You are on page 1of 4

2019 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)

October 15-17, 2019, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

Understanding the differences in students’ attitudes


towards social media use: A case study from Oman
Noor Al-Qaysi Norhisham Mohamad-Nordin Mostafa Al-Emran
Faculty of Art, Computing & Creative Faculty of Art, Computing & Creative Faculty of Computer Systems &
Industry, Industry, Software Engineering,
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Universiti Malaysia Pahang,
Tanjung Malim, Malaysia Tanjung Malim, Malaysia Gambang, Malaysia
noor.j.alqaysi@gmail.com norhisham@fskik.upsi.edu.my malemran@buc.edu.om

Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi
Faculty of Computer Systems &
Software Engineering,
Universiti Malaysia Pahang,
Gambang, Malaysia
ma_shrafi@yahoo.com

Abstract—Social media use by university students attracted educators [4]. Second, social media tools allow the students
the interest of several scholars worldwide. However, a limited to meet their individual learning styles. Such tools also
amount of research articles was published to investigate the support cognition, socialization, collaboration, interaction,
students’ attitudes towards social media usage in the Arab world meaningful knowledge construction within classrooms [11].
universities. As a case study, the core objective of this research Moreover, social media supports group work and
is to measure the students’ attitudes towards the use of social independent research to boost students’ confidence [12].
media at an academic institute in Oman. The study intends to
examine the differences in these attitudes from the lenses of Social media has proved its effectiveness in different
several attributes, including gender, age, year of study, and fields like medical and health sciences [13], nurse education
social media application. A total of 198 students took part in the [14], anatomy education [15], business [16], marketing [17],
study through an online survey. Although the findings showed [18], and higher education [19]. In that, an increasing amount
no significant differences in attitudes with regard to the of articles analyzed the effectiveness of social media in
aforementioned studied attributes, it is imperative to report that higher educational settings. Such studies mainly focused on
all the participated students were mutually interested in using analysing the acceptance of social media [20], the
social media applications in learning practices. relationship between professional and educational activities
of using social media by scholars [21], the factors influencing
Keywords—students’ attitudes, social media, higher
social networking sites [3], impacts on learning performance
education.
level [22], [23], and students’ attitudes toward social media
I. INTRODUCTION [24].
The escalating progress of “Web 2.0” technologies in Based on the extant literature and the authors’ prior
general and social media in specific is exceptional [1]. This experience, there is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to the
is due to the reason that social media has markedly reshaped understanding of students’ intention towards using social
the fashion in which users communicate and share their media in the Arab higher educational institutes. Further,
information, personal messages, opinions, and ideas [2], [3]. research overlooked the importance of the differences in
Social media is considered a “buzzword” that was originated learners’ attitudes from the lenses of several attributes such
in 2005 [4], and it has rapidly altered the landscape of social as gender, age, year of study, and social media application. In
life via its interactive platforms [5]. The term “social media” response to these arguments, the current case study aims
highlights the landscape of “user-generated content” and the mainly to explore the students’ attitudes towards using social
effective societal characteristics pertained to the creation and media in the Omani higher educational atmosphere from the
usage of such content [6], [7]. Social media refers to “a group perspective of the aforementioned attributes. As a
of Internet-based applications that are built on the ideological consequent, the following research questions were
and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and allow the formulated:
creation and exchange of user generated content” [8]. Social
RQ1: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
media consists of two kinds of applications, namely “content-
media affected by gender?
sharing applications” (e.g., “YouTube”, “Wikipedia”, “blog”,
and “Twitter”) and “relationship-building applications” (e.g., RQ2: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
“Facebook”) [9]. Such applications are used to generate media affected by age?
content (i.e., “user-generated content”), produce content of
their own (i.e., “user-created content”), or retrieve it from RQ3: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
various websites (i.e., “user-driven content”) [4]. media affected by year of study?

In education, an escalating number of benefits were RQ4: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
provided to educators and learners while using social media media affected by social media application?
platforms for learning practices [4], [10]. First, social media
has enabled students to engage, collaborate, share thoughts,
and build permanent relationships with their peers and their

