Professional Documents
Culture Documents
| Conduct, respectfully requests that this Court issue an Order authorizing the public
broadcastingoffuture courtroom proceedings in this cause. In supportof saidMotion,
Defendant Allen states as follows:
1 ana
CodeofJudici
1. Rule 2.17 of theIndi al Conduct generally prohibits |
| comments:
And you've
“Thejudicial branchi he leastunderstoodbranch ofgovernment...here |
got millionsofHoosiers counting on itforjustice everyyear in Indiana. So why not
pullthecurtains outand say, ok,thisis whatwearedoing and thisis whywearedoing |
| it..the sky isnotgoing toall, since there are safeguards inplace.” See comments by |
Chief JusticeRushinthe article titled “The Indiana Supreme Court is lifting itsban on
courtroom cameras. Howthat could impact future cases.” Posted April 26, 2023.
“The media has beenpatient with delays in the hearings,and for the mostpart has been
unobirusiveandaccommodatingofthe Sheriff's security concerns regarding camera
placement. They have beenprofessional in their coverage andpresence.” Comments
‘bythe Honorable JudgeFranGull referenced in the Indiana Court Times. article titled
Leese suse, | “Broadcast Pilot Project Allows CamerasInCourt” March 24, 2022. |
Re aasri
Coummamomr.i eer | “Once the hearings start everyone seems toforget news media ispresent.” Judge Sean |
out.SeeIndiana CourtTimesarticletitled
CountyCircuitCoe
silelirme | Pers,Tippecan |
some | “BroadeastPilotProjectAllowsCamerasinCourt”datedMarch 24,2022.
|
1 |
| «_..especially in the high profile matters thatif we have those cameras in there to show
| whatishappening inrealtimeand whydecisionsare beingmadeandhowtheyare
beingmade, Ithinkthat willeducatethe public...” See comments by Scott County
Circuit Court Judge, Jason M. Mount. Indiana judges can now allow cameras inside the |
courtroom - YouTube. [
6. The justice system and the general public willbenefit from a public
broadcastofthepre-trial proceedings andanytrialthatmayoccur inthiscause forthe
following reasons:
a. Theproceedingswillundoubtedlygenerateahigh levelof
viewership allofwhichwillofferuptheopportunityforconstructive |
| an
ofthecase. Thisinturn,willprovide
feedbackattheconclusion |
opportunityto the Community RelationsComitteeof the Indiana. |
toCICRule 2.17to
Supreme Courtto considerfurthermodifications
‘benefit
thecitizensofIndiana, moving forward;
| b. Thesitting Judgeinthiscausehasparticipatedinthepilotprogram,
| ‘communicatedherpositiveexperienceswithcamerasinthe
courtroom,andtherefore,herpastexperienceswith theprocesswill
instill ahighdegreeofconfidencethattheprocesswillbe carried out
withefficiencyandwillnothinderand/or materiallyalterthe [
proceedings;
c. The Carroll CountyCircuitCourtis anunusually large courtroom
| whichoffersupadequate spacetoallowfor abroadcastingteam and
thevariousactorsinvolvedintheproceeding toworkinan
| ‘unobstructed manner. The Courtroom’s traditional construction and
I décoralsooffersup asolemnsettingwhichwillfurthermitigate
againstindividualconductthatmightotherwisebedistracting tothe
proceedings;
Pan
resulted
e. Thepassageoftimesincethecommissionofthecrimeshasstedinthi
intheagingofthehandfulofchildwitnessesthatonceexitherewills
case.Therefore, DefendantAllen'slegalteamanticipates iscause.
bevery fewminors,ifany,who willtestifya the rialinth
£ Totheextentthere is a needto shieldtheVictims® family members
fromthe public eye,such anintentiswithoutmeritasmanyofthe
family membershavevoluntarilytaken tosocial mediaandother
‘mediaoutlets,withbroadcoverageareas,andparticipa tedin the
‘media'scoverageoftheinvestigation,ove rthe past 6years.
g Counselforthedefenseanticipatesthat many ofthewitnessesvillb e
Jawenforcementofficialsandother expertswhowilllikely testify
viduals
regardingtheirspecificareasofexpertiseandtherefore,indiThis
Whoaregenerally comfor tab
incourtroom le will
proceedi ngs.
reducetherisk ofunpredictablebehaviorfrom witnessesandother
‘participants;and
b. Manyofthecircums tan
surroundingth werekept
iscaseces
confidentialbylaw enforcementofficials, leadingup tothefilingof
chargesagainstDefendantAllen.Earlycourtr erealso
filingswoom
Keptconfi denfthis
byOrdero tia l dOrderon.
Court.Sai
confidentialityhasbeen lifted.Offeringuptransparencythrough the
remainderofthecasewillincrease thepublictrustinthejudicial
process.
7. In the altemative, DefendantAllenrequests thattheCourt consider
authorizing the broadcasting ofpre-trial proceedings to assess the practicality,
‘advantages anddisadvantagesof broadcastinganyfuture trialin thiscause.
Respectfully Submittc
a rd
la“ARy, #23365-09
"Attorneyfor“Defendant
Pree
CERTIFICATE
OFSERVICE
A.Rozzi; 12336509
radldy
HILLIS, ILLIS,ROZZI & DEAN
200FourthStreet
Logansport,
IN46947
Andrew J. Baldwin
AndrewJ. Baldwin, #1785141
BALDWIN, PERRY & WILEY, P.C.
150N.MainStreet
Franklin,
IN46131