You are on page 1of 49

A STUDY ON THE PARTICIPATION OF STUDENTS OF CHINMAYA

INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY IN UNIVERSITY SPORTS COMPETITIONS


A Project Report

Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

KANNUR UNIVERSITY

Submitted by

Ajul P
Anumod M

Under the guidance of


Mr. Aswin Prakash
Assistant Professor

SUBMITED TO
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE
CHINMAYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
GOVINDAGIRI CHALA, KANNUR

1
Table of contents

S.no Title Page no

Introduction
1 7

Literature Review
2 11

College profile
3 19

4 Data analysis and Interpretation 22

2
5 Findings, suggestions and conclusion 42

Bibliography
6 45

Annexure
7 47

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. Title Page no

4.1 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION 23

4.2 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION 24

4.3 COURSE WISE CLASSIFICATION 25

4.4 PARTICIPATION IN SPORTS 26

4.5 INTERESTED SPORTS OR GAMES 27

SPORTS OR GAMES PLAYED IN


4.6 28
COLLEGE
FREQUENTNESS IN PARTICIPATION IN
4.7 29
COLLEGE SPORTS
3
INTERESTED IN INDIVIDUAL OR
4.8 30
GROUP SPORTS ACTIVITIES
INTEREST IN UNIVERSITY SPORTS
4.9 31
COMPETITIONS
REASON FOR NOT PARTICIPATING IN
4.10 32
UNIVERSITY SPORTS COMPETITION

4.11 INTEREST MIND SPORTS 33

SUPPORT FROM FAMILY TO


4.12 PARTICIPATE IN UNIVERSITY 34
SPORTS COMPETITIONS
SATISFACTION WITH THE SPORTS
4.13 EQUIPMENT PROVIDED IN THE 35
COLLEGE
SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPPORT
4.14 PROVIDED BY THE COLLEGE’S 36
SPORTS DEPARTMENT

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND


4.15 SATISFACTION WITH THE SPORTS 37
EQUIPMENT

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE AND


4.16 SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT 38
PROVIDED BY SPORTS DEPARTMENT

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE AND


4.17 SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT 39
PROVIDED BY SPORTS DEPARTMENT

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND


4.18 REASON FOR NOT PARTICIPATING IN 40
UNIVERSITY SPORTS

4
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERESTED
4.19 SPORTS AND SPORTS WHICH ARE 41
ACTUALLY PLAYED

5
LIST OF CHARTS

Chart No. Title Page no

4.1 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION 23

4.2 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION 24

4.3 COURSE WISE CLASSIFICATION 25

4.4 PARTICIPATION IN SPORTS 26

4.5 INTERESTED SPORTS OR GAMES 27

SPORTS OR GAMES PLAYED IN


4.6 28
COLLEGE
FREQUENTNESS IN PARTICIPATION IN
4.7 29
COLLEGE SPORTS
INTERESTED IN INDIVIDUAL OR
4.8 30
GROUP SPORTS ACTIVITIES
INTEREST IN UNIVERSITY SPORTS
4.9 31
COMPETITIONS
REASON FOR NOT PARTICIPATING IN
4.10 32
UNIVERSITY SPORTS COMPETITION

4.11 INTEREST MIND SPORTS 33

SUPPORT FROM FAMILY TO


4.12 PARTICIPATE IN UNIVERSITY 34
SPORTS COMPETITIONS

4.13 SATISFACTION WITH THE SPORTS 35

6
EQUIPMENT PROVIDED IN THE
COLLEGE
SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPPORT

4.14 PROVIDED BY THE COLLEGE’S 36


SPORTS DEPARTMENT

7
CHAPTER.1
INTRODUCTION

8
Background of the Study
Leisure, Sports and wellness have emerged as important social construction of
the 21st Century. Hundreds of sports events exist, from those being single
contestants, through to those with hundreds of simultaneous participants.
Research shows that sports have the capacity to connect youth to positive adult
role models and provide positive development opportunities, as well as promote
the learning and application of life skills. In recent years the use of sports to
reduce crime, as well as to prevent violent extremism and radicalization, has
become more widespread, especially as a tool to improve self-esteem, enhance
social bonds and provide participants with a feeling of purpose. Participation in
sports has always been an ideal element to gauge the personality of the
university students. However recent trends are showing that there is a decline
the participation of students in the Intercollege or university sports
competitions.

