You are on page 1of 4

THE CLUB FOR GROWTH FOUNDATION’S

Congressional
Scorecard 2022

2022 SCORECARD METHODOLOGY The Foundation conducted a comprehensive examination


of each lawmaker’s record on votes related to pro-
Club for Growth publishes the Club for growth policies and computed an Economic Growth
Score on a scale of 0 to 100. A score of 100 indicates
Growth Foundation’s scorecard study so our
the highest support for pro-growth policies. Those
members and the public can monitor the
lawmakers scoring 90 or higher in 2022 – and who
actions and the voting behavior of Members also have a lifetime score of 90 or higher – receive the
of Congress on economic growth issues. Defender of Economic Freedom award from the Club.

The Foundation • Reducing income tax rates • Social Security reform with • Replacing the current tax
personal retirement accounts code (flat tax, fair tax)
examines legislative • Death tax repeal
for younger workers
• Expanding school choice
votes related to the • Limited government
• Expanding trade freedom
through reduced spending • Implementing Term
Club’s immediate (free trade)
and budget reform, Limits
pro-economic including a Balanced • Ending abusive lawsuits
• Regulatory reform and
Budget Amendment to the through medical malpractice
growth policy deregulation
United States Constitution and tort reform
goals, including:
Not all of these policies will come up for a vote in each session of Congress.

Whenever possible the Club sends a “key vote” alert to Capitol Hill prior
The Foundation also examines
to an expected roll call vote or pending legislative action important
votes on bills that would
to the Club’s goals. Notwithstanding the Club’s “key vote” alerts, the
directly harm these goals.
Foundation reserves the right to include any vote or action in the study.

CLUB FOR GROWTH FOUNDATION | 2001 L STREET NW, SUITE 600 | WASHINGTON, DC 20036 | P: 202-955-5500
2022 HOUSE RATINGS Members of Congress with annual scores AND lifetime scores of 90% or higher

MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

ALASKA Pelosi, Nancy n/a 6% GEORGIA KENTUCKY


Peltola, Mary n/a n/a Peters, Scott 218 0% 11% Allen, Rick 1 100% 80% Barr, Andy 116 85% 73%
Young, Don n/a 51% Porter, Katie 218 0% 3% Bishop, Sanford 218 0% 10% Comer, James 97 88% 83%
ALABAMA Roybal-Allard, Bourdeaux, Carolyn 218 0% 0% Guthrie, Brett 116 85% 72%
218 0% 6%
Lucille
Carl, Jerry 82 91% 92% Carter, Buddy 65 92% 79% Massie, Thomas 1 100% 94%
Ruiz, Raul 218 0% 6%
Aderholt, Robert 154 82% 64% Clyde, Andrew 59 93% 97% Rogers, Hal 174 77% 60%
Sanchez, Linda 218 0% 7%
Brooks, Mo 65 92% 88% Ferguson, Drew 50 95% 77% Yarmuth, John 218 0% 4%
Schiff, Adam 218 0% 7%
Moore, Barry 57 94% 97% Greene, Marjorie 1 100% 100% LOUISIANA
Sherman, Brad 218 0% 5%
Palmer, Gary 32 97% 91% Hice, Jody 1 100% 96% Carter, Troy 218 0% 0%
Speier, Jackie 218 0% 9%
Rogers, Mike 150 83% 62% Johnson, Henry 218 0% 5% Graves, Garret 170 80% 77%
Steel, Michelle 88 89% 87%
Sewell, Terri 218 0% 6% Loudermilk, Barry 1 100% 89% Higgins, Clay 1 100% 85%
Swalwell, Eric 218 0% 8%
ARKANSAS McBath, Lucy 218 0% 5% Johnson, Mike 65 92% 85%
Takano, Mark 218 0% 7%
Crawford, Rick 65 92% 68% Scott, Austin 88 89% 79% Letlow, Julia 116 85% 87%
Thompson, Mike 218 0% 6%
Hill, French 154 82% 72% Scott, David 218 0% 7% Scalise, Steve 97 88% 81%
Torres, Norma 218 0% 6%
Westerman, Bruce 85 90% 81% Williams, Nikema 218 0% 0% MASSACHUSETTS
Valadao, David 154 82% 52%
Womack, Steve 196 64% 62% HAWAII Auchincloss, Jake 218 0% 0%
Vargas, Juan 218 0% 8%
ARIZONA Case, Ed 218 0% 9% Clark, Katherine 218 0% 6%
Waters, Maxine 218 0% 8%
Biggs, Andy 1 100% 100% Kahele, Kaialii 218 0% 0% Keating, William 218 0% 6%
COLORADO
Gallego, Ruben 218 0% 7% IOWA Lynch, Stephen 218 0% 6%
Boebert, Lauren 1 100% 100%
Gosar, Paul 1 100% 92% Axne, Cindy 218 0% 8% McGovern, James 218 0% 6%
Buck, Ken 32 97% 98%
Grijalva, Raul 218 0% 8% Feenstra, Randy 116 85% 85% Moulton, Seth 218 0% 6%
Crow, Jason 218 0% 3%
Kirkpatrick, Ann 218 0% 10% Hinson, Ashley 88 89% 87% Neal, Richard 218 0% 7%
DeGette, Diana 218 0% 8%
Lesko, Debbie 1 100% 89% Miller-Meeks, Pressley, Ayanna 218 0% 13%
Lamborn, Doug 50 95% 93% 170 80% 79%
Mariannette
O'Halleran, Tom 218 0% 5% Trahan, Lori 218 0% 4%
Neguse, Joseph 218 0% 4% IDAHO
Schweikert, David 32 97% 94% MARYLAND
Perlmutter, Ed 218 0% 6% Fulcher, Russ 1 100% 95%
Stanton, Greg 218 0% 4% Brown, Anthony 218 0% 4%
CONNECTICUT Simpson, Mike 116 85% 58%
CALIFORNIA Harris, Andy 50 95% 89%
Courtney, Joe 218 0% 5% ILLINOIS
Aguilar, Pete 218 0% 7% Hoyer, Steny 218 0% 6%
DeLauro, Rosa 218 0% 5% Bost, Mike 116 85% 57%
Barragan, Nanette 218 0% 7% Mfume, Kweisi 218 0% 0%
Hayes, Jahana 218 0% 3% Bustos, Cheri 218 0% 4%
Bass, Karen 218 0% 8% Raskin, Jamie 218 0% 7%
Himes, James 214 6% 7% Casten, Sean 218 0% 3%
Bera, Ami 218 0% 5% Ruppersberger, C.A. 218 0% 8%
Larson, John 218 0% 6% Davis, Danny 218 0% 6%
Brownley, Julia 218 0% 5% Sarbanes, John 218 0% 6%
DELAWARE Davis, Rodney 205 57% 51%
Calvert, Ken 154 82% 63% Trone, David 218 0% 3%
