S. K.

PURI MEMORIAL
INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT
JUSTIFIED’19

(27-29 September, 2019)

Venue: Law Centre-II, Umang Bhawan,

North Campus, University of Delhi

Official Media Partner :

Dr. Rajni Abbi Prof. V. K. Ahuja

Convener, Moot Court Committee Professor-In-charge, Law Centre-II
 ABOUT LAW CENTER-II

Law Centre-II made a humble beginning in the year 1971. It has a glorious past of 48 years. The
Centre had the privilege of being headed by the top law scholars of India, such as Prof. Upendra
Baxi, a well-known jurist and former Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi; Prof. Tahir
Mahmood, who subsequently became Chairperson, Minority Commission, Prof. A.K. Koul, who
was elevated as Vice-Chancellor, National Law University, Jodhpur and National Law University,
Ranchi, Prof. Gurdip Singh, who became Vice-Chancellor, National Law University, Lucknow,
Prof. Poonam Saxena, who is presently Vice-Chancellor, National Law University, Jodhpur and
Prof. B.T. Kaul, who is presently Chairperson, Delhi Judicial Academy. Adding strength to the
center is its well-qualified and dedicated faculty for the overall development of the students which
help them to become innovative legal professionals and public leaders.

Law Centre-II, a dynamic leader in the field of legal education, has produced many Judges,
distinguished jurists, leading advocates, ministers and some of the best teachers in the country. The
alumni included Senior Bureaucrats, Police Officers, Revenue Officers, Doctors, Engineers,
Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Politicians, etc. Some of its alumni include His
Excellency Hon'ble Governor of Arunachal Pradesh Brigadier Sh. B.D. Mishra, Hon'ble Minister of
State for Tourism Sh. K.J. Alphons, Justice B.D. Ahmed, Chief Justice, Jammu and Kashmir High
Court, Justice Kailash Gambhir, Justice S.N. Dhingra, Justice Rajiv Shakdhar, Justice V.K. Rao,
SEBI Chairman Mr. M. Damodaran, TDSAT Chairman Mr. G.D. Geha, among many more legal
luminaries.

Law Centre-II is a premier institution and is known for its qualitative teaching, research and other
co-curricular and extra-curricular activities. It is one of the best institutions in the country which
imparts three year LL.B. program. The S.K. Puri Memorial Moot Court Competition of Law Centre
-II “JUSTIFIED” is an annual activity in which teams from all parts of the country participate.

Page 2
 ABOUT
LATE SHRI S.K. PURI
SENIOR ADVOCATE
Born in 1937 in Punjab, Mr. Surinder Kumar Puri's family had lost everything they had during the
Partition of the country. Mr. S.K. Puri did his law from the University of Delhi in 1962 amidst deep
struggle and started practicing with Shri Bawa Shiv Charan, an authority on criminal and civil law in the
Tis Hazari courts from 1963.

A first generation lawyer, Mr. S.K. Puri had humble

beginnings. He commenced with a modest practice from a
small wooden bench under a tree in the Tis Hazari Courts.
In the year 1968, he shifted his practice to Delhi High
Court and with his sheer grit and determination he rose to
become a successful lawyer and was designated as a senior
advocate in 2001 by the Delhi High Court.

Apart from being a consummate lawyer, Mr. S.K. Puri was

endowed with great leadership qualities. Besides being the
joint secretary of Delhi Bar Association (DBA), Mr. S.K.
Puri was also elected as the Honorary Secretary of the
Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) for as many
as six terms between 1974-1985. He, as the leader of the
bar, has had a mass appeal and has always been perceived
as an upright, ethical and honest lawyer. A firm believer in
action, as the Honorary Secretary of DHCBA, he fought for
the rights of the lawyers and was instrumental in getting
the first Chamber Block constructed in the High Court of
Delhi.

Mr. S.K. Puri was also an avid Reader and a quick learner.
Having been bestowed with a photographic memory, he had the unique ability to retain each and every
word of a document and was able to recite the exact word or sentence used in a particular para or context
of a document. Often referred as "Ready Reckoner", he was blessed with amazing sensitivity and an
ability to share knowledge.

A brilliant lawyer in every possible way, Mr. S.K. Puri had built a reputation for his gentle but incite
cross examination skills which brought the toughest of witnesses to their knees. Mr. S.K. Puri has always
reiterated and stressed on 3Ps of practice - Preparation, Presence and Perseverance and his charisma as a
lawyer, from drafting or preparation to presentation of a case were unparalleled and unmatched.

The illustrious son of Late Shri S. K. Puri, Mr. Sacchin Puri, who has the honour of being one of
the youngest advocates, to be designated as a Senior Advocate at Delhi High Court, and an
alumnus of Law Centre - II, University of Delhi, instituted this Moot Competition in the Year
2018, in the fond memory of his father, to provide a platform to budding legal minds to enhance
their knowledge & skills.

Page 3
 JUSTIFIED 2019
GENERAL INFORMATION
https://skpurimemorialmoot.org

1. DATE & VENUE

The Oral Rounds of S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition– Justified’19
{hereinafter called ‘the Competition’} will be held from 27th to 29th September, 2019 at Law
Centre-II, Umang Bhawan, Chhatra Marg, North Campus, University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007
India.
2. ELIGIBILITY
All students enrolled in a recognized 3 year LL.B. programme or a recognized 5 year integrated
LL.B. programme (or international equivalent), shall be eligible to participate in the Competition.
Only one team can register from a particular College or Law School for participation in the
competition.
3. TEAM COMPOSITION
Each team shall consist only of two speakers and one researcher.
A team may consist only of two members as well (both speakers).
The Organizing Committee (OC) will assign a unique team code to each team, for identification.
4. OFFICIAL LANGUAGE
The official language of the competition shall be English, for written as well as oral submissions.
5. MEMORIAL RULES
Please refer the competition website for memorial rules.
6. FORMAT OF THE COMPETITION
The Moot competition shall consist of Preliminary Rounds, Quarter Final Rounds, Semi-Final
Round and the Final Round. Registration, Orientation, Draw of Lots and Memorial Exchange will
be held on 27th September 2019, and the teams are requested to kindly report latest by 2.00 pm at
the Venue. The OC retains the right to draw on behalf of any team/s, if the team/s is/are not present
during registration. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 must remain the same throughout the competition.
Please refer the competition website for further details.

