Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation
Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation
To cite this article: P. Magudeswaran & P. Sakthivel (2023): Internet of Things Based Horizontal
Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation, Electric Power Components and Systems,
DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2243940
Article views: 19
CONTENTS
Abstract—Renewable energy is undergoing significant
1. Introduction advancements through the utilization of new technologies. Among
these technologies, fixed solar panels serve as a fundamental type
2. Design Initialization
of solar photovoltaic energy generator. Monitoring and optimizing
3. Whale Optimization Algorithm the performance of these panels is achieved through the
4. Results and Discussions implementation of controller algorithms. However, there is a
5. Conclusion growing emphasis on axis tracking systems for solar panels, as
that has the feasible to extract more power compared to fixed
References panels. In this context, the integration of the Internet of Things
(IoT), big data analytics, deep learning, and cloud computing
presents a contemporary solution for addressing various challenges
associated with monitoring renewable solar energy systems. By
employing sensors and actuators grouped within an IoT
framework, real-time data can be extracted and stored in a cloud
server, allowing remote access from anywhere. Furthermore, the
use of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms, such as the Whale
Optimization Algorithm, has become commonplace in solving
engineering issues. In this proposed system, the performance of
horizontal axis trackers is analyzed and compared with fixed
panels using the WOA-based axis tracking analysis. Through the
application of a control algorithm, optimal values can be obtained
under typical weather conditions. The system’s simulation and
performance are thoroughly assessed and evaluated.
1. INTRODUCTION
During the preceding five years, 70,000 solar panels are
expected to be added per hour globally. There are numer-
ous varieties of solar panels availed the market today.
Also, the efficiency and output power increase substantially
depending on the type [1]. Monitoring refers to supervising
the existing appliance or system with some prominent
parameters. The YOLOv3 algorithm may be applied to the
Keywords: Internet of things, algorithm, optimization, solar panel, tracker
Internet of Things (IoT) based monitoring systems in a
Received 13 April 2023; accepted 27 July 2023 healthcare setting. Using this efficient Smart healthcare sur-
Address correspondence to P. Magudeswaran, Department of Electrical veillance is possible [2,3]. Smart security systems for
and Electronic Engineering, Vivekanandha College of Engineering for
Women, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu 637205, India. E-mail:
homes built on the Internet of Things that was developed
magudeswaranp4@gmail.com and tested on a mobile network. With this effort, the
1
2 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
NOMENCLATURE
IoT Internet of Things GSM Global System for Mobile Communications (a standard
PV Photovoltaic for cellular networks)
WOA Whale Optimization Algorithm
YOLOv3 You Only Look Once Version 3 (an object detection
algorithm)
system is location autonomous and the user may get notifi- keeping track of the performance of devices [16]. The
cations from anywhere using the Raspberry Pi and GSM unprocessed data is processed by the IoT-centric solar
networks [4]. The design of the SMARTIE, a platform for trackers to acquire data, which is then transmitted to a dis-
the Internet of Things for the secure and confidentiality tant central point for additional processing and administra-
dissemination of data in smart communities, will be devel- tion [17]. To better understand the output of the solar cell,
oped by IoT-ARM [5]. Using an internet-based programme temperatures and cloud cover sensors might be included. In
and a PIC microcontroller, you may monitor a distant solar order to accurately and continuously improve self-monitor-
power plant’s parameters of performance [6]. An embedded ing, all processing is done employing an algorithm for seg-
microprocessor on an Arduino board with a GPRS modem mentation and filters to forecast the correct angle of the
monitors solar energy [7]. Through straightforward pins sun in situations like overcast days, rainy days, dust, etc.
attached to the solar panel, Arduino measures both voltage The computation that determines the variation between the
and energy. A freely available cloud platform called actual information saved and the intended data is per-
Things Speak is utilized for storing and retrieving data [8– formed using an ANN (artificial neural network) technique.
