Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
When employees know how to apply their strengths, they can focus on meeting their goals.
Goals. Employees personal goal attainment should contribute to success for the whole
department and organization.
Human resource management can create work systems that contribute to high
performance. The challenge facing managers today is how make their organizations into high –
performance work systems.
References:
Kello, John (2007). “High Performance Organization Model” Encyclopedia of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology (Vol 1, pp. 306-308)
Holbeche, Linda (2005). The High-Performance Organization: Creating Dynamic stability and
Sustainable Success. Routledge. ISBN 9780750656207.
Learning Objectives:
To align and build individual objectives along with the organizational objectives of the
company.
To enhance the skills and personal development of employees, with the help of
managers and leaders.
To familiarize managers with the tools required for performance management.
To improve productivity
To develop the concept of “Managing for Success”.
Training Content:
1. Agenda
1.1 High Performance Organization History
1.2 High Performance Organization Characteristics
1.3 High Performance Organization Strategies
3. Contents
During World War II there was increased in manufacturing and industrial production.
This increase concerns over the human impact on work. The Hawthorne studies were part of
the reason why more importance was placed on considering the human impact of work. The
Hawthorne effect is a type of reactivity in which individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in
response to their awareness of being observed. In this period, industrial manufacturers followed
the standardized large scale production method, characterized by mass production, scientific
management, and stringent division of labor. This standardization increased boredom among
blue collar workers who would do the same repetitive job on a daily basis. Management in this
period was characterized by careful and calculated monitoring which would cause workers to
feel a sense of distrust.
In 1960s management for the industrial manufacturing industries had difficulty attracting
and retaining its workforce. During the 1960s there was a push for job enrichment. This grew
out of the sociotechnical systems approach to work, which was pioneered by the Tavistock
Institute. This system is characterized by the open systems model and self-directed work team,
which are also key to the success of a high performance organization. Research on the
sociotechnical systems approach to work has shown that this approach is related to increased
employee satisfaction and motivation.
Another important step towards the high performance organization was the Japanese
Revolution in manufacturing, which pointed out another flaw to the scientific model of
production. Because workers were so focused on only doing one monotonous task, they were
not aware of the bigger picture. Most employees were completely unaware of the quality of the
products that they were producing. The focus that Japanese manufacturing companies put on
quality, through their early quality circles, eventually led to the implementation of total quality
management which is a key factor of producing quality products that meet consumer demands
at low price points. Another reason for the move away from the older, highly bureaucratic
approach towards the high performance organization was the rapid change in the business
environment since the 1980s.
The 1980s were characterized by a difficulty in American production due to increased
competition from foreign firms, increased inflation on oil prices, and a decrease in
productivity. This change was characterized by increased globalization, an increase in diversity
in the workplace, large technological advances, and increased competition. To better meet the
demands of the changing market place, organizations first tried to implement increased
technological innovation in their production facilities in order to regain the competitive
advantage. These companies soon came to realize that the human factor was also necessary in
regaining its competitive footing. The realization of the importance of the human factors in work
have led organizations to rely on the high performance organization to drive production and
increase their employee's quality of work.
Objectives/Criteria:
1. Connects people to each other
2. Connects people to the purpose of you are here
3. Creates option or choice for authenticity and vulnerability
Activity Flow:
- Host to throw a single question that begins with How or What that could meet all three
of these criteria.
- Question is, what are you intending to achieve at work and what about that is important?
- Ask the audience to group into three (3), all the members of the group will have their
conversation, answering the question, what is something you intend to achieve at work
and what about this is important?
- Give the audience between 10 – 15 minutes to discuss.
- After that, bring all the clicks and breakout groups into one community and share out
with question, what struck you about the experience?
- Make the activity more purposeful rather than and less pointless and eradicating that
activity and uplifting connection before content.
- And so, you got to bring people out and get some voices into the large group and give
another 10-15 minutes to hear their voices.
- What struck you about those conversations, what have you notice about those
conversations, and once you hear that, then declare that they are connected.
Organizational Design
Teamwork and collaboration are priorities of high performance organizations in
their organization design. It basically flattens hierarchies and make it easier for cross-
functional collaboration to happen. Barriers are reduced between functional units and
eradicating complex bureaucracies. Relationship among distinct function employees
strengthened which improves organizational performance. Evident example for this is
hospital.
Teams
Mechanics/Instructions:
References
Jump up to:a b c Katzenbach, Jon R.; Smith, Douglas K. (2015-09-22). The Wisdom of Teams:
Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Review
Press. ISBN 9781633691070.
Jump up to:a b Bonebright, Denise (2010). "40 years of storming: a historical review of
Tuckman's model of small group development". Human Resource Development
International. 13: 111–120. doi:10.1080/13678861003589099. S2CID 144331444.
Jump up to:a b c d e f Owen, Keith (2001). "Creating and sustaining the high performance
organization". Managing Service Quality. 11: 10–21. doi:10.1108/09604520110362443.
The HPO methodology provided a perfect means of bench-marking where we were, what we
really needed to focus on, a target to aim for and the means to measure our progress.
This approach is rigorous and is based on a close systematic examination of the facts across
time, cultures and different industries. Giving definition to what is meant by ‘performance’.
Culture is very important at HPOs and the HPO research by André de Waal provides us with a
tool for thinking in terms of the long run.
Mechanics/Instructions: