Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIP Bio CURE Manuscript X 1
CIP Bio CURE Manuscript X 1
Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
LIST OF CUSTOMERS
TEAM COMPSITION
Jaime R. Soriano TEAM LEADER
Ma. Lourdes M. Dionisio FACILITATOR
Mark Anthony R. Santos COMMUNICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Cristina M. Mendoza SCRIBE & RESOURCE PERSON
Ma. Fatima N. Dela Cruz PROCESS OBSERVER
Rosemarie B. Noro PROCESS OBSERVER
According to UNESCO (2022), the Philippines, despite numerous attempts to improve its educational
outcomes, has instead become an educational laggard, taking the ignominious distinction of getting low
rankings in three different global evaluations that scored students’ performance in Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).
In the 2019 functional literacy, education, and mass media report completed by the Philippine
Statistics Authority (PSA), Filipino learners received low rankings in three different evaluations including
their performance in STEM subjects within the past five years. Likewise, in the 2018 Programme for
International Student Assessment (PISA), which evaluated the performance of 15-year-olds in reading,
mathematics, and science, the Philippines took the second-lowest spot in science and mathematics.
To contextualize, in the 50-item General Biology Pre-Assessment conducted among the 37 targeted
STEM 11 participants, the mean score was 18 and none of them got a passing score of 38. While the class
average of the targeted STEM 11 participants in their General Biology 1 class was 87, there are still learners
whose average was less than 85 which is low especially when STEM students wish to apply to universities
and colleges with certain grade requirements.
The above data could be compounded by the recent COVID times when students are predisposed with
serious challenges of learning losses, reduced academic skills, and over-exposure and dependence on the
internet and gadgets. Specifically, access issues, lack of good learning resources, and inflexible curriculum
guides are the identified causes of the problem making this CI project relevant to the present time.
Hence, this Project Bio-C.U.R.E. (Biology Class Utilizing Research-Based Experiences) will
adapt research-based activities and hands‐on scientific discovery to help the students develop authentic
scientific thinking and practice in their General Biology 2 subject. Furthermore, the concept of peer
leadership experience will also be utilized to aid the students in the development of skills such as excellent
oral communication, critical thinking, teamwork, and problem solving.
The steps to be implemented during Project Bio-C.U.R.E. is subdivided into three (3) primary stages
– assess, analyze, and act. Each stage has corresponding sub-activities and will run for twelve (12) weeks,
from February 13, 2023 to April 05, 2023.
1. Get organized
a. Organize the different committees
b. Brainstorming the school’s top priority problem
c. Register possible causes of the prioritized problem to be resolved
d. Weighing the proposal and cons of the problem to find ways and solutions
e. Asking permission from the author of the exit assessment to be used as the pretest.
2. Talk with customers
a. Selection of target customers
b. Dissemination of Information about the expected target customers
c. Gathering of data from students and teachers
3. Walk the process
a. Validation of the tool
b. Analyzing data
c. Data Graphical Interpretation
d. Specify the SIPOC team
e. Identified the problem that needs to be prioritized
4. Identifying improvement areas
Next, the following activities will be undertaken under the ANALYZE stage:
1. Pilot Solution
a. Implementation of project to target students
2. Roll-out
a. Implementation of the project to all students
3. Check Progress
a. Evaluate the progress report based on the given target
It is expected that through Project Bio-C.U.R.E., the students will develop improved authentic
scientific thinking and practice in their General Biology 2 subject through utilization of research experiences
and hands‐on learning activities such as experiments, laboratory notebook, reflection assignments, research,
critique journal articles, and other related research-based activities as evidenced by an increased in the
students’ third quarter general average to 85%.