Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4106220?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The Sociological Quarterly
Randy Hodson
University of Texas at Austin
This article outlines some issues concerning the organization of work in the new "high
technology" industries. High technology industries are defined as industries involved
in the manufacture of electronic information processing machinery and related products.
Two central tensions are key to understanding work in the new high technology
industries. First, a limited reduction in the prevalance of repetitive tasks is counterbalanced
by increasing isolation of workers due to semi-automated production processes. This
tension may be mediated by intentional efforts on the part of unions and/or management
to recreate meaningful work environments. Second, potential empowerment arising
from the creation of new job-related skills is frequently offset by continuing high
unemployment in the broader labor market that is to some extent a result of the very
success of high technology production techniques. Difficulties in realizing potential
aspects of empowerment may be further amplified by large-scale utilization of female
and minority labor in high technology industries in the West and Southwest. Research
techniques of addressing these issues are also surveyed and evaluated.
WORKING IN "HIGH-TECH"
In a recent article in The Sociological Quarterly Miller (1984) suggested that the f
of sociology as an academic discipline may be increasingly dependent on its abilit
identify and exploit applied settings in which sociologists can made a concrete contri
Miller identified the workplace as one of the key settings in which sociologists can
such a contribution. The theme of Miller's timely suggestion is reiterated by the Am
Sociological Association's decision to select "Working and Not Working" as the th
for the 1985 annual meetings. The historic period when sociology existed as main
academic discipline may well be passing. We may also find that, as sociologis
* Direct all communications to: Professor Randy Hodson, Department of Sociology, University of
Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Perhaps the most intense debates and disagreements about the impact of high technology
on work concern the extent to which the resulting jobs require new and more sophisticated
skills as opposed to fewer and more mundane skills. The central argument in favor of
the skill-upgrading thesis is that electronics technology automates repetitious tasks thus
leading to greater diversity in the remaining work. In addition, there is some indication
that high technology leads to greater job autonomy in terms of worker controlled pace
and physical mobility (Blauner, 1964; Hrebiniak, 1974). The more pleasant physical
setting in many high technology plants is also cited as an important element in an upgraded
work environment.' Finally, there is the argument summarized succinctly by Naisbitt
(1984) in the phrase: "computers destroy hierarchy." The argument here is that knowledge
is an essential ingredient of power and that computers make information more readily
available to greater numbers of people leading to a breakdown of traditional hierarchies.
The alternative position argues that the capitalist dynamic of deskilling jobs to drive
down the cost of labor has greatly influenced the development of high technology forms
of production (Braverman, 1974; Cooley, 1980). Under this argument the development
of high technology serves to either eliminate or deskill existing highly skilled jobs and
to replace them with either electronic machinery or with less skilled jobs. In support of
this argument, there is already evidence suggesting that the most important production
skills in high technology industries are neither traditional craft skills nor skills based on
formal training but are simply precision and speed (Form and McMillen, 1983; Applebaum,
1983; see also, Schervish, 1983). Electronic technology also creates the possibility of
even more intense supervision and monitoring of workers. Thus, electronic technology
may be developed for the purpose of more closely monitoring workers and increasing
the intensity of their work rather than for increasing the productivity of labor of a given
intensity (Moberg, 1979).
The increasing use of electronic technology has also been accompanied by an increasing
isolation of workers as living labor becomes an ever smaller component of production.
The negative effects of this isolation may be amplified by an increase in shift work to
ensure the full utilization of expensive equipment. The worst scenario in this agenda
envisions a world in which production is designed for automated robots and in which
humans fill in during equipment failures, working in patterns, rhythms, and under conditions
that are designed for electronic machines.
Organizational Characteristics
As well as altering the nature of the work task, the introduction of electronic technology
also has consequences for organizations. Electronic technology may influence both the
relationship of the organization to the external environment as well as its internal structure.
High technology has possible consequences for three important labor force issues: (1)
the creation of segmented labor markets, and, in particular, the erosion of middle-class
and stable working-class positions resulting in increasing divergence between privileged
positions and subordinate positions; (2) female and minority labor force participation;
and (3) the educational requirements of the labor force.
