Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ce
ep op
Binder Kadeer: Consultation
du
tR wC
in the Company
No vie
Teacher’s Package
Do Re
Teaching Notes
Summary
This simulation can be run as either a three-party or four-party consultation exercise in skill
development. If played by three parties, one Human Resources Consultant consults
sequentially with the Manager and the Employee. If played by four parties, two Human
Resources Consultants consult one on one with the Manager and with the Employee, and then
pairs and roles are reversed, so that each player has an opportunity to play consultant and
consultee. Key lessons include the role of the consultant in:
ro y
ce
• reality testing and providing neutral feedback.
•
ep op
reframing problems.
du
• clarifying and exploring options and developing workable strategies.
tR wC
Scenario
No vie
THE COMPANY has employed Binder Kadeer for eight years, since he immigrated to the United
States from Malaysia, where he was employed in several minor managerial positions.
Management reports indicate that he is a good employee, but he has remained in customer
Do Re
field engineering services for several years without a promotion. Believing that he has been
unfairly treated, Kadeer files a complaint with THE COMPANY'S office, charging his manager, B.
Holmes, with discrimination. The case is referred to a Human Resources Consultant, with the
hope that consultation with both parties can clarify the situation and lead to problem solving.
The purpose of the simulation is for the HR Consultant to consult with and assist the parties in
managing the situation. The HR Consultant should not attempt to mediate a resolution
between the parties.
Pre-Game Discussion
This exercise was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at
Harvard Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised, or translated in whole or in part by any
means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall, Cambridge,
MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
Execution of Game
ro y
ce
ep op
Conducting the Exercise (Two Options) 60 minutes
du
tR wC
(For groups of three)
• HR Consultant then consults with Manager for 30 minutes while Employee observes.
• Each HR Consultant consults with one player (either Employee or Manager) for 30
minutes; then the two HR Consultants take the roles of Employee and Manager and
the former Employee and Manager assume the HR Consultant roles.
• Each (new) HR Consultant consults with one player (either Employee or Manager)
for 30 minutes.
You have not been asked to settle the dispute. Rather, your role is to strengthen
the capacity of managers and employees by assisting all parties in considering
their options and dealing with their feelings.
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 2
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
THE COMPANY is bound only by its policy statement (see Appendix B). Remind
the Manager and the HR Consultant to consult Appendices B and C to clarify
Kadeer's employment history and current status.
Yes. To meet the learning objectives of this case, players must stay in role.
Possible Responses:
ro y
ce
• ep op
Helping clients obtain skills necessary to resolve current and future problems on
du
their own.
tR wC
• Empowering clients by helping them obtain the information and confidence they
need to resolve their problems.
• Listening.
• Gaining an understanding of the problems and the people behind the problems.
No vie
Post-Game Debriefing
Debriefing Questions:
1. Did they achieve these outcomes? If so, how? If not, why not?
2. How did the HR Consultant's actual outcome compare with the outcome s/he
wrote down before the consultation session?
3. If participants could repeat this simulation, what would they do differently?
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 3
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
Summary of Lessons
Each party has different expectations. Holmes would like the HR Consultant to take care of
Kadeer's problem, and Kadeer would just like the situation resolved. The sequence of the
consultation, the order in which players are approached, is very important. The HR Consultant
is responsible for helping both parties equally and must make the parties aware of this. For
example, Kadeer may think that the HR Consultant will favor management and must be
convinced that this will not be the case. This involves trust-building on the part of the
Consultant. HR Consultants also need to let clients know that their role is to help clients work
out their own solutions, not to resolve their conflicts for them.
Trainers may find it useful to record expectations of each role, and to encourage HR
Consultants to identify the gaps which need to be bridged in order to develop an achievable
agreement.
ro y
ce
Debriefing Questions
ep op
du
1. (To HR Consultant:) How would you describe your role? What did you want to
tR wC
achieve?
2. (To HR Consultant:) How did you begin your consultation session?
• How did you describe your position to the client?
• Did you treat sessions with each client in the same way or differently? Why?
No vie
4. (To Holmes and Kadeer:) Did the HR Consultant gain your trust?
One role of the HR Consultant is to help clients vent emotions in order to stabilize the climate
between the two parties. Conflicts may escalate quickly if clients are not given a chance to let
off steam and ease tensions. Empathetic responses and active listening by the consultant can
facilitate this process. The consultant should avoid judging or evaluating the client's
experience. The information revealed by the client in the venting stage is important to the
consultant's understanding of his/her frame of reference.
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 4
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
In the early stages, it is often useful for HR Consultants to listen more than talk. While the
client is venting emotions, it is important to clarify points rather than to question or advise.