978-1-7281-2613-5/19/$31.00 ©2019 IEEE 176


II. LITERATURE REVIEW are capable of producing more reliable results [36]. The
Social media use by university students attracted the students were requested to participate in the survey through
interest of several scholars worldwide [25]. Attitude and emails. In order to maximize the response rate, follow-up
behavioral intentions play an important role in affecting emails were also sent as reminders. The survey was designed
educational technologies [26]–[28]. Investigating the to be completed in around 10 minutes. A total of 204
attitudes towards using the applications of social media responses were collected. Six entries were removed from the
supports determining the students’ willingness to use these dataset due to the large number of incomplete answers, and
applications. Attitudes towards using social media by thereby, 198 entries were retained for further analysis. Out of
learners and educators have been examined by an increasing those, there were 144 females and 54 males. 71.7% of the
number of researchers. participants were aged between 18 and 22. Concerning the
year of study, 39.9% of the respondents were in year 1,
Gangadharbatla [29] explored the influence of “internet followed by 32.3% in year 2, 13.6% in year 3, and 14.1% in
self-efficacy”, “need to belong”, “need for cognition”, and year 4.
“collective self-esteem” on college learners’ attitudes in
respect of using social media platforms. The empirical results B. Survey Structure
indicated that these factors had positive impacts on learners’ The online questionnaire survey is categorized into three
attitudes in respect of using these platforms. Furthermore, sections. The first section was related to personal information,
Kim et al. [30] examined the cultural contexts role in shaping including “gender”, “age”, and “year of study”. The second
college students’ use of communication technology, which in section includes six items that were related to measure social
turn influences their motives for using social media media usage information. The third section is a 13-item
applications in two different nations, namely the US and instrument pertained to the employment of social media in
Korea. Practically, the findings recommended that the social educational activities. To evaluate the items used in section
media marketers need to enhance the entertainment features three, a five-point Likert-scale with “strongly disagree (1),
of social media for attracting more consumers in disagree (2), neutral (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5)” was
individualistic cultures, and to embed the characteristics that used. The third section items were adapted from the existing
simplify social support exchange via existing social relevant literature with further adjustments to fit the study core
relationships in their collectivistic cultures. objective [37], [38].
Moreover, Hartshorne and Ajjan [31] examined the IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
educational advantages of “Web 2.0” to achieve the “in-class
RQ1: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
learning” and to recognize the determinants affecting
media affected by gender?
learners’ willingness to use these platforms. The students’
“attitudes” and their “subjective norms” were found as For examining the statistically significant difference
effective predictors for their intention to utilize the “Web 2.0” among the students’ attitudes toward the usage of social media
applications. Baſöz [32] measured the perceptions of 120 with respect to gender, the authors calculated the independent
“pre-service teachers” towards using social media platforms samples t-test. Table 1 clearly shows that there is no
in EFL classrooms. The findings concluded that these significant difference among the attitudes of students with
platforms should be involved in fostering communication regard to their gender (t = 1.126, p > 0.05). This result is in
skills among the students. Roblyer et al. [33] also carried out agreement with the outcomes noticed in previous studies [13],
a study to compare the faculty members and student [32], in which the usage of social media was not considerably
perceptions and uses of Facebook and email technologies for influenced by gender. In this sense, the gender factor does not
personal and educational purposes in the USA. The findings expose any impact on the attitudes towards social media use
indicated that students were in favor of using “Facebook” and for educational practices. A possible explanation for this result
other interactive technologies, whereas, faculty members might be that males and females in Oman are both equally in
were in favor of using the “traditional technologies” like favor of using social media while performing their learning
emails in order to support classroom activities. activities.
Studying the attitudes towards social media plays an TABLE I. DIFFERENCES IN TERMS OF GENDER
effective turn in the educational process [26]. Accordingly, it
is anticipated to explore the students’ attitudes towards using Gender N Mean Std. t-value Sig.
social media applications prior to adopting them in higher Deviation
Male 54 3.7037 1.17151 1.126 0.261
education settings. Such attitudes will offer a better insight
Female 144 3.5069 1.06508
into the incorporation of these applications in the learning-
teaching activities.
RQ2: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
III. RESEARCH METHOD media affected by age?
A. Context and Subjects In order to explore the significant difference among the
The targeted sample involved the students enrolled at “Al students’ attitudes with respect to their age, the means and
Buraimi University College” (BUC) in Oman. The purpose of standard deviations were calculated (see Figure 1). To
selecting BUC refers to the fact that BUC is running a number measure the statistically significant differences between the
of educational technologies and its students showed positive mean values, a “one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)” was
perceptions in using these technologies [10], [34], [35]. performed. Table 2 triggered out that there are no statistically
Students from different departments specialized in different significant differences (F = 0.870, p > 0.05) among the
majors took part in the study. The data were gathered via an students’ attitudes concerning their age. This result contradicts
online survey. This is due to the fact that questionnaire surveys with the findings concluded in prior research [38], in which

177
students aged between 18 and 23 were the most effective users RQ4: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social
of Facebook. This result could be interpreted by the notion that media affected by social media application?
university students in Oman are equally in favor of using
social media in learning activities regardless of their age. The means and standard deviations for the social media
applications were calculated (see Figure 3). To examine the
Fig. 1. Mean and standard deviation for age groups. significant difference among the students’ attitudes towards
the usage of social media concerning the used social media
application, “a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)” was
calculated. Table 4 exhibits that there are no significant
differences (F = 0.840, p > 0.05) among the students’ attitudes
with respect to the used social media application. However,
this result contradicts with that observed in previous research
[39], in which “Facebook” was among the most frequently
utilized websites. A possible justification for this result is that
the university students in Oman are willing to incorporating
social media in educational activities regardless of the used
application.
Fig. 3. Mean and standard deviation for social media applications.

