated for 5 days at 28 ◦ C ±
predatory ability were monitored during the production process 0.5 ◦ C following the methodology described by (Céspedes Gutiérrez
knowing in advance that these are the most important variables related et al., 2021).
to the expected effect (Céspedes Gutiérrez et al., 2021). ■ Nematode predatory ability (%): was performed using the Baermann
funnel technique following the methodologies described by (Men­
2. Materials and methods doza de Gives, 2011; Rodríguez-Martínez et al., 2018) using the
biological model of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus (Braga et al.,
2.1. Location 2012). The larvae recovered were counted, and the percentage of
nematode predatory ability was calculated compared to control
The field trial was conducted at the CIDTEO (Centro de Inves­ (Rodríguez-Martínez et al., 2018).
tigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y Extension Ovina) of the Universidad ■ Contaminant concentration: to determine the presence and concen­
Nacional de Colombia, located in the agricultural center Marengo, tration of bacterial and yeast-like contaminants, samples were
Mosquera, Colombia at 2510 m above sea level (4◦ 40′ 57′′ N 74◦ 12′ 50′′ inoculated in Petri dishes with Nutritive Agar (24 h) and east malt
W). The weather conditions (maximum temperature, minimum tem­ extract agar (YMA) (48 h) correspondingly and incubated (at 26 ◦ C
perature and precipitation) during the experimental period (every 14 ± 0.5 ◦ C). Potato extract agar (PDA) was used to determine fungal
days) are presented in Table 1. contaminants. The incubation time was 7 days at 28 ◦ C ± 0.5 ◦ C.
The technological development of the formulations based on chla­ Results were expressed as colony-forming units (CFU).
mydospores of the nematophagous fungus D. flagrans was carried out at
the Bioproducts department of AGROSAVIA. The diagnostic coprology 2.3.2. Physicochemical characterization
techniques were carried out in the animal health laboratory - helmin­
thology, at the Tibaitatá Research Center Mosquera, Colombia. ■ Specific gravity: Briefly, 5 g of each formulation were weighed and
placed in a 100 mL beaker, 25 mL of distilled water were added. The
mixture was left overnight for moistening and transferred to a 100
mL volumetric flask, and the volume was completed with distilled
water. Equation 1 was employed to calculate the specific gravity
Table 1 (Materials testing FM 5–472, 2001).
Weather conditions during the experimental period in Mosquera, Cundinamarca
– Colombia.
Experimental Temperature Máx Temperature Mín Precipitation Table 2
day (ºC) (ºC) (mm) Composition of the two coating formulations applied over the fungal biomass of
0 16.6 5 4 Duddingtonia flagrans (% weight/weight).
14 20.6 9.6 0
Excipient E3 E16
28 21.4 5.2 1
42 18.6 4 0.8 Vegetal oil 50.5 52.6
56 21 7.2 13.3 Eudragit® S100 3.1 26.3
70 19.8 8 0 Tween® 80 0 15.8
84 20.6 4.8 0 Arabic gum 3.1 0
98 20.4 5 13 Kaolin 28.3 0
112 22 5.4 2 Soy protein isolate 15.0 0
126 20.8 4.6 0 Oleic acid 0 5.3