Rochester, Lisa 218 0% 4% Foster, Bill 218 0% 7%
Carbajal, Salud 218 0% 4% MAINE
FLORIDA Garcia, Jesus 218 0% 6%
Cardenas, Tony 218 0% 8% Golden, Jared 214 6% 13%
Bilirakis, Gus 154 82% 68% Kelly, Robin 218 0% 6%
Chu, Judy 218 0% 7% Pingree, Chellie 218 0% 6%
Buchanan, Vern 88 89% 61% Kinzinger, Adam 208 41% 50%
Conway, Connie 108 87% 87% MICHIGAN
Cammack, Kat 1 100% 96% Krishnamoorthi,
Correa, Luis 218 0% 11% 218 0% 5% Bergman, Jack 154 82% 68%
Raja
Castor, Kathy 218 0% 5%
Costa, Jim 218 0% 14% LaHood, Darin 65 92% 79% Dingell, Debbie 218 0% 5%
Cherfilus-
DeSaulnier, Mark 218 0% 6% 218 0% 0% Miller, Mary 1 100% 100% Huizenga, Bill 146 84% 81%
McCormick, Sheila
Eshoo, Anna 218 0% 8% Crist, Charlie 218 0% 4% Newman, Marie 218 0% 0% Kildee, Daniel 218 0% 5%
Garamendi, John 218 0% 5% Demings, Val 218 0% 5% Quigley, Mike 218 0% 8% Lawrence, Brenda 218 0% 4%
Garcia, Mike 187 70% 69% Deutch, Ted 218 0% 5% Rush, Bobby 218 0% 8% Levin, Andy 218 0% 5%
Gomez, Jimmy 218 0% 10% Diaz-Balart, Mario 154 82% 56% Schakowsky, Janice 218 0% 7% McClain, Lisa 115 86% 89%
Harder, Josh 218 0% 5% Donalds, Byron 1 100% 100% Schneider, Bradley 218 0% 8% Meijer, Peter 192 65% 73%
Huffman, Jared 218 0% 5% Dunn, Neal 116 85% 74% Underwood, Lauren 218 0% 3% Moolenaar, John 146 84% 70%
Issa, Darrell 65 92% 75% Frankel, Lois 218 0% 5% INDIANA Slotkin, Elissa 218 0% 3%
Jacobs, Sara 218 0% 0% Franklin, Scott 65 92% 92% Baird, James 187 70% 76% Stevens, Haley 218 0% 3%
Khanna, Ro 218 0% 9% Gaetz, Matt 82 91% 85% Banks, Jim 1 100% 94% Tlaib, Rashida 218 0% 13%
Kim, Young 187 70% 74% Gimenez, Carlos 154 82% 80% Bucshon, Larry 116 85% 66% Upton, Fred 210 26% 51%
LaMalfa, Doug 97 88% 73% Lawson, Al 218 0% 3% Carson, Andre 218 0% 5% Walberg, Tim 174 77% 79%
Lee, Barbara 218 0% 7% Mast, Brian 116 85% 72% Hollingsworth, Trey 174 77% 84% MINNESOTA
Levin, Mike 218 0% 3% Murphy, Stephanie 214 6% 11% Mrvan, Frank 218 0% 0% Craig, Angela 218 0% 3%
Lieu, Ted 218 0% 6% Posey, Bill 65 92% 84% Pence, Greg 150 83% 74% Emmer, Tom 116 85% 79%
Lofgren, Zoe 218 0% 8% Rutherford, John 116 85% 64% Spartz, Victoria 154 82% 84% Finstad, Brad n/a n/a
Lowenthal, Alan 218 0% 5% Salazar, Maria 183 75% 76% Walorski, Jackie 97 88% 70% Fischbach, Michelle 116 85% 85%
Matsui, Doris 218 0% 6% Soto, Darren 218 0% 3% Yakym, Rudolph n/a n/a Hagedorn, James n/a 72%
McCarthy, Kevin 116 85% 72% Steube, Greg 1 100% 98% KANSAS McCollum, Betty 218 0% 4%
McClintock, Tom 65 92% 96% Waltz, Michael 154 82% 78% Davids, Sharice 218 0% 7% Omar, Ilhan 218 0% 14%
McNerney, Jerry 218 0% 6% Wasserman Schultz, Estes, Ron 1 100% 81% Phillips, Dean 218 0% 6%
218 0% 5%
Debbie
Napolitano, Grace 218 0% 6% LaTurner, Jake 116 85% 89% Stauber, Pete 174 77% 63%
Webster, Daniel 116 85% 76%
Obernolte, Jay 154 82% 84% Mann, Tracey 32 97% 99% MISSOURI
Wilson, Frederica 218 0% 6%
Panetta, Jimmy 218 0% 8% Bush, Cori 218 0% 6%
r 2022 HOUSE RATINGS
FE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE MEMBER RANK SCORE LIFE
ORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