The research mainly focuses to identify the perception of students of Chinmaya


Institute of Technology towards the participation of sports activities and
perception of the department of Physical Education regarding improving student
participation. The goal of this paper is to understand the reasons behind the
decline in participation of students in college sports events and to suggest the
various measures through which we can increase the student participation

9
SIGNIFICANCE

Participation in sports can help students in a multitude of ways. Physical


activity can not only contribute to improving students’ physical health, it can
also aid in developing social skills and improving mental health, as well as
leading to better academic outcomes and college completion. Students who
participate in sports during the academic years tend to have a positive attitude
towards physical activity which does not diminish as they age

RESEARCH PROBLEM

Recently there has been a reduction in the number of students participating in


the university sports events. Even though there are student participation in
sports like tennis and badminton, other sports like Cricket, Football, Hockey,
Chess etc. are not getting participation from the College. This study aims to find
the reason behind the absence of participation of students from sports events.

OBJECTIVES

 To identify the perception of students towards the participation of sports


activities
 To find the reason behind the absence of participation of students from
university sports events.
 To find out the perception of students toward the equipment and support
provided by the sports department
 To find the number of students who are willing to participate in
university sports events

SCOPE

The scope of the study is extended only to the students of Chinmaya Institute of
Technology in Chala Kannur.

10
SAMPLE DESIGN

A sample design is the framework, or road map, that serves as the basis for the
selection of a Survey sample and affects many other important aspects of a
survey as well. Systematic random Sampling technique has been used for
selecting sampling

SAMPLE SIZE

Number of sample units on which the survey is conducted is known as sample


size. In this study the sample size taken is 32.

TOOLS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION

In this study the tool used for data collection is questionnaire. A questionnaire is
a research Instrument which consists of a set of questions or other types of
prompts that aims to collect Information from a respondent.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

• Sample size is limited to 32 students

• The accuracy of the study is based on the information given by the


respondents.

• The study is confined to the particular college .

• Since the study was taken up for academic purpose, this report was controlled
to a limited

11
CHAPTER.2

LITERATURE REVIEW

12
1) Research on the Chu Liu, This Research was conducted by
influence of College of Physical Chu Liu to find the influence of
college students’ Education, college students' participation in
participation in Northeast Normal sports activities on their sense of
sports activities University, inferiority. The study found that
on their sense of Changchun, Jilin, sports has a significant positive
inferiority based China correlation with the reduction of
on self-esteem 10 Nov 2022 college students' inferiority
and general self- complex. This is because sports
efficacy can help to improve self-esteem
and general self-efficacy. When
people participate in sports, they
are able to set goals and achieve
them. This can lead to increased
self-esteem. Additionally, sports
can help people to develop new
skills and abilities. This can lead to
increased general self-efficacy.
The study concludes that sports is
an effective means to reduce
college students' inferiority
complex. This is because sports
can help to improve self-esteem
and general self-efficacy.
2) The Impact of Sarita Singleton The article "The Impact of Sports
Sports 2016 Participation on the Academic
Participation on Achievement of African American
the Academic Girls" says that African American
Achievement of girls are underrepresented in sports
African American participation. Sports participation
girls has been shown to have a positive

13
impact on academic achievement
for all students, including African
American girls. The positive
effects of sports participation on
academic achievement for African
American girls are particularly
evident in the areas of self-esteem,
motivation, and school
engagement. There are a number
of factors that can contribute to the
positive impact of sports
participation on academic
achievement for African American
girls, including:

