CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Peer and Self Evaluation Tool

(Please Read) Here are six categories that you will use to assess your peers or yourself for the class project. For each
item, rate each person or yourself using the scale given. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories
and how you or each group member performed.

Beside each rating item is a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help the professor
understand your ratings.

Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a
group opinion. Your ratings must be based on your perceptions and experiences.

Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person ’s name on each form.

Person being Evaluated: Erica Ecita Role played in the group: Researcher
Name of Project: Ang tinig ni titser ngayong pandemya. Date: March 3, 2022

Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc.

Group Participation She is hard to contact duing meetings. She only joined
Attends meetings regularly and on time. few meetings.
2

Time Management & Responsibility She has problems in her time management
Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by
2
the required time.

Adaptability
Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in
service of the project, readily accepts changed 3
approach or constructive criticism.

Creativity/Originality She only gives ideas whenever she attends the meeting.
Problem-solves when faced with impasses or But, she often attend group meetings.
challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team 2
decisions.

Communication Skills She communicates the group every time she has free
Effective in discussions, good listener, capable time
presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing, 3
and documenting work.

General Team Skills She do encourage the group everytime

Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team,
supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus, 3
helps resolve conflicts in the group.

Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own
initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member
of your team a score using this scale.
(adapted from Goldfinch, 1994; Lejk & Wyvill, 2001)
3
5 –Always demonstrates the quality
4 –Frequently demonstrates the quality
3 – Sometimes demonstrates the quality
2 – Seldom demonstrates the quality
1 – Never demonstrates the quality
0 – No help at all to the group
TOTAL SCORE: 18

Name and Signature of Evaluator: Chrsitopher Joshua Bringas

 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Peer and Self Evaluation Tool

(Please Read) Here are six categories that you will use to assess your peers or yourself for the class project. For each
item, rate each person or yourself using the scale given. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories
and how you or each group member performed.

Beside each rating item is a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help the professor
understand your ratings.

Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a
group opinion. Your ratings must be based on your perceptions and experiences.

Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person ’s name on each form.

Person being Evaluated: Lorielyn Rendon Role played in the group:

Researcher_____________________________
Name of Project: Ang tinig ni titser ngayong pandemya Date: March 3, 2022

Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc.

Group Participation She always participate

Attends meetings regularly and on time.
5

Time Management & Responsibility She always shows and do her responsibility
Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by
5
the required time.

Adaptability She shows professionalism in each task

Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in
service of the project, readily accepts changed 5
approach or constructive criticism.

Creativity/Originality She always share new ideas to improve the project

Problem-solves when faced with impasses or
challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team 5
decisions.

Communication Skills She never missed to communicate with her

Effective in discussions, good listener, capable groupmates
presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing, 5
and documenting work.

General Team Skills She always show possive attitude to the group
Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team,
supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus, 5
helps resolve conflicts in the group.

Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own
initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member
of your team a score using this scale.
(adapted from Goldfinch, 1994; Lejk & Wyvill, 2001)
5
5 –Always demonstrates the quality
4 –Frequently demonstrates the quality
3 – Sometimes demonstrates the quality
2 – Seldom demonstrates the quality
1 – Never demonstrates the quality
0 – No help at all to the group
TOTAL SCORE: 35

Name and Signature of Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas

 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Peer and Self Evaluation Tool

(Please Read) Here are six categories that you will use to assess your peers or yourself for the class project. For each
item, rate each person or yourself using the scale given. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories
and how you or each group member performed.

Beside each rating item is a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help the professor
understand your ratings.

Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a
group opinion. Your ratings must be based on your perceptions and experiences.

Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person ’s name on each form.

Person being Evaluated: Jennifer Cardenas Role played in the group: Reseacher
Name of Project: Ang tinig ni titser ngayong pandemya Date: March 3, 2022

Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc.

Group Participation She always participate

Attends meetings regularly and on time.
5

Time Management & Responsibility She always shows and do her responsibility
Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by
5
the required time.

Adaptability She shows professionalism in each task

Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in
service of the project, readily accepts changed 5
approach or constructive criticism.

Creativity/Originality She always share new ideas to improve the project

Problem-solves when faced with impasses or
challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team 5
decisions.

Communication Skills She never missed to communicate with her

Effective in discussions, good listener, capable groupmates
presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing, 5
and documenting work.

General Team Skills She always show possive attitude to the group
Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team,
supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus, 5
helps resolve conflicts in the group.

Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own
initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member
of your team a score using this scale.
(adapted from Goldfinch, 1994; Lejk & Wyvill, 2001)
4
5 –Always demonstrates the quality
4 –Frequently demonstrates the quality
3 – Sometimes demonstrates the quality
2 – Seldom demonstrates the quality
1 – Never demonstrates the quality
0 – No help at all to the group
TOTAL SCORE: 34

Name and Signature of Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas

 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Peer and Self Evaluation Tool

(Please Read) Here are six categories that you will use to assess your peers or yourself for the class project. For each
item, rate each person or yourself using the scale given. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories
and how you or each group member performed.

Beside each rating item is a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help the professor
understand your ratings.

Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a
group opinion. Your ratings must be based on your perceptions and experiences.

Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person ’s name on each form.

Person being Evaluated: Abigail Malana Role played in the group: Editor/Scriptwriter
Name of Project: Ang tinig ni titser ngayong pandemya Date: March 3, 2022

Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc.

Group Participation She always participate

Attends meetings regularly and on time. .
5

Time Management & Responsibility She always shows and do her responsibility
Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by
5
the required time.

Adaptability She shows professionalism in each task

Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in
service of the project, readily accepts changed 5
approach or constructive criticism.

Creativity/Originality She always share new ideas to improve the project

Problem-solves when faced with impasses or
challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team 5
decisions.

Communication Skills She never missed to communicate with her

Effective in discussions, good listener, capable groupmates
presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing, 5
and documenting work.

General Team Skills She always show possive attitude to the group
Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team,
supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus, 5
helps resolve conflicts in the group.

Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own
initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member
of your team a score using this scale.
(adapted from Goldfinch, 1994; Lejk & Wyvill, 2001)
4
5 –Always demonstrates the quality
4 –Frequently demonstrates the quality
3 – Sometimes demonstrates the quality
2 – Seldom demonstrates the quality
1 – Never demonstrates the quality
0 – No help at all to the group
TOTAL SCORE: 34

Name and Signature of Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas

 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Peer and Self Evaluation Tool

(Please Read) Here are six categories that you will use to assess your peers or yourself for the class project. For each
item, rate each person or yourself using the scale given. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories
and how you or each group member performed.

Beside each rating item is a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help the professor
understand your ratings.

Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a
group opinion. Your ratings must be based on your perceptions and experiences.

Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person ’s name on each form.

Person being Evaluated: Christophee Joshua Bringas Role played in the group: Researcher/ Videographer
Name of Project: Ang tinig ni titser ngayong pandemya. Date: March 3, 2022

Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc.

Group Participation Always initiate group meetings

Attends meetings regularly and on time.

Time Management & Responsibility

Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by Doing his task given nd always pass it on time
the required time.

Adaptability Shows his eagerness to try new things

Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in
service of the project, readily accepts changed
approach or constructive criticism.

Creativity/Originality Gives immediate solutions in unexpected situations

Problem-solves when faced with impasses or
challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team
decisions.

Communication Skills Always updates the group and communicating wih

Effective in discussions, good listener, capable them
presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing,
and documenting work.

General Team Skills Acts as the leader of the group that always shyoes his
Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team, good attitude
supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus,
helps resolve conflicts in the group.

Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own
initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member
of your team a score using this scale.
(adapted from Goldfinch, 1994; Lejk & Wyvill, 2001)
5 –Always demonstrates the quality
4 –Frequently demonstrates the quality
3 – Sometimes demonstrates the quality
2 – Seldom demonstrates the quality
1 – Never demonstrates the quality
0 – No help at all to the group
TOTAL SCORE: 35

Name and Signature of Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas

 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Evaluation Sheet: DOCUMENTARY

Title of the Documentary: Padyak
Producers: Leiann Acera
Fatima Apolonio
Rowena Caccam
Rodel Gabun