Competition Website: https://skpurimemorialmoot.org

Page 4
 JUSTIFIED 2019
REGISTRATION

Registration:
a. The “soft copy” of the duly filled registration form along with scanned copy of Demand Draft should
be sent, on or before 07th August, 2019 via email to skpm.justified19@gmail.com.
Teams must submit a Demand Draft of INR 3000/- (in case of a National team), and USD 100/- (in case
of an International team), drawn in the name of “Registrar, University of Delhi, Delhi”, payable at
Delhi, India.
b. The Demand Draft along with the hard copy of the duly filled Registration form shall reach on or
before 12th August, 2019 at the address mentioned below:
Prof. V. K. Ahuja
Professor-In-Charge, Law Centre-II
Room No. 103, First Floor,
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
University of Delhi,
Delhi – 100007,
India

ANNEXURE - I
i) Duly filled Registration Form
ii) Participant Details/Bona fide Students Certificate
iii) Demand Draft for registration fee
iv) Travel Itinerary

Please note that incomplete registration forms will not be accepted.

The teams successfully registering as aforesaid will be provided a Unique Team Code (UTC). Once the
teams have been provided the UTC, the said code will have to be mentioned by the teams in all future
communication(s) with the Organizing Committee (OC). Please note that apart from the UTC, the
names or logos of their Colleges, Universities or Law Schools shall not be mentioned anywhere in
any communication(s) addressed to the OC.

No change in the names of the participants shall be permitted, unless the same has been communicated to
the OC, a week prior to the event, in exceptional circumstances only, after due proof has been attached
by the participating college.

Page 5
 JUSTIFIED 2019
AWARDS

# Category Trophy Cash Prize

1. Winning Team Rs. 35,000/-

2. Runners Up Rs. 25,000/-

3. Best Memorial Rs. 15,000/-

4. Second Best Memorial Rs. 10,000/-

5. Best Researcher Rs. 15,000/-

6. Second Best Researcher Rs. 10,000/-

7. Best Speaker Rs. 15,000/-

8. Second Best Speaker Rs. 10,000/-

Page 6
 IMPORTANT DATES

S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition– Justified’19

(27th to 29th September, 2019)

E-MAIL ID/
SCHEDULE LAST DATE
POSTAL ADDRESS
Submission of Registration form and
07th August, 2019 skpm.justified19@gmail.com
DD (Soft Copy Only)

Clarifications on the Moot Problem 10th August, 2019 skpm.justified19@gmail.com

Prof. V. K. Ahuja
Professor-In-Charge, Law Centre-II

Demand Draft of Registration Fee Room No. 103, First Floor,

(Original) Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
12th August, 2019
+ Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
Registration Form (Hard Copy) University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India

Soft Copies of the Memorials 10th September, 2019 skpm.justified19@gmail.com

Prof. V. K. Ahuja
Professor-In-Charge, Law Centre-II
Room No. 103, First Floor,
Travel Itinerary
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
+ 15th September, 2019
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
Hard Copies of the Memorials
University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India

Official email id skpm.justified19@gmail.com

For more information, visit: https://skpurimemorialmoot.org

Page 7
 MOOT PROBLEM

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

SPECIAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE STATE OF KOSOVINA (APPLICANT)
AND THE REPUBLIC OF SAYOMA (RESPONDENT)
TO SUBMIT TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES
CONCERNING THE PAMALI REFUGEES OF BORODINA
jointly notified to the Court on 16 March 2019

Page 8
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

JOINT NOTIFICATION
ADDRESSED TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE COURT:

The Hague, 16 March 2019

On behalf of the State of Kosovina and the Republic of Sayoma, and in accordance with Article 40(1) of
the Statute of the International Court of Justice, we have the honor to transmit to you an original of the
Special Agreement for submission to the International Court of Justice of the Differences between the
Applicant and the Respondent concerning the Pamali refugees of Borodina, signed in The Hague, The
Netherlands, on the sixteenth day of March in the year two thousand nineteen.

His Excellency Nayam Niya His Excellency Homori Mono

Ambassador of the State of Kosovina Ambassador of the Republic of Sayoma
to the Kingdom of The Netherlands to the Kingdom of The Netherlands

Page 9
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

SPECIAL AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
BY THE STATE OF KOSOVINA
AND THE REPUBLIC OF SAYOMA
ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM
CONCERNING THE PAMALI REFUGEES OF BORODINA

The State of Kosovina (“the Applicant”) and the Republic of Sayoma (“the Respondent”)
(hereinafter “the Parties”);
Considering that differences have arisen between them concerning the protection of Pamali refugees of
Borodina and other related matters;
Recognizing that the Parties have been unable to settle these differences by negotiations;
Desiring further to define the issues to be submitted to the International Court of Justice (“the Court”)
for resolution;
In furtherance thereof the Parties have agreed as follows:
Article 1
The Parties submit the questions contained in the Special Agreement (together with Corrections and
Clarifications to follow) (“the Case”) to the Court pursuant to Article 40(1) of the Court’s Statute.
Article 2
It is agreed by the Parties that the State of Kosovina shall appear as Applicant and the Republic of
Sayoma as Respondent, but such agreement is without prejudice to any question of the burden of
proof.
Article 3
(a) The Court is requested to decide the Case on the basis of the rules and principles of international
law, including any applicable treaties.
(b) The Court is also requested to determine the legal consequences, including the rights and
obligations of the Parties, arising from its Judgment on the questions presented in the Case.
Article 4
(a) Procedures shall be regulated in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Official Rules of
the S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition JUSTFIED 2019.

Page 10
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

(b) The Parties request the Court to order that the written proceedings should consist of Memorials
presented by each of the Parties not later than the date set forth in the Official Schedule of the S. K.
Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition JUSTFIED 2019.
Article 5
(a) The Parties shall accept any Judgment of the Court as final and binding upon them and shall execute
it in its entirety and in good faith.
(b) Immediately after the transmission of any Judgment, the Parties shall enter into negotiations on the
modalities for its execution.

