Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review article
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Background: There is a growing interest in exploring maternal mental health effects of unintended
Received 12 August 2015 pregnancies carried to term. However, the evidence base from a small number of available studies is
Received in revised form characterised by considerable variability, inconsistency and inconclusive findings. We present a sys-
3 November 2015
tematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies on unintended pregnancy as these are related to
Accepted 10 December 2015
Available online 17 December 2015
maternal depression.
Methods: Using PRISMA guideline, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed studies reporting an
Keywords: association between unintended pregnancy and maternal depression from PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO
Unintended or unplanned pregnancy and Google Scholar. We used a priori set criteria and included details of quality and magnitude of effect
Childbirth
sizes. Sample sizes, adjusted odds ratios and standard errors were extracted. Random effects were used
Depression
to calculate pooled estimates in Stata 13. Cochran's Q, I2 and meta-bias statistics assessed heterogeneity
Maternal mental health disorders
and publication bias of included studies.
Results: Meta-bias and funnel plot of inverse variance detected no publication bias. Overall prevalence of
maternal depression in unintended pregnancy was 21%. Unintended pregnancy was significantly asso-
ciated with maternal depression. Despite statistically significant heterogeneities of included studies, sub-
group analyses revealed positive and significant associations by types of unintended pregnancies, timing
of measurements with respect to pregnancy and childbirth, study designs and settings.
Conclusions: The prevalence of perinatal depression is two-fold in women with unintended pregnancy.
Perinatal care settings may screen pregnancy intention and depression of women backed by integrating
family planning and mental health services.
& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2. Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Conflict of interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Acknowledgement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
n
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: amanuel.abajobir@uqconnect.edu.au (A.A. Abajobir).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.008
0165-0327/& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63 57
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
58
Table 1
Summary of characteristics of 10 full-text articles with quality scores and effect-size odds ratios magnitude.
Authors Study Study Exposure Number and character- Outcome Key finding Confounders adjusted in mul- Significant Response Quality Effect size
and year country design measurement istics of participants measurement tivariable analyses confounders rate (%) score magnitude
Fellenzer USA CS Antepartum 18,059 Women from New Self-reported Mistimed pregnancy was a pre- Maternal socio-demographics, Education, 94 6 Large
and Cibu- depression York State-wide Perinatal prenatal de- dictor for moderate to severe number of termination of a race, marital
la (2014) rated within Data System pression prenatal depression and moder- pregnancy, timing for ANC, ma- status, Medi-
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
72 hours of symptoms ate to severe prenatal depression ternal medical risk, GDM, caid use,
delivery was associated with unintended smoking, amount smoked, drug smoking and
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ANC – antenatal care; CS – cross-sectional; GA – gestational age; GDM – gestational diabetes milletus; PPD – postpartum depression; RCT – random clinical trial.
A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63 59
451
n=187 studies
studiesexcluded
with
(non-relevant
irrelevant topics
topic).
excluded
Screened
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of studies included in the systematic review using PRISMA checklist and flow-diagram.
3. Results 2009; Dibaba et al., 2013) used intended, mistimed and unwanted
categories. We merged mistimed and unwanted into unintended
Given the paucity of the existing literature, we included studies category for three of these studies and used the intended vs. un-
from both developed and developing countries. A total of 512 intended group for overall estimates. One study used the combi-
studies were identified using search engines and strategies. We nation of two methods (Christensen et al., 2011). We used the
screened 61 full-text published articles. Ten full-text studies were crude (intended vs. unintended) and specific classification (mis-
eligible. Half of the studies, 50% (n ¼5), used cross-sectional timed vs. unwanted) for overall and sub-group estimates, respec-
methods, 40% (n ¼4) observational longitudinal and 10% (n ¼1) tively. We conducted separate sub-group analyses for mistimed vs.
