Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • OI Model

    Uploaded by

    anhum jadoon
    16 views4 pages
    This document reports the results of reliability, validity, regression and mediation analyses of four constructs: affective commitment (joy), affective commitment (love), organizational identification, and organizational prestige. It shows the constructs have acceptable composite reliability and average variance extracted. Discriminant validity is established through HTMT and crossloadings. Regression analysis finds organizational identification positively predicts affective commitment (joy) and negatively predicts affective commitment (love). Organizational prestige has indirect effects on the commitment constructs through organizational identification.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document reports the results of reliability, validity, regression and mediation analyses of four constructs: affective commitment (joy), affective commitment (love), organizational identification, and organizational prestige. It shows the constructs have acceptable composite reliability and average variance extracted. Discriminant validity is established through HTMT and crossloadings. Regression analysis finds organizational identification positively predicts affective commitment (joy) and negatively predicts affective commitment (love). Organizational prestige has indirect effects on the commitment constructs through organizational identification.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views4 pages

    OI Model

    Uploaded by

    anhum jadoon
    This document reports the results of reliability, validity, regression and mediation analyses of four constructs: affective commitment (joy), affective commitment (love), organizational identification, and organizational prestige. It shows the constructs have acceptable composite reliability and average variance extracted. Discriminant validity is established through HTMT and crossloadings. Regression analysis finds organizational identification positively predicts affective commitment (joy) and negatively predicts affective commitment (love). Organizational prestige has indirect effects on the commitment constructs through organizational identification.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Construct reliability and validity

    Cronbach's alpha Composite reliability (rho_a) Composite reliability (rho_c) Average variance extracted (AVE)
    Affective _Commitment (Joy) 0.766 0.774 0.851 0.589
    Affective _Commitment (Love) 0.642 0.670 0.804 0.579
    Organizational_Identification 0.854 0.863 0.892 0.581
    Organizational_Prestige 0.920 0.923 0.934 0.640
    Discriminant validity
    Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) - Matrix
    Affective _Commitment (Joy) Affective _Commitment (Love) Organizational_Identification Organizational_Prestige
    Affective _Commitment (Joy)
    Affective _Commitment (Love) 0.641
    Organizational_Identification 0.753 0.527
    Organizational_Prestige 0.467 0.263 0.408
    Fornell-Larcker criterion
    Affective _Commitment (Joy) Affective _Commitment (Love) Organizational_Identification Organizational_Prestige
    Affective _Commitment (Joy) 0.767
    Affective _Commitment (Love) -0.471 0.761
    Organizational_Identification 0.614 -0.409 0.762
    Organizational_Prestige 0.386 -0.221 0.362 0.800
    Cross loadings
    Affective _Commitment (Joy) Affective _Commitment (Love) Organizational_Identification Organizational_Prestige
    ac_joy1 0.743 -0.372 0.424 0.311
    ac_joy2 0.788 -0.368 0.472 0.308
    ac_joy3 0.822 -0.427 0.533 0.248
    ac_joy4 0.711 -0.270 0.446 0.332
    ac_love1 -0.416 0.792 -0.316 -0.166
    ac_love2 -0.198 0.664 -0.229 -0.043
    ac_love3 -0.420 0.817 -0.369 -0.253
    org_ident1 0.445 -0.276 0.786 0.331
    org_ident2 0.458 -0.259 0.758 0.295
    org_ident3 0.421 -0.247 0.636 0.259
    org_ident4 0.548 -0.421 0.822 0.246
    org_ident5 0.484 -0.406 0.812 0.289
    org_ident6 0.437 -0.221 0.746 0.242
    org_pre1 0.295 -0.129 0.262 0.773
    org_pre2 0.283 -0.160 0.302 0.828
    org_pre3 0.285 -0.203 0.314 0.779
    org_pre4 0.356 -0.203 0.242 0.794
    org_pre5 0.340 -0.166 0.289 0.794
    org_pre6 0.338 -0.235 0.330 0.848
    org_pre7 0.306 -0.160 0.292 0.785
    org_pre8 0.276 -0.148 0.271 0.798

    PATH COEFFICIENTS
    Affective _Commitment Affective _Commitment Organizational_Identific Organizational_Pres
    (Joy) (Love) ation tige
    Affective _Commitment (Joy)
    Affective _Commitment (Love)
    Organizational_Identification 0.614 -0.409
    Organizational_Prestige 0.362
    TOTAL INDIRECT EFFECTS
    Affective _Commitment Affective _Commitment Organizational_Identific Organizational_Pres
    (Joy) (Love) ation tige
    Affective _Commitment (Joy)
    Affective _Commitment (Love)
    Organizational_Identification
    Organizational_Prestige 0.222 -0.148
    SPECIFIC INDIRECT EFFECTS
    Specific indirect effects
    Organizational_Prestige -> Organizational_Identification -> Affective -0.148
    _Commitment (Love)
    Organizational_Prestige -> Organizational_Identification -> Affective 0.222
    _Commitment (Joy)
    TOTAL EFFECTS
    Affective _Commitment Affective _Commitment Organizational_Identific Organizational_Pres
    (Joy) (Love) ation tige
    Affective _Commitment (Joy)
    Affective _Commitment (Love)
    Organizational_Identification 0.614 -0.409
    Organizational_Prestige 0.222 -0.148 0.362

    Questions:
    1. Suggest any suitable title for the study.
    2. Develop and report the tables for the Reliability, Convergent, and Discriminant Validity.
    3. Develop and report the tables for the Regression and Mediation Analysis.

    You might also like