The document is a court order that modifies a previous judgment dated March 13, 2023. It notes that in the last line of paragraphs 3 and 26 of the previous judgment, "Sub Divisional Magistrate" was typed incorrectly instead of "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate". The order modifies the previous judgment by replacing "Sub Divisional Magistrate" with "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate" in those paragraphs. It declares this modifying order will be treated as part of the original March 13, 2023 judgment.
The document is a court order that modifies a previous judgment dated March 13, 2023. It notes that in the last line of paragraphs 3 and 26 of the previous judgment, "Sub Divisional Magistrate" was typed incorrectly instead of "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate". The order modifies the previous judgment by replacing "Sub Divisional Magistrate" with "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate" in those paragraphs. It declares this modifying order will be treated as part of the original March 13, 2023 judgment.
The document is a court order that modifies a previous judgment dated March 13, 2023. It notes that in the last line of paragraphs 3 and 26 of the previous judgment, "Sub Divisional Magistrate" was typed incorrectly instead of "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate". The order modifies the previous judgment by replacing "Sub Divisional Magistrate" with "Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate" in those paragraphs. It declares this modifying order will be treated as part of the original March 13, 2023 judgment.
Dr. Nishikant Dubey & others … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others … Respondents With W.P. (Cr.) No. 452 of 2022 Sandeep Kumar Dhingra … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others … Respondents With W.P. (Cr.) No. 463 of 2022 Mr. Mukesh Pathak & others … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate For the State : Ms. Surabhi, A.C. to A.A.G.-II -----
05/22.03.2023 These matters were disposed of vide judgment dated 13.03.2023. On
office note, these matters have been listed today.
It appears that in last line of paragraph 3 of the judgment dated
13.03.2023, in place of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Dumka, it has been typed as the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dumka.
Identical is the situation in last line of paragraph 26 of the said judgment. It
happened inadvertently.
Let it be read as the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Dumka in place of the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dumka.
The judgment dated 13.03.2023 is modified to the above extent.
Let this order be treated as part of the judgment dated 13.03.2023.