was a randomized clinical trial design. The majority, 60% (n ¼6), unwanted groups, by measurement time, study designs and set-
were conducted in USA. Sample sizes ranged from 215 (Chris- tings. Depression was ascertained with both structured and stan-
tensen et al., 2011) to 18,059 (Fellenzer and Cibula, 2014) singleton dardized self-reported scales (Fellenzer and Cibula, 2014) such as
mothers. The mean quality score was 5.63 (SD 7 0.48). Based on an the Delusion-States-Symptoms Inventory anxiety and depression
analysis of individual forest plots (Fig. 2), four studies had large scale (DSSI) (Najman et al., 1991), the Beck Depression Inventory
effect size estimates. Table 1 presents detailed summary char- (BDI) (Christensen et al., 2011), the Centre for Epidemiological
acteristics of included studies. The PRISMA flow diagram was used Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (McCrory and McNally, 2013;
to present the process of screening and selection of eligible studies Messer et al., 2005) and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression
(Fig. 1). Scale (EPDS) (Lau and Keung, 2007; Dibaba et al., 2013; Abbasi
We aggregated studies by pregnancy stages, types of unin- et al., 2013; Mercier et al., 2013). Studies with standard tools used
tendedness, designs and settings. Pregnancy intention was mea- standardised cut-offs to diagnose depression. For depression
sured by using standard questionnaires as used by National Survey measured at different time points (Christensen et al., 2011), we
for Family Growth (NSFG) (Kost and Lindberg, 2015), Pregnancy selected the most conservative effect size for inclusion in the
Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) (Fellenzer and Ci- analysis. One study did not report the measurement of depression
bula, 2014) and Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) (Palamu- used (Cheng et al., 2009). Three studies measured depression
leni and Adebowale, 2014). The common survey questions used during pregnancy while seven measured depression postpartum
were: “At the time you became pregnant, did you want to become (Table 1).
pregnant then, did you want to wait until later, or did you not The overall point prevalence of maternal depression in women
want to have any (more) children at all”? Women were also asked who were in the unintended pregnancy category and/or childbirth
whether the pregnancy was planned or not, intended or not or was 21% (Table 2). The overall risk difference in prevalence of
wanted or not wanted. The questions: “Are you trying to get depression was 12% (95%CI: 5–19%; p o0.001).
pregnant now or in future? and how important is avoiding a Depression was estimated for sub-study characteristics in-
pregnancy to you?” are used in prospective studies while retro- cluding time of measurement, types of unintendedness, study
spective studies asked women if the pregnancy was intended or designs and settings. Corresponding 95%CI were indicated. Sub-
not. Pregnancy intention could be categorized as intended vs. group analysis for types of unintended was restricted for five
unintended (Altfeld et al., 1997) or as intended/wanted, mistimed studies that had a priori delineation to mistimed and unwanted
and unwanted (D'Angelo et al., 2004). The majority (n ¼7) of in- classifications. The odds of depression was higher during post-
cluded studies applied the intended vs. unintended scheme. partum, for unwanted pregnancy/childbirth, in cross-sectional
However, three studies (Fellenzer and Cibula, 2014; Cheng et al., studies and in women from developed countries. Statistically
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
60 A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63
Fig. 2. Forest plots of unintendedness and maternal depression using log scale.
significant overall heterogeneity was recorded (Table 3). The in- countries in sub-group analyses. These findings may mean that
verse of variances of the between group heterogeneity were minimal differences in perinatal depression exist during ante-
computed: for time of measurement (Q¼55.86; po .001), types of partum period when longitudinal study design is used. Moreover,
unintendedness (Q¼ 12.32; p o.001), study designs (Q¼26.55; unintended pregnancy may more reliably predict perinatal de-
p o.001) and settings (Q¼59.75; p o.001). pression for women in developing regions of the world.
The heterogeneities of included studies were excluded for We carried out sensitivity analysis and detected statistically
antepartum period, longitudinal study designs and developing significant difference for one study and excluded it (Nakku et al.,
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63 61
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
62 A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63
95,000
90,000
85,000
80,000
75,000
70,000
65,000
60,000
55,000
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
0 1 2
ln OR
may be chronic or acute (O'hara and Swain, 1996) we could not mental health services. Moreover, maternal health services including
compare these findings with prior large scale systematic review user-friendly family planning should be strengthened and integrated
and meta-analysis (Gavin et al., 2005; Lancaster et al., 2010; O'hara in primary healthcare to prevent unintended pregnancy.
and Swain, 1996) that focused on depression but had no details of
pregnancy or childbirth intention.
Given extensive evidence on perinatal depression of women
(Gavin et al., 2005; Lancaster et al., 2010; O'hara and Swain, 1996), Contributors
this study provides an insight into the contexts of unintendedness
and maternal depression. However, all included studies exclusively AAA conceived the hypothesis, developed the methodology,
focussed on perinatal depression and little is known about the identified all potential studies, extracted the data, assessed quality,
trajectory of maternal depression for mothers with unintended conducted the analysis, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and
children. Future research should focus on exploring trajectories of proofread the final version. JCM reviewed abstracts, extracted data
unintended pregnancies and maternal depression beyond the and assessed quality. RA commented on relevance of topic of in-
perinatal period using large-scale longitudinal studies and con- terest, reviewed and proofread the final version. JMN reviewed
trolling for potential confounders. data extraction and synthesis, reviewed the manuscript and
commented and proofread the final version. All authors approved
the final submitted version of the manuscript.
