TOWARDS WORLD CLASS

PROFESSIONALS IN INTEGRATED
COASTAL AND WATER RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
Future Search Conference
Capacity Development in Integrated Coastal
Zone Management Project

Yogyakarta, 21-23 February 2018

1
This Future Search Conference is an It is co-hosted by the IDN265 consortium It is made possible with It is facilitated by:
initiative of: partners: support of:
3

2
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
Background & context of the programme 4
Introduction 5
Opening 6
Focus on the Past 7
Focus on the Present 8
Focus on the Future 11
Common Ground 12
Action Plans 13
And now? 17
Participants 183
 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT OF THE PROGRAMME

This conference is part of Nuffic’s NICHE project IDN265 on Capacity Development in Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and Integrated Water
Resource Management. In this project, Dutch and Indonesian peer institutes collaborate on capacity development for the curricula in the area of water. The
Indonesian partners are the Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember in Surabaya (ITS) and the Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). The project focuses mainly on
the curricula of the programmes on Coastal Engineering at ITS and Water Resources Engineering and Management at ITB. The Dutch partners are the
Technische Universiteit Delft (TU Delft), the International Institute for Infrastructural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering (IHE) and sub-contractors
Hogeschool Zeeland and Deltares.

4
 E R S
INTRODUCTION R I

STAKEHOLDERS
U N
Around 80 stakeholders come together on the LECT ALU
M
21st to the 23rd of February 2018 in Yogyakarta
to advance higher education in Indonesia and
address the future challenges for integrated
coastal and water resource management.

Management and lecturers from ITS and ITB are

IE S
NTS A N
present as well as students and alumni from
D E M P
STU
those universities. Also present are policy
makers, specialists and representatives from CO
government, industry and other universities
throughout Indonesia.

The purpose of this conference is to develop

E R S
common ambitions and initial actions towards
N T A K
ME M
educating world-class professionals in
integrated coastal and water resource
ER N L I CY
management. The conference is an unique
opportunity for all stakeholders groups to GO
V PO
interact and work together.

In three days, we create a shared picture of the

problems and opportunities, foster mutual
TIE S
understanding of difference in perspective and
R S I
interests, and find common ground and
IS TS IV E
propose action on what we intend to do for the
E CIAL UN
near future that is supported by all parties.
S P
This report provides a summary of the
outcomes of the conference.

5
OPENING
AGENDA
After praying and singing the national anthem, Programme Coordinator Ir. Bert Geers from the TU Delft
Day 1 - 21st February 2018
opens the conference. He welcomes all participants and clarifies the purpose of this conference: to bring
Opening
all important parties together to hear everyone’s views and take the next step towards educating world-
Focus on the Past
class professionals together. Dr. Wahyudi (ITS) and Prof. Ir. Iwan Kridasantausa (ITB) from the
Focus on the Present
conference committee provide more background information about what the project has already
Day 2 - 22nd February 2018
achieved in ITS and ITB, such as the provision of Python and Delft3D programming courses and the
Focus on the Future
master plan assignment to Jakarta. The vice-rector of ITB Dr. Miming Mirharja emphasizes the
Common Ground on the future
importance of collaboration between the different stakeholders and wishes everyone a fruitful
Action Initiatives
conference. The rector of ITS Prof. Ir. Joni Hermana stresses the importance and potential of coastal
Day 3 - 23rd of February 2018
zone and water resource management in Indonesia, a country of which 70% consists of water, and
Resilience and enhanced actions
underlines the need to think big but start small. Dr Han Rakels (Perspectivity) facilitates the conference.
6

• On the world time line, we identify environment
LESSONS FROM THE PAST (eg. climate change and natural disasters),
Next, the participants share the main themes and policies in Indonesia and in the world, and
storylines in these histories. They also pull out what technological development as the main themes.
they see as the key implications of the past for the
• Regarding the educational timeline, we see an
future. increase in human, institutional and infrastruc-
The findings are: tural resources. From 1998 onwards we see a
• The main personal themes we can distinguish are growing awareness of the importance of
about family, education and career, with events research, which from 2005 developed into more
such as getting married, studying abroad and research collaboration projects and regulations
changing or advancing in a career. These for universities.
experiences are important to create networks
• With our Indonesian human resources and our
and to become professional. education programmes we can ensure good
FOCUS ON THE PAST
Highlights and milestones
As a first focus of the conference, we create a
picture of our past to collect our history and learn
from the past. Participants are asked to note key
events and milestones on large timelines that run
between the period of 1990 and 2018. They do so
on three levels:
• Personal
• World
• Educating professionals
water resources and coastal zone management
to adequately deal with the changes in the
economy, politics and environmental disasters.
So that, for example, we are able to mitigate the
human aspect in natural disasters related to
floods.
• This means that we need comprehensive and
integrated approaches where the quality and
relevance of the work our universities do,
becomes more and more important. Our
educational programmes should be relevant for
students, for companies and for society.
7
FOCUS ON THE PRESENT
Now we have a shared image of what has lead us to where we currently are, we can start looking at the present. As a first step, participants create a mind map,
or a shared picture of the world they are dealing with. We do this because, before we can move into action, we have to understand the whole picture. If we
understand the environment that affects us, we can design appropriate responses.