TABLE II. ANOVA RESULTS FOR AGE GROUPS


Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups 2.091 2 1.045 0.870 0.421
Within Groups 234.386 195 1.202
Total 236.477 197

RQ3: Are the students’ attitudes towards the use of social


media affected by year of study?
Figure 2 illustrates the mean and standard deviation for the
year of study. Further, “a one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA)” was measured for the purpose of testing the TABLE IV. ANOVA RESULTS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATIONS
statistically significant difference between the mean values.
Table 3 shows that there are no significant differences (F = Sum of df Mean F Sig.
0.224, p > 0.05) among the students’ attitudes with respect to Squares Square
Between Groups 4.045 4 1.011 0.840 0.501
their year of study. This result matches the results noticed in a Within Groups 232.432 193 1.204
previous study conducted in the past [13], which indicated that Total 236.477 197
the usage of social media was not effectively pertained to the
academic year. This indicates that the year of study does not V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
affect social media use in learning activities.
Social media within the higher educational contexts has
Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviation for the year of study. been widely investigated by scholars [21], [22], [25].
However, the attitude towards social media use is an
important topic that still calls for further investigation.
Examining the students’ attitudes is regarded as an essential
issue that could recognize the shortcomings and strengths of
social media, and identify the determinants for its possible
employment in the higher education sector.
Based on the extant literature, a few attempts were made
to study the attitudes of students in respect of using social
media in the Arab world. Thus, the present case study mainly
aims at investigating the attitudes of students towards using
social media in BUC in Oman. The study mainly focused on
the differences in these attitudes from the lenses of different
attributes, including gender, age, year of study, and social
media application. A total of 198 university students took part
TABLE III. ANOVA RESULTS FOR THE YEAR OF STUDY in the study. Although the findings showed no significant
differences in attitudes concerning the gender, age, study
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square year, and social media application, it is imperative to report
Between Groups 0.816 3 0.272 0.224 0.880 that all the respondents were mutually interested in using
Within Groups 235.661 194 1.215 social media applications in pedagogical activities regardless
Total 236.477 197 to the studied attributes.

