FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0

Teamwork Assesment Form

Class: _______________________________

Group Name/Number: ___________________

1. Names your group members. (The letters corresponds to the student's name, do not forget to
include yourself )
A
B
C
D
E
F
G

2. Teamwork Performance (Tick one criteria for each person)

a. Effort to do the assignment
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not do anything, did not care about the assignment.

Developing: did average amount of work or did all the work.

PI 3
Competent: did fair share of work, no more or less than others.

Exemplary: did fair share of work, sometimes help others with their
work.

b. Reliable for meetings

Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never attended meetings, never prepared.

Developing: skipped some meetings, arrived late, almost never

PI 2 prepared.
Competent: attended most meetings, almost always on time and
prepared.
Exemplary: always attended meetings, on time and fully prepared.

c. Contribution to discussions and decisions

Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: made no contribution.

Developing: made some contributions with minimum quality.

PI 1
Competent: made most contributions with average quality.

Exemplary: fully contributed with high quality.

d. Respects each group member's opinions

Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never talk nor argue, did not care about others opinions.

Developing: continuously talking, rarely care about others opinions,

PI 1 argued inappropriately.
 FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0
Developing: continuously talking, rarely care about others opinions,
PI 1 argued inappropriately.
Competent: most of the time listens and speaks appropriately, rarely
argued inappropriately.
Exemplary: knows when to listen and talk, argued appropriately.

e. Team spirit
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not give input nor cooperate with others.

Developing: did not really care about team effort, or overbearing and
PI 2 incosiderate of team members.
Competent: Usually respectful to the team members, cooperative, and
considerate.
Exemplary: exceptionally respectful, helpful, and considerate to the
team members.

f. Overall evaluation
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not want to work with this person again.

Developing: may would not mind to work with this person again.

Competent: Probably would work with this person again.

Exemplary: Definitely want to work with this person again.

Analyze ideas to discern feasible solutions by building consensus with people from different
PI 1 background or having different perspectives.
Share team's responsibilities and duties and take on different roles when applicable.
PI 2
Develop and execute a strategy for action to achieve team's goal (i.e. group climate that
PI 3 encourages success, communication strategies for dealing with conflict).

Do not base your evaluation on friendship or personal conflicts. Your input can be a valuable indicator to help assess
contributions in a fair manner. THIS EVALUATION WILL NOT BE SEEN BY YOUR GROUP MEMBERS
Source: Designing Better Engineering Education through Assessment by Spurlin / Rajala / Lavella, 2008 with modification