KEY TRENDS
Out of all the identified trends, the group selects
the following eight trends as the current most
important trends for educating professionals:
1. Increasing lack of technical & manual skills
2. Less depth in learning (the Google effect)
3. Decreasing social awareness and empathy
4. Students have improved soft skills (eg
English, team work & communication skills)
5. Young generation wants instant results and
process
6. Increasing environmental awareness in local
communities because of government
regulations
7. Wider gap between the curriculum and the
requirement of the field
8. Increasing demand for modern teaching
methods 8
PROUDS AND SORRIES
The trends that are identified are of importance
to everybody. To get more insight into how this
works out for every stakeholder group,
participants ask themselves:
• What are important trends for us?
• What are we doing now?
• What are we not doing now?
To deepen the understanding of the present,
stakeholders own up to and share what they are
proud of and sorry for in relationship to
educating professionals in water resource and
coastal zone management. These are the
findings by stakeholder group: COMPANIES
Prouds:
• Introduction courses for graduates starting at
ITS LECTURERS companies
Prouds: • Possibility for fresh graduate to become
UNIVERSITIES • Qualified human resources for young engineer under senior supervision
Prouds: modern teaching methods • Provision of internships to connect student
• Attendance of students to lectures 80% • Wide network to support teaching and practice
• Manual calculation and software comparison • Adequate facilities with potential for better • Ability to change challenge into opportunity
assignment • Highly qualified students and improving Sorries:
• Feedback possibility for students to lecturer enrolment method • Inability of graduates to produce high level
after last class Sorries: written reports
Sorries: • Inability to master the software • Conflict created because of people competing
• Inability to buy licensed software • No proper maintenance and updates facilities for jobs
• Insufficient use of models by lecturers • Insufficient effort to explore the right • Unwillingness of seniors to upgrade technical
• Out-of-date laboratory instruments methods for students skills
• Inability of lecturers to cope with new • Limited opportunity to be involved in • Problematic and time-consuming access to
technology practical work for lecturers data

9
POLICY MAKERS
Prouds:
• Ability of students to graduate
faster with good grades
• Adaptability of graduate to work surrounding
• Opportunities for students to develop
themselves
Sorries:
• Lower standard skill level for graduates
• Insufficient budget to improve technical skills
• Inexistent link and match system between
universities and industries
• Failure to convince industry of importance of
universities
ALUMNI
Prouds:
• Sophistication and independence of students.
They can find information themselves.
• Wider access to information
• Provision of information to students about
internships, vacancies and thesis topics
• Active alumni organisation
• Use of Corporate Social Responsibility Budget
Sorries:
• Lack of knowledge sharing to students
• Lack of networking with others
• Lack of information filter
• Suboptimal Process of giving feedback
• Less logical skills
GOVERNMENT
Prouds:
• Interest of students to work for and do
internships with the government
• Alumni recruitment system
• Availability of scholarships
• Assistance to students by providing data
• Possession of good facilities, software and
hardware
Sorries:
• Suboptimal partnership with universities
• Lack of human capacity to teach at
universities
• No synergy between central and local
government
• No education on operation and maintenance
SPECIALISTS
Prouds:
• Implementation of regulation on engineering
skill level
• Increase in attention for environmental
impact assessment
• Knowledge transfers through internships
Sorries:
• View that degrees are more important than
experience
• Culture of ranking students degrades the
quality
• Increase of courses spectrum
STUDENTS
Prouds:
• Timely and relatively faster graduation
• Increase in average GPA
• Successful completion of final assignment
• More involvement in other fields (hobbies,
soft skills, etc.)
• Ability to learn and adapt quickly
Sorries:
• Procrastination
• Failure to realize importance of basic theories
• Not making use of all facilities
• Less initiative to find other references
ITB LECTURERS
Prouds:
• Increased use of software
• Increased transparency and openness
• More opportunities for advanced study
• Stronger demand for modern teaching
methods
• More environmental awareness
Sorries:
• Slow speed and lack of reliable internet
connection
• Desire for instant process by young
generation
• Capacity gap between curriculum and society
• Decrease in nationalism, need to act local
• Less social awareness and empathy
10
 “IN 2025, ITS AND ITB HAVE
FOUND APPROACHES TO
SOLVE FLOODS AND COASTAL
ISSUES”

