This document provides an assessment tool to evaluate a chapter 2 literature review. It assesses the chapter on introduction and structure, body, conceptual framework, and summary. For the body section, the review is assessed on developing a theoretical framework covering all aspects of the research problem and objectives, as well as providing arguments and counterarguments from quality sources. The conceptual framework section is assessed on how measurements will achieve the stated objectives by identifying critical constructs and variables. Overall, the literature review received a score of 20 out of 25, with justification provided for partial scores in the body and conceptual framework sections related to structure and showing how measurements will be made.
This document provides an assessment tool to evaluate a chapter 2 literature review. It assesses the chapter on introduction and structure, body, conceptual framework, and summary. For the body section, the review is assessed on developing a theoretical framework covering all aspects of the research problem and objectives, as well as providing arguments and counterarguments from quality sources. The conceptual framework section is assessed on how measurements will achieve the stated objectives by identifying critical constructs and variables. Overall, the literature review received a score of 20 out of 25, with justification provided for partial scores in the body and conceptual framework sections related to structure and showing how measurements will be made.
This document provides an assessment tool to evaluate a chapter 2 literature review. It assesses the chapter on introduction and structure, body, conceptual framework, and summary. For the body section, the review is assessed on developing a theoretical framework covering all aspects of the research problem and objectives, as well as providing arguments and counterarguments from quality sources. The conceptual framework section is assessed on how measurements will achieve the stated objectives by identifying critical constructs and variables. Overall, the literature review received a score of 20 out of 25, with justification provided for partial scores in the body and conceptual framework sections related to structure and showing how measurements will be made.
Appendix C: Assessment Tool for -Chapter 2 Literature Review
Minimum expectations Max \ Score
score award ed Justification for the score C1: Introduction- purpose of chapter stated and its structure stated Stated how the body is organised a well as the breakdown structure 5 5 The purpose of chapter is also stated C2: Body - review develops a theoretical framework that Gathered information about theoretical framework with relation to the covers: all aspects related to the research problem and research problem objectives; arguments and counter arguments from a wide The theoretical framework covers various theories and arguments to why variety of quality sources which are current, authoritative, project scope management is important relevant, accurate and balanced; a critical analysis and The author used other project management tools to validate the point and synthesis other than a regurgitation; well-structured and need for his case logical flow of discussion Relevant and quality sources of topic On page 18 of the Research Project, Time Management is introduced 10 8 without flow into it. C3: Conceptual framework –provides an indication how measurements are to be made to achieve stated objectives Does not clearly show how measurements will be made to achieve the through identifying critical constructs and variables; the objectives. review is logically structured. 5 3 The review is not properly structured C4: Chapter summary - exists and key issues are well Chapter summary exists summarised with a linkage to chapter 3. Key issues with relation to scope management addressed and its importance shown 5 4 Chapter 3 linkage not properly shown C:Total