Program Evaluation

A. Self-Evaluation

Using a scale of 1 – 5 (with 5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest), what rating
would you give your project implementation? Explain your answer.

Rating Explanation:

List down 3 (1)

recommendations to
improve your project (2)
implementation.
(3)

Attach at 5 or more
pieces of evidence to
showcase your
project’s
contributions and/or
accomplishments.
(photos, outputs,
materials created,
etc.) Use extra sheets
if needed.

1
Personal Reflection:
Review your journal
entries. Use 250 – 300
words. What are your
concrete realizations,
insights, and thoughts
about your project
implementation? How
did this project help
you become a better
Filipino? a better son?
a better community
member?

B. Parent/Guardian/Community Leader’s Evaluation

Using a scale of 1 – 5 (with 5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest), what rating
would you give your child/ward/supervisee’s project implementation?
Explain your answer.

Rating: 5 Explanation:
The students help children to encourage what they
will do in their activities in our brgy and give more
confidence. I observe that students are more
energetic and give time for playing and eating
healthy food.

List down 3 (1) No Recommendations

recommendations to
help improve your (2) No Recommendations
child/ward/
supervisee’s project (3) No Recommendations
implementation.

Page 2
We certify the aforementioned evaluation results are accurate.

______________________________________ ________________________________________________
Student’s Signature over Printed Name Parent/Guardian’s Signature over Printed Name

Kag. Myrna Cuja

Supervisor’s Signature over Printed Name/ Position/Organization or Community (if needed)

___________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name Date Signed

Page 3
Rubric of Evaluation
Take time to review the rubric of evaluation to give you an idea how you will
be graded for Task 3.

SCORE and CRITERIA

41 - 50 points
· Journal entry for week 4 is complete and submitted on time.
· The self-assessment and parent/guardian/community leader’s assessment are
complete.
· All the needed information is accurately provided.
· Concrete and substantial pieces of evidence of the project implementation are
included and well documented.
· Details are comprehensive.
· Personal reflection is well written.

31 - 40 points
· Journal entry for week 4 is somewhat complete and submitted on time.
· The self-assessment and parent/guardian/community leader’s assessment are
somewhat complete.
· Some information is missing.
· Some pieces of evidence of the project implementation are included and
documented.
· Details provided are somewhat accurate
· Personal reflection is somewhat well written.

21 - 30 points
· Journal entry for week 4 is somewhat complete and submitted on time.
· The self-assessment and parent/guardian/community leader’s assessment are
somewhat complete.
· Most of the important information is missing.
· Few pieces of evidence of the project implementation are included and
documented.
· Details provided are not very accurate.
· Personal reflection is somewhat not well written.

Page 4
11 - 20 points
· Journal entry for week 4 is not complete but submitted on time.
· The self-assessment and parent/guardian/community leader’s assessment are not
complete.
· Most of the important information is missing.
· Few pieces of evidence of the project implementation are included.
· Details provided are not accurate.
· Personal reflection is not well written.

1 - 10 points
· Journal entry for week 4 is not complete and not submitted on time.
· The self-assessment and parent/guardian/community leader’s assessment are not
complete.
· Most of the important information is missing.
· The pieces of evidence of the project implementation are not substantial
· Details provided are not accurate.
· Personal reflection is poorly written.

YOUR SCORE and NOTES

Page 5