5. Conclusions
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
A.A. Abajobir et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 192 (2016) 56–63 63
Conflict of interest among young women with mental health symptoms. Soc. Sci. Med. (1982) 100,
No conflict of interest declared. 62–71.
Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., 2003. Measuring incon-
sistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 327 (7414), 557.
Ikamari, L., Izugbara, C., Ochako, R., 2013. Prevalence and determinants of unin-
Acknowledgement tended pregnancy among women in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
We are grateful for the University of Queensland library for providing us with a 13, 69.
wide range of available online databases. Iranfar, S., Shakeri, J., Ranjbar, M., NazhadJafar, P., Razaie, M., 2005. Is unintended
pregnancy a risk factor for depression in Iranian women? East. Mediterr. Health
J. ¼ La. Rev. De. sante De. La. Mediterr. Orient. ¼ al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq
al-mutawassit 11 (4), 618–624.
References Klier, C.M., Rosenblum, K.L., Zeller, M., Steinhardt, K., Bergemann, N., Muzik, M.,
2008. A multirisk approach to predicting chronicity of postpartum depression
symptoms. Depression anxiety. 25 (8), 718.
Altfeld, S., Handler, A., Burton, D., Berman, L., 1997. Wantedness of pregnancy and
Kingsbury, A.M., Hayatbakhsh, R., Mamun, A.M., Clavarino, A.M., Williams, G.,
prenatal health behaviors. Women Health 26 (4), 29–43.
Najman, J.M., 2015. Trajectories and predictors of women's depression follow-
Abbasi, S., Chuang, C.H., Dagher, R., Zhu, J., Kjerulff, K., 2013. Unintended pregnancy
ing the birth of an infant to 21 years: a longitudinal study. Matern. Child Health
and postpartum depression among first-time mothers. J. Women's Health 22
(5), 412–416. J. 19 (4), 877–888.
Brown, S.S., Eisenberg, L., 1995. The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Kurstjens, S., Wolke, D., 2001. Effects of maternal depression on cognitive devel-
Well-being of Children and Families. National Academies Press. opment of children over the first 7 years of life. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 42
Balaji, A.B., Claussen, A.H., Smith, D.C., Visser, S.N., Morales, M.J., Perou, R., 2007. (05), 623–636.
Social support networks and maternal mental health and well-being. J. Wo- Kuroki, L.M., Allsworth, J.E., Redding, C.A., Blume, J.D., Peipert, J.F., 2008. Is a pre-
men's Health 16 (10), 1386–1396. vious unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned preg-
Burke, L., 2003. The impact of maternal depression on familial relationships. Int. nancy? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199 (5), 517.e1-7.
Rev. Psychiatry 15 (3), 243–255. Kost, K., Lindberg, L., 2015. Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant
Cogill, S., Caplan, H., Alexandra, H., Robson, K.M., Kumar, R., 1986. . Impact of ma- health: investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score
ternal postnatal depression on cognitive development of young children. Br. analysis. Demography 52 (1), 83–111.
Med. J. 292 (6529), 1165–1167. Logan, C., Holcombe, E., Manlove, J., Ryan, S., 2007. The consequences of unintended
Cheng, D., Schwarz, E.B., Douglas, E., Horon, I., 2009. Unintended pregnancy and childbearing. Child Trends Natl. Campaign Prev. Teen Pregnancy 28, 142–151.
associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Con- Lau, Y., Keung, D.W.F., 2007. Correlates of depressive symptomatology during the
traception 79 (3), 194–198. second trimester of pregnancy among Hong Kong Chinese. Soc. Sci. Med. 64 (9),
Christensen, A.L., Stuart, E.A., Perry, D.F., Le, H.-N., 2011. Unintended pregnancy and 1802–1811.
perinatal depression trajectories in low-income, high-risk Hispanic immigrants. Lancaster, C.A., Gold, K.J., Flynn, H.A., Yoo, H., Marcus, S.M., Davis, M.M., 2010. Risk
Prev. Sci. 12 (3), 289–299. factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am. J.