In witness whereof, the undersigned, being duly authorized, have signed the present Special
Agreement and have affixed thereto their respective seals of office.

Done in The Hague, The Netherlands, this sixteenth day of March in the year two thousand nineteen, in
triplicate in the English language.

His Excellency Nayam Niya His Excellency Homori Mono

Ambassador of the State of Kosovina Ambassador of the Republic of Sayoma
to the Kingdom of The Netherlands to the Kingdom of The Netherlands

Page 11
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

SPECIAL AGREEMENT
THE CASE CONCERNING THE PAMALI REFUGEES OF BORODINA
STATE OF KOSOVINA V. REPUBLIC OF SAYOMA

1. The state of Borodina is on the continent of Manobi. It borders with the state of Kosovina on its
north and with the State of Jakosli on its south. These States are on the west of the Pleasant Sea. On
the east of the Pleasant Sea is the continent of Maropia. Most of Manobi continent was under the
colonial rule of Maropian States till the 1950s. The process of decolonization led to the liberation of
the Manobi continent from colonialism, and by 1980s all States became independent. Because of
the long colonial rule and because of other historical reasons, all the States of Manobi lag in the
economic development and are broadly referred to as developing economies. Historically, people
belonging to different ethnicities lived in the territories which now constitute the States of
Borodina, Kosovina, and Jakosli.

2. The postcolonial state creation in Manobi did not take place in accordance with the administrative
units of the pre-colonial era. It primarily followed colonial administrative units. This was the course
through which Borodina came into existence. As a result, the ethnic composition of the population
and governance of the pre-colonial time was not followed. In all of Manobi, pre-colonial
administration was predominantly based on ethnic, linguistic and socially cohesive units. Colonial
administration did not strictly follow this system and adopted their own scheme of geographical
units, which was more in tune with their economic exploitation and political subjugation of the
colonies. The post-colonial state formation mostly followed the colonial geographical units.
Consequently, Borodina’s population consists of multiple ethnic identities. While multiple ethnic
identities themselves symbolize social diversity of society, representation in the political sphere
always remains a challenge in general in such societies, and Borodina is not an exception. People
belonging to Tomu ethnicity constitute 60 percent of the Borodina population. Pamali ethnic people
constitute 25 percent, Kohila ethnic people constitute another 10 percent, and other ethnic groups
constitute remaining five percent. For administrative purposes, Borodina is divided into three
provinces. These are Eastern Province, Western Province, and Northern Province.

Page 12
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

3. After attaining independence from colonialism in 1968, Borodina adopted representative

constitutional democracy as the form of governance. Despite criticism on the fairness and
transparency in the electoral system, elections are held periodically to elect successive
governments. However, Pamalis and Kohilas feel that they are not adequately represented in the
political processes at every Level. They observe that during the first few decades after the
independence, successive governments attempted to bring policies with a view to including the
minority ethnic groups into all walks of life. They claim that this changed significantly from 2000,
the year in which Tomu Nationalist Party (TNP) won the elections and took over the power. Since
then TNP has been winning the elections consecutively. Pamali and Kohila ethnic leaders argue that
TNP led governments have been consistently resorting to anti-minority policies in Borodina.

4. In May 2016, TNP led government brought the legislation to do away with the preferential
treatment provided to ethnic minorities in educational institutions. The preferential treatment
involved earmarking of 10 percent seats in government-run higher educational institutions. This
added to the already existing resentment among the minority groups. Particularly, Pamalis felt that
this action by the government would affect them adversely and would have long term implications
to all the minority communities in Borodina. However, the government of Borodina clarified that
the legislation incorporating preferential treatment to minorities was made in 1973 to provide
adequate representation to them in the field of education as it was found that they were
underrepresented then. Nevertheless, the government informed, a recent government survey
shows that all the minority groups were adequately represented in education and employment at
every level. However, the government has not revealed any data to substantiate its assertion.

5. On 1 June 2016, Pamali community leaders gave a call for a nationwide protest to be observed on
10 June 2016. Borodina witnessed nationwide protests on 10 June 2016. Protests were
overwhelmingly successful in the Eastern Province where the majority of the Pamalis live. Media
reported that there was a large scale mobilization of people of all ethnic minorities. Following
months have witnessed active mobilization of the ethnic minorities by the respective community
leaders. Borodina Minority Front (BMF) was formed in October 2016. All the ethnic minorities are
represented in it. BMF declared that they would democratically fight for the equal treatment of all
people in Borodina. They demanded the government that it should do away with all discriminatory
policies and prevent all forms of discrimination. However, the media reported that there were
differences of opinion in the BMF on the modes of struggle to be adopted.

Page 13
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

6. Violent protests erupted in November 2016. On the night of 30 November 2016, government offices
and property were attacked at several places. The transport system was specifically targeted. On 2
December 2016, a press note was released to the media with the name Pamali Liberation Front
(PLF). PLF claimed responsibility for the attacks of 30 November 2016. The press note stated that
the PLF would fight for equality of Pamalis and other ethnic minorities with Tomus. If that is not
facilitated by the government, they will fight for the ultimate goal of forming a State of Pamali Land.
The press note asserted that all the Pamali people were supporting the PLF agenda. It also sought
solidarity from all the minority ethnic groups in Borodina. The press release also underlined that
they resort to all means to achieve their objective. It emphasized that they had the support of the
neighboring States.

7. The interior minister of Borodina responded to this in a media meet on 15 December 2016. He
stated that the government would take all necessary measures to maintain law and order in
Borodina. They would deal sternly with all those who disrupt the peace and tranquility. He said the
PLF is formed to disrupt the peace and to create hatred among different ethnic groups. He appealed
to people not to allow any divisive forces to disturb the cordial relations among the people in
Borodina. Soon after that, police forces started arresting supporters of the PLF. It was reported by
the media that by the end of January 2017 more than 3000 Pamali people were arrested. Many
were booked under the Anti-Terrorism Law of 2015. The interior minister explained that all the
arrests were being made in accordance with the law and all those arrested would be dealt with in
compliance with all the procedural guarantees.

