Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Authorized licensed use limited to: Brayan nino jimenez. Downloaded on June 02,2022 at 08:40:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Applying Clarke-Concordia transformation, followed by the technique is able to characterize a set of data line currents,
eigenvalue approach [7], [SI it was obtained typical using eigenvectors and eigenvalues of data sample correlation
characteristic parameters for each state. It allows also the matrix.
definition of fault location algorithm
To study the effectiveness of the proposed method, a model 111. PROPOSEDALGORIWM
for the physical components of the system (source,
transmission line and load) was developed. This system model A. Fault Classification Algorithm
uses lumped parameters and adopts the differential equations Each type of fault (Single line to ground, double line to
representing each of the possible fault or steady-state ground, line-to-line, and three-phase), is represented by
situations. specific eigenvectors position on “ap U‘space.
It remains as a major advantage of this method, that it is Based on those eigenvectors it is possible to establish a
enough to consider only three current signals. Another pattern for each fault type. Fault classification algorithm is
advantage, of significant importance, is the immunity to based on those patterns, which are represented in Table 1.
interference such as harmonics and noise signals, since the
method is based on comparing patterns. TABLE I
[T,] = .ElI 0
JJ
- --A I
all eigenvectors fault types.
2 1
I-L X Z’ 1
1 1 B. Fault Location Algorithm
There are several methodologies that can he used to extract
the unknown inputloutput functional relationship between
So it is possible to characterize the different fault states, by distance of the fault point “m” and characteristic eigenvalue
current components i,, ib io. analysis, that can be obtained “A”,for a specific type of fault.
considering the following: This paper considers the application of artificial neural
networks (ANN) since they present, among others, some
advantages as: capability to deal with nonlinearities; adaptive,
they can learn from data; they can handle noise or uncertain
data; good predictive accuracy; they can operate quickly.
The topology of the proposed algorithm (Fig. 2), is
comprised of two input vectors (eigenvalue data and fault type
To interpret the entire set of data signals (after Clarke- vector), one hidden layer, composed by five neurons, and one
Concordia transformation) eigenvalue approach was used. This output layer.
2092
Authorized licensed use limited to: Brayan nino jimenez. Downloaded on June 02,2022 at 08:40:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
R = 0.382 Oh&,
S = 95 ma; L= 0.33 mwkm.
Source - Substation power transformer of 20 MVA,
60/10 kV, Y/d, artificial neutral formed by short-circuit
current limiting impedance for 1 kA;
Load - Substation power transformers of 10/0,4 kV -
Dyn, with total power of 3.6 MVA, which corresponds
to maximum presumed capacity line.
B. Simulated Results
In order to confirm the effective performance of the
proposed methodology a high number of computer simulations
were performed.
The following basic conditions are considered:
Steady state with rated values. The steady state results
are important as a base standard for patterns definition;
Fig. 2. Anifieial Neural Network Topology.
Admissible distance fault variation of 0 to loo%, total
The applied ANN is of the Feedfonvard type. Error-Back- line length;
propagation it was considered since it i s a well-adapted Resistance fault of 1 Ohm, for line to ground faults; and
training algorithm for neural networks. of 0 Ohm, for line to line faults.
The weights and biases are updated using the generalized
delta rule with adaptive learning rate and momentum. With the obtained results, the following fault types were
identified: single line to ground; double line to ground; line-to-
line and three-phase short-circuit. Tables I1 and 111 represent
C. Algorithm Structure obtained eigenvectors for different fault situations on the line
The main steps of the proposed algorithm are the following: end.
Step 1) Single-end line data acquisition, from power The obtained relationships between engenvalues and fault
system currents. Digital conversion. distance are represented in Fig. 3 for different fault situations
Step 2) Mathematical treatment of the sample applying (line to ground fault, line-to-line and three phase fault).
Clarke-Concbrdia transformation.
Step 3) Eigenvalue approach obtaining eigenvectors
and eigenvalues of correlation matrix. TABLE II
Step 4) Fault Detection - Compare fault and pre-fault EIGENVECTORS
OF LINETO GROUND FAULTS
characteristic eigenvalues.
For each new incoming treated sample, this one is Fault Eigenvector I
compared to the one previously memorized, having as
an objective the identification of possible existing fault. _ el_ _ _
e2 ~ -e3
.0.2403 % + 0.4266 % + 0.8720 e.
If there is a significant difference between pre-set and + 0.9469 eg + 0.3008 q + 0. I138 eg
actual value it is assumed that a fault is occurred. Then +0.2138 ea - 0.8530 ea + 0.4762 eo
the location algorithm is activated. Othenvise the .0,6999 e., - 0.4738 e. - 0.5345 e,
-0.6815g +0.2191 eg +0.6983ea
storage sample is erased. +0.2137 eo - 0.8530 ea + 0.4762 ea
Step 5) Fault Classification - Compare characteristic
~
LI-U-C - 0.2679 e.