 Increased self-esteem and


confidence
 Development of leadership
skills
 Improved time management
skills
 Increased motivation to
succeed
 Reduced stress levels
 Increased opportunities for
social interaction
 Positive role models

The article concludes by stating


that sports participation can be a
valuable tool for improving the
academic achievement of African

14
American girls. It recommends
that schools and communities take
steps to increase sports
participation opportunities for
African American girls and to
support their participation in
sports.
3) Sports Daniel I. Rees
Participation and Joseph J. Sabia The article "Sports participation
Academic 10 Jan 2009 and academic performance:
Performance Evidence from the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health" examines the relationship
between high school sports
participation and academic
performance. The authors find that
students who participate in sports
perform better in school than those
who do not, even after controlling
for a variety of factors such as
family background, socioeconomic
status, and prior academic
achievement. They argue that
sports participation can help to
improve academic performance by
increasing motivation, teaching
teamwork and self-discipline, and
providing a positive outlet for
stress.

The authors also suggest that

15
sports participation can help to
reduce dropout rates and improve
college attendance rates.
The authors found that sports
participation had a positive effect
on academic performance, even
after controlling for a variety of
factors such as family background,
socioeconomic status, and prior
academic achievement. They
found that students who
participated in sports were more
likely to graduate from high school
and attend college. They also
found that students who
participated in sports had higher
GPAs and were less likely to drop
4) Student Andrew Mearman out of school.
Participation in and Don J. Webber This Research was conducted by
Sporting Andrew Mearman and Don J.
Activities Webber to find out the student
participation in Sporting
Activities. The research found that
student participation in sporting
activities has declined in recent
years.
The decline in student
participation in sporting activities
is likely due to a number of
factors, including:

16
 Increased competition from
other leisure activities, such
as video games and social
media.
 Concerns about safety and
injury.
 Lack of access to facilities
and equipment.
 Increased pressure on
students to achieve
academically.

The research recommends a


number of strategies to address the
decline in student participation in
sporting activities, including:

 Making sporting activities


more accessible and
affordable.
 Promoting the benefits of
physical activity to students
and their families.
 Providing more
opportunities for students to
participate in sporting
activities.
 Working with schools to
create a more supportive
environment for physical
5) Variables Emmanuel Osei

17
Sarpong, Charlotte activity.
Associated with Adomah Diabor,
Low Female The study investigated the factors
Benjamin Martin
Participation in associated with low female
Appiah, Michael
College of participation in sports in Colleges
Aniabre and Ernest
Education Sports of Education (Teacher Colleges) in
Tsikata
in Central, Ghana. The study was conducted
Western and in six Colleges of Education in the
Western North Central, Western and Western
Regions of Ghana North Regions of Ghana. The
study used a cross-sectional survey
design and a sample of 400 female
students. The data was collected
using a self-administered
questionnaire.

The study found that the following


factors were associated with low
female participation in sports:

 Lack of interest: The most


common reason given by
female students for not
participating in sports was
lack of interest.

 Fear of injury: Some


female students were afraid
of getting injured while
playing sports.
 Lack of time: Some female
students said that they did

18
not have enough time to
participate in sports because
of their academic workload.
 Cultural norms: Some
female students said that
their culture did not allow
them to participate in
sports.
 Lack of facilities: Some
female students said that
there were not enough
sports facilities available for
them to participate in
sports.

The study concluded that the


factors associated with low female
participation in sports in Colleges
of Education in Ghana are
complex and multifaceted. The
study recommends that
interventions to increase female
participation in sports should
address these factors.