Cohen, J., 1992. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112 (1), 155. Obstet. Gynecol. 202 (1), 5–14.
DB, W., 2014. Practical Meta-analysis Effect Size Calculator. The Campbell Colla- McIntosh, C.A., Finkle, J.L., 1995. The Cairo conference on population and devel-
boration, Oslo. opment: a new paradigm? Popul. Dev. Rev., 223–260.
Doi, S.A., Williams, G.M., 2013. Methods of Clinical Epidemiology. Springer. McCrory, C., McNally, S., 2013. The effect of pregnancy intention on maternal pre-
D'Angelo, D.V., Gilbert, B.C., Rochat, R.W., Santelli, J.S., Herold, J.M., 2004. Differ- natal behaviours and parent and child health: results of an irish cohort study.
ences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 27 (2), 208–215.
live births. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 36 (5), 192–197. Messer, L.C., Dole, N., Kaufman, J.S., Savitz, D.A., 2005. Pregnancy intendedness,
Dibaba, Y., Fantahun, M., Hindin, M.J., 2013. The association of unwanted pregnancy maternal psychosocial factors and preterm birth. Matern. Child. Health J. 9 (4),
and social support with depressive symptoms in pregnancy: evidence from 403–412.
rural Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13 (1), 135. Mercier, R.J., Garrett, J., Thorp, J., Siega-Riz, A.M., 2013. Pregnancy intention and
Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Altman, D., 2008. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta- postpartum depression: secondary data analysis from a prospective cohort.
analysis in Context. John Wiley & Sons. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 120 (9), 1116–1122.
Fellenzer, J.L., Cibula, D.A., 2014. Intendedness of pregnancy and other predictive Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., 2009. Preferred reporting items for
factors for symptoms of prenatal depression in a population-based study. systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern.
Matern. Child. health J. 18 (10), 2426–2436. Med. 151 (4), 264–269.
Gipson, J.D., Koenig, M.A., Hindin, M.J., 2008. The effects of unintended pregnancy Mercier, R.J., Garrett, J., Thorp, J., Siega‐Riz, A.M., 2013. Pregnancy intention and
on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud. Fam. Plan., postpartum depression: secondary data analysis from a prospective cohort.
18–38. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 120 (9), 1116–1122.
Gavin, N.I., Gaynes, B.N., Lohr, K.N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Gartlehner, G., Swinson, T., Najman, J.M., Morrison, J., Williams, G., Andersen, M., Keeping, J.D., 1991. The
2005. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. mental health of women 6 months after they give birth to an unwanted baby: a
Obstet. Gynecol. 106 (5 Pt 1), 1071–1083. longitudinal study. Soc. Sci. Med. 32 (3), 241–247.
Goodman, S.H., Gotlib, I.H., 1999. Risk for psychopathology in the children of de- Nakku, J., Nakasi, G., Mirembe, F., 2007. Postpartum major depression at six weeks
pressed mothers: a developmental model for understanding mechanisms of in primary health care: prevalence and associated factors. Afr. Health Sci. 6, 4.
transmission. Psychol. Rev. 106 (3), 458. Olkin, I., 1999. Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta‐analyses. Stat.
Grussu, P., Quatraro, R.M., Nasta, M.T., 2005. Profile of Mood States and parental Med. 18 (17–18), 2331–2341.
attitudes in motherhood: comparing women with planned and unplanned O'hara, M.W., Swain, A.M., 1996. Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-
pregnancies. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) 32 (2), 107–114. analysis. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 8 (1), 37–54.
Gorman, L.L., O'Hara, M.W., Figueiredo, B., Hayes, S., Jacquemain, F., Kammerer, M. Palamuleni, M.E., Adebowale, A., 2014. Prevalence and determinants of unintended
H., et al., 2004. Adaptation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV pregnancies in Malawi. Afr. Popul. Stud. 28 (1), 551–563.
disorders for assessing depression in women during pregnancy and post-par- Yanikkerem, E., Ay, S., Piro, N., 2013. Planned and unplanned pregnancy: effects on
tum across countries and cultures. Br. J. Psychiatry 184 (46), s17–s23. health practice and depression during pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 39
Hall, K.S., Kusunoki, Y., Gatny, H., Barber, J., 2014. The risk of unintended pregnancy (1), 180–187.
Downloaded for Meera Al Ali (meeali@seha.ae) at Abu Dhabi Health Services Co from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on February
27, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.