The HR Consultant should respond to the client's feelings as well as to the content of what s/he
is expressing and should try to understand the situation from the client's viewpoint.
Debriefing Questions:
ro y
ce
1. (To Kadeer and Holmes:) How were your feelings and emotions handled?
2. ep op
(To HR Consultant:) How did you handle Kadeer's and Holmes' feelings and
du
emotions?
tR wC
3. (To Kadeer and Holmes:) Did you feel "listened to?" How would you describe the
kind of listening you received?
4. (To HR Consultant): What did you do to de-escalate the conflict? How did you
do this?
No vie
5. (To Holmes and HR Consultant): How did the HR Consultant handle Holmes'
anger about Kadeer's going over Holmes' head to the Diversity, Equity, and
Do Re
Inclusion Office?
• Holmes is concerned that the case may threaten his or her reputation as a
competent supervisor.
• Holmes' first reaction to Kadeer's letter to the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 5
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
Once the HR Consultant understands the situation from each client's perspective, s/he may be
able to help the clients gain perspective on the situation. This can be done through reframing
the problem and providing reality testing for each client. HR Consultants can encourage clients
to think more objectively through skillful questioning and help them to see the problem in a
new light. Consultants should attempt to discover a client's underlying interests and separate
them from stated positions. Without cross-examining clients or putting them on the defensive,
consultants can help them broaden and change their perception of the problem.
Debriefing Questions:
1. Did the HR Consultant provide reality testing? How was this accomplished? (i.e.,
did this help Kadeer or Holmes to change their perception of the problem? If so,
what were the changes? Did the HR Consultant trace out the implications of
ro y
ce
Kadeer's and Holmes' actions?)
2. ep op
Did the HR Consultant try to shift the clients' perspectives from the past to the
du
future? If so, how?
tR wC
3. How did the HR Consultant make the transition from listening to problem
solving?
1. (General and Confidential Instructions:) Kadeer believes that THE COMPANY has
Do Re
The final stage of consultation involves helping clients sort out options, develop new ones, and
plan workable strategies. Helping them brainstorm options and develop strategies can expand
the range of potential solutions. Consultants must recognize that each client faces short- as
well as long-term needs and should therefore tailor their approaches to such needs. For
example, Kadeer may need immediate counseling to address family and legal issues, and long-
term assistance in planning for career advancement. HR Consultants should assess the clients'
receptiveness to various options and help them choose which ones they find most helpful.
Consider developing a strategic plan with each.
Debriefing Questions:
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 6
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
ro y
ce
• ep op
Consider sitting down with Kadeer to work things out.
du
tR wC
Overall Debriefing Questions
1. What criteria would you use to judge whether the HR Consultant did a good job?
2. How would you measure successful consultation? Consider the following
No vie
measures:
• Each client's interests were satisfied.
Do Re
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 7
Binder Kadeer: Teaching Notes
ro y
ce
ep op
du
tR wC
No vie
Do Re
PROGRAM ON NEGOTIATION AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
AN INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM TO IMPROVE THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Binder Kadeer works for THE COMPANY. He was hired eight years ago after emigrating with his
family from Malaysia. In Malaysia, he held several managerial positions with a large electronics
firm. Kadeer started on the production line at THE COMPANY and advanced, after one year, to
Customer Field Engineering Services. Since then, he has spent seven years troubleshooting and
meeting with buyers. Kadeer is a pleasant, low-key person. He smiles a lot, but rarely reveals
his true emotions; he is known among co-workers for having a very quiet demeanor.
ro y
ce
indicate that he has been doing well, and has demonstrated competence in handling technical
ep op
and service responsibilities. He has proven extremely reliable, reporting to work on time and
du
meeting all deadlines. In Kadeer's view, he has tried to maintain the same high standards as a
tR wC
spouse and parent of two children.
Over the past year, Kadeer has grown increasingly concerned about not being promoted to
Branch Manager. He entered the appropriate training sequence three years ago, but training
No vie
was discontinued last year without, as far as he knows, any reason. Five years ago, Kadeer's
supervisor was replaced by a newcomer to the firm, B. Holmes.
Do Re
Although Kadeer has never confronted supervisors directly about the issue of promotion, he
has reminded them periodically in informal conversation about how successful he has been in
meeting customer needs. In recent months Kadeer has begun to wonder whether he is a victim
of discrimination.
Three months ago, Kadeer suffered a mild stroke. While he has recuperated fully and returned
to work, he is still somewhat depressed. He has vowed to family and friends that he will seek
justice by pursuing a promotion.
