Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supervisor
A. S. M. Badrudduza
Assistant Professor
Introduction
Literature Review
System Model
Contribution
Problem
Formulation
Numerical Results
Conclusions
2/32
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface(RIS)Multicasting
Reflected path
2. Applications:
Satellite Communication
Radar and Sensing
Smart Cities
Transmitter
Obstacle
Dual-hop
[1] Odeyemi, Kehinde & Pius, Owolawi & Olakanmi, Oladayo. (2021). On the Performance of Reconfigurable
Intelligent Surface Aided Power Line Communication System under Different Relay Transmission Protocols.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C. 111. 119-133. 10.2528/PIERC21020803.
[2] A. R. Ndjiongue, T. M. N. Ngatched, O. A. Dobre, A. G. Armada and H. Haas, "Analysis of RIS-Based Terrestrial-
FSO Link Over G-G Turbulence With Distance and Jitter Ratios," in Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 39, no.
21, pp. 6746-6758, 1 Nov.1, 2021, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3108532.
5/32
Literature Review
Le-Tran. [3] L. Yang [4]
Channel: Channel:
PLC: Log normal PLC: Log normal
FSO Link: Gamma-Gamma FSO Link: Exponentiated
Contributions: Weibull
Average Bit Error Rate, OP Contributions:
Limitations: Average Bit Error Rate, OP
Security Parameters Limitations:
Security Parameters
[3] Le-Tran, Manh, and Sunghwan Kim. "Performance analysis of dual-hop mixed power line communication/free-space
optical cooperative systems." Photonics. Vol. 8. No. 6. MDPI, 2021.
[4] LYang, Q. Zhu, X. Yan, S. Li and H. Jiang, "Performance Analysis of Mixed PLC-FSO Dual-Hop Communication
Systems," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 19307-19317, 1 Oct.1, 2022, doi:
10.1109/JIOT.2022.3165190.
6/32
Open Problems
7/32
System Model
Nakagami-m
8/32
Contributions
Derivation of the expressions for the following secrecy measures considering RIS-Assisted
FSO-PLC mixed System:
1. Average Secrecy Capacity (ASC)
2. Secure Outage Probability (SOP)
3. Strictly Positive Secrecy Capacity (SPSC)
4. Effective Secrecy Throughput (EST)
Offering some numerical results based on the derivations of the ASC, SOP, and SPSC,
EST expressions.
Required Softwares:
1. Wolfram Mathematica 13.6.1 (for data acquisition and data analysis)
2. Latex (for thesis book writing)
9/32
PDFs and CDFs of SNRs
(1)
(2)
[5] Kumar, L. Bhargava, et al. "RIS assisted triple-hop RF-FSO convergent with UWOC system." IEEE
Access 10 (2022): 66564-66575.
10/32
PDFs and CDFs of SNRs(cont.)
(3)
(4)
[6] Jani, Manan, Parul Garg, and Akash Gupta. "Performance analysis of a mixed cooperative PLC–VLC system for
indoor communication systems." IEEE Systems Journal 14.1 (2019): 469-476.
11/32
PDFs and CDFs of SNRs(cont.)
(5)
(6)
12/32
Working Steps
1. Selection of PDF and CDF for SNR of all link
Channels
(7)
14/32
Performance Metrices(cont.)
The Closed Form Expressions for SPSC :
(8)
(9)
15/32
Performance Metrices(cont.)
The Closed Form Expressions for ASC :
(10)
16/32
Numerical Result
Table 1: System Parameters
Symbols Parameters Values
N No. of RIS elements 16, 32, 64
(α, β) Atmospheric Turbulence Weak (4.6 , 7.1)
Moderate (2.4 , 4.5)
Strong (1.4 , 3.5)
Pointing Error Severe 1
ϵ
Negligible 6.7
(c,d) Standard deviation of Pointing Error (5, 10, 15, 20) mrad
C2 Refractive index 3*10-12
mi Shadowing Severity Parameter 1, 1,5, 2
P Impulsive Noise 0.05, 0.3, 0.6
17/32
Numerical Results(cont.)
(a) (b)
Fig. 4 : The SOP versus average SNR of FSO Channel for selected values (a) no. of RIS elements, (b)
Pointing error parameters respectively.
18/32
Numerical Results
Fig. 5 : The ASC versus Average SNR of PLC Channel for the selective value of Shadowing Parameter , m1 = m2.
19/32
Numerical Results
(a) (b)
Fig.6: The SOP versus average SNR of PLC Channel for the selective value of (a) Shadowing parameters, (b) Impulsive noise
parameters respectively. 20/32
Numerical Results
(a) (b)
Fig. 7 : The SOP versus Average SNR of PLC Channel for the selective value of (a) atmospheric turbulence (b) Rs.
21/32
Comparison with Existing Work
Fig. 8 : The SOP versus Average SNR of FSO Channel for selected values of pointing error parameters.
22/32
Comparison with Existing Work
Table 2 : Comparison Table
Existing Work Proposed Work
PLC Channel: Log normal PLC Channel : Log normal
FSO Channel: Exponentiated Weibull distribution [4] FSO Channel: Gamma- Gamma
Eavesdropper Position: Source to Relay
Contributions: Contributions:
1. Dual-hop 1. Physical Layer Security
2. Supporting both fix and variable gain relay 2. Dual-hop
3. Performance metrices: OP, BER 3. RIS based FSO-PLC Relaying Network
4. One Eavesdropping scenario
5. Performance metrices: ASC, SOP , SPSC, EST.
23/32
Conclusions
The author have derived the following closed-form novel expressions:
ASC.
SOP.
SPSC.
EST
Observations:
The considered PLC link perform better for the weak impulsive noise scenarios as
compared to the high impulsive noise scenarios.
The secrecy performance degrades with the increase of pointing error and atmospheric
turbulence FSO Channels
Finally we get our desire result from this proposed network in weak turbulence, large
number of RIS elements, weak impulsive noise.
24/32
Thank You!
25/32
Usual Repeaters Vs RIS
User
er
RIS User
er
User
er
User
er
Advantages:
Flexibility
Applicability to Scintillation
Experimental Validation
Tractable Analysis.
27/32
PLC Link- Log Normal distribution
Advantages:
Logarithmic Nature of Signal
Attenuation.
Variability of Attenuation
Compatibility with Measured Data
Analytical and Simulation
Convenience
28/32
Backup Slides: Secrecy Trade-off
The CDF of Dual Hop Network is given by
29/32
Backup Slides:
The PDF and CDF of PLC Link is
Where,
30/32
Backup Slides:
The CDF of Eavesdropper Link is,
Where,
31/32
Backup Slides:
SOP is derived as,
32/32