Certain common themes can be distinguished in • Universities are internationally accredited, have
FOCUS ON THE the future scenarios: modern facilities and use case studies to teach

FUTURE • Different stakeholders collaborate with each

Having analysed the present, participants imagine
the future they want to work towards and express
them in creative ways. For example, there are a
few journalists from various broadcasting stations
in Indonesia and abroad reporting on the current
state of affairs, there is a fairy-tale, a vlog, an open
online course, and theatre plays about a boy
becoming older and a day in the life of world’s best
engineer.
other and share resources
• Students can identify problems in society and
solve them by applying their knowledge
• Students have integrity, are able to understand
the basic concepts and benefit from further
developing their soft skills
• Both students and lecturers are able to use
software properly and are proficient in ICT
• Lecturers facilitate learning and sometimes it is
the student who teaches
their students
• There is an improvement of social and
environmental awareness for all stakeholders
and an improved discussion with local
communities
• Government ensures clear regulations, good
spatial regional planning and synchronisation
between national and regional levels
• Companies collaborate with government and
universities in research and project to ensure
applicability of education

11
COMMON GROUND
From these visions for the future, the group distills shared elements that make up the common ground for
educating world class professionals. The common ground is what everyone believes to be the elements
that are shared and desired by the whole system (all stakeholders). These could be values, policies, projects
or other things. The common ground elements are clustered into six thematic categories:

SHARED AMBITIONS FOR THE FUTURE

1. Curriculum innovation
We have a smart curriculum that produces world-class professionals with high integrity, who
are visionary and respond to the needs and problems of society.

2. Open and easy access to content

We have easy and open access to environmental and technological data.

3. Physical laboratory infrastructure

Our laboratories and equipment, both indoor and outdoor, are complete and well-maintained.

4. Stakeholder collaboration
We ensure and promote well-established and sustainable collaboration between all
stakeholders.

5. Quality control and certification

We guarantee that our students are world-class and that our lecturers are accredited and
certified according to national and international standards.

6. Social and environmental awareness

We ensure the consideration of social and environmental factors to raise awareness and to
safeguard the applicability of the curriculum in assisting with solving current issues related to
coastal zone and water resource management.

12
ACTION PLANNING
After having agreed on the common ground
agenda, we move into action planning. Small
groups convene around each of the common
ground themes and generate proposals for
implementing this theme in practice. The groups
each receive critique and praise from their
colleagues and then improve their plans. This has
lead to the following six action plans:
CURRICULUM INNOVATION
Output 1. Certification
Milestones:
1. All lecturers are certified
2. New lecturers receive certification within
one year
3. Set programme design in one year (module)
4. Compliance attendance reports by also
notifying students
Output 2. Soft skills subjects
Milestones:
1. Number of details complete SAP is 100%
2. At least 8 guest lectures per year
3. Soft skills subjects at least 5% of total
credits
4. Subjects focusing on character-building at
least 5% of total credits
5. Participation in at least one subject relating
to entrepreneurship
6. Participation in at least one subject relating
to social and environmental factors
Output 3. Implementation and follow-up
Milestones:
1. The curriculum has been implemented as
expected in three years
2. Tracer study system in place
Commitment: Lecturers
Some other ideas: Guest lectures by
entrepreneurs or successful alumni; Involving
entrepreneur alumni or seniors to create the
course material; Advisory board related to ICZM
to support stakeholders and universities; Social
psychology education to produce local wisdom;
Concentrate on character building education;
Communication and presentation skills; Soft skill
training for lecturer
OPEN AND EASY ACCESS
Output 1: Building ICT infrastructure
Milestones:
1. Suitable high quality platform is available
2. Training in ICT
3. Launching the infrastructure
Output 2: Easy content access
Milestones:
1. Material and guidance is available (module,
practicum, community service, final project,
publications and e-books)
2. All this material is uploaded online and is
easily accessible
Output 3: Easy access to environmental and
technological data on coastal and water
resources
Milestones:
1. Establishing agreements between universities
and institutions
2. Accessible data
Indicators: Platform is launched;
Content is easy accessed
Commitment: Related institutions - Rector is
willing to provide grant for ICT infra. development
Some other ideas: Regular updates; Developing
practicum and field study guidance; Filter wrong
information; Website management; Collected on
one platform; Online quiz, assignments & tests;
Collaboration with other universities
13
EQUIPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE QUALITY CONTROL & CERTIFICATION