9]. The sensor device and solar panel are connected using Solar Trackers are designed using either electronic circuits
an Arduino. The data is sent via a Wi-Fi module to the ser- or electromechanical fixtures [18]. Sensors, a microcontrol-
ver and then returned to the system [10]. Chang-Sic Choi ler such as an ESP8266, a cloud server, Node-RED soft-
et. al. carried out work with renewable energy plants con- ware, a grid-tie inverter, and solar panels make up the
trolled with a long-range network (LoRA). The design was planned 2-axis solar tracking IoT systems. The production
done using Raspberry pi [11,12]. is 30% higher than with the earlier installed equipment
Compared to the cosine of the panel’s misalignment [19]. Single-point, single-axis solar trackers follow the sun
with the Sun, a flat-panel solar collector’s efficient collect- from east to west. Panels that use dual-axis trackers
ing area is larger. So, tracking the solar angle is one of the revolve on the X and Y axes in order to follow the sun
best options to collect more power from the sun. Any sys- accurately. To maximize the energy received from the sun,
tem must have monitoring as a crucial part of it. An dual solar axis monitoring modifies both altitudes and azi-
improved tracking system is ensured by the employment of muth angles [20]. The motions in dual-axis solar tracking
LDR sensors and highest accuracy of current and voltage are two. It may be divided into horizontal and vertical cate-
sensors [13]. 4 LDR-based sun axis trackers sensors pro- gories. 2 180-degree servomotors are responsible for both
vide a median voltage of 19.40 volts in sunny conditions, motions. The automated tracking of the sun’s location
18.05 volts in overcast conditions, and 13.60 volts in rainy using a dual axis solar tracker increases solar output. The
conditions [14]. system in this instance uses a Raspberry Pi. The tracking
Using various randomization qualities, metaheuristic mobile app Blynk can enhance the overall performance of
algorithms like whale optimization algorithms (WOA) the monitoring system [21].
attempt to repeatedly improve the outcome. The vast The energy management and control strategies for
majority of these computations are influenced by biological renewable energy resources, specifically solar and electro-
factors. Metaheuristic computations, in contrast to deter- magnetic (EM) waves propose the use of a neural network
ministic solution techniques, are not impacted by the model for PV and RF signal generation and utilizes MPPT
behavior of the optimization issue [15]. Temperature is one tracking and rectenna for efficient energy utilization.
of the influential factors which is directly proportional to However, the random selection and lack of capability for
the resulting voltage. the usage of Thinger and hybrid resources of multiple array functioning during sys-
AppInventor on mobile devices. Io is highly useful for tem utilization and switching [22]. The power harvesting
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 3
weather conditions around the solar panel system. This diagram of the proposed system. Tamil Nadu, an Indian
data can help in predicting the panel’s output and detecting state, is situated in the Northern Hemisphere’s hot zone
any weather-related issues that may affect its performance. between latitudes 8 and 13 N and 78 and 80 E. longitudes.
The location of the solar panel may be improved by keep- The surface temperature of the solar panel is measured
ing an eye on weather factors like humidity and wind using a temperature sensor (DHT11). Current and voltage
speed, which can also assist to prevent damage from bad from the panels are measured using the MAX471. In
weather. The energy produced by the system of solar pan- accordance with the location of the sun, PV solar trackers
els is measured using energy meters. This data can be used or actuators settings change the orientation of the panel.
to monitor the system’s performance, detect any issues The solar cell generates maximum power output from
with the system, and optimize its operation. In addition to the sunlight when the light angle and solar cell are perpen-
these sensors, other IoT devices such as cameras and dicular to each other. (90 ) Therefore, when the light angle
microphones can also be used to monitor the solar panel is lesser or greater than 90 then it will generate a power
system. By combining data from multiple sensors, it is pos- output lower than the maximum power output. Light angle
sible to build a comprehensive monitoring system that can lesser or greater than means, some portion of the light fall-
detect and address any issues with the solar panel system, ing is reflected and cannot be utilized for power generation
and optimize its performance. that is the reason to track the sunlight and arrange the axis
The proposed system comprises of solar panel, sensor, for the maximum power. Optimum energy is taken in
actuator, PV inverter, raspberry pi, and cloud server. when the solar panel is kept parallel to the sun, reducing
Figure 2 It is necessary to check the angle of orientation the amount of light that is expressed. The installed PV
of the panel as well as the corresponding voltage. To man- panel is to be arranged more vertically during winter to
age all these devices with a system needs some advanced arrest most of the irradiance and more tilted during sum-
techniques. Figure 2 depicts the overall miniature block mer to optimize the output. A PV inverter is used to
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 5
convert the DC output from the panel/battery into AC out- services are employed to send data from the end nodes to the
put. This output then flows into the electrical grid. While controllers in real time. The FG gadget comes with solar
designing an inverter, it needs to withstand the maximum light sensors, a voltage-divider circuit, current sensors, and
voltage, current, and power generated by the panels. The single-board mini-computers. It encompasses communica-
inverter’s rating was chosen since it exceeds the panel’s tions standards that provide connectivity to networks and
greatest possible power. serve as the foundation of IoT systems. The suggested sys-
tem uses a REST based communications API. Services
2.1.1. Internet of Things Initialization. Sensors, actuators, including devices tracking, device control, data publication,
software, network resources, data gathering and analysis and discovering devices are included in the service oper-
services are just a few of the sophisticated software, hard- ational category Figure 3.