Last week he approached THE COMPANY'S Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office representative
to file a discrimination charge against supervisor Holmes. Along with the other forms the
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office requested, Kadeer submitted a copy of the attached letter
This case was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at Harvard
Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised, or translated in whole or in part by
any means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall,
Cambridge, MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022
by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: General Instructions
(see Appendix A). A copy of THE COMPANY'S policy on employment discrimination is also
attached (see Appendix B).
Next Steps
The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office referred Kadeer's case to the Human Resources
Department in THE COMPANY. The HR staff members will explore this situation by consulting
with both Kadeer and Holmes.
ro y
ce
ep op
du
tR wC
No vie
Do Re
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: General Instructions
Mr. B. Holmes
Supervisor of Customer Engineering Services
THE COMPANY
10 Bellows St.
Amesly, NY 10198
I have been a loyal, committed, and competent employee for eight years. All the reports on file
indicate that I have met my obligations, including all specified deadlines. I have achieved
consistently high standards of customer satisfaction.
I am filing a discrimination complaint against you because all evidence demonstrates that you
have passed me over for promotion due to my race and ethnicity. I cite three examples.
ro y
ce
ep op
1. Five years ago, on June 12th during our monthly staff meeting, my supervisor
du
expressed interest in promoting me to Branch Manager, yet to this day I have still not been
tR wC
promoted.
2. Four years ago, from January 15th to March 1st, THE COMPANY initiated and
completed a promotion review and hiring process for Mrs. Susan Hornsby. Mrs. Hornsby first
No vie
entered THE COMPANY three years after I did. Records indicate that my performance has been
equal if not superior to hers.
Do Re
3. After completing Step One in the Branch Manager Training sequence three years ago
on October 6th, I received a notice saying that I needed additional training. But THE COMPANY
never took steps to instruct me on how to get this training. I received no follow-up procedural
material or any letter concerning what I needed to do in order to continue in the training
sequence.
The documented evidence shows quite conclusively that THE COMPANY intentionally
discriminated against me. I have fulfilled my role as an employee, but you have not met your
obligations as a supervisor.
I hope that you will now promote me to the Branch Manager position before I am forced to
pursue legal action.
Sincerely,
Binder Kadeer
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: General Instructions
THE COMPANY complies fully with Section 250 of Title XII of The Civil Rights Act. THE
COMPANY does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, age, ethnicity, or
physical disability in its practices or recruitment, screening, employment, placement,
promotion, or termination.
ro y
ce
ep op
du
tR wC
No vie
Do Re
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
PROGRAM ON NEGOTIATION AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
AN INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM TO IMPROVE THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Summary of Lessons
Each party has different expectations. Holmes would like the HR Consultant to take care of
Kadeer's problem, and Kadeer would just like the situation resolved. The HR Consultant is
responsible for helping both parties equally, and must make the parties aware of this. For
example, Kadeer may think that the HR Consultant will favor management, and must be
convinced that this will not be the case. This involves trust-building on the part of the
Consultant. HR Consultants also need to let clients know that their role is to help clients work
ro y
ce
out their own solutions. The HR Consultant should not attempt to resolve their conflicts for
them. ep op
du
2. De-escalating the Conflict
tR wC
One role of the HR Consultant is to help clients vent emotions in order to stabilize the climate
between the two parties. Conflicts may escalate quickly if clients are not given a chance to let
No vie
off steam and ease tensions. Empathetic responses and active listening by the consultant can
facilitate this process. The consultant should avoid judging or evaluating the client's
experience. The information revealed by the client in the venting stage is important to the
Do Re
This case was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at Harvard
Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised, or translated in whole or in part by any
means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall, Cambridge,
MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: Summary of Lessons
Encouraging clients to be more concrete helps them to be more specific and hence
accountable for their claims. It can also help consultants uncover certain patterns of
behavior or emotional response.
In the early stages, it is often useful for HR Consultants to listen more than talk. While the
client is venting emotions, it is important to clarify points rather than to question or advise.
The HR Consultant should respond to the client's feelings as well as to the content of what s/he
is expressing, and should try to understand the situation from the client's viewpoint.
