Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cleveland Presentation
Cleveland Presentation
Introduction:
Content: • Background information
• Planning history and key actors (1903-present)
18th October 2022 • Planning approaches analysis
DEVP0029
• Social justice analysis
• Conclusion
2
Background info
Krumholz, H. & Equity planning
3
DEVP0029 PRACTICE2_CLEVELAND
Planning History
5
Planning history
The Erieview Plan I and II
(The Urban Renewal Plan for Downtown Cleveland)
1959 (Pei and Associates)
1961 1975
6
Planning history
Civic Vision 2000:Citywide Plan
(Cleveland City Planning Commission)
1988 1991 2020
7
Planning history
8
DEVP0029 PRACTICE2_CLEVELAND
“Equity requires that government institutions give priority attention to the goal of
promoting a wider range of choices for those Cleveland residents who have few, if
any, choices”
10
The Cleveland
Policy Plan
Content Report
• Vision: Institutions are • A 25cent fare for at least 3 • Focusing on building and • To assure all Cleveland residents
established to serve individuals years leasing low-income housing in with household responsibilities
in their pursuit of their own good residential areas instead an annual income above the
goals, also to provide wider • Fare discount for some groups of deteriorated neighborhoods. poverty level, the Commission
choices. • Improve sequence and supports the following Federal
• To encourage rehabilitation and
• Goal: Simple equity requires coverage conservation of the City’s policies:
that locally-responsible • RTA would be prohibited from existing housing stock. a) Basic allowances (payments
government institutions - with spending funds on planning or made to families with incomes
limited powers and resources - • Initiation of Federal housing
developing a downtown subsidies in the form of direct below the poverty level) should
should give first and priority subway or elevated system for vary by region of residencies
attention to the goal of cash assistance to lower-
at least 5 years income families and should be adjusted
promoting wider choices (more periodically as the cost of living
alternatives and opportunities) • Community Responsive • Housing for low-income family changes.
for those individuals and groups Transit (CRT), a door-to-door, housing should be in small-
in the City of Cleveland who dial-a-ride service would be scale, b) Benefits should not
have few, if any choices. initiated. discriminate against the
• scattered-site developments. ‘working poor’–those who work
full time but at wages below
the poverty level. 11
Analysis
Use comprehensive The approach to Set up 3-5 years plan Planning through the
research to collect achieve “Equity” for “Equity planning” discussion of various
data and identify Focusing on senior in Cleveland key actors instead of
issues groups, low-incomes, “government’s
disabled people, etc. Negotiate with the decision”
Set up goals and government and
visions to control the Provide wider range institutions for local
city’s growth of choice for people communities and
who have few vulnerable groups
Long-term plans after
The Cleveland Policy
Plan Report
12
Towards a postmodern planning (Hirt, 2005)
• A search for urbanity, urban identity, and cultural uniqueness (in lieu of
Search
the former focus on functionalism, efficiency, and rational organization
of urban forms)
Traditional urban forms • An appreciation of historic spaces; a return to traditional urban forms (in
lieu of the modernist belief in the supremacy of new forms)
• A mixing of land uses and flexible zoning (rather than strict land-use
Mixing of land uses and
segregation)
flexible zoning
• The pursuit of human-scale, pedestrian-friendly, higher density, urbane,
and compact forms (in contrast to spread-out, low-density, and auto-
Pursuit oriented forms)
13
DEVP0029 PRACTICE2_CLEVELAND
REDISTRIBUTION
allocation of material resources that people need to
REDISTRIBUTION participate in social life on equal terms by economic structure.
economic aspect
RECOGNITION
cultural recognition relates to institutionalized value
patterns that allow or deny people the social status, as well as
opportunities for achieving social esteem.
RECOGNITION REPRESENTATION
cultural aspect political aspect REPRESENTATION
how decision rules around membership and procedures can
allow or deny people equal voice in public and democratic
decision-making.
15
Redistribution dimension
Income
• From 1950 to 1980, manufacturing jobs declined by 60 percent
• Nearly 50% of Cleveland’s families ranked in the bottom third of all families in the Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Area (SMSA) in terms of income
• Critical problems are concentrated in low-income neighborhoods
“…efforts to improve the incomes of City residents address the roots of many of Cleveland problems.”
(The Cleveland Policy Plan Report, 1975)
Widespread Abandonment
Low income use of Low income &
automobile emigration
“For those who must depend upon public transit, there “Large areas of the City are rapidly deteriorating
are fewer and fewer places which can be reached, at because residents lack incomes adequate to
higher and higher fares, and with longer and longer command standard housing.”
waiting periods.” (The Cleveland Policy Plan Report, 1975)
(The Cleveland Policy Plan Report, 1975)
17
Recognition dimension Racial distribution map
Racial prejudice
1 Strong-mayor-council government
• Planners need to convince mayor, city council
• Often takes long term or even decades
(Kellymlacy, 2020) 19
Conclusion of social justice analysis
REDISTRIBUTION
Unequal resource and economic distribution
REDISTRIBUTION
economic aspect
RECOGNITION
Racial prejudice combined with cultural and social
system (City and National scale)
RECOGNITION REPRESENTATION
cultural aspect political aspect REPRESENTATION
Relatively Passive participation system
20
How Cleveland responded to social justice
• Objection focusing actions
-study definite targeted groups formulate action-oriented strategies
• Advocate, convince and oppose
• Conflicts: not all problems could be solved successfully
• Income/ transportation/ housing aspects
23