8. This created a sense of insecurity among ordinary Pamalis. While the police continued to arrest
those suspected of supporting the PLF, those who claimed to belong to the PLF continued targeting
government offices and property. Meanwhile, several cultural and social organizations of Tomu
ethnicity started organizing gatherings with a view to supporting the government. This added to the
already existing sense of insecurity among Pamalis. The media reported that the PLF is trying to
gather support from outside Borodina. PLF started targeting police and paramilitary forces of
Borodina. In March 2017, it was reported in the media that 33 police and paramilitary forces lost
lives. The government also claimed that 54 PLF cadres were killed in the anti-PLF operations. This
aggravated the sense of fear among the Pamalis.

Page 14
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

9. Pamalis are mainly concentrated in the Eastern Province which is on the coast of the Pleasant Sea.
Pamalis constitute 42 percent population of the Eastern Province. PLF claimed that 25 percent of
the Eastern Province came under their control. The area that is claimed to be under the control of
the PLF is mainly covered with forest. Media reported in April 2017 that a large number of people
was moving in different directions from the conflict areas, particularly from the Eastern Province of
Borodina. Some moved to safer places in other provinces of Borodina. As the conflict between the
government forces and the PLF intensified in the Eastern Province and adjoining areas, normal life
of the people got affected. Security forces increased their activities, and a large number of people
were arrested and sent to prisons located in other parts of Borodina. Media reported that people
were experiencing a sense of fear and were concerned about their safety.

10. In the first week of May 2017, thousands of Pamalis cross into Jakosli. Jakosli also has a mixed
ethnic composition, and Pamalis constitute 35 percent of its population. Jakosli government reacted
quickly to the inflow of Pamalis from Borodina by creating temporary camps with necessary food
supplies. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) started its operations with
humanitarian relief. By the end of May 2017, it was estimated that more than 200000 Pamalis of
Borodina were residing in the camps in Jakosli. All the camps in Jakosli were established just next to
the border with Borodina. Despite Jakosli government's positive response to the inflow of Borodina
people and the work of the humanitarian organizations, the condition of camps was reported to be
deplorable. Media reported the paucity of food supply and sanitary amenities. These conditions
discouraged the fleeing Pamalis of Borodina from entering into Jakosli. Thus, the fleeing Pamali
people, instead of approaching the Jakosli border, started moving towards the Pleasant Sea coast
and from there to Kosovina through the sea route. Though a few thousand people could reach
Kosovina, they soon avoided that route to escape from the coast guard personnel of Borodina. It
was reported that several boats carrying Pamali people were sent back to Borodina coast by the
Borodina coast guard.

Page 15
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

11. This situation forced the people to move towards Maropian continent. Reaching Maropian
continent would require them to cross the Pleasant Sea. The manageable destination in Maropia
continent is the Republic of Sayoma. It was reported that the people of Pamali ethnicity from
Borodina were reaching the coast at night to take boats and cross the sea to reach Sayoma. Sayoma
government stated that it had received more than 5000 people of Borodina in the month of June
2017. Borodina said it would comply with its obligations under international law and would take
every measure to prevent illegal migration. Sayoma's other neighbouring states Vania, Jowami, and
Saro also received people from Borodina. It is estimated that the other three States together
received around 4000 Borodina people. On 5 July 2017, these four States enter into a written
Understanding on maritime security. The understanding clearly states that there would be
coordinated activities involving security measures in the Pleasant Sea, mainly targeting illegal
migration. Understanding further states that, being parties to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its
Protocol, they would comply with all the obligations under international law. However, they would
take every measure to prevent illegal entry into their territories. Understanding further states that
the four States would coordinate their activities over the sea in preventing illegal entry of people.

12. Conflict in Borodina intensifies during the month of August 2017. Security forces of Borodina further
step up their military activities in the territory which was being controlled by the PLF in the Eastern
Province. This led many civilians to move from their locations for safer places. Jakosli, though did
not stop people from entering into its territory, however, expressed its inability to bear the burden
and requested the international community to extend the humanitarian help to the fleeing people
of Borodina. Estimates show that more than 400000 Borodina people are hosted by Jakosli. As the
possibility of getting safe havens in Jakosli was becoming difficult, movement of the Pamali people
of Borodina increased in large numbers across the Pleasant Sea to reach Sayoma.

13. Sayoma, in coordination with other three coastal States, increased its coast guard surveillance as
they concluded in their Understanding. It is reported that more than 20000 Borodina people were
interdicted in a period of four months from September to December 2017. It is suspected that many
people approached the smugglers to facilitate their movement towards safety. On 5 January 2018,
the foreign minister of Sayoma, along with the foreign ministers of Vania, Jowami, and Saro issued a
press statement in Molua, capital of Sayoma. The press statement stated that all the measures
undertaken by Sayoma in cooperation with other coastal States were in accordance with their
international legal obligations. Their security measures in the high seas of the Pleasant Sea were
very much within the applicable legal framework.

Page 16
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

14. As a result of the security measures by Sayoma and its neighboring States, the movement of fleeing
people on the Pleasant Sea took a different turn. Most of the people who were interdicted on the
high seas started moving towards northwest on the Pleasant Sea and Reached Kosovina. The inflow
of Borodina people increased into Kosovina. By the end of February 2018, Kosovina announced that
90000 Borodina people entered Kosovina. Similar to Jakosli, Kosovina established makeshift
arrangements to accommodate all the refugees. Kosovina sought the intervention of the
international community. The prime minister of Kosovina addressed the media on 1 March 2018.
While appealing for the humanitarian relief, he alleged that Sayoma was violating its obligations
under international law by preventing the asylum seekers from entering into its territory by
resorting to interdiction in the high seas. He appealed to the international community to use their
good offices to convince Sayoma to respect its obligations in accordance with international law.

