Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 - Learning Media Review - Manuscript Template JPKI
4 - Learning Media Review - Manuscript Template JPKI
ABSTRACT
(english, max 250 words)
Manuscripts in Bahasa Indonesia should include both abstracts in Bahasa Indonesia and
English. Manuscripts in English may not include abstract in Bahasa Indonesia.
ABSTRAK
(bahasa, maks 250 kata)
Manuscripts in Bahasa Indonesia should include both abstracts in Bahasa Indonesia and
English. Manuscripts in English may not include abstract in Bahasa Indonesia.
Latar belakang: latar belakang dan juga rationale dari review sumber belajar ini.
Tujuan: tujuan dari review sumber belajar ini.
Review Sumber Bejalar: penjelasan singkat mengenai sumber belajar yang
dianalisis dan diskusinya
Kesimpulan: tuliskan kesimpukan dan saran secara singkat.
Kata kunci: tuliskan 2-5 kata kunci yang berkaitan dengan kajian ini
PRACTICE POINTS
Can be written in English or Bahasa Indonesia, based on the manuscript’s language
The introduction should discuss the background of the review, the rationale and aims
of the review. In this section, the current evidence on the topic should be discussed
to subsequently be related to the gap which would be addressed by the review.
This section should include a detailed description of the learning media being
studied, to provide an adequate context to the reader. This section may include
tables, charts/figures/flowcharts or transcripts
DISCUSSION/PEMBAHASAN
Can be written in English or Bahasa Indonesia, based on the manuscript’s language
The discussion of the learning media above to be related and analysed using
appropriate literature. The discussion may be presented using tables,
charts/figures/flowcharts or transcripts. In this section, authors also should discuss
the strengths and limitations of the current study.
CONCLUSION/KESIMPULAN
Can be written in English or Bahasa Indonesia, based on the manuscript’s language
Authors are expected to provide a brief conclusion to recap the information in the
previous sections. It is recommended that the conclusion is presented in narratives
rather than bullet points.
RECOMMENDATION/SARAN
Can be written in English or Bahasa Indonesia, based on the manuscript’s language
Authors are suggested to provide recommendation for further practise and research
based on the current review. It is recommended that the recommendation is
presented in narratives rather than bullet points.
Authors might express their acknowledgement to ones who are supporting this
review, including funding and other kinds or support. This section is optional.
Authors should declare any competing or possible conflict of interest regarding to the
article. Available funding donors should also be declared. If there is no competing
interest to this study, please write:
English: The authors declare that there are no competing interests related to the
study
In this section, authors’ details and their contribution toward the manuscript and
research should be described. Example:
Andika Susina – developing research proposal, collecting data, data analysis, and
publication manuscript.
Berlarminus – developing research proposal and collecting data.
Chicka Ardelia – developing research proposal and collecting data.
Dadang Suparman – data analysis and publication manuscript.
REFERENCES/DAFTAR PUSTAKA
The amount of literature cited should be sound but reasonable and it is expected that
70% of them are current literature of the last 10 years. Please use JPKI’s Vancouver
citation style:
In-text Citation:
Example: Using superscript numbering system without brackets, that should be
written after commas,1 or full-stops.2,3 The in-text citation should be written before
semicolon4-6; or colon:1,3,5-9 to adhere to JPKI’s guideline.
Reference List:
Some examples:
Books
Reeves S, Lewin S, Espin S, Zwarenstein M, Ed HB. Interprofessional Teamwork for
Health and Social Care., Blackwell Wiley Publishing. 2011; pp. 32-33.