2
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

Ws a week, based on the work published by Paraud et al. (2005). The


GS =
(Ws + Wbw − Wbws amount of granular formulation to achieve the dose of 1 × 106 chla­
mydospores/Kg of body weight for each animal was mixed with a
Where, Ws is the weight of the solid formulation, Wbw is the weight of commercial concentrate composed of 20 % protein 3 % fat, 9 % crude
the volumetric flask with water, and Wbws is the weight of the volu­ fiber, and 10 % ashes. A rotational grazing scheme was carried out in a
metric flask with the stable formulation and water. monoculture meadow of Pennisetum clandestinum. Pasture was divided
by fencing and 3 paddocks were assigned to each experimental group
■ pH: 1 g of each formulation was diluted in 10 mL of distilled water (Fig. 1), the occupation period for each paddock was 21 days giving 42
and homogenized with an immersion blender (KitchenAid® days of meadow rest. Each paddock was used exclusively by only one of
KHB1231ER). A calibrated pH-meter (Consort®, C1010, Turnhout, the treatment groups. A cycle (63 days) was considered as the rotation
Belgium) was employed for analysis. through three exclusive paddocks of each experimental group. The
■ Moisture content: 0,5 g of each formulation were placed in the experiment lasted 18 weeks, therefore two cycles were completed dur­
moisture analyzer at 105 ◦ C (KERN, MLS50-3, Southampton, United ing the experiment. The response variables monitored were egg count
Kingdom) until constant weight. per gram of feces (EPG) weekly and pasture larvae count every 21 days.
■ Particle size: was analyzed by sieving. 200 g of each formulation were EPG was evaluated according to Gordon and Whitlock (1934) tech­
placed in a column of sieves with a nominal opening of 4750 µm, nique; fecal samples were taken directly from the rectal ampulla of each
2000 µm, and 1000 µm. Sieves were shake for 10 min (Tyler 12) and animal. For pasture larvae count samples from each paddock were
the amount retained in each sieve was weighed. Results were collected according to Minguetto et al. (2021) and processed according
expressed as percentages. to Molento et al. (2016), results were expressed as the number of larvae
per kilogram in dry basis (L3/ Kg db).
Any animal presenting an EPG higher than 4000 was dewormed
2.4. In vivo tests using Levamisole (Coopersol®, MSD).
The genera of gastrointestinal nematodes of the different experi­
The animals selected for the experiment were lambs of approxi­ mental groups were monitored weekly (100 larvae from each experi­
mately 4 months old post weaning of the Hampshire and wool Creole mental group) by means of stool cultures (Van Wyk and Mayhew 2013).
breeds, located in a pasture with a low load of gastrointestinal nema­
todes established by pre-trial grazing. For the evaluation, a mixed model
was used with a completely randomized design supported by a structure 2.5. Post-cessation persistence effect
of repeated measures over time. The animals were distributed in four
groups of nine lambs (n = 9) each. Group 1 was administered the Once the administration of the formulations finished, the evaluation
formulation (E3), group 2 was administered the formulation (E16), of the response variables EPG and pasture larvae count (L3/kg dry basis
group 3 was administered the dried fungus biomass (DB) and group 4 [db]) in the treated and control groups continued for two up to 42 days.
was the control treatment, to which no formulation or anthelmintic drug Two samplings were carried out at 21 and 42 days, the results were
was administered. The formulations were administered orally, five days compared with the last two reports of the in vivo test in which the

Fig. 1. Rotational grazing scheme for animals (n = 9) through the paddocks of Pennisetum clandestinum grass for each experimental group to evaluate the effect of
Duddingtonia flagrans formulations. *The occupation period for each paddock was 21 days. A cycle (63 days) was considered as the rotation through three exclusive
paddocks of each experimental group.

3
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

formulations were evaluated. Table 3


Physical, microbiological and biological characterization of formulations.