19
CHAPTER.3

PROFILE OF COLLEGE CHINTECH

20
COLLEGE OVERVIEW

Chinmaya Institute of Technology, approved by All India Council for Technical


Education, New Delhi and Government of Kerala, affiliated to the Kannur
University is a Professional Institute established by Chinmaya Mission
Educational and Cultural Trust, Kannur as a Golden Jubilee project of
Chinmaya Movement. Chinmaya Institute of Technology, associated with
Chinmaya Mission, the pioneers of quality education in the country for decades,
is leveraging their expertise and capability to bring up the Institute as one of the
best in the region. The whole idea is to facilitate learning through initiating,
exploring and experimenting in a conducive environment.

The institute has the state-of-the-art campus in a serene, salubrious and sylvan
surroundings on a hillock commanding a beautiful view. The freshness of the
ambience will go a long way in making learning a pleasurable experience. The
institute not only extends good campus and state of the art computing facilities
to the students but also aims at giving them competencies that will make them
leaders and trend setters in their respective fields, in this age of competition.

ChinTech – A dynamic, self-financing Professional Education and research


institute, in relentless pursuit of perfection, leading the advance of information
technology, and educating the new generation of front-runners for India and the
world.Since its official opening in December 2002, Chinmaya Institute of
Technology has established itself as an intellectual powerhouse, energizing the
community’s transformation into a knowledge-based society, and securing a
place on the academic map in record-breaking time. Its ground breaking
teaching in information technology is successfully pushing back the boundaries
of the information age. Such advances are assisted by the Institute’s top-class
facilities.

21
ChinTech brings forward the vision of the future. On its serene, salubrious and
sylvan campus, situated on a hillock commanding a beautiful view of the
Arabian Sea at Govindagiri, the life to come is being shaped today. Chinmaya
Institute of Technology was inaugurated by H.H. Swami Tejomayananda at
8:30 AM on Monday, 16th December 2002.

22
CHAPTER 4

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

23
Table 4.1

Gender wise classification

Gender No. of respondents Percentage(%)

Male 22 69

Female 10 31
Total 32 100

Source: Primary Data

Chart No 4.1

Gender wise classification

Gender

10
Male
Female

22

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 69% of the respondents are
male and 31% of the respondents are female

24
Table 4.2

Age wise classification

Age No. of respondents Percentage(%)


21 6 19
22 10 31
23 8 25
>23 8 25
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.2

Age wise classification

AGE
12

10

8
AGE
6

0
21 22 23 >23

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 19% of respondents are of
age 21, 31% are of age 22, 25% are of 23, 25% are above 23 years of age

25
Table 4.3

Course wise classification

Course No. of respondents Percentage(%)


MBA 15 47
MCA 17 53
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.3

Course wise classification

COURSE

MBA
15 MCA

17

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 47% of respondents are from
MBA and 53% is from MCA

26
Table 4.4

Participation in sports

No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Yes 22 69
No 10 31
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.4

Participation in sports

Participation in Sports
25

20

15
Participation in Sports

10

0
Yes No

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 69% of respondents
participate in sports activities and 31% do not

27
Table 4.5

Interested sports or games

Sports/Games No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Badminton 22 68.75
Cricket 4 12.5
Football 3 9.375
Tennis 2 6.25
Swimming 1 3.125
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.5

Interested sports or games

Interested Sports or Games


1

2
Badminton
3
Cricket
Football
Tennis
4 Swimming

22

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 68.75% of respondents are
interested in Badminton, 12.5% in Cricket, 9.375% in Football, 6.25% in
Tennis and 3.125% in Swimming

28
Table 4.6

Sports or games played in college

Sports/Games No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Badminton 26 81.25
Cricket 2 6.25
Football 2 6.25
Tennis 1 3.125
Swimming 1 3.125
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.6

Sports or games played in college

Sports or Games Played in College

1
1
2 Badminton
2 Cricket
Football
Tennis
Swimming

26

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 81.25% of respondents have
played Badminton, 6.5% in Cricket, 6.25% in Football, 3.125% in Tennis
and 3.125% in Swimming

29
Table 4.7

Frequentness in participation in college sports

Scaling No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Often 9 29
Sometimes 10 32.3
Rarely 8 25.8
Never 4 12.9
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.7