15. As the intensity of the conflict increased in Borodina, more and more Pamali people started moving
for safer places. With the increased movement of people, security surveillance over the sea also
increased mainly by the Maropian States. While Pamali people of Borodina continue to move
towards the shores of Maropia, their movement towards Maropian continent has been drastically
restricted. On 25 March 2018, media prominently reported in Borodina, Sayona, and other
neighboring countries that more than 200 people drowned in the Pleasant Sea on the night of 23
March 2018. It was reported that all of them were Pamalis from the Eastern Province of Borodina. It
was also reported that they were proceeding to reach Sayona. As they found that the movement of
people was being restricted, they approached the smugglers and were promised to be taken to the
shores of Maropia safely. The boat they were traveling was filled beyond its capacity. It was
suspected that there were no survivors of the tragedy. This incident drew the attention of the
international community. World leaders appealed to the concerned States to address the situation
and prevent further loss of lives. A strong opinion emerged that there was a need for humanitarian
approach to prevent future such incidents.

16. Kosovina and Jakosli ministers of foreign affairs blamed the Maropian States for their security-
centric approach to what is essentially a humanitarian crisis. They demanded that Maropian States
should change their policy towards refugees and stop their border control measures. Despite safety
issues involved in crossing the sea over unsafe boats, Pamali people continued to venture to reach
the Maropian coast. Sayona and other Maropian coastal States insisted that their security measures
were very much in accordance with international law and they were taking these measures to
prevent the acts of terrorism and illegal economic migration.

Page 17
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

17. Meanwhile, Maropian Human Rights Alert (MHRA), a non-profit human rights organization released
a report blaming the Maropian coastal States, particularly Sayoma, for resorting to stringent
security measures over the sea, which is resulting in the prevention of refugees from reaching their
territory. The MHRA stated that their measures were in clear violation of the principle of non-
refoulement. The MHRA report also said that Borodina security forces were indiscriminately
targeting Pamalis in their actions to curb the activities of the PLF. As a result, many innocent
Pamalis are either being arbitrarily arrested or losing their lives. The report said that these actions
by the Borodina security forces are in clear violation of international humanitarian law and human
rights law obligations of Borodina.

18. On 15 May 2018, at the initiative of the Manobi Cooperation Union (MCU) and the Maropian
Economic Union (MEU), a meeting was convened in Molua to discuss the issue. The meeting was
attended by the foreign ministers of Borodina, Jakosli, Jowami, Kosovina, Saro, Sayoma, Vania, and
the Secretaries-General of the MCU and MEU. The Maropian States felt that Borodina has to take
measures to end the conflict on its territory as soon as possible which is the root cause for the
movement of refugees. The Maropian States defended the security measures they were
undertaking in their territorial waters as well as on the high sea as in accordance with international
law.

19. Kosovina stated that the security measures that were being implemented by the Maropain States
on the high sea of the Pleasant Sea are contrary to international law and clearly violate the principle
of non-refoulement. Kosovina minister was of the view that though they were willing to receive
refugees, they see that the refugees were reaching their territory because of the actions of Sayoma
and the other Maropian States which were contrary to their international law obligations. The
opinion of the participating States at the meeting was clearly divided. They could not agree on the
measures to be taken by each participating State. At the end of the ministerial level meeting, with
the intervention of the Secretaries-General of the MCU and MEU, it was decided that the dispute
over the nature of legal obligations should be referred to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Accordingly, an agreement would be reached between Kosovina and Sayoma referring the matter
to the ICJ.

20. Accordingly, Kosovina and Sayoma enter into this special agreement on 16 March 2019 and submit
the same to the International Court of Justice in accordance with Article 40(1) of the Statute of the
Court. It is agreed in the special agreement that Kosovina would act as the Applicant and Sayoma as
the Respondent.

Page 18
 MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

Accordingly,

21. Kosovina requests the Court to adjudge and declare that:

a) Sayoma has an obligation under international law to provide protection to all those Pamali refugees
from Borodina, who seek its protection;
b) Sayoma’s measures interdicting the Pamali refugees from Borodina on the Pleasant Sea are in
violation of its obligations under international law, specifically Convention Relating to the Status of
Refugees of 1951 and its Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1967, the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
of 1982 and under other relevant international laws.

22. Sayoma requests the Court to adjudge and declare that:

a) Sayoma has an obligation under international law to provide protection to all those Pamali refugees
from Borodina, who fall under its jurisdiction;
b) Sayoma’s measures interdicting the Pamali refugees from Borodina on the Pleasant Sea are not in
violation of its obligations under international law, and are very much in accordance with the
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and its Protocol Relating to the Status of
Refugees of 1967, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, Convention
against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 and under other relevant international laws.

23. Some of the relevant treaties to which Kosovina and Sayoma are parties are: Convention Relating to
the Status of Refugees of 1951 and the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1967,
International Covenant on Civil Political Rights of 1966, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea of 1982,Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime
Navigation (SUA) of 1988,and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969.

Page 19
MOOT PROBLEM
(CONTINUED)

Page 20
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

INVITATION
LAW CENTRE- II
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

1. DATE & VENUE

The Oral Rounds of S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition– Justified’19
{hereinafter called ‘the Competition’} will be held from 27th to 29th September, 2019 at Law
Centre-II, Umang Bhawan, Chhatra Marg, North Campus, University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007
India.

2. ELIGIBILITY
All students enrolled in a recognized 3 year LL.B. programme or a recognized 5 year integrated
LL.B. programme (or international equivalent), shall be eligible to participate in the Competition.

Only one team can register from a particular College or Law School for participation in the
competition.

3. TEAM COMPOSITION
Each team shall consist only of two speakers and one researcher.
A team may consist only of two members as well (both speakers).
The Organising Committee (OC) will assign a unique team code to each team, for identification.

4. OFFICIAL LANGUAGE
The official language of the competition shall be English, for written as well as oral submissions.

Page 1 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

5. REGISTRATION
a.The “soft copy” of the duly filled registration form along with Scanned copy of Demand Draft ,
shall be sent on or before 07thAugust, 2019 via email to skpm.justified19@gmail.com.
Teams must submit a Demand Draft of INR 3000/- (in case of a National team), and USD 100/-
(in case of an International team), drawn in the name of “Registrar, University of Delhi, Delhi”,
payable at Delhi, India.
b. The demand Draft along with the hard copy of the duly filled Registration form shall reach on
or before 12th August, 2019 at the address mentioned below, .