Criteria Description E VS S F P
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Objective Documentary is compelling and purpose of project is clearly ✔️
accomplished.
Documentary is appropriate for target audience. ✔️
Content Covers topic in depth with details and examples and displays ✔️
subject knowledge.
Documentary is truthful. ✔️
Script Uses correct language, restricted vocabulary, descriptive, ✔️
connotative , forceful words. follows script format
Shooting list, shot list and script are made basis for production. ✔️
Creativity Superior creative skill. Exceptional level of innovation and ✔️
originality
Narrative The opening sequence draws in the viewer and holds attention ✔️
Exposition lays out the setting, characters, and situation/conflict ✔️
The rising action includes escalating conflict that ultimately brings ✔️
the climax
The falling action includes a resolution and closure to the ✔️
documentary.
Pont of view The topic is examined from someone’s perspective/ or from the ✔️
eyes of different persons who are affected in different ways.
Audience The documentary engages the audience through involving them ✔️
Involvement to the real people involved in the topic, actual sounds of the
location and the conditions in which the participant is involved.
Visuals Uses appropriate shots, movements, angles and transitions ✔️
Effectively uses montage and juxtaposition to build scenes ✔️
Sound Audio is flawless, excellent balance of sound, music and ambient ✔️
noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound.
Editing Shots are at the right length, nothing is cut off too soon or left ✔️
dangling for too long
Engages rhythm; use of punctuation; suggestions of emotions via ✔️
sound effects
Music is used appropriately and cut to the right length ✔️
Original music is used or music is edited to manipulate film ✔️
Lighting Additional lighting has been used to eliminate shadows and ✔️
glares.
Cameras are set to the appropriate light level. ✔️
Video Integration of all elements is exceptional. Demonstrates ✔️
Continuity accomplishment in video/audio/lighting techniques.
Ethical The documentary shows what audience should think and feel, it ✔️
concerns does not preach.
Shows a balanced view of what the camera witnessed ✔️
Remarks:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________
Name and Signature Evaluator:
 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Evaluation Sheet: DOCUMENTARY

Title of the Documentary: Ukay Online Selling
Producers:
Jefferson Olangco
Jessica Butay
Reymar Olibas
Lyka Janine Opeña
Colyn Bayang
Criteria Description E VS S F P
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Objective Documentary is compelling and purpose of project is clearly ✔️
accomplished.
Documentary is appropriate for target audience. ✔️
Content Covers topic in depth with details and examples and displays ✔️
subject knowledge.
Documentary is truthful. ✔️
Script Uses correct language, restricted vocabulary, descriptive, ✔️
connotative , forceful words. follows script format
Shooting list, shot list and script are made basis for production. ✔️
Creativity Superior creative skill. Exceptional level of innovation and ✔️
originality
Narrative The opening sequence draws in the viewer and holds attention ✔️
Exposition lays out the setting, characters, and situation/conflict ✔️
The rising action includes escalating conflict that ultimately brings ✔️
the climax
The falling action includes a resolution and closure to the ✔️
documentary.
Pont of view The topic is examined from someone’s perspective/ or from the ✔️
eyes of different persons who are affected in different ways.
Audience The documentary engages the audience through involving them ✔️
Involvement to the real people involved in the topic, actual sounds of the
location and the conditions in which the participant is involved.
Visuals Uses appropriate shots, movements, angles and transitions ✔️
Effectively uses montage and juxtaposition to build scenes ✔️
Sound Audio is flawless, excellent balance of sound, music and ambient ✔️
noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound.
Editing Shots are at the right length, nothing is cut off too soon or left ✔️
dangling for too long
Engages rhythm; use of punctuation; suggestions of emotions via ✔️
sound effects
Music is used appropriately and cut to the right length ✔️
Original music is used or music is edited to manipulate film ✔️
Lighting Additional lighting has been used to eliminate shadows and ✔️
glares.
Cameras are set to the appropriate light level. ✔️
Video Integration of all elements is exceptional. Demonstrates ✔️
Continuity accomplishment in video/audio/lighting techniques.
Ethical The documentary shows what audience should think and feel, it ✔️
concerns does not preach.
Shows a balanced view of what the camera witnessed ✔️
Remarks:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________
Name and Signature Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas
 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Evaluation Sheet: DOCUMENTARY

Title of the Documentary: "KWENTONG KUTSERO: Si Mang Samuel, Mario, at ang Pandemya"
Producers:
Mark Joshua Sibayan
Aleli Gargar
Mark Jade Etsa
Alicia Rose Marayag
Criteria Description E VS S F P
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Objective Documentary is compelling and purpose of project is clearly ✔️
accomplished.
Documentary is appropriate for target audience. ✔️
Content Covers topic in depth with details and examples and displays ✔️
subject knowledge.
Documentary is truthful. ✔️
Script Uses correct language, restricted vocabulary, descriptive, ,✔️
connotative , forceful words. follows script format
Shooting list, shot list and script are made basis for production. ✔️
Creativity Superior creative skill. Exceptional level of innovation and ✔️
originality
Narrative The opening sequence draws in the viewer and holds attention ✔️
Exposition lays out the setting, characters, and situation/conflict ✔️
The rising action includes escalating conflict that ultimately brings ✔️
the climax
The falling action includes a resolution and closure to the ✔️
documentary.
Pont of view The topic is examined from someone’s perspective/ or from the ✔️
eyes of different persons who are affected in different ways.
Audience The documentary engages the audience through involving them ✔️
Involvement to the real people involved in the topic, actual sounds of the
location and the conditions in which the participant is involved.
Visuals Uses appropriate shots, movements, angles and transitions ✔️
Effectively uses montage and juxtaposition to build scenes
Sound Audio is flawless, excellent balance of sound, music and ambient ✔️
noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound.
Editing Shots are at the right length, nothing is cut off too soon or left ✔️
dangling for too long
Engages rhythm; use of punctuation; suggestions of emotions via ✔️
sound effects
Music is used appropriately and cut to the right length ✔️
Original music is used or music is edited to manipulate film ✔️
Lighting Additional lighting has been used to eliminate shadows and ✔️
glares.
Cameras are set to the appropriate light level. ✔️
Video Integration of all elements is exceptional. Demonstrates ✔️
Continuity accomplishment in video/audio/lighting techniques.
Ethical The documentary shows what audience should think and feel, it ✔️
concerns does not preach.
Shows a balanced view of what the camera witnessed ✔️
Remarks:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________
Name and Signature Evaluator: __Christopher Joshua Bringas___
 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Evaluation Sheet: DOCUMENTARY