Definition of the adequate fault type location algorithm. - 0.4400 eg - 0.6597 eu - 0.6092 eo
Application of A N N algorithm for distance calculation -0.0371 ea
_____-.. - 0.6645 eo___ -+ 0.7464 eo -
(Obtained fault distance as a percentage of t o d length U-U-G + 0.0677 e., - 0.7469 e, + 0.661 5 e,
distribution line). - 0.9970 ep - 0.0260 eg + 0.0726 eg
+ 0.0370 ea
-______. + 0.6645 ea + 0.7464~!-_.
U-LI-G + 0.8295 e. + 0.3962 % - 0.3936 e.
+ 0.5573 eg - 0.6336 eg + 0.5366 e8
IV. CASESTUDY + 0.0368 ea + 0.6645 eo + 0.7464 ea 4
2093
Authorized licensed use limited to: Brayan nino jimenez. Downloaded on June 02,2022 at 08:40:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE 111 Where
EIGENVECTORSOF I.METO L~NEFAULTS
maDP calculated location of fault
rnre0, actual location of fault
Eigenvector
For the defined neural network algorithm, it is possible to
confirm that estimated error is less then 0.4 %.
LI-L2 -0.8972% +0.3510e, +0.0000e,,
+ 0.4400 e,, + 0.6597 e" + 0.0000ep
V. CONCLUSIONS
n -- -- I + 0.4400 e,, I + 0.6597en I + 0.0000 eo n In this paper a new methodology for fault location in
distribution power networks was proposed.
This methodology is based on the Clarke-Concordia
transformation and eigenvalue approach, used as a data
processing method. For the decision method it is used an
artificial neural network.
The main characteristics of the presented methodology are:
Reduced number of input signals;
Recognition of the faults type and identification of
, faulty line or lines;
Independence of the fault presence at the moment of the
analysis, (off-line operation);
Independence of noise, since the methodology is based
on ANN and in comparing patterns. Thus filtering can
be avoided.
Simulation results have been presented, showing the
effectiveness of the proposed technique for the correct Fault
Location.
VI. REFERENCES
Fig. 3. Distance versus "eigenvalue", real value.
[I] A. Poeltl, K. Frohlich "Two New Methods for Very Fast Fault Type
Detection by Means of Parameter Fitting and Artificial Neural
Networks". IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery. Val. 14, N" 4, October
1999, pp. 1269.1275.
[Z] 2. Chen, J.C. Maun: "Artificial Neural Network Approach to Single-
Ended Fault Locator for Transmission Lincs". IEEE Trans. on Power
Systems. Vol. 15, N" 1, February 2000, pp. 370-375.
[3] D. V. Coury, D. C. Jorge; "Artificial Neural Network Approach to
Distance Protection of Transmission Line". IEEE Trans. on Power
Delivery; Vol. 13, N" I . Jan 1998, pp. 102-108.
[4] Aggarwal, Xuan, Dum, Johns, Benne: "A Novel Fault Classification
Techique far Double-circuit lines Based on a Combined
Unrupervisedirupcrvised Neural Network. IEEE Trans. on Power
Delivery; Vol. 14, No4, October 1999, pp. 1250-1256
[5] Jun Zhu, David L. Lubkeman, Adly A.Girgis; "Automated Fault
Loeation and Diagnosis on Electric Power Distribution Feeders". IEEE
Trans. on Power Systems; Vol. 12, No 2, April 1997, pp. 801-809.
[6] Huisheng Wang, W. W. L. Keetthipala; "Fuuy-Neum Approach to
F a d l Classification for Transmission Line Protection". IEEE Trans. on
PawerDeliveryVol. 13, N"4, 1998,pp. 1093-1104.
[7] Huben Podvin; "Fault location .on MV networks". PMAPS' 2000
Fig. 4. Distance versus "eigenvalue" after ANN application September 2000, pp. 6.
[8] Brandao Faria, J.A.; "Application of Clarke's Transformation to the
Modal Analysis of Asvmmenical Sinele-Circuit Three-phase Line
I
The percentage of error E is calculated as Configurations". ETEP European Trans. on Electrical Power, Vol. IO,
"4, JulyiAugust 2000, pp. 225-231.
191 C. V. Jones: "The unified theory of electiical machines". Plenum Press,
1967.
2094
Authorized licensed use limited to: Brayan nino jimenez. Downloaded on June 02,2022 at 08:40:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VU. BIOGRAPHIES
2095
Authorized licensed use limited to: Brayan nino jimenez. Downloaded on June 02,2022 at 08:40:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.