2.6. Statistical analysis Dried biomass E3 E16

Concentration 3.09 1.64 2.93


The selection of the variance/covariance structure for each variable (chlamydospores/g) ± 0.73 × 107 a ± 0.66 × 107 a ± 0.41 × 107 a
was carried out by comparing the BIC, AIC, and AICC criteria. Its se­ Viability (UFC/g) 5.90 3.30 5.60
± 0.00 × 106 a ± 0.14 × 106 b ± 0.99 × 106 a
lection comes from combining the lowest values of the three criteria. The
In vitro nematode 82.58 ± 10.71a 92.03 ± 6.55b 93.58 ± 4.92b
data were transformed into a log(x + 1) before the analysis and sub­ predatory ability (%)
jected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures and Bacterial contaminants 2.95 4.50 5.00
Tukey’s test using a randomized design at a probability level of 5 %. (UFC/g) ± 0.49 × 104 a ± 3.54 × 103 b ± 7.00 × 103 b
Yeast contaminants < 10 1.00
Statistical analyzes were performed with the GLIMMIX procedure of the <10
(UFC/g) ± 0.00 × 103
SAS 9.4 statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). For in Fungal contaminants 6.20 4.85 1.40
vivo test of all the measured variables, the assumptions of normality and (UFC/g) ± 0.57 × 104 a ± 0.78 × 104 a ± 0.28 × 104 b
homoscedasticity of the residuals were evaluated, from these analyzes it pH (-) 5.72 ± 0.04a 6.97 ± 0.03b 6.91 ± 0.06b
was decided to transform larvae and EPG count to normalize data, using Moisture (%) 3.92 ± 0.44a 0.82 ± 0.16b 2.70 ± 0.95a
Specific gravity (-) 1.233 ± 0.020a 1.304 ± 0.026b 1.354 ± 0.030b
the logarithm in base 10 of the observed value plus 100, to change the
Particle size 92.5 73.7 51.3
magnitude of the variable and reduce the number of zeros in the results. 2000–4750 µm (%) 7.5 26.3 48.7
The treatment effectiveness based on the variables was carried out 1000–2000 µm (%)
through a repeated measure complete randomized design, accordingly
* Values with the same letter do not present statistically significant difference
to the following model: with respect to time zero (Tukey p < 0.05).
yij = μ + τi + θj + (τi ∗ θk ) + oij + eij
in the control group, in fact two animals (Hematocrit level below 20 %)
yij = evaluatedvariable of this group required anthelmintic treatment, one in experimental day
56 and another later in experimental day 84. No anthelmintic treatment
μ = generalmean was needed in the groups treated with nematophagous fungi. The sta­
tistical model showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05)
τi = treatmenteffect between the control group and the treated groups. The cumulative
reduction for the formulations were 62.7 %, 62.3 % and 80.2 % for DB,
θk = samplingtimeeffect E3 and E16 respectively, no significant differences were observed be­
tween formulation E3 and E16.
(τi ∗ θk ) = treatmentinteractioninsamplingtimes
In Fig. 3, it is observed that pasture larvae count increased gradually
after each rotation, especially for the control group (without fungi).
oij = randomerroramongovine(replicate)
During the last rotation cycle, statistically significant differences
eij = randomerrorinanimals(repeatedmeasure) (p < 0.05) were found in the mean larvae pasture count (L3/Kg db); the
E16 group showed a more substantial reduction (89%).
For the post-cessation persistence effect of nematophagous fungi, the The genera of gastrointestinal nematodes of the experimental groups
comparison of the results of the last two sampling times of the admin­ is presented in Table 4. No wide variations were observed among
istration of the formulation with the two sampling results of the post- groups, although in the case of the control group the Haemonchus genera
cessation months, was performed using the Wilcoxon test for related predominated.
groups.
3.3. Post-cessation persistence effect of formulations
3. Results
For the EPG variable, the results of the animals in the previous
3.1. Formulation characterization experimental groups increased considerably at 42 post cessation days
(Figs. 4 and 5), showing significant differences in the experimental
The formulations selected for this study, E3 and E16, as well as the groups with the Wilcoxon test. The counts for the E3 group increased
DB, were analyzed in terms of their physical- and microbiological from an average of 600 EPG to 2560 EPG. For the E16 group, the change
properties and in vitro predatory ability (Table 3). The concentration of was from 54.6 to 2042 EPG, and for the DB group, from 92.7 to 2645
