Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi
Faculty of Computer Systems &
Software Engineering,
Universiti Malaysia Pahang,
Gambang, Malaysia
ma_shrafi@yahoo.com
Abstract—Social media use by university students attracted educators [4]. Second, social media tools allow the students
the interest of several scholars worldwide. However, a limited to meet their individual learning styles. Such tools also
amount of research articles was published to investigate the support cognition, socialization, collaboration, interaction,
students’ attitudes towards social media usage in the Arab world meaningful knowledge construction within classrooms [11].
universities. As a case study, the core objective of this research Moreover, social media supports group work and
is to measure the students’ attitudes towards the use of social independent research to boost students’ confidence [12].
media at an academic institute in Oman. The study intends to
examine the differences in these attitudes from the lenses of Social media has proved its effectiveness in different
several attributes, including gender, age, year of study, and fields like medical and health sciences [13], nurse education
social media application. A total of 198 students took part in the [14], anatomy education [15], business [16], marketing [17],
study through an online survey. Although the findings showed [18], and higher education [19]. In that, an increasing amount
no significant differences in attitudes with regard to the of articles analyzed the effectiveness of social media in
aforementioned studied attributes, it is imperative to report that higher educational settings. Such studies mainly focused on
all the participated students were mutually interested in using analysing the acceptance of social media [20], the
social media applications in learning practices. relationship between professional and educational activities
of using social media by scholars [21], the factors influencing
Keywords—students’ attitudes, social media, higher
social networking sites [3], impacts on learning performance
education.
level [22], [23], and students’ attitudes toward social media
I. INTRODUCTION [24].
The escalating progress of “Web 2.0” technologies in Based on the extant literature and the authors’ prior
general and social media in specific is exceptional [1]. This experience, there is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to the
is due to the reason that social media has markedly reshaped understanding of students’ intention towards using social
the fashion in which users communicate and share their media in the Arab higher educational institutes. Further,
information, personal messages, opinions, and ideas [2], [3]. research overlooked the importance of the differences in
Social media is considered a “buzzword” that was originated learners’ attitudes from the lenses of several attributes such
in 2005 [4], and it has rapidly altered the landscape of social as gender, age, year of study, and social media application. In
life via its interactive platforms [5]. The term “social media” response to these arguments, the current case study aims
highlights the landscape of “user-generated content” and the mainly to explore the students’ attitudes towards using social
effective societal characteristics pertained to the creation and media in the Omani higher educational atmosphere from the
usage of such content [6], [7]. Social media refers to “a group perspective of the aforementioned attributes. As a
of Internet-based applications that are built on the ideological consequent, the following research questions were
and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and allow the formulated:
creation and exchange of user generated content” [8]. Social
RQ1: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
media consists of two kinds of applications, namely “content-
media affected by gender?
sharing applications” (e.g., “YouTube”, “Wikipedia”, “blog”,
and “Twitter”) and “relationship-building applications” (e.g., RQ2: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
“Facebook”) [9]. Such applications are used to generate media affected by age?
content (i.e., “user-generated content”), produce content of
their own (i.e., “user-created content”), or retrieve it from RQ3: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
various websites (i.e., “user-driven content”) [4]. media affected by year of study?
In education, an escalating number of benefits were RQ4: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
provided to educators and learners while using social media media affected by social media application?
platforms for learning practices [4], [10]. First, social media
has enabled students to engage, collaborate, share thoughts,
and build permanent relationships with their peers and their
177
students aged between 18 and 23 were the most effective users RQ4: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
of Facebook. This result could be interpreted by the notion that media affected by social media application?
university students in Oman are equally in favor of using
social media in learning activities regardless of their age. The means and standard deviations for the social media
applications were calculated (see Figure 3). To examine the
Fig. 1. Mean and standard deviation for age groups. significant difference among the students’ attitudes towards
the usage of social media concerning the used social media
application, “a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)” was
calculated. Table 4 exhibits that there are no significant
differences (F = 0.840, p > 0.05) among the students’ attitudes
with respect to the used social media application. However,
this result contradicts with that observed in previous research
[39], in which “Facebook” was among the most frequently
utilized websites. A possible justification for this result is that
the university students in Oman are willing to incorporating
social media in educational activities regardless of the used
application.
Fig. 3. Mean and standard deviation for social media applications.
178
Although this is a case study, the core limitation of this [20] D. Z. Dumpit and C. J. Fernandez, “Analysis of the use of social media
research is the focus on only one academic institution in in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology
Acceptance Model,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1,
Oman. It is difficult to generalize the results to the entire 2017.
academic institutions in Oman. Future endeavors should [21] S. Manca and M. Ranieri, “‘yes for sharing, no for teaching!’: Social
consider more academic institutions in order to maximize the Media in academic practices,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 29, pp. 63–74,
possibility of results generalization. 2016.
[22] J. A. Paul, H. M. Baker, and J. D. Cochran, “Effect of online social
REFERENCES networking on student academic performance,” Comput. Human
[1] S. Sharma, “Black Twitter? Racial Hashtags, Networks and Behav., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2117–2127, 2012.
Contagion,” New Form., vol. 78, no. 78, pp. 46–64, 2013. [23] M. Habes, M. Alghizzawi, R. Khalaf, S. A. Salloum, and M. Abd.
[2] Q. Tang, B. Gu, and A. B. Whinston, “Content Contribution for Ghani, “The Relationship between Social Media and Academic
Revenue Sharing and Reputation in Social Media: A Dynamic Performance: Facebook Perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud.,
Structural Model,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 41–76, 2012. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2018.