Title of the Documentary: "APAT NA SULOK NG PAGKATUTO"
Producers:
Dan Angeles
Jonathan Lavadia
Lovely Fieror
Joanna Eduardo
Ronald Badiag

Criteria Description E VS S F P
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Objective Documentary is compelling and purpose of project is clearly ✔️
accomplished.
Documentary is appropriate for target audience. ✔️
Content Covers topic in depth with details and examples and displays ✔️
subject knowledge.
Documentary is truthful. ✔️
Script Uses correct language, restricted vocabulary, descriptive, ✔️
connotative , forceful words. follows script format
Shooting list, shot list and script are made basis for production. ✔️
Creativity Superior creative skill. Exceptional level of innovation and ✔️
originality
Narrative The opening sequence draws in the viewer and holds attention ✔️
Exposition lays out the setting, characters, and situation/conflict ✔️
The rising action includes escalating conflict that ultimately brings ✔️
the climax
The falling action includes a resolution and closure to the ✔️
documentary.
Pont of view The topic is examined from someone’s perspective/ or from the ✔️
eyes of different persons who are affected in different ways.
Audience The documentary engages the audience through involving them ✔️
Involvement to the real people involved in the topic, actual sounds of the
location and the conditions in which the participant is involved.
Visuals Uses appropriate shots, movements, angles and transitions ✔️
Effectively uses montage and juxtaposition to build scenes ✔️
Sound Audio is flawless, excellent balance of sound, music and ambient ✔️
noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound.
Editing Shots are at the right length, nothing is cut off too soon or left ✔️
dangling for too long
Engages rhythm; use of punctuation; suggestions of emotions via ✔️
sound effects
Music is used appropriately and cut to the right length ✔️
Original music is used or music is edited to manipulate film ✔️
Lighting Additional lighting has been used to eliminate shadows and ✔️
glares.
Cameras are set to the appropriate light level. ✔️
Video Integration of all elements is exceptional. Demonstrates ✔️
Continuity accomplishment in video/audio/lighting techniques.
Ethical The documentary shows what audience should think and feel, it ✔️
concerns does not preach.
Shows a balanced view of what the camera witnessed ✔️
Remarks:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________
Name and Signature Evaluator: Christopher Joshua Bringas

Reflection

Making documentary film is not an easy job. It requires passion and patience for finding worthy topics
that are needed to be published and would be helpful for the public to know.
 CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
AB MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

In our topic which is about a high school teachee named Romeo Sadino, who shows his passion for
teaching despite of the struggles that experiences as a teacher in this new normal. Sir Sadino as a
teacher, extends his help to hia students not juat by teaching them but also by making projects such as
donating school supplies and gadgets needed for online class.

In this situation, it is true that gadgets and internet access is very important for students who are
attending online classes. Basing from my experiences, it is a struggle for the students who doesn't have
internet access to cope up with the lessons that they needed to learn. So the passion that Mr. Sabino is
doing for his students an amazing job, an inspiration for his co-teachers and other schools.

Despite of the struggles that our teachers re now experiencing, some of them still extends their hands
to help their students to learn more and to have access to cope with new normal of learning. We don't
see this kind of love for teaching everyday. Not all teachers can do the same thing that Mr. Sabino do
for his students. He is unique and passionate. As what he have said "My passion is teaching the
students", but how can he do that if the students doesn't have the access,? That is why he did
some.projects, his own porjects, he went to different agencies to look sponsors that will help him in his
projects for the students. Indeed, he is a great teacher.