Frequentness in participation in college sports

Frequentness in Participation in College


Sports

4
Often
9 Sometimes
Rarely
Never
8

10

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 29% of respondents have
often participated in sports, 32.3% had participated sometimes, 25.8% have
participated rarely and 12.9% have never participated in college sports

30
Table 4.8

Interested in Individual or Group Sports Activities

No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Individual 2 6.3
Group 13 40.6
Both 17 53.1
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.8

Interested in Individual or Group Sports Activities

Interested in Individual or Group Sports Ac-


tivities

2
Individual
Group
Both

17 13

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 6.3% of respondents are
interested in individual Sports, 40.6% are in interested in Group Sports and
53.1% are interested in Both

31
Table 4.9

Interest in University Sports Competitions

No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Yes 22 69
No 10 31
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.9

Interest in University Sports Competitions

Interest in University Sports Competitions


25

20

15 Interest in University Sports


Competitions

10

0
Yes No

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 69% of respondents are
interested in University Sports Competition and 31% are not interested

32
Table 4.10

Reason for not participating in University Sports Competition

No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Not Interested 12 54.5
Medical Condition 1 4.5
Lack of Time 19 40.9
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.10

Reason for not Participating in University Sports Competition

Reason for not Participating in University


Sports Competition

Not Interested
9 Medical Condition
Lack of time
12

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 54.5% of respondents are not
interested in Sports because of no interest, 4.5% because of Medical
Condition and 40.9% because of lack of interest

33
Table 4.11

Interest Mind Sports

No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Yes 17 53.1
No 15 46.9
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.11

Interest Mind Sports

Interest Mind Sports


17.5

17

16.5

16 Interest Mind Sports

15.5

15

14.5

14
Yes No

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 53.1% of respondents are
interested in Mind Sports Competition and 46.9% are not interested

34
Table 4.12

Support from family to participate in University Sports Competitions

Scaling No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Strongly Agree 12 37.5
Agree 12 21.9
Neither Agree nor 7 21.9
Disagree
Disagree 0 0
Strongly Disagree 1 3.1
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.12

Support from family to participate in University Sports Competitions

Support from family to participate in Uni-


versity Sports Competitions

1 Strongly Agree
Agree
7 Neither Agree nor Disagree
12 Disagree
Strongly Disagree

12

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 37.5% of respondents
Strongly agree with the statement, 21.9% agree with the statement 21.9%
neither agree nor disagreed with the statement 0% disagreed with the
statement and 31.% Strongly disagreed with the statement

35
Table 4.13

Satisfaction with the sports equipment provided in the college

Scaling No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Completely Satisfied 6 18.8
Satisfied 11 34.4
Neither Satisfied nor 8 25
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied 3 9.4
Completely Dissatisfied 4 12.5
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.13

Satisfaction with the sports equipment provided in the college

Satisfaction with the sports equipment


provided in the college

Completely Satisfied
4 6 Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Completely Dissatisfied

11

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 18.8% of respondents
Completely Satisfied with the statement, 34.4% are satisfied with the
statement 25% are Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with the statement
9.4% are Dissatisfied and 12.5% are Completely Dissatisfied

36
Table 4.14

Satisfaction with the Support provided by the College’s Sports


Department

Scaling No. of respondents Percentage(%)


Completely Satisfied 9 28.1
Satisfied 9 28.1
Neither Satisfied nor 9 28.1
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied 2 6.3
Completely Dissatisfied 3 9.4
Total 32 100

Chart No 4.14

Satisfaction with the Support provided by the College’s Sports


Department

Satisfaction with the Support provided by the


College’s Sports Department

Completely Satisfied
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
9
Dissatisfied
Completely Dissatisfied
9
9