The nature of high technology labor markets is directly tied to the questions discussed
above concerning the skills required by high technology production. To the extent that
new skills are needed to operate sophisticated electronic equipment, then strong labor
markets for workers possessing these skills will emerge. To the extent that the deskilling
dynamic dominates, then the skills possesed by the labor force become largely irrelevant.
However, in this situation, the conditions under which workers can be coerced into
working for low pay and the strategies through which they may be able to protect
themselves from this outcome become a central focus of concern. In particular, questions
of underemployment and job security take on a central role.
Probably no one dynamic holds across the entire range of class and occupational
positions in high technology firms. Researchers must be sensitive to the possibility of
different outcomes for different positions. In particular, very dissimilar consequences may
result for professional and managerial positions than for production workers. The rapid
expansion of lower management positions in high technology industries adds an additional
unknown quantity to the equation. The content and quality of these jobs is often quite
indeterminate and may be contingent on implied promises of upward mobility, promises
which may or may not be realized. Indeed, the whole issue of mobility within internal
labor markets will be crucial to understanding labor force dynamics in high technology
industries. Jobs may be thought of as being comprised both by their current content as
well as by linkages to future career possibilities. Any fundamental change in the nature
of job content thus entails parallel changes in job ladders that will also demand investigation.
The social and demographic characteristics of labor employed in high technology
industries also provide an important area of investigation. Early indications suggest that
Job Attitudes
Community Effects
Perhaps the most straightforward method of studying the consequences of high technology
for the organization of work is to directly access executive level positions in high technology
corporations. Once access to top corporate levels is obtained, it may be possible to secure
interviews with a variety of key personnel. The benefit of this method is that it can
potentially provide a wealth of direct interview and observational data about the ways in
which organizations have dealt with technological change. The limitations of this method
include the difficulty of securing such access, problems of case studies (or limited and
potentially awkward samples) versus a systematic sampling of organizations, and the
possibility that the researcher will be allowed to see only the "public-face" of the organization
or that his or her research topics will have to be sharply curtailed in order to gain entrance
to the organization. This technique has been used effectively by Blau et al. (1976) and
Marsh and Mannari (1981), as well as by many other researchers.
Content Analysis of th
I introduced this essay by noting the imperative for sociology to become more involv
in applied fields. If we are to fulfill the demands of this imperative and to secure its
benefits, we must give special attention to how we can translate the knowledge gaine
through social science research into useable forms and how we can make this knowled
more readily available.
Social science researchers have an important contribution to make by undertaking
evaluation studies of the need for, and the success of, job redesign programs. Problem
in the workplace can be identified and the ability of various job redesign programs t
address these problems can be evaluated. Sociologists can also generate social impa
statements about the probable effects of high technology developments on the labor for
and on local communities. Such studies can be invaluable planning tools for local governmen
and public groups. Further, sociologists can plan conferences and serve as information
clearing houses on high technology issues. Such conferences have an important funct
to serve in making social science knowledge available to the public as well as to those
in business and government hierarchies. Finally, sociologists can work closely with trad
unions and with public interest groups in planning strategies to confront the change
brought about by high technology and in shaping programs through which workers an
the public can gain the maximum possible benefit from the potentials that high technolo
has to offer.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Joe Feagin, William P. Bridges, and three anonymous reviewers for Sociological Quar
provided useful and much appreciated critical comments on earlier versions of this ar
Any remaining errors or oversights remain my own responsibility. Thanks also to
Parker who helped with the survey of the literature for this paper.
NOTES
1. While the stark contrast between many high technology plants and traditional factories, in terms of
lighting, noise, dirt, wearing apparel, and so on, is immediately apparent to the outside observer, the significance
of these changes to the workers themselves should not be assumed and demands direct verification.
REFERENCES
Allen, Michael Patrick
1978 "Economic interest groups and the corporate elite structure." Social Science Quarterly 58: 597-615.
Applebaum, Eileen
1983 "Winners and losers in the high-tech workplace." Challenge 26: 52-55.
Austin American Statesman
1984 "Lure of high-tech may be a siren's call." July 24: D6.
Averitt, Robert T.
1968 The Dual Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.