ware, and deployment architectures that may be found in Raspberry Pi is like a microprocessor and Arduino is
the Internet of Things. To design an IoT-based system, like a microcontroller. Both are accessible by computer by
integration of software and hardware elements like sensors, connecting it with Laptop/PC. Raspberry pi is the promin-
actuators, and cloud services is important. The characteris- ent choice for interfacing with IoT. Raspberry pi supports
tics of objects and connections between items are described C/Cþþ, and Python 2/3 and also can support interpreting
in the IoT domain model. (e.g., solar panel voltage, irradi- any language with Raspberry OS. It is a low-cost computer
ance, axis tracker, etc.). The functional group is used to that uses the Linux operating system and offers a number
gather detailed data utilizing sensors and perform actuation of common input/output (GPIO) pins for controlling devi-
using actuators. ces like IoT. Raspbian OS is like Linux which needs to
Two virtual entities—one for the solar panel variables install in a memory card and fix it with Raspberry Board.
and the other for the panel output—are present in the sug- ESP8266 is a processor as well as for Wi-Fi connectivity.
gested system. It has a number of autonomous end nodes In Raspberry Board, it is simple to connect with Wi-Fi and
that combine sensing with actuation. Both the programme send the data, run the program, and save it to a cloud ser-
and the data are kept on the cloud. The system uses several ver. You may interface with a Raspberry Pi wirelessly
nodes dispersed across various areas to track the solar pan- from a machine using MATLAB or using MATLAB
el’s temperature, current, voltage, and irradiation. Numerous OnlineTM in a web browser. This is made possible via the
sensors are installed in the end nodes. A web-based socket MATLABV R Support Package for Raspberry PiTM
6 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
Hardware. The Raspberry Pi may be used to collect infor- The sun’s position is detected using sensors: A horizon-
mation from sensor and devices for imaging, which can tal axis solar tracker typically uses light sensors or photo-
then be processed in MATLAB. Additionally, use the voltaic cells to detect the sun’s positions in the sky. These
GPIO, serial, I2C, and SPI pins to interact with other sensors estimate the azimuth and elevations angle of the
electronics. sun by detecting the angle of reflections of the sun’s
ESP8266 has a CPU, RAM, wi-fi network, and also an beams. The solar panel’s position is changed: The solar
operating system. So, it is a good option for IoT. It is the panel’s orientation is changed to maximize its reach of
merge point between the processor and the cloud server. sunlight after the location of the sun has been determined.
There are lots of cloud servers available like Microsoft To track the sun’s path across the sky, a vertical rotation
Azure, amazon web services, Google Cloud, of the solar panel along an axis at the center is used. The
ThingSpeak, etc., angle of rotation is calculated using trigonometry:
Trigonometry is used to determine the needed rotational
angle to change the orientation of the solar panel. The
2.1.2. Axis Tracker-Actuator. A solar panel tracking device angle of rotation may be calculated using the equation
that rotates a solar panel vertically in order to monitor the below:
sun’s path over the sky is known as a horizontally oriented
solar trackers. The solar panel’s orientation is changed by h ¼ tan 1 ½ð cos u cos d cos xÞ þ ð sin u sin dÞ
the tracker to maximize the solar panel’s exposure to light where:h ¼ the angle of rotation required to adjust the solar
after sensors measure the sun’s location. panel’s orientationu ¼ the latitude of the location where
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 7
the solar panel is installedd ¼ the declination angle of the Then, normally, the secondary axis, also known as an ele-
sun, which changes throughout the yearx ¼ the hour angle vation axis, is normal to the principal azimuth axis.
