You are on page 1of 2

FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0

Teamwork Assesment Form

Class: BA41

Group Name/Number: ___________________


HIS01/2440010011

1. Names your group members. (The letters corresponds to the student's name, do not forget to
include yourself )
A Adit
B Budi
C Cahya
D Danur
E
F
G

2. Teamwork Performance (Tick one criteria for each person)


a. Effort to do the assignment
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not do anything, did not care about the assignment.
a x
Developing: did average amount of work or did all the work.
PI 3 b
Competent: did fair share of work, no more or less than others.
c
Exemplary: did fair share of work, sometimes help others with their
work.
d x x x

b. Reliable for meetings Satu anggota hanya diisi 1 jawaban,


antara a/b/c/d
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never attended meetings, never prepared.
x
Developing: skipped some meetings, arrived late, almost never
PI 2 prepared.
Competent: attended most meetings, almost always on time and
x
prepared.
Exemplary: always attended meetings, on time and fully prepared.
x x

c. Contribution to discussions and decisions


Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: made no contribution.
x
Developing: made some contributions with minimum quality.
PI 1
Competent: made most contributions with average quality.
x
Exemplary: fully contributed with high quality.
x x

d. Respects each group member's opinions


Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: never talk nor argue, did not care about others opinions.

Developing: continuously talking, rarely care about others opinions,


PI 1 argued inappropriately.
Competent: most of the time listens and speaks appropriately, rarely
argued inappropriately.
Exemplary: knows when to listen and talk, argued appropriately.
x x x x
FM-BINUS-AA-FPT-322/R0

e. Team spirit
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not give input nor cooperate with others.
x
Developing: did not really care about team effort, or overbearing and
PI 2 incosiderate of team members.
Competent: Usually respectful to the team members, cooperative, and
considerate.
Exemplary: exceptionally respectful, helpful, and considerate to the
x x x
team members.

f. Overall evaluation
Students A B C D E F G
Criteria
Novice: did not want to work with this person again.

Developing: may would not mind to work with this person again.
x
Competent: Probably would work with this person again.

Exemplary: Definitely want to work with this person again.


x x x

Analyze ideas to discern feasible solutions by building consensus with people from different
PI 1
background or having different perspectives.
Share team's responsibilities and duties and take on different roles when applicable.
PI 2
Develop and execute a strategy for action to achieve team's goal (i.e. group climate that
PI 3
encourages success, communication strategies for dealing with conflict).

Do not base your evaluation on friendship or personal conflicts. Your input can be a valuable indicator to help assess contributions
in a fair manner. THIS EVALUATION WILL NOT BE SEEN BY YOUR GROUP MEMBERS
Source: Designing Better Engineering Education through Assessment by Spurlin / Rajala / Lavella, 2008 with modification

You might also like