[3] M. Alshurideh, S. A. Salloum, B. Al Kurdi, and M. Al-Emran, “Factors [24] S. Molinillo, R. Anaya-Sánchez, R. Aguilar-Illescas, and M. Vallespín-
affecting the Social Networks Acceptance: An Empirical Study using Arán, “Social media-based collaborative learning: Exploring
PLS-SEM Approach,” in 8th International Conference on Software antecedents of attitude,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 38, pp. 18–27, 2018.
and Computer Applications, 2019. [25] V. Balakrishnan, “Key determinants for intention to use social media
[4] A. S. Yussiff, W. F. W. Ahmad, and A. Oxley, “An exploration of for learning in higher education institutions,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc.,
Social Media Technologies and their potential uses in higher vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2017.
educational institutions: A case study of Universiti Teknologi [26] Ö. Korkmaz, “A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative
PETRONAS,” in 2013 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e- Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS),” Comput. Educ., 2012.
Management and e-Services, IC3e 2013, 2013. [27] M. Al-Emran, Y. A. Alkhoudary, V. Mezhuyev, and M. Al-Emran,
[5] S. A. Salloum, C. Mhamdi, M. Al-Emran, and K. Shaalan, “Analysis “Students and Educators Attitudes towards the use of M-Learning:
and Classification of Arabic Newspapers’ Facebook Pages using Text Gender and Smartphone ownership Differences,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
Mining Techniques,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2019.
8–17, 2017. [28] M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “Students’
[6] K. Lietsala and E. Sirkkunen, Social media: Introduction to the tools Perceptions towards the Integration of Knowledge Management
and processes of participatory economy. 2008. Processes in M-learning Systems: A Preliminary Study,” Int. J. Eng.
[7] N. Al-Qaysi, N. Mohamad-Nordin, and M. Al-Emran, “A Systematic Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2018.
Review of Social Media Acceptance from the Perspective of [29] H. Gangadharbatla, “Facebook me : Collective self-esteem, need to
Educational and Information Systems Theories and Models,” J. Educ. belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGgeneration’s
Comput. Res., 2018. attitudes toward social networking sites,” J. Interact. Advert., 2010.
[8] A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, “Users of the world, unite! The [30] Y. Kim, D. Sohn, and S. M. Choi, “Cultural difference in motivations
challenges and opportunities of Social Media,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 53, no. for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and
1, pp. 59–68, 2010. Korean college students,” Comput. Human Behav., 2011.
[9] A. Benetoli, T. F. Chen, and P. Aslani, “The use of social media in [31] R. Hartshorne and H. Ajjan, “Examining student decisions to adopt
pharmacy practice and education,” Research in Social and Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests,” J. Comput. High.
Administrative Pharmacy, vol. 11, no. 1. pp. 1–46, 2015. Educ., 2009.
[10] N. Al-Qaysi and M. Al-Emran, “Code-switching Usage in Social [32] T. Baſöz, “Pre-service EFL Teachers’ Attitudes towards Language
Media: A Case Study from Oman,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., Learning through Social Media,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2017. Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 430–438.
[11] J. E. Rodriguez, “Social Media Use in Higher Education : Key Areas [33] M. D. Roblyer, M. McDaniel, M. Webb, J. Herman, and J. V. Witty,
to Consider for Educators,” Learning, 2011. “Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college
[12] R. Thackeray, B. L. Neiger, C. L. Hanson, and J. F. Mckenzie, faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites,”
“Enhancing Promotional Strategies Within Social Marketing Internet High. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 134–140, 2010.
Programs: Use of Web 2.0 Social Media,” Health Promot. Pract., 2008. [34] M. Al-Emran and S. A. Salloum, “Students’ Attitudes Towards the Use
[13] K. Avcı, S. G. Çelikden, S. Eren, and D. Aydenizöz, “Assessment of of Mobile Technologies in e-Evaluation,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
medical students’ attitudes on social media use in medicine: a cross- Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 195–202, 2017.
sectional study,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 18, 2015. [35] M. Al-Emran and K. Shaalan, “Attitudes towards the use of mobile
[14] N. M. Al-Shdayfat, “Undergraduate student nurses’ attitudes towards learning: A case study from the gulf region,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
using social media websites: A study from Jordan,” Nurse Educ. Today, Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 75–78, 2015.
vol. 66, pp. 39–43, 2018. [36] M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “PLS-SEM in
[15] D. Chytas, “Use of social media in anatomy education: A narrative Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive Methodological
review of the literature,” Ann. Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeige, 2019. Reference,” in 4th International Conference on Advanced Intelligent
Systems and Informatics (AISI 2018), 2018, pp. 644–653.
[16] R. Hanna, A. Rohm, and V. L. Crittenden, “We’re all connected: The
power ofthe social media ecosystem,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. [37] N. M. Suki, T. Ramayah, and K. K. Ly, “Empirical investigation on
265–273, 2011. factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Facebook,” Univers.
Access Inf. Soc., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223–231, 2012.
[17] L. Xiong, A. Alsadoon, A. Maag, P. W. C. Prasad, L. S. Hoe, and A.
Elchouemi, “Rise of Social Media Marketing: A Perspective on Higher [38] R. Arteaga Sánchez, V. Cortijo, and U. Javed, “Students’ perceptions
Education,” in In 2018 13th International Conference on Computer of Facebook for academic purposes,” Comput. Educ., vol. 70, pp. 138–
Science & Education (ICCSE), 2018, pp. 1–6. 149, 2014.
[18] E. Akar and B. Topçu, “An examination of the factors influencing [39] M. I. Weiler, C. D. Santanello, D. Isaacs, A. Rahman, E. P. O’Donnell,
consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing,” J. Internet and G. L. Peters, “Pharmacy students’ attitudes about social media use
Commer., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–67, 2011. at five schools of pharmacy,” Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., vol. 7, pp.
804–810, 2015.
[19] G. Grosseck, “To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?,”
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2009.
179