Output 1: Investments lab (laboratory equipment and building) Output 1: Getting national and international accreditation
Milestones: Milestones:
1. Practicum design 1. Needs analysis in terms of curriculum, HR facilities and research
2. Needs analysis (education & research) 2. Building a team
Output 2. Good maintenance (well-maintained and certified) 3. Standard-based implementation
Milestones: 4. Accreditation process
1. Standard O&P (national and international certificate) Output 2. Getting national and international certification
2. Budget allocation Milestones:
Output 3: Laboratory basic practicum 1. Fulfilling formal education
Milestones: 2. Professional education
1. Designing model Output 3. National contribution
2. Creating schedule Milestones:
Output 4: Filled laboratory 1. Collaboration between stakeholders
Milestones: 2. Improve national economy standards
1. Deciding the location 3. Improvement of appreciation and standards towards experts
2. MoU with stakeholders 4. New industry in ICZM initiated by professional HR

Indicators + Commitment: Availability of equipment and infrastructure;
SOP: ITS ITB (Arno & Agro) ; Staff ITB (Eka) ITS (Rudi); MoU PU (Adi) +
Alumni (Hima); Investor Nuffic (Olivier); Location ITB (Farid) + ITS (Rudi);
Practicum module (ITB Widya and Fajar)
Some other ideas: Increase the coast-based laboratory; Benchmarking with
other university’s laboratories; Hold a survey with stakeholders involved;
Utilisation of existing infrastructure; MoU for shared facilities with other
university; Common shared field laboratory facilities; Micro controller
workshop for students; Development of multi-media e-learning centre;
Routine site visit by students to observation station and telemetry system;
State of the art sensors & loggers (bachelor practice)
Indicators: standard-based infrastructure; certified HR; entrepreneurs in
ICZM who are competent and increasing in number; products
(publications, patents, national and international standard innovation)
Commitment: Institutional Accreditation: Dhemi & Asa; Certification
student & lecturers & experts: Irwan; National contribution: Weny &
policymaker
Some other ideas: National exam based on universities’ scale; Student
exchange and evaluation standard; More case studies; Evaluating
curriculum; Evaluating study program accreditation based on society
demand; Creating term of reference for certification; Evaluating teaching
method

14
STAKEHOLDER INTERACTION
Indicators: MoU and platform agreement
realised in first and second year. At least 5
Output 1: Collaboration among stakeholders
to develop research coastal and water research and publications every year and from
second to fifth year at least 20 researches.
resources
Information and database system has been
Milestones:
1. MoU and agreement established. In first year one website per
organisation, and one database and social
2. Research and publication
media profile per organisation.
3. Field trip, guest lecture, community service
& university exchange
Output 2: Building study centre networks Commitment: Suhariyanto (UNDIP), Ridwan
(ITB), Rengganis (ITB), Annisak (DPU SDA) ,
Milestones:
Rusli (ITS), Fauzy (PU Jatim) , Peter (University
1. Regulation and study centre networks
2. Data base and information system Pattimura), Suci (Bappeda), Joko (Pusat
Bendungan), Sumaji (PU SDA Jabar), Yudhi
3. Routine meetings & annual meeting agenda
(Pelindo) & Andre (Royal Haskoning DHV)
Output 3: Open forum amongst stakeholders
to synchronise the development of curriculum
1st meeting is 26 april 2018 @ Lombok, NTB
Milestones:
1. Guidance from stakeholders to students
Some other ideas: Open space meeting; Training
2. Innovation competition among stakeholders
3. Establishing forum platform for students associations about giving feedback;
Fun sharing with alumni, students and others;
Output 4: Creating alumni and student
Regular gathering & fund raising; Career and
networks
Milestones: sharing day; Tracer study among alumni; The
creation of a basic framework and guidelines for
1. Regulation of alumni and students networks
establishing a coastal study centre; MoU with
2. Database and information system
3. Routine campus visit companies (internships, field visits, research);
Stakeholder involvement (government,
community, and company) in long-term research
activities (or projects) in (or at) universities