Dr. V. K. Ahuja
In-Charge, Law Centre-II
Room No. 103, First Floor,
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India

ANNEXURE - I
(i). Duly filled Registration Form
(ii). Participant Details/Bona fide Students Certificate.
(iii). Demand Draft for registration fee.
(iv). Travel Itinerary.

Please note that incomplete registration forms will not be accepted.

c. The teams successfully registering as aforesaid will be provided a Unique Team Code [UTC].
Once the teams have been provided the UTC, the said code will have to be mentioned by the
teams in all future communication(s) with the OC. Please note that apart from the UTC, the
names or logos of their Colleges, Universities or Law Schools shall not be mentioned
anywhere in any communication(s) addressed to the OC.

d. No change in the names of the participants shall be permitted, unless the same has been
communicated to the OC, a week prior to the event, in exceptional circumstances only, after
due proof has been attached by the participating college.

Page 2 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

6. QUALIFICATION FOR ORAL ROUNDS

a. The soft copies of the memorials must be submitted by 10thSeptember, 2019 to

skpm.justified19@gmail.com

b. Teams shall be required to submit the hard copies of the memorials by 15thSeptember, 2019
(details given below).

c. All the registered teams fulfilling the above conditions, are eligible to participate in oral
rounds.

7. MEMORIAL RULES
a. Teams may raise grounds of challenge other than those indicated in the Statement of Facts.

b. Each team must prepare memorials for both parties to the dispute.

c. Once the memorials have been submitted, no revision, supplements or additions will be
allowed. In case the contents of the soft copy and the hard copy of the memorials are found
to be different, the team shall be disqualified.

d. The teams may seek clarifications on the moot problem till 10thAugust, 2019, after which
no such request shall be entertained.

e. All teams shall send one soft copy of the memorials in .pdf format as well as .docx format
(compatible with Windows) to skpm.justified19@gmail.com on or before 11:59 PM,
10thSeptember, 2019 with the subject line as ‘Memorials for <Team Code>’. All four files
(two .docx and two .pdf) should be submitted through a single mail.

e. 5 sets of hard copies of memorials (5 Petitioner’s and 5 Respondent’s memorials) of the

qualifying teams, should reach the OC by 15thSeptember, 2019, addressed to :

Page 3 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

Dr. V. K. Ahuja
In-Charge, Law Centre - II
Room No. 103, First Floor,
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India

f. Apart from the UTC, the names of the participants or the names or logos of the Colleges,
Universities or Law Schools shall not be mentioned anywhere in the memorials submitted
by the participants.

g. All memorials submitted must conform to the following requirements and a team will attract
negative marking for failure to keep within the limitations as described below :

(i) Memorials must be printed on one side of A-4 size paper with black ink and must be neatly
bound.

(ii) The font of the body of the Memorial must be Times New Roman, size 12, with 1.5 line
spacing and the font-size of footnotes/endnotes, if any, must not be less than size 10. A uniform
method of citation of authorities must be followed.

(iii) Each page must have a margin of at least an inch on all sides.

(iv) The Memorial should not exceed 25 typed pages (not including the Cover Page) and shall at
least consist of the following parts –
• Cover Page – [coloured blue for Petitioner, and red for Respondent]
• Table of Contents
• Index of Authorities
• Statement of Facts (not exceeding 2 pages)
• Issues Raised
• Summary of Arguments (not exceeding 2 pages)
• Arguments Advanced
Page 4 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

• Prayer

(v). The Cover Page of each memorial must contain only the following information -
• The Team Code in the upper right corner of each memorial.
• The name of the Competition
• The name of the forum resolving the dispute.
• The Cause Title
• The Party for which the Memorial is prepared

h. A memorial once submitted will be considered as final, and cannot be revised.

Speaking footnotes or endnotes are not allowed.

8. PENALTIES

Any memorial violating any of the specifications mentioned above will be penalized according to
the following scheme:

S. No. Criterion Penalty (each side)

(-) 1 mark each, for every

1. Late submission of Memorials hour after the deadline

2. Exceeding the prescribed page limit (-) 1 mark per extra page

Not following the prescribed format (-) 0.5 mark per specification
3. per page
4. Submitting memorials in multiple emails (-) 1 mark

5. Speaking footnote or endnote (-) 0.5 mark per footnote

Page 5 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

9. SCORING CRITERIA FOR THE MEMORIALS

The marks distribution for the memorials shall be as follows:

S. No. Criterion Marks

1. Application of Facts 25 marks

2. Reasoning 25 marks

3. Use of Authorities and Precedent 20 marks

4. Understanding Law and Procedure 20 marks

5. Presentation 10 marks

NOTE : The hard copies must be exact replicas of the soft copies. Non-compliance with this
rule would entail disqualification.

10. ANONYMITY
a. There should be no indication of the institution which the team represents, at any time and in
any manner, including, but not limited to, wearing any identifying items (such as college
clothing, ties, patches, or pins) or carrying identifying material (such as books with a college
logo or college seal etc.) or disclosure of the names of the team members to the Judges, for the
entire duration of the Moot Court Competition.

b. The violation of this rule will cause severe penalty, which may involve disqualification, as
determined by the OC.

11. FORMAT OF THE COMPETITION

The Moot competition shall consist of Preliminary Rounds, Quarter Final Rounds, Semi-Final
Round and the Final Round
Page 6 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

Registration, Orientation, Draw of Lots and Memorial Exchange will be held on 27th September,
2019, and the teams are requested to kindly report latest by 2.00 pm at the Venue. The OC
retains the right to draw on behalf of any team/s, if the team/s is/are not present during
registration.
Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 must remain the same throughout the competition.

a.Preliminary Round
The Preliminary Rounds will be held on 28th September, 2019. During the Preliminary Rounds,
each team shall have to argue once for the Applicant and once for the Respondent.

Top 8 teams shall qualify for the Quarter Final rounds. The qualification will be based on:
Total Aggregate Score in both the preliminary rounds. The top 8 teams with highest aggregate
score in both preliminary rounds, will qualify for the next round. The aggregate score of a team
shall be computed as the total of - Oral Score of Speaker 1 and Oral Score of Speaker 2, in both
the Preliminary Rounds.

In case of a tie in score, team with more number of wins in preliminary rounds will qualify for
the next round.