Interpretation

From the above table and chart, it is clear that 28.1% of respondents
Completely Satisfied with the statement, 28.1% are satisfied with the
statement 28.1% are Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with the statement
6.3% are Dissatisfied and 9.4% are Completely Dissatisfied
37
CHI- SQUARE TEST

Table No. 4.15

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND SATISFACTION WITH


THE SPORTS EQUIPMENT

Neither
Completely Satisfied Completely
Gender Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied

Male 0 3 4 1 3 11

Female 7 5 6 2 1 21

Total 7 8 10 3 4 32

H0 = There is no significant relationship between Gender and Satisfaction with sports


equipment

H1= There is a significant relationship between Gender and Satisfaction with sports
equipment

𝑥 2 = (𝑂 − 𝐸) 2 /𝐸
Calculation:

𝑥 2 (𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) = 6.769408

At 5% level of significance,

Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)

= (2-1) *(5-1)

=4

Table value of Chi- square is = 0.148587

38
Since, calculated value is greater than the table value, we reject the null
hypothesis. Therefore, we interpret that there is significant relationship between
Gender and Satisfaction with sports equipment

CHI- SQUARE TEST

Table No. 4.16

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE AND SATISFACTION WITH


SUPPORT PROVIDED BY SPORTS DEPARTMENT

Neither
Completely Satisfied Completely
Gender Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied

MBA 4 5 6 0 0 15

MCA 5 5 3 1 3 17

Total 9 10 9 1 3 32

H0 = There is no significant relationship between Course and Satisfaction with support


provided by sports department

H1= There is a significant relationship between Course and Satisfaction with support
provided by sports department

𝑥 2 = (𝑂 − 𝐸) 2 /𝐸
Calculation:

𝑥 2 (𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) = 0.286717

At 5% level of significance,

Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)

= (2-1) *(5-1)

=4

Table value of Chi- square is = 0.990655

Since, calculated value is lesser than the table value, we accept the null hypothesis.
39
Therefore, we interpret that there is no significant relationship between Couse and
Satisfaction with support provided by sports department

ANOVA

Table No. 4.17

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE AND SATISFACTION WITH


SUPPORT PROVIDED BY SPORTS DEPARTMENT

Neither
Strongly Completely
Gender Agree Agree nor Disagree Total
Agree Disagree
Disagree

Male 3 5 2 0 0 10

Female 8 8 5 0 1 22

Total 11 13 7 0 1 32

H0 = There is no significant difference between Gender and Support provided by parents

H1= There is a significant difference between Gender and Support provided by parents

F=Mean sum of Squares between squares/Mean Sum of Squares within groups


Calculation:

F (𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) = 0.636364

At 5% level of significance,

Degree of freedom = (1,6)

Table value is = 0.455433

Since, calculated value is greater than the table value, we reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we interpret that there is significant difference between Gender and
Satisfaction with support provided by parents

ANOVA

40
Table No. 4.18

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND REASON FOR NOT


PARTICIPATING IN UNIVERSITY SPORTS

Not Medical Lack of


Gender Total
Interested Condition Time

Male 3 0 3 9

Female 8 1 7 16

Total 11 1 10 22

H0 = There is no significant difference between Gender and reason for not participating in
university sports

H1= There is a significant difference between Gender and reason for not participating in
university sports

F=Mean sum of Squares between squares/Mean Sum of Squares within groups


Calculation:

F (𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) = 0.555556

At 5% level of significance,

Degree of freedom = (1,2)

Table value is = 0.533748

Since, calculated value is greater than the table value, we reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we interpret that there is significant difference between Gender and reason
for not participating in university sports

41
CORRELATION

Table No. 4.19

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERESTED SPORTS AND SPORTS


WHICH ARE ACTUALLY PLAYED

Sports Interested Played

Badminto
22 26
n
Cricket 4 2

Football 3 2

Tennis 2 1
Swimming 1 1
Total 32 32

H0 = There is no relationship between interested sports and sports which are actually played

H1= There is relationship between interested sports and sports which are actually played