of the sun, which changes throughout the day. Figure 3 shows how effectively the axis tracking can
The horizontal axis solar trackers can boost the amount get energy in a typical day. The graph displays the result
of energy produced by the solar panel by continuously comparison between the horizontal single-axis, vertical sin-
altering the position of the panel to follow the sun’s path gle-axis, and altazimuth dual-axis tracker with the fixed
across the sky. This might raise the solar panel’s total out- solar panel. From the comparison, of the horizontal and
put and boost its effectiveness. vertical axis tracker, both performances are slightly nearby
Before designing the Solar axis tracker, we have to values. There is a difference of 0.12 KWh between HSAT
understand the concept behind the angle of inclination. The and VSAT. But the design complexity and cost are higher
Sun position algorithm (SPA) can be depending on the lati- in the vertical solar axis tracker than in HSAT.
tudes, longitudes, altitude, place, and date of the sun’s path Compared with dual-axis tracker output with the hori-
on the Earth. zontal single axis, 0.96 times deviation is there. But, a
Using the below formula, we can find out the sunrise horizontal single-axis tracker is 1.42 times more energy-
and sunset solar times. producing than fixed solar panels. Because of the higher
cost and less reliability of dual axis tracker, it is also not
hrise,sol ¼ 12 ð180=15PÞ cos 1 ð tan d: tan uÞ (1)
fit for the system.
hset,sol ¼ 12 þ ð180=15PÞ cos 1 ð tan d: tan uÞ (2)
3. WHALE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM
Then Convert from solar to local time by deducting the
equation of time difference instead of adding it. The WOA can be very useful to optimize complex prob-
hrise ¼ hrise,sol –Dt (3) lems. The Whale Optimization Algorithm is utilized to
obtain maximum or minimum value from an objective
function called optimum value [26]. It is a brand-new algo-
hset ¼ hset,sol –Dt (4)
rithm for solving optimization issues. It has three operators
Algorithm steps: to represent the pursuit of prey, encircling of prey, and
At starting sunrise time, the solar panel is fixed at whale bubble-net foraging. All three processes can be used
þ30 degrees. to search for the maximum prey or food in the sea. This
For every hour, the panel movement increases 10 phenomenon is applied for finding the optimum power
degrees from the east direction to the west direction
from the solar panels corresponding to the tracking angle.
can capture maximum irradiance.
Here, in the above results, we can easily compare the
At noon, 90 degrees orientation with the sun are pos-
sible with this arrangement. right algorithm to adopt for our problem. Grey Wolf
Consider the optimum tilt angle which is calculated as Optimizer, Moth Flame Optimizer, Whale Optimizer, and
latitude minus 15 in summer and adding 15 in enhanced whale optimizer are the four-optimization tool to
winter. compare an engineering problem [27,28]. In these four, the
Figure 4 there are different kinds of panel arrangements result received from the whale optimizer can produce the
available. Fixed axis panel no movement in its initial pos- more fast convergence for the given input values.
ition. A horizontal solar axis tracker, or HSAT, travels con- Enhanced produces the output even before the 100th iter-
tinuously from east to west along a single stable axis. ation. And, the moth flame optimizer produces the best
VSAT refers to a vertical axis tracker which moves verti- value at the 1000th iteration. Also, the grey wolf optimizer
cally to the ground. The study revealed that moving verti- produces the best optimal value 400th iteration. By compar-
cally or horizontally can merely same and the last one is ing all these results, Whale optimized only produces the
cost-effective. The complexity level of the horizontal axis very opted result for the given problem with some good
tracker is low. Actuators are responsible to accompany this convergence.
work as per the program schedule. a linear actuator is mov- Figure 5 the axis tracker can be controlled by a motor
ing at 3 mm/sec. Solar irradiance value will be varying that will control the axis of the panel with the sunlight
depends on the position of the panel. rays. The control activity is converted into a movement to
The principal azimuth axis of an azimuth-altitude dou- tilt on either a single axis or a dual axis. Solar panels
ble-axis tracker, or AADAT, is horizontal to the ground. should be aligned with some typical angle for the summer
8 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
FIGURE 4. Daily and annual energy yield of Fixed, HSAT, VSAT, AADAT.
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 9
period starting from March to August. Then, from lies between 0 and 1. Cr is the random coefficient vector.
