Self and peer evaluation CIVL458/958/HCIV958 Tasks 1 and 2

Please refer to this document when filling in yourself and peer evaluation using the
team evaluation tool. Self and peer evaluations will need to be completed for both
Assessment task 1 and Assessment task 2.
Failure to submit an evaluation will result in a 5% deduction from your grade for the
related task – that does not include any deductions as a result of peer assessment.
As a result of the self and peer evaluation, individual marks for these
assignments may be adjusted if some team members do not contribute to an
appropriate level.
Self and peer evaluations will open at the time of submission of the
group assignments, and are due by the following dates:
 Task 1 – 17:00 Wednesday 24th August 2022
 Task 2 – 17:00 Wednesday 26th October 2022
You can only fill in your evaluation once your assignment is submitted. Just click on
your assignment in Moodle under “Assessment submission” and the questionnaire
should pop up.
Below is an explanation of the criteria.
In all cases, a score of 1 is very poor and a score of 5 is excellent. Any criteria with a
score under 3 may require elaboration if marks are to be deducted. Leniency will be
shown to individuals who are honest in their own self-assessment and understand
they did not contribute well.

Enthusiasm
 Willingness to step up and participate in a timely manner
 Does not put off until the last moment
 Participates and contributes wholeheartedly
 Positive attitude towards the assessment
Criteria explained
1. No enthusiasm at all
2. Minimal enthusiasm - Avoids task
3. Somewhat enthusiastic - Only provide the basics
4. Very enthusiastic - Plays their role and initiates tasks to get the job done
5. Super enthusiastic - Want to work with them again

Understanding
 Understanding of the knowledge required for the task
 Understanding of the specific requirements of the task
Criteria explained
1. No understanding of learning content, so no understanding of what to do in
assessment
 2. Minimal understanding of theory so can't contribute to required standard in
task
3. Across the theoretical content but not really confident. Contributions need
some rework but the basic understanding of assessment and theory is there.
4. Good understanding of theory. Evidence of engaging with content. Therefore
able to contribute solidly to assessment tasks
5. Extensive understanding of content. Able to guide others and ensure
consistency of contributions across task

Ability to suggest ideas

 Willingness to speak up and add ideas to the task
 Listens to others' ideas and encourages input from all group members
Criteria explained
1. Does not contribute at all - no ideas offered
2. Contributes one or two ideas but requires lots of prompts
3. Contributes ideas but does not listen to others' ideas
4. Some good ideas contributed but also a willingness to listen to others' ideas
too
5. Good ideas but a fine balance struck between contributing own ideas, listening
to others and maturely shaping everyone's ideas so everyone feels they have
had the chance to contribute

Performed tasks well and on time

 Contributes to all decisions in assessment - not just knowledge of one
 Meets deadlines as per group timeline
 Performs tasks at or above a fourth year university or first year Masters
standard respectively
Criteria explained
1. Always late - only contributed to their one part if at all
2. Met deadlines but only just - only contributed to one part so minimal
understanding of other parts
3. Team deadlines met well - not always high quality work - work needed to be
redone because it was not always correct, but they made a genuine effort to
contribute and engage in decisions
4. Deadlines always met - content covered was done to a relatively high standard
and met subject requirements without too much rework required
5. Deadlines always met - high quality standard of work - contributed to team
effort in all decisions, but did not dominate

Further comments
Please provide comments to back up your scores.
This section is of particular relevance if you have scored 3 or less on criteria for
fellow students or yourself.