Calculation:

r= 0.99

Since, calculated value suggest that there is strong positive correlation between
interested sports and sports which are actually played so we reject the Null
hypothesis

42
CHAPTER 5

FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION

43
FINDINGS

 From the survey it is found that most of the respondents are female
 It is found that most of the respondents are from MCA batch
 Majority of the respondents are of the age 22
 69% of the respondents say they participate in sports
 Majority of the respondents are interested in Badminton
 81.9% of respondents plays badminton at the college
 29% of the respondents says they often participate in college sports
activities while 12.9% of the respondents says they never participate
in college sports
 53% of respondents are interested in both Individual and Group
sports activities
 69% of respondents are not interested in participating in university
sports competitions
 The main reasons for not participating in university sports
competition are Lack of Time and Lack of Interest
 53% of the respondents are interested in mind sports
 Most of the respondents feel that they get support from their family
to participate in sports competition
 Only 18.8% of the respondents are completely satisfied with the
sports equipment in the college while 12.5% of the respondents are
completely dissatisfied with the sports equipment
 28.1% of the respondents are completely satisfied with the support
they are getting from the college sports department
 From the above study it is found out that majority of the respondents
are interested in sports activities and have participated in sports

44
 However most of the respondents are not interested to participate in
university sports competition
 The main reason for the absence of students in university sports
events are Lack of Interest and Lack of Time for sports activities
 Majority of the respondents are not completely satisfied with the
sports equipment provided in the college

SUGGESTIONS

 The sports department should encourage students by providing


awareness about the benefits of participating in University sports
competition
 Majority of the students are interested in playing badminton in the
college, the sports department should encourage the students to
participate in other sports as well
 College should improve their sports equipment as the students not
satisfied with the current equipment
 Most of the students are interested in Mind sports like Chess, so the
sports department can promote these games more as it requires less
physical activity

CONCLUSION

The study of participation of students in college sports have helped in


finding out the reason behind the absence of participation of students in
University Sports Competition. Although most of the students are
interested in Sports Activities they are reluctant to participate in
University Sports Competitions. According to the findings students are
mostly interested in playing badminton. The college should try to
promote other sports activities as well.

45
Sports not only includes physical games, it also includes mind games
like chess. The sports department should also try to promote that too.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
 https://www.researchgate.net
 https://www.csus.edu
 https://core.ac.uk
 https://www.google.co.in
 https://www.scipublications.com
 https://www.wikipedia.org

46
QUESTTIONNAIRE

1) Gender :

o Male
o Female

2) Course:

o MBA
o MCA

3) Age :

o 21
o 22
o 23
o >23

4) Do you participate in Sports:

o Yes
o No

5) Which Sports/Games are you interested in:

o Badminton
o Cricket
o Football
o Tennis
o others

6) What Sports Activities do you play in your college:

o Badminton
o Tennis
o Table Tennis
o Others

8) How often do you participate in College Sports Activities :

o Very Often

47
o Often
o Sometimes
o Rarely

9) Are you interested in Individual or Group Sports Activities :

o Individual
o Group
o Both

10) Are you interested in University Sports Competitions :

o Yes
o No

11) Do you intend to participate in University Sports Competitions in the future

o Yes
o No

12) If No What is the reason for it :

o Not Interested
o Medical Condition
o Lack of time for Sports Activities
o Others (Specify)

13) Are you interested in participating in Mind Sports :

o Yes
o No

14) Do you feel like you get enough support from your family to participate in
University Sports Competitions:

o Strongly Agree
o Agree
o Neither Agree nor Disagree
o Disagree
o Strongly Disagree

48
15)

Completel Somewhat Neither Somewhat Completely


y Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfie Dissatisfied
nor d
Dissatisfied
Are you
satisfied with
the sports
equipments
provided in
the college
Are you
satisfied with
the Support
provided by
the College’s
Sports
Department

49

You might also like