Cleaver, Emanuel 218 0% 6% Ocasio-Cortez, Dean, Madeleine 218 0% 3% Jackson-Lee, Sheila 218 0% 6%
212 13% 16%
Alexandria
Graves, Sam 116 85% 69% Reed, Tom n/a 53% Doyle, Michael 218 0% 5% Jackson, Ronny 1 100% 96%
Hartzler, Vicky 154 82% 69% Rice, Kathleen 214 6% 8% Evans, Dwight 218 0% 3% Johnson, Eddie 218 0% 5%
Long, Billy 65 92% 80% Ryan, Pat n/a n/a Fitzpatrick, Brian 211 20% 30% McCaul, Michael 187 70% 72%
Luetkemeyer, Blaine 116 85% 69% Sempolinski, Joe n/a n/a Houlahan, Chrissy 218 0% 3% Nehls, Troy 57 94% 93%
Smith, Jason 82 91% 85% Stefanik, Elise 154 82% 46% Joyce, John 59 93% 88% Pfluger, August 1 100% 96%
Wagner, Ann 97 88% 68% Suozzi, Thomas 218 0% 8% Keller, Fred 116 85% 90% Roy, Chip 1 100% 100%
MISSISSIPPI Tenney, Claudia 185 74% 59% Kelly, Mike 174 77% 64% Sessions, Pete 116 85% 83%
Guest, Michael 150 83% 82% Tonko, Paul 218 0% 5% Lamb, Conor 218 0% 12% Taylor, Van 1 100% 97%
Kelly, Trent 65 92% 85% Torres, Ritchie 218 0% 0% Meuser, Dan 150 83% 79% Van Duyne, Beth 32 97% 95%
Palazzo, Steven 88 89% 71% Velazquez, Nydia 218 0% 7% Perry, Scott 1 100% 92% Veasey, Marc 218 0% 8%
Thompson, Bennie 218 0% 6% Zeldin, Lee 170 80% 65% Reschenthaler, Guy 154 82% 77% Vela, Filemon n/a 12%
MONTANA NORTH CAROLINA Scanlon, Mary 218 0% 3% Weber, Randy 50 95% 86%
Rosendale, Matt 1 100% 100% Adams, Alma 218 0% 4% Smucker, Lloyd 88 89% 81% Williams, Roger 32 97% 82%
NEBRASKA Bishop, Dan 1 100% 98% Thompson, Glenn 116 85% 63% UTAH
Bacon, Don 187 70% 64% Budd, Ted 65 92% 97% Wild, Susan 218 0% 4% Curtis, John 154 82% 82%
Flood, Mike 108 87% 87% Butterfield, G.K. 218 0% 5% RHODE ISLAND Moore, Blake 116 85% 85%
Fortenberry, Jeff N/A 58% Cawthorn, Madison 108 87% 89% Cicilline, David 218 0% 7% Owens, Burgess 97 88% 87%
Smith, Adrian 50 95% 81% Foxx, Virginia 108 87% 86% Langevin, James 218 0% 5% Stewart, Chris 97 88% 79%
NEVADA Hudson, Richard 170 80% 81% SOUTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA
Amodei, Mark 154 82% 65% Manning, Kathy 218 0% 0% Clyburn, James 218 0% 6% Beyer, Don 218 0% 5%
Horsford, Steven 218 0% 7% McHenry, Patrick 108 87% 81% Duncan, Jeff 50 95% 94% Cline, Ben 1 100% 94%
Lee, Suzanne 218 0% 4% Murphy, Greg 32 97% 86% Mace, Nancy 116 85% 90% Connolly, Gerald 218 0% 7%
Titus, Dina 218 0% 7% Price, David 218 0% 5% Norman, Ralph 1 100% 96% Good, Robert 1 100% 100%
NEW HAMPSHIRE Ross, Deborah 218 0% 0% Rice, Tom 32 97% 84% Griffith, H. Morgan 59 93% 77%
Kuster, Ann 218 0% 6% Rouzer, David 97 88% 80% Timmons, William 32 97% 96% Luria, Elaine 218 0% 7%
Pappas, Christopher 218 0% 4% NORTH DAKOTA Wilson, Joe 85 90% 80% McEachin, Donald 218 0% 5%
NEW JERSEY Armstrong, Kelly 88 89% 86% SOUTH DAKOTA Scott, Robert 218 0% 6%
Gottheimer, Josh 218 0% 6% OHIO Johnson, Dusty 116 85% 82% Spanberger, Abigail 218 0% 10%
Kim, Andy 218 0% 3% Balderson, Troy 198 62% 69% TENNESSEE Wexton, Jennifer 218 0% 3%
Malinowski, Tom 218 0% 3% Beatty, Joyce 218 0% 4% Burchett, Tim 32 97% 95% Wittman, Robert 146 84% 75%
Norcross, Donald 218 0% 4% Brown, Shontel 218 0% 0% Cohen, Steve 218 0% 6% VERMONT
