Rivera obtained a loan from the Spouses Chua in 1995 and issued checks in 1998 to pay the loan that were dishonored. The amount due was P366,000 including 5% monthly interest. The Spouses Chua sued Rivera for payment. The Supreme Court ruled that the 5% monthly interest was unconscionable and lowered the interest rate to 12% annually until June 2013 and 6% annually after based on new BSP regulations. Rivera was ordered to pay the principal, interest, and attorney's fees based on the new interest rates.
Rivera obtained a loan from the Spouses Chua in 1995 and issued checks in 1998 to pay the loan that were dishonored. The amount due was P366,000 including 5% monthly interest. The Spouses Chua sued Rivera for payment. The Supreme Court ruled that the 5% monthly interest was unconscionable and lowered the interest rate to 12% annually until June 2013 and 6% annually after based on new BSP regulations. Rivera was ordered to pay the principal, interest, and attorney's fees based on the new interest rates.
Rivera obtained a loan from the Spouses Chua in 1995 and issued checks in 1998 to pay the loan that were dishonored. The amount due was P366,000 including 5% monthly interest. The Spouses Chua sued Rivera for payment. The Supreme Court ruled that the 5% monthly interest was unconscionable and lowered the interest rate to 12% annually until June 2013 and 6% annually after based on new BSP regulations. Rivera was ordered to pay the principal, interest, and attorney's fees based on the new interest rates.
Facts: The parties were friends of long standing having known each other since 1973: Rivera and Salvador are kumpadres, the former is the godfather of the Spouses Chua’s son. On 24 February 1995, Rivera obtained a loan from the Spouses Chua evidenced by a Promissory Note. Three years from the date of payment stipulated in the promissory note, Rivera, issued and delivered to Spouses Chua two (2) checks drawn against his account at Philippine Commercial International Bank (PCIB) but upon presentment for payment, the two checks were dishonored forthe reason “account closed.” As of 31 May 1999, the amount due the Spouses Chua was pegged at P366,000.00 covering the principal of P120,000.00 plus five percent (5%) interest per month from 1 January 1996 to 31 May 1999. The Spouses Chua alleged that they have repeatedly demanded payment from Rivera to no avail. Because of Rivera’s unjustified refusal to pay, the Spouses Chua were constrained to file a suit before the MeTC, Branch 30, Manila. Issue: Whether or not the stipulated interest is unconscionable and should really be lowered. Ruling: The Supreme Court held that as observed by Rivera, the stipulated interest of 5% per month or 60% per annum in addition to legal interests and attorney’s fees is, indeed, highly iniquitous and unreasonable and stipulated interest rates if illegal and are unconscionable the Court is allowed to temper interest rates when necessary. The rate of interest should be 12% per annum computed from the date of judicial or extrajudicial demand. However, the 12% per annum rate of legal interest is only applicable until 30 June 2013, before the advent and effectivity of Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Circular No. 799, Series of 2013. Wherefore, Rivera is ordered to pay respondents: (1) the principal amount of ₱120,000.00; (2) legal interest of 12% per annumof the principal amount of ₱120,000.00 reckoned from 1 January 1996 until 30 June 2013; (3) legal interest of 6% per annumof the principal amount of ₱120,000.00 form 1 July 2013 to date when this Decision becomes final and executory; (4) 12% per annum applied to the total of paragraphs 2 and 3 from 11 June 1999, date of judicial demand, to 30 June 2013, as interest due earning legal interest; (5) 6% per annum applied to the total amount of paragraphs 2 and 3 from 1 July 2013 to date when this Decision becomes final and executor, as interest due earning legal interest; xxx (7) 6% per annum interest on the total of the monetary awards from the finality of this Decision until full payment thereof