Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session Objectives
At the end of the session, participants will be able to:
1. Hazard Identification
• Be sure that all hazards are found:
o Look at all aspects of the work.
o Include non‐routine activities, such as maintenance, repair, or cleaning.
o Look at accident/incident/near‐miss records.
o Include people who work “off site” either at home, on other job sites, drivers,
teleworkers, with clients, etc.
o Look at the way the work is organized or “done.”
o Look at foreseeable unusual conditions:
Emergency situation; or
Power outage.
1. Hazard Identification
• Types of hazards
o Health hazards
Working conditions which result in an illness, such as noise, improper working stations,
etc.
Exposure to dangerous substances or microorganisms
Often, latency between exposure and disease
o Safety hazards
Working conditions where harm to the workers is of an immediate and violent nature
Result in broken bones, cuts, bruises, sprains, loss of limbs, etc.
The harm results in some kind of injury to the worker
Associated with poorly guarded or dangerous equipment and machinery
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
• Dose
o Total amount of a chemical that is administered to, or taken by, the organism
• Response
o The effect a chemical has on a living organism
• Effect of a chemical depends on:
o The amount of the chemical that gets into the organism
o Resulting concentration of the chemical in the body (the amount of chemical
compared with the body size)
o The length of exposure to the chemical
o The route of exposure
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
• A chemical is considered toxic if it produces adverse effects in a living
organism at levels of exposure that are likely to occur.
o Ranging from slight symptoms (i.e., such as headache, nausea, or rashes) to
severe symptoms (i.e., coma, convulsions, and death)
• How does a toxicologist know when a chemical is toxic to humans?
o When available, toxicologists study data from human populations that have
been exposed to specific chemicals.
o In the absence of human data, toxicologists test the toxicity of different doses
of chemicals on cell and tissue cultures, plants, and other animals, such as
rats and mice.
LD50
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
• Tests
o Subacute toxicity tests to learn about the toxicity of a chemical after repeated
doses over 90 days
o Long‐term or chronic exposure studies in a similar manner, but the exposure
time is increased to a time period that can range from six months to two years
Marczerski, A.E., and Kamrin, M. Toxicology for the citizen (figure 6). Institute for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State University
Department of Labor and Employment
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
• An important aspect of dose‐
response relationships is the
concept of threshold
o Below which there are no adverse
effects from exposure to the
chemical
• Threshold:
o Point at which toxicity first
appears
o Occurs at the point where the
body's ability to detoxify or repair
toxic injury has been exceeded.
2. Dose‐Response Assessment
• Cancer‐causing chemical
o General assumption in risk assessment has been that there are no exposures
that have “zero risk” unless there is clear evidence otherwise
o Difficulty in estimating risk
Progressive disease – series of cellular transformations occur before cancer develops
Often develops many years after exposure
Limited studies
3. Exposure Assessment
• Variables in exposure assessment
o Exposed population
o Types of substances (occupational chemical or environmental pollutant)
o Single substance or mixture of substances
o Duration of exposure
o Modes of entry (inhalation, ingestion, skin contact)
4. Risk Characterization
• Cancer risk
o Expressed as the maximum number of new cases of cancer projected to occur
in a population of one million people due to exposure to the cancer‐causing
substance over a 70‐year lifetime
o Factors affecting risk
Actual exposure
Genetic background
Family history of certain types of cancer
Health
Diet
Lifestyle choices (smoking and alcohol consumption)
o Compared to
overall risk of cancer in the general population
risk posed by all harmful chemicals in a particular medium, such as the air
4. Risk Characterization
• Non‐Cancer risk
o Compares actual level of exposure to a chemical to the level of exposure that
is not expected to cause any adverse health effects, even in the most
susceptible people.
Health reference levels
Based on results of animal studies
o Health reference level may be set 100 to 100,000 times lower than the levels
of exposure observed to have no adverse effects on animal studies
Prioritizing Risks
• Percentage of workforce exposed
• Frequency of exposure
• Degree of harm likely to result from the exposure
• Probability of occurrence
Very likely Low risk Very high risk Very high risk
Note: These categorizations and the resulting asymmetry of the matrix arise from the examples of harm and
likelihood illustrated within the British Standard. Organizations should adjust the design and size of the matrix
to suit their needs.