September to February, the angle will be varied. When the magnitude of C is greater than 1 means, the
In the summer period, the angle of the horizontal axis prey-searching process starts in the area.
tracker can be varied for every hour from sunrise to sunset. amn ðr þ 1Þ ¼ ar C amn (5)
The movement will be applicable for this period only. In
the winter period, the angle is slightly modified from the ar¼ Duty cycle random value;amn(r þ 1) ¼Duty cycle at
summer period. An initial set of randomly selected answers (r þ 1);amn¼ nth whale-mth agent
to the given problem are used in this approach. Here, the Search method:
hunting action of humpback whales is used to track the Each iteration updates the locations of the search agents
optimum power obtained from the solar panels. For any in relation to either the best solution found or a search
optimization problem, it needs one or two objective func- agent selected at random. In the next step, WOA points out
tions. Here, the duty cycle is an element that decides the the prey/food. During this operation, the magnitude of C is
optimal voltage and current. Figure 6 the duty cycle always less than 1.
10 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
amn ¼ A aopt ðrÞ amn ðrÞ (6) Where L and Rc are random numbers. (1<L > 1).
When a random search agent is selected, (jaj>1) When
amn ðr þ 1Þ ¼ aopt amn ðrÞ (7) choosing the optimal course of action, (jaj < 1) for
th updating search agents’ positions. Because a refers to the
r iteration can give the optimal value of the Duty cycle.
Lastly, while attacking the prey, whales can either move duty cycle and it must be between 0 (failure of attack-
in circular or linear. Any one kind of movement is possible ing/no good angle for maximum power) and 1(prey for
at the time of the attack. whale received/maximum power obtained at the angle).
amn ðr þ 1Þ ¼ aopt ðrÞC amn ifRc < 0:5 (8) There will be a change in angle variation as per the con-
trol algorithm. The objective function is taken from the
amn ðr þ 1Þ ¼ amn emLcosð2PÞ þ aopt ðrÞifRc ¼> 0:5 (9) power equation of solar panels.
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 11
monitoring, especially in large-scale projects. ThingSpeak verified and excess energy can be connected to the grid
is an open-source platform, which means that users can system.
customize it to suit their specific needs. This makes it an Figures 9 and 10 show the response obtained from the
attractive option for users who want more control over fixed panel and horizontal tracker panel. From the fixed
their monitoring system panel 2327 KWh of power is generated in a year. The
angle taken for the fixed panel is 450 degrees and the azi-
muth angle is 00 degrees. And, for the horizontal tracker,
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
the resultant power generated about 3285 KWh in the same
The system needs internet access to allow connections typical year.
between the system of solar panels and the cloud-based Table 1 explains the accuracy and error of the algorith-
platforms. Depending on where the system is located and mic result. For the different periods, there is a difference
the infrastructure that is accessible, this can be accom- between the actual solar angle and with panel angle com-
plished over a Wi-Fi, Ethernet, or cellular connection. A pared. The installed panel can track the error in the angle
solar panel linked to the IoT may be monitored via a var- that can be followed. In the future, the error will get mini-
iety of communication techniques. The choice of connec- mized. The electricity produced by the solar panel over the
tions can be influenced by a number of variables, including course of the entire year is shown in Table 2. It is esti-
cost, power consumption, bandwidth needs, and distance. It mated using a house’s typical daily use of 4.00 KWh. The
is necessary to simulate the panel and find the right place installed capacity of 1.5 KW can produce an average power
to install the setup. Then, the calculation is made for that of about 4.97 kWh of energy in the day. LOL refers to
location regarding the solar incident for the particular day/- Loss of Loads. This number represents the probability that
month/year. Tables 1 and 2 values, it is verified against the the requirements of the user cannot be met. There may be
demand of the load. Demand and PV availability are a loss due to shading and other effects are possible.
14 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
FIGURE 10. Horizontal axis solar panel and its average annual energy yield.
An average of 5 KWh power was generated from the web application. The application has controlled the mode
panel. The device and components used here are (auto-on or auto-off) and logging data of monitoring
Raspberry Pi minicomputer and Sensor. The creation of parameters. The horizontal tracking system can move
an application for the Internet of Things to manage the from 30 degrees to 120 degrees. The horizontal axis
suggested system is the last phase in the IoT design pro- tracker produces an energy value greater than the fixed
cess. Figure 11 shows a screenshot of the smart solar PV axis panel.
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 15
FIGURE 11. Hardware setup to verify the result from the board.