Further, in case of a tie in score, as well as in number of wins, memorial marks of two teams will
be considered.

The Best Advocate and the Second-Best Advocate will be decided on the basis of the scores of
the Preliminary rounds.

b. Quarter Final Round :

Quarter Final Rounds shall also take place on 28th September, 2019.
The teams will be provided their opponent's memorial after the declaration of Preliminary Round
results and the draw of lots for the Quarter Final Round.
Quarter Final Round shall be knockout round.

The Winners of the Quarter Final shall advance to the Semi Final Round.
c. Semi Final Round
The Semi Final Round shall be held on 29th September, 2019.

Page 7 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

Semi Final Round shall be knockout round.

d. Final Round
The Final Round shall be held on 29th September, 2019.
Final Round shall be knockout round. The Winner of the Final Round shall be declared the
Winner of the Competition.

12. RESEARCHER TEST

A Researcher Test consisting of subjective and objective type questions will be held on 28th
September 2019. The test will comprise of questions relating to the problem, both legal and
factual. The duration of the test will be a minimum of 45 minutes and a maximum of 1 hour. No
hand written or printed material/books/manuals/electronic devices etc. will be allowed during the
test. Any participant found using any unfair means during the test, will be disqualified
immediately.
NOTE: All the Participants will get participation certificates only during the Valedictory
Ceremony on 29th September 2019. No Certificates shall be couriered/ posted after the
event.

13. TIME LIMIT & OTHER INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ORAL ROUNDS
a. Each team would be given 30 minutes to present their oral arguments, subject to a maximum
of 20 minutes per Speaker in the Preliminary Rounds and the Quarter Final Rounds. This shall
include the pleadings and any rebuttal time. For the Semi Final and Final Rounds, each team
would get 45 minutes, subject to a maximum of 25 minutes per Speaker.

b. Judges, at their discretion, may extend the time limit for the oral arguments upto a
maximum of 5 minutes per team.

c. Rebuttal would be allowed only to the Petitioner. At the commencement of each round, the
team shall notify the Court Master as to the division of time between the 2 speakers (including
the time for rebuttal).
e. Teams will be provided with their opponent team’s memorials after the conclusion of draw of
lots.Memorials must be returned to the Court Masters without any markings, immediately after
the conclusion of the rounds.
f. During the Oral Rounds, communication between the members of a team shall be allowed,
however, the same must be in a written form and through Court Masters only.
Page 8 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

g. The participating teams are not allowed to carry or use any electronic device, including (but
not limited to), laptops, tablet computers, mobile phones, smart/digital watches etc. in the court
room during the course of the round, including when the opposite team is addressing arguments.
In case a member of a team is found using any electronic device during the Oral Rounds, the
team shall invite a severe penalty which may include disqualification. Teams are therefore
advised to ensure that the delivery of their oral arguments is not dependent on electronic devices.

h. Every form of scouting is strictly prohibited and shall cause a disqualification of the team from
the Competition. The decision of the OC shall be final in this regard.

i.. Any reference to identity of a team’s institution or individual team members, during oral
arguments may lead to disqualification of the team.

j. If a team scheduled to take part in a round does not appear within 10 minutes of the scheduled
time, the other team shall be allowed to submit ex-parte.

14. SCORING CRITERIA FOR ORAL ROUNDS

S. No. Criterion Marks

1. Response to Questions and Articulation 25 marks

2. Reasoning in the Application of Principles 25 marks

3. Use of Authorities and Precedents 20 marks

4. Application of Facts 20 marks

5. Advocacy Skills, Court Craft and Demeanour 10 marks

15. AWARDS
Awards will be distributed in the following categories:
Page 9 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

a. Winner & Runner-up

The Team which wins the final round will be declared the ‘Winner of the Competition’ and will
get an amount of ₹ 35,000/- along with a trophy.

The team which secures the second place will get the ‘Runners-up’ title and ₹ 25,000/- along
with a trophy.

b. Best Memorial & Second Best Memorial

Team with the highest memorial score (aggregate) will get the ‘Best Memorial’ prize of ₹
15,000/- along with a trophy.

Team with the second highest memorial score (aggregate) will get the ‘Second Best Memorial’
prize of ₹ 10,000/- along with a trophy.

d. Best Researcher & Second Best Researcher

Cash prize of ₹ 15,000/- and ₹ 10,000/- respectively, along with a trophy.

e. Best Speaker
Cash prize of ₹ 15,000/- along with a trophy.

f. Second Best Speaker

Cash prize of ₹ 10,000/- along with a trophy.

16. ACCOMMODATION
The Organizers shall provide the accommodation and local transport (from the place of
accommodation to the venue for the competition) only to the outstation and international teams.

The accommodation will be provided from 26th September (Standard check-in time) till 30th
September, 2019 (Standard check-out time) to the international teams and from 27th September
(Standard check-in time) till 30th September, 2019 (Standard check-out time) to the outstation
national teams.

Page 10 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

17. CODE OF CONDUCT

A violation of the prescribed Code of Conduct will invite sanctions which will be decided by the
OC ;
a. Teams are expected to behave with other team members and the Judges/Organisers/
Volunteers in a dignified manner.

b. Teams should not attempt to influence Judges/ Organisers in any manner.

c. Participants are expected to maintain the decorum in the Court during the Competition and to
conduct themselves in a manner befitting the legal profession.

d. The teams should not engage in any form of unethical, unprofessional and wrongful conduct
during the entire period of the Competition.

e. Participants should not indulge in the consumption/carrying of drugs/ alcohol/ arms or

ammunitions/ immoral/ illegal activity or any other form(s) of taste/addiction during the course
of the Competition.

f. It is mandatory for all participants to carry with them, their photo identity cards issued by their
respective colleges/institutes AND any other valid Government photo identity card.The OC and
the Moot Court Society, Law Centre-II retains the right to check these at any time during the
Competition.

g. Participating teams should carry with them the required study or reference materials for their
own use during the oral rounds of the Competition.

h. The participants shall strictly follow a Formal Dress Code, during the entire duration of the
competition.

For Women : Indian formals - White/black salwar-suit/kurta along with black blazer and black
footwear OR western formals - white shirt and black trousers/skirt along with black blazer and
black shoes.