178
Although this is a case study, the core limitation of this [20] D. Z. Dumpit and C. J. Fernandez, “Analysis of the use of social media
research is the focus on only one academic institution in in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology
Acceptance Model,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1,
Oman. It is difficult to generalize the results to the entire 2017.
academic institutions in Oman. Future endeavors should [21] S. Manca and M. Ranieri, “‘yes for sharing, no for teaching!’: Social
consider more academic institutions in order to maximize the Media in academic practices,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 29, pp. 63–74,
possibility of results generalization. 2016.
[22] J. A. Paul, H. M. Baker, and J. D. Cochran, “Effect of online social
REFERENCES networking on student academic performance,” Comput. Human
[1] S. Sharma, “Black Twitter? Racial Hashtags, Networks and Behav., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2117–2127, 2012.
Contagion,” New Form., vol. 78, no. 78, pp. 46–64, 2013. [23] M. Habes, M. Alghizzawi, R. Khalaf, S. A. Salloum, and M. Abd.
[2] Q. Tang, B. Gu, and A. B. Whinston, “Content Contribution for Ghani, “The Relationship between Social Media and Academic
Revenue Sharing and Reputation in Social Media: A Dynamic Performance: Facebook Perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud.,
Structural Model,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 41–76, 2012. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2018.
[3] M. Alshurideh, S. A. Salloum, B. Al Kurdi, and M. Al-Emran, “Factors [24] S. Molinillo, R. Anaya-Sánchez, R. Aguilar-Illescas, and M. Vallespín-
affecting the Social Networks Acceptance: An Empirical Study using Arán, “Social media-based collaborative learning: Exploring
PLS-SEM Approach,” in 8th International Conference on Software antecedents of attitude,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 38, pp. 18–27, 2018.
and Computer Applications, 2019. [25] V. Balakrishnan, “Key determinants for intention to use social media
[4] A. S. Yussiff, W. F. W. Ahmad, and A. Oxley, “An exploration of for learning in higher education institutions,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc.,
Social Media Technologies and their potential uses in higher vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2017.
educational institutions: A case study of Universiti Teknologi [26] Ö. Korkmaz, “A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative
PETRONAS,” in 2013 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e- Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS),” Comput. Educ., 2012.
Management and e-Services, IC3e 2013, 2013. [27] M. Al-Emran, Y. A. Alkhoudary, V. Mezhuyev, and M. Al-Emran,
[5] S. A. Salloum, C. Mhamdi, M. Al-Emran, and K. Shaalan, “Analysis “Students and Educators Attitudes towards the use of M-Learning:
and Classification of Arabic Newspapers’ Facebook Pages using Text Gender and Smartphone ownership Differences,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
Mining Techniques,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2019.
8–17, 2017. [28] M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “Students’
[6] K. Lietsala and E. Sirkkunen, Social media: Introduction to the tools Perceptions towards the Integration of Knowledge Management
and processes of participatory economy. 2008. Processes in M-learning Systems: A Preliminary Study,” Int. J. Eng.
[7] N. Al-Qaysi, N. Mohamad-Nordin, and M. Al-Emran, “A Systematic Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2018.
Review of Social Media Acceptance from the Perspective of [29] H. Gangadharbatla, “Facebook me : Collective self-esteem, need to
Educational and Information Systems Theories and Models,” J. Educ. belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGgeneration’s
Comput. Res., 2018. attitudes toward social networking sites,” J. Interact. Advert., 2010.
[8] A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, “Users of the world, unite! The [30] Y. Kim, D. Sohn, and S. M. Choi, “Cultural difference in motivations
challenges and opportunities of Social Media,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 53, no. for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and
1, pp. 59–68, 2010. Korean college students,” Comput. Human Behav., 2011.
[9] A. Benetoli, T. F. Chen, and P. Aslani, “The use of social media in [31] R. Hartshorne and H. Ajjan, “Examining student decisions to adopt
pharmacy practice and education,” Research in Social and Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests,” J. Comput. High.
Administrative Pharmacy, vol. 11, no. 1. pp. 1–46, 2015. Educ., 2009.
[10] N. Al-Qaysi and M. Al-Emran, “Code-switching Usage in Social [32] T. Baſöz, “Pre-service EFL Teachers’ Attitudes towards Language
Media: A Case Study from Oman,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., Learning through Social Media,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2017. Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 430–438.
[11] J. E. Rodriguez, “Social Media Use in Higher Education : Key Areas [33] M. D. Roblyer, M. McDaniel, M. Webb, J. Herman, and J. V. Witty,
to Consider for Educators,” Learning, 2011. “Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college
[12] R. Thackeray, B. L. Neiger, C. L. Hanson, and J. F. Mckenzie, faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites,”
“Enhancing Promotional Strategies Within Social Marketing Internet High. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 134–140, 2010.
Programs: Use of Web 2.0 Social Media,” Health Promot. Pract., 2008. [34] M. Al-Emran and S. A. Salloum, “Students’ Attitudes Towards the Use
[13] K. Avcı, S. G. Çelikden, S. Eren, and D. Aydenizöz, “Assessment of of Mobile Technologies in e-Evaluation,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
medical students’ attitudes on social media use in medicine: a cross- Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 195–202, 2017.
sectional study,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 18, 2015. [35] M. Al-Emran and K. Shaalan, “Attitudes towards the use of mobile
[14] N. M. Al-Shdayfat, “Undergraduate student nurses’ attitudes towards learning: A case study from the gulf region,” Int. J. Interact. Mob.
using social media websites: A study from Jordan,” Nurse Educ. Today, Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 75–78, 2015.
vol. 66, pp. 39–43, 2018. [36] M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “PLS-SEM in
[15] D. Chytas, “Use of social media in anatomy education: A narrative Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive Methodological
review of the literature,” Ann. Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeige, 2019. Reference,” in 4th International Conference on Advanced Intelligent
Systems and Informatics (AISI 2018), 2018, pp. 644–653.
[16] R. Hanna, A. Rohm, and V. L. Crittenden, “We’re all connected: The
power ofthe social media ecosystem,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. [37] N. M. Suki, T. Ramayah, and K. K. Ly, “Empirical investigation on
265–273, 2011. factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Facebook,” Univers.
Access Inf. Soc., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223–231, 2012.
[17] L. Xiong, A. Alsadoon, A. Maag, P. W. C. Prasad, L. S. Hoe, and A.
Elchouemi, “Rise of Social Media Marketing: A Perspective on Higher [38] R. Arteaga Sánchez, V. Cortijo, and U. Javed, “Students’ perceptions
Education,” in In 2018 13th International Conference on Computer of Facebook for academic purposes,” Comput. Educ., vol. 70, pp. 138–
Science & Education (ICCSE), 2018, pp. 1–6. 149, 2014.
[18] E. Akar and B. Topçu, “An examination of the factors influencing [39] M. I. Weiler, C. D. Santanello, D. Isaacs, A. Rahman, E. P. O’Donnell,
consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing,” J. Internet and G. L. Peters, “Pharmacy students’ attitudes about social media use
Commer., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–67, 2011. at five schools of pharmacy,” Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., vol. 7, pp.
804–810, 2015.
[19] G. Grosseck, “To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?,”
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2009.

179

You might also like