chlamydospores in each formulation was higher than one × 107 chla­ EPG. These results indicate that after 42 days of cessation, the treated
mydospores/g; no significant differences were observed with the DB. groups achieve loads equal to the control group; therefore, the persis­
Regarding viability, values were lower than the concentration in all the tence time of the fungus is less than 42 experimental days.
formulations, which means that not all the chlamydospores produced by In the case of larvae in a pasture, there was an increase in the treated
the fungus can develop. The pH of the formulations dispersed in water groups after 21 days after the last administration of fungus in the groups
was very close to 7, this indicates that the added excipients do not alter (mean 775 and 232 L3/Kg db for E3 and E16, respectively).
the pH of the medium in which the formulation is diluted. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) compared to the last
rotation and the rotation carried out 42 days after the previous fungi
3.2. In vivo test: EPG and pasture larvae count administration; the mean pasture larvae count was 1832 L3/Kg db for E3
and 2042 L3/Kg db for E16. These results indicate that the persistence
The EPG results during the field study in the different experimental period could be between 21 and 42 days because there are no significant
groups showedan evident effect of the use of nematophagous fungus as increases in larvae on the pasture before 21 days; however, after 42
biocontrol agent (Fig. 2). The mean EPG in the group that did not receive days, the EPG increased.
D. flagrans (control) is considerably higher than the other groups. An
increase of EPG in all groups was observed after a rainy period (Table 1)
in experimental day 48. This efffect began to decrease for the groups
treated with the nematophagous fungi formulations, but remained high

4
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

Fig. 2. Mean eggs per gram (EPG) over time of each experimental group receiving Duddingtonia flagrans formulations E3, E16, DB (dried biomass), and a group did
not receive fungi (without fungi).

Fig. 3. Mean pasture larvae count (L3 larvae/Kg dry basis) during the two cycles of paddock rotation for experimental groups receiving Duddingtonia flagrans
formulations: E3, E16, D.B. (dried biomass) and the group that did not receive fungi (without fungi).

coating with excipients that avoid the action of enzymes or the effect of
Table 4
pH fluctuation in the ruminal digestive tract such as Eudragit® S100.
Gastrointestinal nematodes genera of the experimental groups.
This polymer is intended for intestinal delivery and dissolves at pH
Nematode genera E3 E16 Dried biomass Control values above 7. Previous in vitro studies (data not presented) showed
Haemonchus 56 48 52 60 that this substance was compatible with the fungi chlamydospores, and
Teladorsagia 33 25 26 22 its physicochemical properties are adequate for the coating formulation
Trichostrongylus 5 10 14 9
process employed in this work. The higher amount of gastro-resistant
Cooperia 3 8 6 5
Nematodirus 2 7 2 2 polymer could be related to the higher efficacy of formulation E16.
Oesophagostomum 1 - - 2 The composition of the formulations developed for this study contains
Chabertia - 2 - - substances that prevent this type of damage. Vegetable oils could also
protect chlamydospores from enzymes in the rumen, ensuring a higher
number of viable chlamydospores come through the animal’s fecal
4. Discussion
matter to exert their effect. The pH of the formulation compositions
developed was monitored considering that this characteristic can
4.1. Formulation characterization
negatively affect the cell membrane of microorganisms and the devel­
opment of traps to capture nematodes (Hasanzadeh et al., 2012); usu­
Considering the mechanism of action of the nematophagous fungus
ally, neutral pH favors the integrity of fungus (Samaniego-Gaxiola,
D. flagrans, which implies the oral administration and the passage
2007). Accordingly, Grønvold et al. (1999) reported that pH values close
through the ruminant gastrointestinal tract, so protection of fungus
to 7 favor the nematophagous capacity of the fungus.
chlamydospores will help ensure that there are more chlamydospores in
Another strategy to avoid the degradation of chlamydospores in the
the feces. One strategy to protect the chlamydospores of the fungus is the