Once the HR Consultant understands the situation from each client's perspective, s/he may be
able to help the clients gain perspective on the situation. This can be done through reframing
the problem and providing reality testing for each client. HR Consultants can encourage clients
to think more objectively through skillful questioning and help them to see the problem in a
new light. Consultants should attempt to discover a client's underlying interests and separate
them from stated positions. Without cross-examining clients or putting them on the defensive,
ro y
ce
consultants can help them broaden and change their perceptions of the problem.
ep op
du
4. Developing Options and Planning Strategies
tR wC
The final stage of consultation involves helping clients sort out options, develop new ones, and
plan workable strategies. Helping them brainstorm options and develop strategies can expand
No vie
the range of potential solutions. Consultants must recognize that each client faces short- as
well as long-term needs, and should tailor their approaches to such needs. For example,
Kadeer may need immediate counseling to address family and legal issues, and long-term
Do Re
assistance in planning for career advancement. HR Consultants should assess the clients'
receptiveness to various options and help them choose which ones they find most helpful.
Consider developing a strategic plan with each.
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
2
PROGRAM ON NEGOTIATION AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
AN INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM TO IMPROVE THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
This case has been referred to you by the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office based on a
complaint that Binder Kadeer filed against his supervisor. The Office is hoping that you can
resolve this dispute so that it doesn’t go to court.
ro y
ce
ep op
You suspect that there has been a communication problem here. Kadeer's cultural background
du
is probably a key factor in this situation. Probing his work experiences prior to coming to THE
tR wC
COMPANY may help you understand more about his concerns. You also obtained a copy of
another employee's work record for comparative purposes. Susan Hornsby's dossier for the
year she was promoted reads:
No vie
team player with outstanding leadership and management characteristics. She initiates
discussions, raises relevant issues in a timely fashion, clarifies points of disagreement
when necessary, and has developed a positive rapport with her colleagues.
How you manage the consultation is up to you. However, you may want to meet separately
with both Kadeer and Holmes. Kadeer expects to deal directly with the Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Office, so he may be suspicious of you. Try to make Kadeer and Holmes feel
comfortable. Try to persuade each that legal action is probably inadvisable in this situation. Try
to get them to explore other options.
This case was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at Harvard
Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised, or translated in whole or in part by
any means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall,
Cambridge, MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022
by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: Confidential Instructions for the HR Consultant
ro y
ce
consistently met deadlines. Kadeer indicates that he is satisfied with his position. No indication
he wants promotion. ep op
du
tR wC
Year 4: Performance review completed December 10th; No changes.
Year 5: Kadeer completed Step One of the Branch Manager Training (BMT) Sequence.
Supervisor's report: Kadeer reports he is satisfied with position. Kadeer was told he needed
No vie
training program (provided by THE COMPANY). Kadeer has not indicated he wants a
promotion. Kadeer continues to do an excellent job in the field and he remains a reliable and
consistent employee. Performance review completed December 12th.
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 2
PROGRAM ON NEGOTIATION AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
AN INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM TO IMPROVE THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
During the three weeks you were in the hospital recuperating from your stroke, you had time to
realize that over the past eight years THE COMPANY has taken advantage of you. You have not
been rewarded appropriately. Having worked diligently, you are now convinced that you have
been discriminated against.
You completed your first training sequence without receiving any negative feedback. You
received a written performance evaluation saying that you needed additional leadership
training in order to be considered for continuation in the BMT sequence. But you never
ro y
ce
received follow-up information from THE COMPANY explaining what steps you needed to take
ep op
in order to get leadership training. You have evidence that employees who have been with THE
COMPANY for fewer years than you have been promoted from below to above you. You are
du
just as qualified as they are!
tR wC
This situation has taken a toll on your family. In Malaysia, you were promoted three times for
your corporate loyalty, diligence, and respect for your superiors. Such behavior brought you
No vie
great respect and honor both at work and in your family. Because THE COMPANY has not
promoted you, your family thinks you are not meeting these standards. For this reason, your
spouse and children have begun to lose respect for you, and you think your spouse is
Do Re
considering leaving you. You are firmly convinced that you have done everything possible to
alert THE COMPANY to your interest in being promoted. And you believe that you have
completed the training successfully.
Your assumptions about promotion and job advancement may be different from the
assumptions made by others with whom you work, but you are not sure. You do not make
unnecessary conversation with your fellow employees. In Malaysia, idle chatter would indicate
that you did not take your job seriously or that you don’t care about your fellow workers' time
constraints. You also think it is unnecessary and inappropriate to pester your supervisor about
a promotion. Your supervisor is an authority figure. Constantly reminding him/her that you
want a promotion would be disrespectful and impolite, and would imply that you did not trust
his/her judgment. If you work very diligently, loyally, and skillfully in your assigned role, you
expect your supervisor to recognize your contributions and untapped capabilities. You wonder
This case was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at Harvard
Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised or translated in whole or in part by any
means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall, Cambridge,
MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: Confidential Instructions for Binder Kadeer
whether management would rather keep you where you are because of your race and
ethnicity. The thought upsets and frustrates you!