15
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS

Output 1: New subjects on social economic Indicators: Policy and roles related to social and
environment and entrepreneurship environment have been applied at least 60%;
Milestones: Lecturers competencies in the relevant field have
1. Learning methodology increased at least 80%; Villages in coastal areas
2. Student skills reaching prosperity at least 80%; Results of
3. Study implementation research applied in every component 80%
4. Subject evaluation (government, university, company, local people,
Output 2. Social laboratory etc.)
Milestones:
1. Field need analyses Commitment: Mustain, Silvianita, Joko, Agung,
2. Deciding main issues Novalty, Ana, Amalia, Ilham & Han Blom
3. Alternative solution
4. Action concept Some other ideas: Students train citizens
Output 3. Research (knowledge transfer); Climate effect knowledge
Milestones: sharing with government; Every research that is
1. Social culture conducted in the coastal zone will be shared and
2. Social psychology distributed to the area, so they can share the
3. Social environment knowledge; Design of creativity program that
4. Environment involves the local community in downstream river
5. Policy analysis and coastal area; Social environmental risk
Output 4. Community service analysis; Organize a forum session for exchanging
Milestones: ideas and sharing opinions
1. Technology application
2. Guidance to villages
3. Women empowerment
4. Children education

16
AND NOW? COLOPHON
The outputs of the Future Search conference will be published and distributed If you have any questions about the
amongst the various stakeholder groups to make the ambitions of the Future content of the report or if you were a
Search participants known. In the remaining period of the project, some of the participant and anything in this report
ideas that came forward during the conference will be used and implemented, is not how you remember phrasing or
such as the inclusion of subjects on social inclusion and environmental writing it or if there is any other
assessment in the curricula. The same goes for the development of soft skills mistake, please get in contact with the
and the introduction of ICT-supported learning approaches. The project may conference committee. You can do
also facilitate initiatives such as forum sessions directly related to the project this by contacting Wahyudi or Iwan,
and with approval from Nuffic. via wahyudictr@oe.its.ac.id or
iwanhadihardaja@gmail.com.
Report by Asrini Chrysanti (ITB), Rasty
Hikmahwaty Sutrisno (ITB) & Anne
van Marwijk (Perspectivity.org)
Photos by EVIO Multimedia
Icons made by Freepik, Retinaicons,
GoodWare, Becris, Anatoly,
Smashicons & Iconnice from
flaticon.com.
17
PARTICIPANTS OF THE FUTURE SEARCH CONFERENCE