Pallone, Frank 218 0% 8% Carey, Mike 192 65% 65% Cooper, Jim 218 0% 18% Welch, Peter 218 0% 6%
Pascrell, Bill 218 0% 6% Chabot, Steve 198 62% 87% DesJarlais, Scott 65 92% 89% WASHINGTON
Payne, Donald 218 0% 6% Davidson, Warren 65 92% 96% Fleischmann, Chuck 32 97% 72% DelBene, Suzan 218 0% 3%
Sherrill, Mikie 218 0% 3% Green, Mark 32 97% 97% Herrera Beutler,
Gibbs, Bob 192 65% 69% 204 58% 59%
Jaime
Sires, Albio 218 0% 6% Gonzalez, Anthony 203 59% 67% Harshbarger, Diana 85 90% 91%
Jayapal, Pramila 218 0% 9%
Smith, Christopher 174 77% 41% Johnson, Bill 192 65% 61% Kustoff, David 32 97% 76%
Kilmer, Derek 218 0% 4%
Van Drew, Jeff 108 87% 46% Jordan, Jim 1 100% 98% Rose, John 65 92% 91%
Larsen, Rick 218 0% 8%
Watson Coleman, TEXAS
218 0% 6% Joyce, David 198 62% 54% McMorris Rodgers,
Bonnie 65 92% 72%
Allred, Colin 218 0% 4% Cathy
NEW MEXICO Kaptur, Marcy 218 0% 5%
Arrington, Jodey 50 95% 82% Newhouse, Dan 116 85% 67%
Fernandez, Teresa 218 0% 0% Latta, Bob 174 77% 81%
Babin, Brian 1 100% 86% Schrier, Kim 218 0% 3%
Herrell, Yvette 116 85% 93% Ryan, Tim 218 0% 6%
Brady, Kevin 97 88% 79% Smith, Adam 218 0% 11%
Stansbury, Melanie 218 0% 0% Turner, Michael 198 62% 54%
Burgess, Michael 59 93% 81% Strickland, Marilyn 218 0% 0%
Stansbury, Melanie 222 0% 0% Wenstrup, Brad 88 89% 80%
Carter, John 97 88% 74% WISCONSIN
NEW YORK Turner, Michael 176 81% 53%
Castro, Joaquin 218 0% 8% Fitzgerald, Scott 116 85% 89%
Bowman, Jamaal 218 0% 5% Wenstrup, Brad 113 85% 79%
Cloud, Michael 1 100% 97% Gallagher, Mike 183 75% 83%
Clarke, Yvette 218 0% 8% OKLAHOMA
Crenshaw, Dan 88 89% 80% Grothman, Glenn 59 93% 90%
Delgado, Antonio n/a 4% Bice, Stephanie 116 85% 85%
Cuellar, Henry 218 0% 21% Kind, Ron 218 0% 12%
Espaillat, Adriano 218 0% 8% Cole, Tom 198 62% 63%
Doggett, Lloyd 218 0% 11% Moore, Gwen 218 0% 8%
Garbarino, Andrew 185 74% 68% Hern, Kevin 32 97% 93%
Ellzey, John 97 88% 88% Pocan, Mark 218 0% 7%
Higgins, Brian 218 0% 5% Lucas, Frank 116 85% 65%
Escobar, Veronica 218 0% 8% Steil, Bryan 146 84% 88%
Jacobs, Christopher 207 44% 59% Mullin, Markwayne 1 100% 81%
Fallon, Pat 32 97% 95% Tiffany, Tom 59 93% 91%
Jeffries, Hakeem 218 0% 7% OREGON
Fletcher, Lizzie 218 0% 3% WEST VIRGINIA
Jones, Mondaire 218 0% 0% Bentz, Cliff 116 85% 85%
Flores, Mayra 108 87% 87% McKinley, David 197 63% 52%
Katko, John 209 27% 35% Blumenauer, Earl 218 0% 14%
Garcia, Sylvia 218 0% 6% Miller, Carol 32 97% 78%
Malliotakis, Nicole 174 77% 72% Bonamici, Suzanne 218 0% 8%
Gohmert, Louie 65 92% 91% Mooney, Alex 32 97% 89%
Maloney, Carolyn 218 0% 7% DeFazio, Peter 218 0% 10%
Gonzales, Tony 116 85% 85% WYOMING
Maloney, Sean 218 0% 8% Schrader, Kurt 213 8% 15%
Gonzalez, Vicente 218 0% 11% Cheney, Liz 205 57% 68%
Meeks, Gregory 218 0% 9% PENNSYLVANIA
Boyle, Brendan 218 0% 6% Gooden, Lance 32 97% 98%
Meng, Grace 218 0% 7%
Cartwright, Granger, Kay 182 76% 68%
Morelle, Joseph 218 0% 3% 218 0% 5%
Matthew Green, Al 218 0% 6%
Nadler, Jerrold 218 0% 5%
2022 SENATE RATINGS Members of the Senate with annual scores AND lifetime scores of 90% or higher

LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE


MEMBER RANK SCORE
SCORE MEMBER RANK SCORE
SCORE MEMBER RANK SCORE
SCORE MEMBER RANK SCORE
SCORE MEMBER RANK SCORE
SCORE

ALASKA HAWAII MAINE NEW JERSEY SOUTH DAKOTA


Murkowski,
49 41% 50% Hirono, Mazie 64 0% 3% Collins, Susan 50 27% 32% Booker, Cory 64 0% 8% Rounds, Mike 38 63% 61%
Lisa
Menendez,
Sullivan, Dan 31 72% 65% Schatz, Brian 64 0% 1% King, Angus 55 7% 3% 64 0% 10% Thune, John 30 74% 72%
Robert
ALABAMA IOWA MICHIGAN NEW MEXICO TENNESSEE
Shelby, Heinrich, Blackburn,
36 67% 73% Ernst, Joni 21 89% 73% Peters, Gary 64 0% 5% 64 0% 3% 1 100% 89%
Richard Martin Marsha
Tuberville, Grassley, Stabenow,
12 95% 98% 25 85% 77% 64 0% 9% Lujan, Ben 64 0% 7% Hagerty, Bill 28 79% 82%
Tommy Chuck Debbie
ARKANSAS IDAHO MINNESOTA NEVADA TEXAS
Boozman, Klobuchar, Cortez Masto,
32 69% 70% Crapo, Mike 20 90% 80% 55 7% 6% 55 7% 3% Cornyn, John 32 69% 78%
John Amy Catherine

Cotton, Tom 32 69% 81% Risch, Jim 9 97% 87% Smith, Tina 64 0% 1% Rosen, Jacky 52 8% 5% Cruz, Ted 1 100% 92%

