Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Legislative power shall be vested in the Congress of the Philippines which shall consist of a Senate and a House of
Representatives, except to the extent reserved to the people by the provision on initiative and referendum.
B. Where Vested
Legislative power is vested in Congress except to the extent reserved to the people by the provision on initiative and
referendum.
Power to Create Public Office is Inherently Legislative Power. It is settled that, except for the offices created by the
Constitution, the creation of a public office is primarily a legislative function. (Separate Opinion of C.J. Corona in
Biraogo v. PTC, 2010) The power to create a public office is essentially legislative, and, therefore, it belongs to Congress.
It is not shared by Congress with the President, until and unless Congress enacts legislation that delegates a part of the
power to the President, or any other officer or agency. (Separate Opinion of J. Bersamin in Biraogo v. PTC, 2010)
Note:
Some commentators include:
(a) delegation to the people at large and
(b) delegation to administrative bodies to the exceptions.(See Cruz, Philippine Political Law p 87, 1995 ed.)
However, I submit this is not accurate. I submit that legislative power is not delegated to the people because in the first
place they are the primary holder of the power; they only delegated such power to the Congress through the Constitution.
(See Preamble and Article II Section 1) Note that Article VI Section 1 does not delegate power to the people. It reserves
legislative power to the people. -asm What is delegated to administrative bodies is not legislative power but rule-making
power or law execution.
Contingent Legislation
The standby authority given to the President to increase the value added tax rate in the VAT Law, R.A. 9337 was upheld
as an example of contingent legislation where the effectivity of the law is made to depend on the verification by the
executive of the existence of certain conditions.
J. Requisites for a valid delegation of rule-making power or execution: (2005 Bar Question)
(1) The delegating law must be complete in itself – it must set therein the policy to be carried out or implemented
by the delegate.
(2) The delegating law must fix a sufficient standard- the limits of which are sufficiently determinate or
determinable, to which the delegate must conform in the performance of his functions.
Importance of Policy.
Without a statutory declaration of policy, the delegate would, in effect, make or formulate such policy, which is the
essence of every law. Importance of Standard. Without standard, there would be no means to determine with reasonable
certainty whether the delegate has acted within or beyond the scope of his authority. Hence, he could thereby arrogate
upon himself the power, not only to make law, but also to unmake it, by adopting measures inconsistent with the end
sought to be attained by the Act of Congress. (Pelaez v. Auditor General)
K. Standards
1. Need not be explicit
2. May be found in various parts of the statute
3. May be embodied in other statutes of the same statute
1. A legislative standard need not be explicit or formulated in precise declaratory language. It can be drawn from
the declared policy of the law and from the totality of the delegating statute. (Osmena v. Orbos) It can be implied from the
policy and purpose of the law (Agustin v. Edu)
2. A legislative standard may be found in various parts of the statute. (Tablarin v. Guttierez)
3. A legislative standard need not be found in the law challenged and may be embodied in other statues on the
same subject. (Chiongbayan v Orbos)