5
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

Fig. 4. Eggs per gram (EPG) excretion after 21 and 42 days after cessation of Duddingtonia flagrans administration (formulations E3, E16, DB [dried biomass]) and
without fungi administration).

(Healey et al., 2018; Mendoza-de Gives et al., 2018). Considering that


the chlamydospore concentration of formulations E3 and E16 is high
(approximately 1 × 107 chlamydospores/g db), only a small amount of
these formulations would be required in order to achieve the recom­
mended dose (1 × 106 chlamydospores/Kg body weight).

4.2. Efficacy of the new formulations

The new formulations developed are a vital differential factor to


consider for the survival of the fungus through the GIT and on its
accumulated efficacy measured as the percentage of reduction of EPG or
pasture larvae count (L3/Kg MS). The results obtained in this work
suggest that the formulation composition and its physicochemical
characteristics could directly impact the nematode control and excretion
over time.
The in vivo efficacy studies described in literature employing
D. flagrans must be analyzed carefully since it will depend on several
variables such as the indicator being evaluated, the fungus strain, the
Fig. 5. Pasture larvae count (L3/Kg dry basis.) after 21 and 42 days after evaluation method, the animal species, the dose of chlamydospores
cessation of Duddingtonia flagrans administration (formulations E3, E16, DB administrated to animals, the simultaneous implementation of other
[dried biomass]) and without fungi administration).
strategies, the grazing system, and the environmental conditions
employed, among others (Canhão-Dias et al., 2020; Chavarría-Joya
gastrointestinal tract of ruminants is to bypass the rumination process or et al., 2022).
decrease the residence time. In this sense, the physical properties of the The reduction of EPG obtained at the end of the assay with the
administered substances, such as particle size and shape and specific formulation E16 (up to 98,6%) was higher than the results found in
gravity, play an essential role (Pell et al., 2000). The specific gravity of lambs by Vilela et al. (2016), Liu et al. (2020) and Silva et al. (2009) In
the formulations developed in the present study was among the ranges the study by Aguilar-Marcelino et al. (2016), a reduction range between
that prevent retention in the ruminal cavity. Therefore, it is expected 30.5% and 78.7% was obtained, using twice the dose of our experiment.
that the fungus chlamydospores do not experience a high residence time Healey et al. (2018) did not find significant differences in the reduction
in the rumen due to the bypass phenomenon (Seyama et al., 2017). after 15 weeks of fungi administration in a similar number of lambs to
According to a study published by Kaske and Engelhardt (1990), plastic those used in the present study due to the impact of salvage drenches but
particles were orally administered to sheep. It was observed that the did find significant differences in tracer lambs. Other authors, such as
specific gravity and its particle size influenced between 28 % and 59 % Liu et al. (2020), reported a 92% reduction of EPG in goats after 120
of the variations in the retention time on the gastrointestinal segments. days. However, the animals were kept in confinement conditions, which
In addition, Seyama et al. (2017) used plastic spheres to study how reduces the possibility of re-infection from the meadow.
specific gravity and particle diameter affected dairy cows’ excretion rate A recent assay used an aqueous suspension of D. flagrans without any
and the rumination process. The results showed that particles with a formulation excipient. After 17 days of the administration, a reduction
particular gravity between 1.19 and 1.41 and diameters between 6.35 of only 62% was obtained, demonstrating the importance of the
and 7.94 mm are ideal for the design of post-ruminal release systems. formulation to improve its efficacy or reduce the administration period
King and Moore (1957) also found that particles with a specific gravity (Chavarría-Joya et al., 2022).
greater than 1.20 and less than 1.77 have a lower tendency to be Regarding the EPG, it is essential to highlight that the trapping ef­
retained in the rumen, ideally being in a range between 1.20 and 1.40. ficiency also depends on the EPG/chlamydospore ratio in the feces
Despite the above, it should be considered that rumination time also (Federica Sagües et al., 2021) since larvae in feces stimulate traps for­
depends on the type of animal and the diet it consumes. For example, in mation and, therefore, the efficacy of D. flagrans. Our results showed
the case of forage digestion, a prolonged rumination process is desirable. that the dose of 1 × 106 Kg of live weight for five days a week was
The dosage of chlamydospores of D. flagrans reported in the litera­ adequate for natural infections of sheep during the trial.
ture for sheep and cattle is 3 × 104 to 5 × 106 chlamydospores/Kg/day The efficacy measured as pasture larvae count could be considered