In the auto mode, the IoT system controls and extracts normal conditions is 27 C. For increase in the irradiance
the data from the panel automatically. The performance can be directly proportional to the power generation. And,
parameters are drawn as a graph and can be verified for the rise in temperature above the standard conditions can
the different values at different time intervals Figure 12. indirectly affect the performance of the panel readings.
The suggested temperature of the solar panels under ThingSpeak is an effective platform for online cloud
16 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
FIGURE 13. Solar panel irradiance, temperature, mean power, mean voltage, duty cycle.
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 17
5. CONCLUSION
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
In conclusion, the utilization of new technology in renew-
able energy, particularly in solar photovoltaic systems, has No violation of Human and Animal Rights is involved.
greatly improved performance and efficiency. The integra-
tion of sensors and actuators, along with IoT and cloud DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
computing, enables real-time data collection, storage, and
analysis, facilitating effective monitoring of solar energy Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets
systems. The Raspberry Pi acts as a central interface were generated or analyzed during the current study.
between the hardware and the data server, enabling seam-
less communication and control. The use of horizontal axis REFERENCES
trackers, coupled with the WOA algorithm, offers a cost-
[1] International Renewable Energy Agency – IRENA. 2019.
effective approach to maximize solar energy generation.
“Future of solar photovoltaic: Deployment, investment, tech-
By optimizing the panel angle based on weather conditions, nology, grid integration, and socio-economic aspects.” In
the trackers can significantly increase energy output com- Irena, November 2019. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/
pared to fixed panels. Temperature variations are also IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Nov/IRENA_Future_of_
considered to ensure accurate power generation estimates. Solar_PV_2019.pdf
18 Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 0 (2023), No. 0
[2] J. Khan, et al., “Efficient secure surveillance on smart [15] J. M. Paredes-Parra, A. Mateo-Aroca, G. Silvente-Ni~nirola,
healthcare IOT system through cosine-transform M. C. Bueso and A. Molina-Garcıa, “PV module monitoring
encryption,” IFS, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1417–1442, Jan. 2021. system based on low-cost solutions: wireless raspberry
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-201770. application and assessment,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 11, pp.
[3] J. Khan, et al., “Secure smart healthcare monitoring in indus- 3051, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11113051.
trial internet of things (IIoT) ecosystem with cosine function [16] E. G. Talbi, “Metaheuristics: from design to Implementation,”
hybrid chaotic map encryption,” Sci. Program., vol. 2022, pp. Numerical Methods & Algorithms, El-Ghazali Talbi and
1–22, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8853448. University of Lille – CNRS – INRIA, pp. 624. June, 2009.
[4] A. Mohammad and K. Radha, “An IOT-based solar inte- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.010.
grated home security system using GSM module and [17] S. Sarswat, I. Yadav and S. K. Maurya, “Real-time monitor-
Raspberry pi,” IJAERS, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 195–199, Dec. ing of solar PV parameter using IoT,” Int. J. Innovat
2017. DOI: 10.22161/ijaers.4.12.28. Technol. Explor Eng, vol. 9, no. 1S, pp. 267–271, Nov.
[5] V. Beltran, A. F. Skarmeta and P. M. Ruiz, “An ARM-com- 2019. DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.A1054.1191S19.
pliant architecture for user privacy in smart cities: [18] H. S. Akbar, M. N. Fathallah and O. O. Raoof, “Efficient
SMARTIE-quality by design in the IoT,” Wireless Commun. single axis sun tracker design for photovoltaic system,”
Mobile Comput, vol. 2017, pp. 1–13, Sept. 2017. DOI: 10. IOSR Jap, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 53–60, May 2017. DOI: 10.
1155/2017/3859836. 9790/4861-0902025360.
[6] N. Nguyen-Quang, J. Connell, N. Barry, C. Levis and M. [19] A. Awasthi, et al., “Review on sun tracking technology in
Hill, “Solar panel mains inverter with improved efficiency,” solar PV system,” Elsevier, vol. 6, pp. 392–405, 2020. DOI:
53rd International Universities Power Engineering 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.004.
Conference (UPEC), September 2018, DOI: 10.1109/UPEC. [20] J. Samuel, Dr. and B. Rajagopal, “IoT based solar panel
2018.8542116. monitoring and control,” Nat. Volatile Essent. Oil, vol. 8,
[7] S. Adhya, D. Saha, A. Das, J. Jana and H. M. Saha, “An no. 5, pp. 7609–7618, 2021. https://www.nveo.org/index.
