Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zhang Yinyi ( ~ : ~ )
Institute of EngineeringMechanics, Nanchang University,
Nanchang 330029, P R China
(Communicated by ILuo HaianJ ; Received Nov. 17, 1997; Revised Sep. 22, 1998)
value.
of the deformable shell element are given, where the parameters /~ represent the principal
coordinates 9 and 0. As a result of describing the deformations of initial bucklings, the
bifurcation exluatiom of spherical shells are derived
cosec 9 v + (
+ qlR sin 9 ~ +cos 9 u + ~ - ~ +2sin 9 w ) = 0, (la)
(
q2R sin~o ~ )
+ cos~o u + ~-~ + 2sincp w = O, (lb)
a2Mo
sin~ a2M~
a~o2 + eos~ (2M~ - Me) + eosec~o - ~ - + (eos~p.eogo - eosee~o) x
A spherical shell has the hinged supports at the bottom and is subjected to the circumferential
shear loads distributed in a sine function along the
T- meridian for any edge angle a, as depicted in Fig. 2.
h
1 ql = 0, q2 = rosin ~a-~' q3 = 0. (2)
For the spherical shell which is in the critical
equilibrium state, the internal forces can be calculated
~=o, ~=o,
foR ~ f
u~ ' = - 2 + 7 / d ~ o s o e ~ l - ~in~ ~ oos t2 +
q2(~,~a)~ -0 0 _
"~( ~a-~) 1
a l-cos +2-rt/a x
(3)
After bifurcation buckling, the boundary
Fig. 2 Spherical shell with circum. conditions are taken as
ferential shear loads ( u , v , w ) ~ = ~ = O, (M~)~_, = 0. (4)
The geomelric equations
Torsional Buckling of Spherical Shells 429
3u w u Ov
+~,
3u 8v v
~.~ = - 3 2 w / R 2 0 ~ 2, (5)
02 w
OW ~ - cosec2 q9 R2002 '
Z0 = - eot~o R28q
32w 3w
- - 0 + cot~o coseccp R230,
Z r = - cosecp R23qgO
T, = (1 - / z ) ~ - ~ r~,
G' T~ = 24(1 - / ~ 2 ) ,--
4 ~ r~,
-'~,
where G, F , ro and r= are the shear modulus, o.o~
Poisson's ratio, buckling load intensity and critical t t t t~
0.020
stress, respectively, while v is the shell parameter.
According to the energy criterion of stability, o.0~5
the ideal buckling mode corresponds to the ,~
constraints, closes to the bfftwcation point o.o~0
deformations, and minimizes the buckling critical
values. This mode may be constructed of the 0.o05
trigonometric functions
0.001
ul = A l , ( s i n ~ o , sina)sin~o sinn0, ] ' i ' ~ v'~ ' ~ ' ~
uz A2.(cos~o- eosa)sinq~ eosn0, 1 (8)
u3 A3.(sin~o - sina)sin~o sinn0. J Fig. 3 Critical dgenvalue curves
The buckling mode number n depends on the shell parameter v and reflects the mode
characteristic.
Subsdtuting Eqs. ( 2 ) ~ ( 8 ) into the bifiam~don equations ( 1 ) i the displacement-type
governing equations of torsional buckling are
V,(~o,O,n,a,v,Aj,) = 0 (i,j = 1,2,3). (9)
430 Zhang Yinyi
3 Numerical Results
The values of geometry parameter v are adopted at the ratio R / t between 125 and 2850 and
the edge angle a between 10~ and 90~ The shells are made of the modem light-weight and high-
strength materials. The material parameters are taken as
G = 26.92 x 103MPa, /z = 0.3.
The calculation which involves mass terms and is multiplicate and staggering looks rather
complicated. However, because of desired regularity, the numerical results are precise and
satisfactory.
Fig. 3 presents the tidy data and smoothly rising curves of critical eigenvalue fcr with
increasing geometry parameter v for any edge angle a. The buckling mode number net becomes
large as v increases, and there is a great difference between shallow shell and hemispherical shell.
In reality, an active region of engineering applications is given on the figure.
20 ' ,' ' . . . . . . . , , 9 o - .1.5,
/l~r
15 n==4-21
1.13
22 25 26 2._7 f
d m
0.5
n ~ , = 5 - 28
5
A curve of the buckling load intensity Qc, versus the geometry parameter v is illustrated in
Fig. 4. As the parameter u increases, the load intensity Qc, drops gradually from the maximum
Qc~ = 12.575 1 to the minimum Q~, = 10.749 2, and then rises slightly, and its change is small.
in the complete domain. The buckling mode number no, increases rapidly following v. "
Fig. 5 plots the relative value 8 curves of the load intensities. Here r~ denotes the load
intensity of the buckling mode number nc~ = 3 ~ 14. It is seen that the curves parallel almost to
Torsional Buckling of Spherical Shells 431
2.5
2 . 8 V . . . . ' . ~ , - I I . . . . t . . . .
2.0 2.4t-
n,,= 11 ~ 2 6 ~
2.01-
~
1.5
,.= 5 - 2 9 1.6~
1.0 1.2F
0.81-
0.5 =4- 8
0.4~
the abscissa v and the change of load intensity r0 is stable on the whole.
Fig. 6 shows the critical stress T, curves. Clearly, the rising curves steepen before reaching
the hemispherical shell, and due to the close geometry parameters two groups of buckling critical
stresses approach each other.
Two groups of bifurcation buckling adopting data being far apart are illustrated in Fig. 7.
One shorter curve represents the shallow shell, and the longer curve represents the deep shell
(30 ~ < a ~< 90~ As the geometry parameter v increases, both critical stresses and critical stress
increments of the deep shell are bigger than that of the shallow shell.
All these calculations have not been simplified in any way, and the presented results are
normal and desirable. It has been confm'ned that the buckling bifurcation equations derived in this
study are correct and exact and the general stability analysis should be made on the exact
equations basis.
Finally, comparing the torsional buckling of the cylindrical, spherical and conical
shells [4'6-s] has disclosed that 1 ) In every shell the critical stresses increase as the shell
parameters ( t / l , a , t/1 ) or ( t / R , bt/R, ~r/2 - a ) increase. 2) On the load-carrying capacity
for stability, the deep shell is stronger than the shallow shell, while the spherical and conical
shells are stronger than the cylindrical shell.
References