6
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

the most relevant indicator of activity by D. flagrans. A reduction of physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters to be administrated
larvae counts by the fungi is subsequently reflected in EPG reduction in to animals; the efficacy in terms of EPG was higher for E16 than either
animals. Larvae presence in the pasture is not influenced by animal the control or the DB. The effect of the formulations remains up to 42
genetics, immune system, feeding, or physiological stage of the animals days after the last administration in a schedule of 18 weeks.
(Hoste et al., 2016; Naeem et al., 2021; Nisbet et al., 2016); after all, it
can be influenced by the quantification methodology as well as by Funding
environmental variables (Molento et al., 2016; Healey et al., 2018).
The ability of D. flagrans to reduce pasture larvae counts has been This work was supported by the corporación colombiana de inves­
proven by several authors; the formulation E16 developed had a mean tigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA project ID 1000449 and Ministerio
reduction of pasture larvae count of 74%, ranging from 55% to 95.6% in de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia (MADR) [Ministry of
the last rotation, is higher than the reported in the literature. Eysker Agriculture and Rural Development].
et al. (2006); Fontenot et al. (2003); Hernández Hernández and de Gives
Mendoza (2004). da Silveira et al. (2017) showed a synergism of Declaration of Competing Interest
D. flagrans with Monacrosporium thaumasium to reduce pasture larvae
count. All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or anal­
Another strategy to reduce pasture larvae counts is the association of ysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it
a nematophagous fungus with an anthelmintic drug; Vilela et al. (2016) critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final
observed a reduction of pasture larvae count more than 40% using version. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review
D. flagrans and levamisole. at, another journal or other publishing venue. The authors have no
Our study could be the first step in integrated control of gastroin­ affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial in­
testinal nematodes in sheep in Colombia, implementing three strategies: terest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.
restricted rotational grazing, nutritional supplementation, and nem­
atophagous fungi. In the case of specialized dairy, authors such as Voinot Acknowledgments
et al. (2020) had already proposed an integrated control by imple­
menting both rotational grazing, nematophagous fungi, and anthel­ The authors would like to thank the CIDTEO – Universidad Nacional
mintic treatments; with this approach, they managed to reduce EPG de Colombia, to John Sebastian Martinez Lopez, Juan Carlos Barrios
loads by 95% in just two months. In the study, Voinot et al. (2020) re­ Murcia and Tatiana Aldana for their support in executing the activities
ported, that the use of anthelmintic drugs, rotational grazing, and the carried out in the current study.
nematophagous fungi D. flagrans and Mucor circinelloides could be
implemented in a two-year assay with encouraging results. This high­ References
lights the role of nematophagous fungi as part of an integrated parasite
management program". Aguilar-Marcelino, L., Mendoza-de-Gives, P., Torres-Hernandez, G., Lopez-Arellano, M.
E., Becerril-Perez, C.M., Orihuela-Trujillo, A., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., 2016.
Consumption of nutritional pellets with Duddingtonia flagrans fungal chlamydospores
4.3. Persistence effect of formulations reduces infective nematode larvae of Haemonchus contortus in faeces of Saint Croix
lambs. J. Helminthol. 1–7.
Baiak, B.H.B., Gasparina, J.M., Ianke, L., de Sousa, K.T., Deniz, M., Pereira, L.M.,
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first post-cessation report of Araújo, J.V., da Rocha, R.A., Dittrich, J.R., 2021. Predatory activity of
D. flagrans formulations after a continuous supplementation scheme. nematophagus fungus Duddingtonia flagrans in infective larvae after gastrointestinal
Studies reported with the registered product Bioworma® show that the transit: biological control in pasture areas and in vitro. J. Helminthol. 95, e31
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149×21000195.
fungus does not spread widely from the fecal matter, but penetrates Bampidis, V., Azimonti, G., de Lourdes Bastos, M., Christensen, H., Dusemund, B., Kos
superficially into the soil by a mechanical translocation of chlamydo­ Durjava, M., Kouba, M., López-Alonso, M., López Puente, S., Marcon, F., Mayo, B.,
spores (Bampidis et al., 2020). Pechová, A., Petkova, M., Ramos, F., Sanz, Y., Villa, R.E., Woutersen, R., Chesson, A.,
Cocconcelli, P.S., Rychen, G., Wallace, J., Galobart, J., Innocenti, M.L., Brozzi, R.,
Our results indicate that the effect of the developed formulations (E3 Saarela, M., 2020. Safety and efficacy of BioWorma® (Duddingtonia flagrans NCIMB
and E16) could persist for 42 days after the cessation of fungus admin­ 30336) as a feed additive for all grazing animals. EFSA J. 18. https://doi.org/
istration. After this period, there is a significant increase in the EPG of 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6208.
Braga, F., Ferraz, C., da Silva, E., de Araújo, J.V., 2020. Efficiency of the Bioverm®
the animals. This behavior could be related to the low nematode pop­
(Duddingtonia flagrans) fungal formulation to control in vivo and in vitro of
ulation that remains in the pasture after a high excretion of chlamydo­ Haemonchus contortus and Strongyloides papillosus in sheep. 3 Biotech 10, 62.
spores; however, without any anthelmintic treatment, this population https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-2042-8.
increased progressively until day 42. Consequently, the EPG of the an­ Braga, F.R., Araújo, J.V., Soares, F.E., de, F., Araujo, J.M., Ferreira, S.R., de Queiroz, J.H.,
2012. Use of statistical tools in the study of the conditions of predation of
imals in the treated groups increased. It should be noted that in the E16 Duddingtonia flagrans versus Panagrellus sp. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 22, 559–565.
group, the average increase in the EPG was mainly associated with one Canhão-Dias, M., Paz-Silva, A., Madeira de Carvalho, L.M., 2020. The efficacy of
animal in the whole group. predatory fungi on the control of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic and wild
animals—a systematic review. Vet. Parasitol. 283, 109173 https://doi.org/10.1016/
A recent study demonstrates the limited ability of D. flagrans to j.vetpar.2020.109173.
control larvae after 20 cm of distance from fecal pads (Minguetto et al., Castillo-Saldarriaga, C., Céspedes-Gutiérrez, E., Cubides-Cárdenas, J.A., Gómez-
2021). Therefore, the persistence effect could not be related to the Álvarez, M., Márquez-Lara, D., 2020. Biphasic fermentation strategy: an alternative
to produce chlamydospores of nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans.
constant colonization of the fungus in the soil, instead, it could be Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 30, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/
associated with nematode-load reduction by fungus in the pasture which 09583157.2020.1793908.
delays the meadow reinfestation. Céspedes Gutiérrez, E., Aragón Novoa, D.M., Cortés Rojas, D.F., Gómez Álvarez, M.I.,
2021. In vitro evaluation of physicochemical variables on the nematophagous fungus
Finally, the persistence effect of D. flagrans can be influenced by Duddingtonia flagrans. J. Basic Microbiol. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/
several environmental factors such as solar radiation, air temperature, jobm.202100039.
and humidity. Baiak et al. (2021) showed the increase of pasture larvae Céspedes-Gutierrez, E., Aragon, D.M., Gómez-Álvarez, M.I., Cubides-Cárdenas, J.Andrés,
Cortes-Rojas, D.F., 2021. Survival of the nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia
count after 21 days of follow-up and it was related to a significant in­
flagrans to in vitro segments of sheep gastrointestinal tract. Exp. Parasitol. 231,
crease in air temperature. The relationship between humidity and sur­ 108172.
vival of the larvae has been clearly established; higher humidity Chavarría-Joya, L., Alonso-Díaz, M.Á., Olmedo-Juárez, A., von Son-de Fernex, E.,
promotes larvae survival and dissemination in the pasture (Rossanigo Mendoza-de-Gives, P., 2022. Assessing the individual and combined use of
Caesalpinia coriaria (Plantae: Fabaceae) and Duddingtonia flagrans (Fungi:
and Gruner, 1995). Orbiliaceae) as sustainable alternatives of control of sheep parasitic nematodes.
The formulations developed in E3 and E16 presented suitable Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2021.2022600.