IoT-based smart solar photovoltaic remote monitoring and php/journal/article/download/2051/1798/2084.
[21] M. M. A. Shah, M. S. Parvez, A. Ahmed and M. R. Hazari, “IoT
control unit,” 2nd International Conference on Control,
based power monitoring of solar panel incorporating tracking
Instrumentation, Energy and Communication, January 2016,
system,” 2021 International Conference on Automation,
pp. 432–436. DOI: 10.1109/CIEC.2016.7513793.
Control, and Mechatronics for Industry 4.0 (ACMI), pp. 1–4,
[8] A. Kekre and S. K. Gawre, “Solar photovoltaic remote mon-
2021. DOI: 10.1109/ACMI53878.2021.9528207.
itoring system using IOT,” Proceeding, In ternational
[22] K. Sathiyaraj and A. Rajaram, “An optimized design model-
Conference on Recent Innovations is Signal Processing and
ling of neural network based green house management system
Embedded Systems (RISE), 27–29 October, 2017. DOI: 10.
using solar and rectenna,” Power Technol. Power Technol.,
1109/RISE.2017.8378227.
vol. 91, pp. 85–91, Jan 2022. DOI: 10.6036/10089.
[9] G. Subhasri and C. Jeyalakshmi, “A study of IoT-based
[23] A. Rajaram and K. Sathiyaraj, “An improved optimization
solar panel tracking system,” Adv Comput Sci Technol., vol.
technique for energy harvesting system with grid connected
11, no. 7, pp. 537–545, 2018. https://www.ripublication. power for green house management,” J. Electr. Eng.
com/acst18/acstv11n7_01.pdf. Technol., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2937–2949, June 2022. DOI:
[10] V. Kavitha and V. Malathi, “A smart solar PV monitoring 10.1007/s42835-022-01033-2.
system using IoT,” J. Thermal Sci. Technol., vol. 9, pp. 19– [24] M. Elsisi and M. Q. Tran, “Development of an IoT architec-
33, 2019. DOI: 10.5121/csit.2019.91502. ture based on a deep neural network against cyber attacks
[11] V. S. Patil, A. P. Morey, G. J. Chauhan, S. S. Bhute and for automated guided vehicles,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 24, pp.
T. S. Borkar, “A review paper on solar power monitoring 8467, Dec. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21248467.
system using an IoT,” IJCSE, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 212–215, [25] M. Tran, et al., “Robust fault recognition and correction
Aug. 2019. DOI: 10.26438/ijcse/v7i8.212215. scheme for induction motors using an effective IoT with deep
[12] O. Chieochan, A. Saokaew and E. Boonchieng, “Internet of learning approach,” Measurement, vol. 207, pp. 112398, Feb.
things (IoT) for smart solar energy: a case study of the 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112398.
smart farm at Maejo University,” International Conference [26] M. Seyedali and A. Lewis, “The whale optimization algo-
on Control, Automation and Information Sciences rithm,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 95, pp. 51–67, May 2016.
(ICCAIS), Chiang Mai, Thailand, November 2017. DOI: 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.
1109/ICCAIS.2017.8217588. [27] M. A. Aziz, A. A. Ewees and A. E. Hassanien, “Whale opti-
[13] D. Saravanan and T. Lingeshwaran, “Monitoring of solar mization algorithm and moth-flame optimization for multilevel
panel based on IOT,” IEEE International Conference on Thresholding Image segmentation,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 83,
System, Computation, Automation and Networking, pp. 1, pp. 242–256, Oct. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.023.
October 2019. 5. DOI: 10.1109/ICSCAN.2019.8878814. [28] H. Mohammed and T. Rashid, “A novel hybrid GWO with
[14] A. Ghasempour, “Internet of things in smart grid: architec- WOA for global numerical optimization and solving pres-
ture, applications, services, key technologies, and sure vessel design,” Neural Comput Appl., vol. 32, no. 18,
challenges,” Inventions, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22, Mar. 2019. pp. 14701–14718, Sept. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-
DOI: 10.3390/inventions4010022. 04823-9.
Magudeswaran and Sakthivel: Internet of Things Based Horizontal Axis Tracking Solar Panel Performance Evaluation 19