ARIZONA ILLINOIS MISSOURI NEW YORK UTAH


Duckworth, Gillibrand,
Kelly, Mark 64 0% 0% 64 0% 2% Blunt, Roy 48 43% 65% 64 0% 7% Lee, Mike 1 100% 99%
Tammy Kirsten
Sinema, Durbin, Schumer,
55 7% 10% 64 0% 2% Hawley, Josh 12 95% 87% 64 0% 3% Romney, Mitt 40 59% 56%
Krysten Richard Chuck
CALIFORNIA INDIANA MISSISSIPPI OHIO VIRGINIA
Feinstein, Hyde-Smith, Brown,
64 0% 5% Braun, Mike 1 100% 94% 26 80% 66% 64 0% 3% Kaine, Tim 55 7% 3%
Dianne Cindy Sherrod
Wicker,
Padilla, Alex 64 0% 0% Young, Todd 44 53% 66% 46 46% 65% Portman, Rob 40 59% 62% Warner, Mark 55 7% 7%
Roger
COLORADO KANSAS MONTANA OKLAHOMA VERMONT
Bennet, Marshall, Leahy,
64 0% 8% 12 95% 75% Daines, Steve 12 95% 83% Inhofe, James 29 76% 86% 64 0% 2%
Michael Roger Patrick
Hickenlooper, Lankford, Sanders,
55 7% 4% Moran, Jerry 42 54% 71% Tester, Jon 51 12% 11% 1 100% 88% 52 8% 8%
John James Bernie
CONNECTICUT KENTUCKY NORTH CAROLINA OREGON WASHINGTON
Blumenthal, McConnell, Cantwell,
64 0% 4% 42 54% 71% Burr, Richard 35 68% 72% Merkley, Jeff 64 0% 6% 64 0% 8%
Richard Mitch Maria
Murphy,
55 7% 5% Paul, Rand 1 100% 96% Tillis, Thom 36 67% 65% Wyden, Ron 64 0% 8% Murray, Patty 64 0% 4%
Christopher
DELAWARE LOUISIANA NORTH DAKOTA PENNSYLVANIA WISCONSIN
Carper, Baldwin,
64 0% 10% Cassidy, Bill 39 62% 70% Cramer, Kevin 18 91% 58% Casey, Bob 64 0% 4% 64 0% 3%
Thomas Tammy
Coons, Kennedy,
64 0% 4% 26 80% 81% Hoeven, John 17 92% 61% Toomey, Pat 1 100% 93% Johnson, Ron 1 100% 89%
Christopher John
FLORIDA MASSACHUSETTS NEBRASKA RHODE ISLAND WEST VIRGINIA
Markey, Capito,
Rubio, Marco 21 89% 86% 64 0% 8% Fischer, Deb 12 95% 74% Reed, Jack 64 0% 5% Shelley 45 51% 51%
Edward
Moore
Warren, Whitehouse,
Scott, Rick 9 97% 88% 64 0% 9% Sasse, Ben 18 91% 92% 64 0% 5%
Elizabeth Sheldon 100% Manchin, Joe 52 8% 18%
GEORGIA MARYLAND NEW HAMPSHIRE SOUTH CAROLINA WYOMING
Ossoff, Cardin, Hassan, Graham,
64 0% 0% 64 0% 3% 64 0% 2% 47 44% 65% Barrasso,
Thomas Benjamin Maggie Lindsey 24 88% 81%
John
Warnock, Van Hollen, Shaheen,
64 0% 0% 64 0% 7% 55 7% 5% Scott, Tim 9 97% 86% Lummis,
Raphael Chris Jeanne 21 89% 85%
Cynthia

LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS The Foundation’s study examined all 970 floor votes in the House (549) and Senate
CONSIDERED IN 2022: (421) and, in the end, included 14 House votes and 17 Senate votes.

the House and #100 in the Senate. Scores and scores, years with “n.a.” listed instead of a score
COMPUTATION
ranks cannot be directly compared between are not included. Comparing such scores to other
Scores are computed on a scale of 0 to 100. the House and Senate, as different votes were members without “n.a.” years may be misleading.
Each vote or action in the rating is assigned taken in each chamber. The study also records a
a certain number of points depending on its “Lifetime Score” for each Member of Congress.
relative importance. Absences are not counted, This is a simple average of the scores from all
ADDITIONAL FACTORS
though the Foundation reserves the right to do previous years where the lawmaker earned a
so if, in its judgment, a Member’s position was score in the Club’s scorecards. A study of roll call votes on the floor of the
otherwise discernible. House and Senate and legislative actions is just
In some cases a lawmaker was not present for that. It cannot account for a lawmaker’s work
To provide some additional guidance concerning enough votes for a meaningful score or ranking in committee, advocacy in his party’s caucus
the scores, each lawmaker was ranked. Members to be computed. In such cases “n.a.” for “not meetings, and effectiveness as a leader in
with 0% scores are, by default, ranked #435 in applicable” appears. In computing lifetime advocating pro-growth policies.

You might also like