7
J.A. Cubides-Cárdenas et al. Small Ruminant Research 223 (2023) 106980

Cubides, J., Márquez, D., Heredia, A., Gomez, J., 2015. Caracterización del conocimiento Mendoza-de Gives, P., López-Arellano, M.E., AguilarMarcelino, L., OlazaránJenkins, S.,
de los asistentes técnicos sobre control integrado de nematodos gastrointestinales en Reyes-Guerrero, D., Ramírez-Várgas, G., Vega-Murillo, V.E., 2018. The
ovinos de Córdoba. Colomb. Rev. Colomb. De. Cienc. Pecu. 28, 108. nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans reduces the gastrointestinal parasitic
Eysker, M., Bakker, N., Kooyman, F.N.J., Olthuis, S.O., Ploeger, H.W., 2006. Effect of nematode larvae population in faeces of orally treated calves maintained under
biological control through the daily application of spores of Duddingtonia flagrans in tropical conditions—Dose/response assessment. Vet. Parasitol. 263, 66–72.
lambs kept under an evasive grazing system in the Netherlands. Vet. Parasitol. 140, Minguetto, J.G.M., Bogado, A.L.G., Okano, W., Filho, L.F.C., da, C., da Silva, L.C.,
312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.013. Zanol, D., Ferraz, C.M., Moreira, T.F., Tobias, F.L., Braga, F.R., de Araújo, J.V., 2021.
Federica Sagües, M., Zegbi, S., Guerrero, I., Fernández, S., Iglesias, L., Junco, M., Biological control of gastrointestinal nematodes in young ewes treated with fungi.
Saumell, C., 2021. Assessment of the efficacy in vitro of Duddingtonia flagrans isolate Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 31, 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/
03/99 in different doses of chlamydospores and faeces egg counts in faecal of sheep. 09583157.2020.1869699.
Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 31, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/ Molento, M.B., Buzatti, A., Sprenger, L.K., 2016. Pasture larval count as a supporting
09583157.2020.1849560. method for parasite epidemiology, population dynamic and control in ruminants.
Fontenot, M.E., Miller, J.E., Peña, M.T., Larsen, M., Gillespie, A., 2003. Efficiency of Livest. Sci. 192, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.013.
feeding Duddingtonia flagrans chlamydospores to grazing ewes on reducing Naeem, M., Iqbal, Z., Roohi, N., 2021. Ovine haemonchosis: a review. Trop. Anim. Health
availability of parasitic nematode larvae on pasture. Vet. Parasitol. 118, 203–213. Prod. 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02439-8.
Gilleard, J.S., Kotze, A.C., Leathwick, D., Nisbet, A.J., McNeilly, T.N., Besier, B., 2021. Nisbet, A.J., Meeusen, E.N., González, J.F., Piedrafita, D.M., 2016. Immunity to
A journey through 50 years of research relevant to the control of gastrointestinal Haemonchus contortus and vaccine development. Adv. Parasitol. 93, 353–396.
nematodes in ruminant livestock and thoughts on future directions. Int. J. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.011.
51, 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.10.007. Ojeda-Robertos, N.F., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Ayala-Burgos, A.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A.,
de Gives Mendoza, P., 2011. Nematophagous fungi from Mexico with activity against the Valero-Coss, R.O., Mendoza-de-Gives, P., 2009. Digestibility of Duddingtonia flagrans
sheep nematode Haemonchus contortus. Rev. Ibero-Latinoam. Parasitol. 70, 101–108. chlamydospores in ruminants: in vitro and in vivo studies. BMC Vet. Res. 5, 46.
Gordon, H.M., Whitlock, H.V., 1934. A new technique for counting nematode eggs in Paraud, C., Hoste, H., Lefrileux, Y., Pommaret, A., Paolini, V., Pors, I., Chartier, C., 2005.
sheep Faeces. J. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. https://doi.org/10.1017/ Administration of Duddingtonia flagrans chlamydospores to goats to control gastro-
S0022149×00019106. intestinal nematodes: dose trials. Vet. Res. 36 (2), 157–166.
Grønvold, J., Wolstrup, J., Nansen, P., Larsen, M., Henriksen, S.A., Bjørn, H., Pell, A.N., Wu, S.H., Welch, J.G., 2000. Design parameters for post-ruminal drug delivery
Kirchheiner, K., Lassen, K., Rawat, H., Kristiansen, H.L., 1999. Biotic and abiotic systems and rumen-stable products. In: Rathbone, M.J., Gurny, R. (Eds.), Controlled
factors influencing growth rate and production of traps by the nematode-trapping Release Veterinary Drug Delivery: Biological and Pharmaceutical Considerations.
fungus Duddingtonia flagrans when induced by Cooperia oncophora larvae. Elsevier, pp. 83–113.
J. Helminthol. 73, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149×99000190. Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Mendoza-De-Gives, P., Aguilar-Marcelino, L., Lopez-Arellano, M.
Hasanzadeh, M., Mohammadifar, M., Sahebany, N., Hasan Rreza, E., 2012. Effect of E., Gamboa-Angulo, M., Hanako Rosas-Saito, G., Reyes-Estebanez, M., García-
cultural condition on biomass production of some Nematophagous fungi as Rubio, V.G., 2018. In vitro lethal activity of the nematophagous fungus Clonostachys
biological control agent. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 5, 115–126. https://doi.org/ rosea (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against nematodes of five different Taxa. Biomed.
10.21608/eajbsa.2012.14947. Res. Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3501827.
