Title: Abolishing the K to 12 Education System: A Position Paper

Introduction:
Ladies and gentlemen, my fellow classmates, schoolmates , and fellow debaters, we
strongly agree that K-12 education should be abolished, the K to 12 education system,
implemented in many countries around the world, aims to provide a comprehensive and
holistic education to students. However, there has been ongoing debate regarding the
effectiveness and merits of this system. This position argues for the abolishment of the
K to 12 education system, presenting several key five reasons and concerns that
support this stance.

1. Lack of Alignment with Economic Realities:

One of the primary justifications for the implementation of the K to 12 system was to
produce a workforce that meets the demands of the job market. However, there is a
growing concern that the current curriculum does not adequately prepare students for
employment. The extended duration of basic education delays the entry of students into
higher education or vocational training, thereby limiting their opportunities to specialize
and acquire relevant skills.

2. Increased Financial Burden on Families:

The K to 12 system necessitates an additional two years of education, resulting in
increased expenses for families. The prolonged duration of schooling places an extra
financial burden on parents who have to support their children for an extended period.
Moreover, the need for additional school facilities, teachers, and resources to
accommodate the expanded system poses a significant financial strain on the
government.

3. Diminished Quality of Education:

The implementation of the K to 12 system has led to concerns about the overall quality
of education. Critics argue that the system's focus on quantity, by extending the number
of years in basic education, may compromise the quality of instruction. Teachers may
feel pressured to rush through the curriculum, resulting in superficial learning
experiences for students. Furthermore, limited resources and overcrowded classrooms
can negatively impact the effectiveness of teaching.

4. Disruption of Higher Education Admission:

The K to 12 system disrupts the traditional structure of higher education admission. With
the addition of two more years in basic education, colleges and universities are forced
to adjust their admission requirements, resulting in a delay or imbalance in the flow of
students into higher education institutions. This disruption could have unintended
consequences, such as limited enrollment opportunities and logistical challenges for
both institutions and students.

5. Inadequate Preparation for Global Competitiveness:

In a highly competitive global economy, countries need to equip their students with the
necessary skills and knowledge to thrive. While the K to 12 system aimed to enhance
the country's global competitiveness, there are concerns that it falls short in achieving
this goal. The additional years fail to provide substantial improvements in critical areas
like science, mathematics, and English proficiency, which are vital for international
competitiveness.

Conclusion:
Based on the aforementioned points, it is evident that the K to 12 education system has
significant drawbacks that warrant its abolishment. The lack of alignment with economic
realities, financial burden on families, compromised quality of education, disruption of
higher education admission, and inadequate preparation for global competitiveness all
contribute to the case against this system. Instead, policymakers should focus on
alternative reforms that address the shortcomings of the current education system while
ensuring students receive a high-quality education that prepares them for the
challenges of the future.