18

NAMES OF PARTICIPANTS
Prof. Ir. Iwan Kridasantausa, M.Sc., Ph.D.
LECTURERS
(ITB) - Ir. M. Cahyono, M.Sc., Ph.D. (ITB) - Ir.
Hermawan Mahfudz, MS. (ITB) - Dhemi Harlan, ST., MT., Ph.D. (ITB) -
Joko Nugroho, ST., MT., Ph. (ITB) - Hadi Kardhana, ST., MT. Ph.D. (ITB) -
Dr. Ana Nurganah Chaidar, ST., MT. (ITB) - Ir. Edy Anto Soentoro G.,
MA. Sc., Ph.D. (ITB) - Dr. Ir. Agung Wiyono HS, MS., M. Eng. (ITB) - Dr.
Ir. Sri Legowo W.Darsono Dr. Eng. Rudi Walujo PrasYanto, ST., MT.
(ITS) - Prof. Ir. Eko Budi Djatmiko, M.Sc., Ph.D (ITS) - Drs. Mahmud
Mustain, M.Sc., Ph.D. (ITS) - Dr.Ir.Wahyudi, M.Sc (ITS) - Suntoyo, ST.,
M. Eng., Ph.D (ITS) - R.Haryo Dwito Armono, ST.,M. Eng., Ph.D (ITS)-
Silvianita, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D (ITS) - Agro Wisudawan, ST., MT. (ITS) - Dr.
Muhammad Zikra, ST., M.SC, (ITS)
Ilham Cahya (ITS) - Zain Zachary (ITS) -
STUDENTS
Salsabilla Gucchaka (ITS) - Dina San Aprisca
(ITS) - Sarah Helena Abighail (ITB) - Lintang Ayu Putri Adhinianti
(ITB) - Fajar Nugraha Saefullah (ITB) - Ridwan (ITB)
GOVERNMENT Ir.Suci Purnomo, MM. (Bappeda Jatim) -
Fauzy Nasruddin, ST., M.Sc. (PU Jatim
Pengairan) - Dr. Eng. Adi Prasetyo (PUSAIR buleleng) - Annisak
(Dinas PU Sda Jatim) - Ir. Joko Mulyono, ME (PU Balai Bendungan) -
Dony Faturochman Saefulloh, ST., MT. (PU BBWS Cimanuk) - Hendra
Ahyadi, ST, MT (Situbondo) - Sumaji, ST., Sp1. (PU Jabar Dinas SDA)
SPECIALISTS Tri Mumpuni (IBK/gender) - Irwan Susilo,
ST., MT (PT.Geospasia Wahana Jaya) - Hans
Dermawan, S.Pd., MT (CKnet) - Yuni Ayu Maharani, MT. (CKnet) - Dr.
Oki Setyandito (CKnet (UBINUS) - Dadan Ramdan (Walhi Jabar) -
Han Blom - Erik de Ruyter van Steveninck (IHE-UNESCO) - Olivier
Hoes ( TU Delft) - Andre Prakoso Djojokusumo,M.Sc (ITS)
Hana, ST., MT. (ITS) - Yudistia Asa Negara
ALUMNI
Wahyudi, ST. (ITS) - Yenung Secasari, ST.,
M.Sc. (ITS) - Rusli Dain (ITS) - Amalia Nafisah Rahmani Irawan, ST.
(ITB) - Rengganis Nurfajrin Ashari, ST. (ITB) - Novaldi Agnial Fikri, ST.
(ITB) - Eka Oktariyanto N., ST., MT., Ph.D. (ITB) - Widyaningtiyas, ST,
MT., Ph.D. (ITB)
Baron Agung Wicaksono (KSO Sucofindo-
COMPANIES
Surveyor Indonesia) - Arendra Haryo
Prabowo (Pelindo 3) - Yudi Prasetyo, ST., M.Sc. (Pelindo 3) - Weny
Hamilton Sihombing (Witteveen+Bos) - Dr. Ir. Arno Adi Kuntoro, ST,
MT. (PPSDA) - Moh. Farid, ST., MT., Ph.D. (PPKL), Ir. Djamhuri M.
Jasin, M.Sc. (Perentjana Djaja) - Ir.Windarto (Konsultalindo) - Ir.
Supranowo (Jaya Konstruksi)
Arie Wiriawan (KKP Kementerian) -
POLICY MAKERS
Ridho Bayuaji, ST., MT. (PII) - Ir.Hasan
Ikhwani, M.Sc. (HAPPI) - Prof. Dr. Chan Basaruddin (BAN PT) - Prof.
Ir. Indratmo Soekarno, M.Sc., Ph.D. (ITB) - Prof. Dr. Ir. Muhammad
Syahril Badri K. (ITB) - Moh Irfan Saleh, ST., MPP, Ph.D (BAPPENAS
(SDA) - Prof.Ir. Ade Sjafruddin M.Sc., Ph.D. (ITB)
Dr. Taufiqur Rachman, ST., MT. (UNHAS) -
UNIVERSITIES
Dr. Pieter Thomas Berhtu , ST., MT.
(UNPATI) - Dr. Heri Suprapto, ST., MT. (CK net (Gunadarma) -
Purwanti Sri Pudyastuti, Ph.D. (CK net (UMS Surakarta) - Dr. Ir.
Suharyanto, M.Sc. (UNDIP) - Prof. Joko Legono (UGM) - Dr. Ir. Yadi
Suryadi, MT. (ITB) - Prof.Ir.Daniel M. Rosyid, Ph.D (ITS)
Prof. Ir. Joni Hermana, M.Sc. ES. Ph.D (ITS),
OTHER
Dr. Miming Miharja ST., M.Sc. Eng (ITB), Ir.
Bert Geers (TU Delft), Winda Herdianti (ITS), Dr. Han Rakels
(Perspectivity), Anne van Marwijk (Perspectivity), Asrini Chrysanti,ST
(ITB), Rasty Hikmahwaty S (ITB), Winda Septiani (ITB), Dea Dedah
Dahliawati (ITB), SE (ITB), Anggita Fazrin, A.Md. (ITB) - Julius Ali
(CKnet), Dr. Eng. Moh. Bagus Adityawan. ST., MT. (ITB)
19