Notice of Conflict or Variance of Law

In the event of conflict between this and any previous recorded documents, the statement and Claims in this Declaration
shall be determined to be my correct facts on the matter. My rights as a private national are in jeopardy, and are of those
classes, rooted in a lofty Christian morality, which the written constitution for the United States of America either confers
or has taken under its protection and no adequate remedy for their enforcement is provided by the forms and proceedings
purely legal, and mode of acquiring jurisdiction martial in character, the same necessity invokes and justifies, in cases to
its remedy can be applied, that jurisdiction in equity vested by the written constitution for the United States of America,
and which cannot be affected by the legislation of the emergency provisional congress, the states or agencies who are
subject to the laws of the emergency ‘United States” in the District of Columbia. In the event the interpretation of words,
doctrines, ideas, principles and laws are in conflict, then the interpretations shall be governed by that of English Chancery
ratified by the Judiciary Act of 1789, next, Chancery Division of the “supreme court of the United States” in paragraph
one of June 19, 1934 of the 73rd Congress Sess. II CHS 651, 652 (Public Law No, 415), which rights, are later left
untouched by the supreme court in their passage of specifically only “SEC 2” in 1934, and American Jurisprudence circa
A.D. 1776 which protection arises under My country governed by the written “We The People” “ The Constitution for
the united Staes of America” Article III, Section 2, subd. 1, Maxims of Equity (listed on page 6), and private trust law:
equity shall always prevail! Take Notice hereby that the primary equitable rights expressed herein are not cognizable at
law, much less by martial modes of acquiring jurisdiction, and thus i am without a speedy, nor adequate and complete
remedy at law and therefore there arises a conflict or variance of the rules of law over subject matter of the States of New
Jersey/Essex county issued registered organizations “Pia LaNae Bikelle Gordon-Lawson” and “PIA LANAE BIKELLE
GORDON-LAWSON” respectively, in relation to My private national citizenship. Said conflict id governed by the
Judiciary Act of 1789 in its §11, §16 & §20 and also by import of England’s High Court of Judicature Act of 1873
Amended 1875 both of which are attached hereto by reference (as well as stated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota
(Dunnell’s 1910 §3140)) “when there is a conflict between the rules of equity and rules of the common law over the same
subject matter the rules of equity shall prevail” to the exclusion of generally Roman Civil Law or Roman Equity du jour,
statues and codes or international law or military doctrine by applying the maxim “Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius”.
As a private New Jerseyan Citizen National party to the organic unimpeachable written “Constitution for The united
States of America” as amended December 15, A.D. 1791 (hereafter “My Constitution”), said original root organic du jure
land jurisdiction of the union “ The United States of America” by My country’s written Articles of Confederation as
ratified by all thirteen original states A.D. 1781 hereinafter said written constitution and articles are collectively referred to
throughout this document as “said USA”, as stated herein this Notice by Declaration herein is to express succinctly with
specificity and particularity My Legal and Equitable Nature and Character, Political wishes, intent, will, purpose and
conscience. i do not voluntarily surrender any part of my sovereignty or Liberties to any non-Republican de facto
provisional “emergency” martial or municipal government, or international military law of occupation by operation of law
otherwise, and instead at all times i receive the civilian due process protections of My country’s adopted written “The
Constitution for The united States of America, as amended A.D. 1791”, without waiver of Article I, Sec. 8,
constitutionally limited grant of powers, on relation to sovereign Territory of the several member union States of the
country of The United States of America, A.D.1791; and therefore i am to be self-governing in the words within in My
nations original executed Bill in Chancery genesis root written title “IN CONGRESS, July4, 1776, The unanimous
Declaration of the thirteen united States of America” A.D. 1776 “under the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” now
in it’s glorious two hundredth and forty seventh year of our Lord Jesus the Christ advocate My wonderful Councilor.
 Hear Ye Hear Ye Hear Ye, Notice of Disclaimer of Trusteeship

That i, pia-lanae bikelle, WHEREAS according to trust expert and published modern master of trust law John C.
Hallbach Jr. (and Albert Lewin 1888 “Law of Trusts” in TOA) states that a trust arrangement cannot be forced
upon anyone designated trustee, and WHEREAS one who has not previously accepted a trust or contracted in
advance to do so can disclaim and refuse appointment as trustee for any reason (or for no reason) whatsoever
(TOA: Hallbach §149 also see TOA: Lewin, Part II, The Trustee, Chapter XI, pages 270-278), and WHEREAS
a sole trustee and sole beneficiary are one and the same and the same person, the result is a merger of legal and
equitable titles, defeating the trust a creating a fee simple in the person (TOA: Hallbach §159; Lewin §196), and
WHEREAS no particular words are required to form a trust, nor is it essential that any of the parties involved
know or understand that the intended relationship is a “trust”, if an effective transfer has been made, a valid
trust exists even if the trustee is not aware of it (TOA: Hallbach §66, §274) and WHEREAS an implied trust
arrangement requires an implied trustee must also therefore, logically, also require an implied
Grantor/Settlor/Administrator or implied Executor, and that said implied trustors can be any government
agency, corporation, legal fiction or judicial officer in the public, and WHEREAS any implied trust relation
can be established as inter vivos TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that i, Gordon-Lawson, pia lanae bikelle,
HEREBY do hereby notice all persons and men worldwide of my express disclaimer of all implied and
voluntary quasi-trusteeships and registered agency in character and in nature to the artificial persons
without my expressed acceptance and valid transfer or receipt of res or sufficient consideration under the
rules of American exclusive equity for the State of New Jersey Registered Organizations names including
but not limited to “Pia LaNae Bikelle Gordon” or “PIA LANAE BIKELLE GORDON” or “Pia LaNae Bikelle
Lawson” or “PIA LANAE BIKELLE LAWSON” or “Gordon, Pia L” or “Lawson, Pia L” and any other legal
derivations; that said disclaimer relates back to the first instance 11 January 1973 in law or implied
acceptance, acquiescence and/or conduct without expressed written consent, whichever is sooner, due to,
including but not limited to a) any voluntary implied/expressed trusteeship or registered agency to an
artificial person is now merged and extinguished by private equitable nature of the relationship of
confidence by me, the Cestui Que of the same subject matter Registered Organizations, b) based in what
is written on my heart, c) it is my wish, d) good conscience, e) good reason, f) the failure of complete
and clear disclosures to Me, g) the failure of a valid transfer/receipt of res or sufficient consideration to
Me, h) mistake, error or accident due to the disability of my legal capacity either as a ward, infant,
and/or incompetent by which my parents and I could avail Myself of my rights and other options that
equity requires in good faith dealings, i) absence of a de jure legal capacity within the current temporary
provisional emergency martial due process of the current public legal system, j) biblical principles
admonish me from being a surety for a stranger.