Assignment#1

Submitted by: Ayesha Asif

Submitted to: Ma’am Zehra Afreen
Course: International Human Resource
Management
Dated: March 7, 2023
Class: BBA 8
1. Analyze the case.
In this case study, the board of director of a company decided to setup
their marketing department separately and Mr. Ramchandran who is CEO
has been appointed by BOD to select the person who will be the head of
marketing department. Mr. Ramchandran has limited the field down to
two potential decisions Rajesh Mehta has a decent reputation with the
organization. He was contracted eight years back and during that time has
demonstrated a decent arrangement of drive and activity in the majority
of his undertakings. Mehta is additionally credited with tolerating full
obligation, in all cases and settling on snappy choices when activity is
called for. Pramod Kumar has been with the organization for a long time.
He is all around preferred by all in his area of expertise and his work is
top notch. Kumar’s administration style contrasts from Mehta’s in that
Kumar isn’t as forceful and fast to go about as Mehta. Before Kumar
settles on a choice, he by and large counsels other people who he feels
can contribute additional data on a given subject. This frequently
incorporates the individuals who work under him.

2. If you were Mr. Ramchandran, whom would you select as the head of
the Marketing Department? Why?
I think Pramod Kumar would be better option because as he is a leader
who consult his employees before making any decision which is
motivating factor for employees who work under him and this leads to
increase their performance which will then improve overall marketing
department performance. Also Pramod is with the organization for 11
years so he must know the organization better than Rajesh Mehta.
Although both candidates have their own strengths, Kumar’s leadership
style more suitable for a new department that needs to be established. His
ability to consult with others and encourage participation can help in
building a strong team and fostering a positive work environment, which
is crucial for the success of a new department. Additionally, his track
record of improving production in his work force is impressive.
3. Will you give any weightage to the length of service in the
organization? Why?
I would definitely give importance to length of service as employees who
have been with the company for many years have considerable
knowledge of the company’s culture and it’s products and services. They
have experienced many changes within the workplace, and consequently
understand what works and what doesn’t. In performing their job duties
day after day, they develop a strong knowledge base, which results in
higher productivity because fewer mistakes are made. Length of service
in the organization can be a factor to consider when making promotion
decisions, but it should not be the only factor. While long service in the
organization may indicate loyalty and commitment, it does not
necessarily mean that the employee is the most qualified for the position.
Factors such as job performance, leadership skills, and relevant
experience should also be considered.