In spite of your frustration and anger, you are determined to remain polite and respectful.
When you met with the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office representative, s/he seemed
quite responsive and impressed with the detailed evidence you were able to muster regarding
your claims about discrimination.
You do not know much about this HR person assigned to your case, and you are feeling
suspicious. From what you have heard, the HR Department sometimes seems to give greater
consideration to the financial interests of THE COMPANY than to its role as an advocate for the
best interests of the employee. You are certain, though, that you want to be promoted and
have decided to take legal action if necessary (even though such a step rubs against the grain).
You want to listen for three things in your upcoming interview with the HR Consultant:
ro y
ce
• ep op
How committed is this HR Consultant to helping you? Specifically, will s/he help you
du
win, or instead just try to protect THE COMPANY?
tR wC
• Does s/he appreciate the fact that legal action is the only real weapon you have in your
fight to get the treatment you deserve?
No vie
Do Re
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 2
PROGRAM ON NEGOTIATION AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
AN INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM TO IMPROVE THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
You have been a supervisor with THE COMPANY for five years and you have worked in similar
management settings for more than 20 years. Your track record has been top-notch and you
are proud of your accomplishments. Because of your active management style, spending in
your division has always remained within budget guidelines.
You have had very few problems with your employee Binder Kadeer. Kadeer rarely complains
about anything, and you have felt no pressure from him to push his way up through the ranks –
not like some of the others who will not let you come up for air. Kadeer is very reliable. For the
ro y
past two years you have been very busy overseeing implementation of the new field-service
ce
ep op
program. You must admit that you have not paid much attention to Kadeer, aside from reading
his field reports. Kadeer knows (and COMPANY policy states) that if he wants to be promoted,
du
he has to say so.
tR wC
The letter he submitted to you last week came as a shock. Your first reaction was anger with
Kadeer – for not talking with you at all about this, and for going around you to the Diversity,
No vie
Equity, and Inclusion Office. You do not want to lose a good employee! On the other hand, you
do not need a hassle. If he wants to work things out with you, he will have to stop talking about
lawsuits!
Do Re
You have a copy of THE COMPANY'S policy on discrimination, as well as the summary of
Kadeer's employment history. You looked at the guidelines and you do not see any conceivable
basis for a charge of discrimination. You also reviewed the notes on Kadeer's employment
history and found no notation, made by you or by Kadeer's previous supervisor, indicating that
he ever asked for a promotion. Now that you think of it, you have some doubts about his
management potential. He may be just too passive to be a good supervisor.
You are concerned that this case may threaten your reputation as a competent supervisor. You
are not quite sure why HR is in the middle of this. If Kadeer has ulterior motives, you will
explore termination. Otherwise, you would just like to sit down and work things out. If HR can
do anything useful for you, it will be to explain to Kadeer that he has no basis for a lawsuit. If
Kadeer wants additional training, all he has to do is ask and you will consider his request just
This case was written by Peter Shapiro with the assistance of Lawrence Susskind and Deborah Kolb, for the Program on Negotiation at Harvard
Law School. Copies are available from the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center (TNRC), online at www.pon.org, by email:
tnrc@law.harvard.edu, or by telephone at 800-258-4406. This case may not be reproduced, revised or translated in whole or in part by any
means without the written permission of the TNRC Coordinator, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 501 Pound Hall, Cambridge,
MA 02138. Please help to preserve the usefulness of this case by keeping it confidential. Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22)
Binder Kadeer: Confidential Instructions for the Manager
like the rest. (Attached is a copy of the dossier on Kadeer's employment record.)
ro y
ce
not interact with me except formally. He has been very reliable in the field, and has
ep op
consistently met deadlines. Kadeer indicates that he is satisfied with his position. No indication
du
that he wants promotion.
tR wC
Year 4: Performance review completed December 10th; No changes.
Year 5: Kadeer completed Step One of the Branch Manager Training (BMT) Sequence.
No vie
Supervisor's report: Kadeer reports he is satisfied with position. Kadeer was told he needed
additional leadership training to be considered for continuation in BMT sequence. No response
Do Re
from him; BMT sequence was discontinued pending Kadeer entering leadership training
program (provided by THE COMPANY). Kadeer has not indicated he wants a promotion.
Kadeer continues to do an excellent job in the field and he remains a reliable and consistent
employee. Performance review completed December 12th.
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 2
Binder Kadeer: Confidential Instructions for the Manager
ro y
ce
ep op
du
tR wC
No vie
Do Re
Copyright © 1988, 1995, 2004, 2006, 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. (Rev. 12/22) 3