Healey, K., Lawlor, C., Knox, M.R., Chambers, M., Lamb, J., Groves, P., 2018. Field Rossanigo, C.E., Gruner, L., 1995. Moisture and temperature requirements in faeces for
evaluation of Duddingtonia flagrans IAH 1297 for the reduction of worm burden in the development of free-living stages of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep, cattle
grazing animals: Pasture larval studies in horse, cattle and goats. Vet. Parasitol. 258, and deer. J. Helminthol. 69, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/
124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.010. S0022149×00014954.
Hernández Hernández, V., de Gives Mendoza, P., 2004. Evaluación de tres biopreparados Samaniego-Gaxiola, J.A., 2007. Efecto del pH en la Sobrevivencia de Esclerocios de
orales a base de clamidosporas de Duddingtonia flagrans en el control de Haemoncosis Phymatotrichopsis omnivora (Dugg.) Hennebert Expuestos a Soluciones
ovina. Invest. Agropecu. 1, 98–101. Amortiguadoras. Ácido Acético Y. NaOCl. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 26, 177–179.
Hoste, H., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Quijada, J., Chan-Perez, I., Dakheel, M.M., Kommuru, D. Seyama, T., Hirayasu, H., Kasai, K., 2017. Excretion rates of indigestible plastic balls of
S., Mueller-Harvey, I., Terrill, T.H., 2016. Interactions Between Nutrition and different speci fi c gravities and diameters in dairy cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 88, 94–98.
Infections With Haemonchus contortus and Related Gastrointestinal Nematodes in https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12590.
Small Ruminants. Advances in Parasitology. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Silva, A.R., Araújo, J. v, Braga, F.R., Frassy, L.N., Tavela, A.O., Carvalho, R.O.,
bs.apar.2016.02.025. Castejon, F.V., 2009. Biological control of sheep gastrointestinal nematodiasis in a
Kaske, M., Engelhardt, W., 1990. The effect of size and density on mean retention time of tropical region of the southeast of Brazil with the nematode predatory fungi
particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 63, 457–465. Duddingtonia flagrans and Monacrosporium thaumasium. Parasitol. Res. (105),
King, K.W., Moore, W.E.C., 1957. Density and size as factors affecting passage rate of 1707–1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1613-8.
ingesta in the bovine and human digestive tracts. J. Dairy Sci. 40, 528–536. da Silveira, W.F., Braga, F.R., de Oliveira Tavela, A., dos Santos, L.F., Domingues, R.R.,
Liu, X.Y., Chang, F.F., Zhao, T.Y., Huang, H.Y., Li, F., di, Wang, F., Wang, B.B., Wang, F. Aguiar, A.R., Ferraz, C.M., de Carvalho, L.M., de Hollanda Ayupe, T., Zanuncio, J.C.,
H., Liu, Q., Luo, Q.H., Cai, K.Z., Zhong, R.M., 2020. Biological control of sheep de Araújo, J.V., 2017. Nematophagous fungi combinations reduce free-living stages
gastrointestinal nematode in three feeding systems in Northern China by using of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes in the field. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 150, 1–5.
powder drug with nematophagous fungi. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 30, 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.08.013.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1765981. Van Wyk, J.A., Mayhew, E., 2013. Morphological Identification of Parasitic Nematode
Márquez, D., Jiménez, G., García, F., Garzón, C., 2008. Resistencia a los antihelmínticos Infective Larvae of Small Ruminants and Cattle: A Practical Lab Guide.
en nematodos gastrointestinales de bovinos en municipios de Cundinamarca y Onderstepoort J Vet Res 80, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v80i1.539.
Boyacá. Ciencia & Tecnología. Agropecuaria 9, 113–123 https://doi.org/10.21930. Vilela, V.L.R., Feitosa, T.F., Braga, F.R., de Araújo, J.V., dos Santos, A., de Morais, D.F.,
Materials Testing FM 5–472. Headquarters Department of the army, Washington D.C. de Oliveira Souto, D.V., Athayde, A.C.R., 2016. Coadministration of nematophagous
2001. fungi for biological control over gastrointestinal helminths in sheep in the semiarid
Medina, P., Guevara, F., la O, M., Ojeda, N., Reyes, E., 2014. Resistencia antihelmintica region of northeastern Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 221, 139–143. https://doi.org/
en ovinos: una revision de informes del sureste de Mexico y alternativas disponibles 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.027.
para el control de nematodos gastrointestinales. Pastos Y. Forrajes 37, 257–263. Voinot, M., Cazapal-Monteiro, C., Hernández, J.Á., Palomero, A.M., Arroyo, F.L.,
Mendoza de Gives, P., Braga, F.R., Araújo, J.V. de, 2022. Nematophagous fungi, an Sanchís, J., Pedreira, J., Sánchez-Andrade, R., Paz-Silva, A., Arias, M.S., 2020.
extraordinary tool for controlling ruminant parasitic nematodes and other Integrating the control of helminths in dairy cattle: Deworming, rotational grazing
biotechnological applications. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1–17. https://doi.org/ and nutritional pellets with parasiticide fungi. Vet. Parasitol. 278, 109038 https://
10.1080/09583157.2022.2028725. doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109038.

You might also like