For Men : Western formals - white shirt and black trousers along with black tie, black blazer and
black shoes.

Page 11 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

18. RIGHTS OVER THE MEMORIALS

a. Upon completion of the Competition, the OC shall reserve the exclusive right to use the
memorials submitted to them, as they deem appropriate. The copyright over the memorials
submitted for participation in the Competition is assigned by the participants and shall also vest
completely and fully in Law Centre- II, Delhi.

b. The participants shall certify in writing the originality of materials contained therein and shall
be responsible for any claim(s) or dispute(s) arising out of the further use and exhibition of these
materials.

c. Further use and exhibition of these materials, electronically or otherwise, shall be the exclusive
right of Law Centre- II, Delhi, and they shall not be responsible for any liability to any person for
any loss caused by errors or omissions in this collection of information, or for the accuracy,
completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in these materials.

d. Distribution of these materials on affiliated websites does not constitute consent to any use of
this material for commercial redistribution either via the Internet or using some other form of
hypertext distribution.

19. DISCLAIMER

The Material in the Moot Court proposition is not intended to and does not attempt to
resemble any incident or any person living or dead. All material in the problem is fictitious
and any resemblance to any incident or person, if any, is not intended, but merely co-
incidental.

20. INTERPRETATION OF THE RULES AND EXEMPLARY POWER CLAUSE

a.. The OC’s decision as regards the interpretation of rules or any other matter related to the
competition will be final.

Page 12 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

b. If there is any situation, which is not contemplated in the rules, the OC’s decision on the
same shall be final.

c. The OC reserves the right to vary, alter, modify, or repeal any of the above Rules if so
required, and as they may deem appropriate, at any time before and/or during the Competition.

d. Any dispute arising in the moot court rooms during the rounds would be at the discretion of
the Judges/OC.

e. In any kind of conflict, the decision of the OC shall be final.

21. ORGANISING COMMITTEE DETAILS:

Competition Administrator:
Dr. V. K. Ahuja In-Charge, Law Centre-II

Organizing Committee (OC)

Dr. Rajni Abbi rajniabbi@gmail.com
Head OC
Dr. Pinki Sharma Pinki_sharma2004@yahoo.co.in
Student Members Contact No.
Sunidhi +91 9643538409
Pranita Goswami +91 9643570830
Rishay Raj +91 8678086422

22. OFFICIAL EMAIL ID

Any query/clarification related to the Competition should be directed to the OC at
skpm.justified19@gmail.com

Page 13 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

ANEXURE – 1
REGISTRATION FORM

{SOFT COPY TO BE E-MAILED DURING FINAL REGISTRATION}

{HARD COPY TO BE SUBMITTED AFTER QUALIFYING FOR THE ORAL ROUNDS}

(TO BE FILLED IN BLOCK LETTERS)

COLLEGE/INSTITUTE DETAILS
Name of the Institution/
University
Postal Address

Contact No

E-Mail ID

Contact Person

Designation

Contact No

E-Mail ID

REGISTRATION FEE DETAILS

{TO BE PROVIDED AFTER QUALIFYING FOR THE ORAL ROUNDS}

DEMAND DRAFT DETAILS

DD No.:

Drawn on Bank

Date
(Please mention the Name & Mobile no. of the contact person participants and the
name of the college/institution on the reverse side of the original demand draft)

Page 14 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

PARTICIPANT DETAILS

SPEAKER 1

Name

Year &Course
Please Paste a Self-
Gender Attested Recent Passport
Size Photograph
Contact No.

Email ID

P
SPEAKER 2

Name

Year & Course

Gender

Contact No.

Email ID

RESEARCHER

Name

Year & Course

Please Paste a Self-
Gender Attested Recent Passport
Size Photograph
Contact No.

Email ID

Page 15 of 17
 S. K. PURI MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT – JUSTIFIED’19

This is to certify that the above mentioned are bona fide students of

(Name & Address of the Institution)

Name of the Head of the Institution ________________________________________

Signature & Seal of the Head of the Institution ______________________________

Date _______________

DECLARATION FORM

1. We declare that the team members participating in the Competition will abide
by all the Rules of the Competition set out and notified to us from time to time
through the period of the Competition.

2. We also declare and confirm that all the information provided in the
Registration Form is true and accurate.

3. In case of any disputes arising during the Competition, the decision of the
Organising Committee of S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court –
Justified’19 shall be final and binding, and will not be subject to any further
deliberations.

Name & Signature of Participant I .. ..

Name & Signature of Participant II ..

Name & Signature of Participant III ..

Page 16 of 17
 LAW CENTRE-II B. R. TRIKHA MEMORIAL DELHI NCR MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2019

TRAVEL ITINERARY

NOTE – PLEASE FILL THE DETAILS IN BLOCK LETTERS

Arrival Details :

Expected Time & Date of Arrival -

Mode of Transport –

De-boarding Station –

Train/Flight Name & Number - __________________________________________

Whether accommodation being provided by the organizers required or not?

_____________________________________________________________
(Valid only for outstation & international teams)

Page 17 of 17
 S. K. Puri Memorial International Moot Court Competition– Justified’19

(27th to 29th September, 2019)

SCHEDULE LAST DATE EMAIL ID/POSTAL ADDRESS

Submission of 07thAugust, 2019 skpm.justified19@gmail.com

Registration form and
DD (Soft Copy Only)

Demand Draft of 12th August, 2019 Dr. V. K. Ahuja

Registration Fee
In-Charge, Law Centre-II
(Original)
+ Room No. 103, First Floor,
Registration Form (Hard
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
Copy)
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India
Clarifications on 10thAugust, 2019 skpm.justified19@gmail.com
theMoot Problem

Soft Copies of the 10th September, skpm.justified19@gmail.com

Memorials 2019

15thSeptember, Dr. V. K. Ahuja

Travel Itinerary 2019
In-Charge, Law Centre-II
+
Hard Copies of Room No. 103, First Floor,
theMemorials
Umang Bhawan, Faculty of Law,
Chhatra Marg, North Campus,
University of Delhi
Delhi – 100007
India
Official Email Id skpm.justified19@gmail.com